Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment of bamboo culm for improved enzymatic release of reducing sugars using recombinant cellulases

  • Nasir AliEmail author
  • Abdulmoseen Segun Giwa
  • Mohnad Abdalla
  • Xiang Liu
Original Research
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Bamboo (Phyllostachys acuta) is considered one of the useful feedstocks of crop residues due to speedy growth, fastest propagation, and convenient harvesting. The influence of alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) pretreatment of bamboo culm, its structural changes, and enzymatic hydrolysis were determined. Scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction were used for the analysis of solid fraction after alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment of bamboo culm. Recombinant enzymes were expressed in Pichia pastoris from newly identified Aspergillus niger BE-2. The obtained results revealed more hemicelluloses hydrolysis and improved cellulose accumulation in degraded part. The cellulose component was increased by 36.87%, hemicellulose decreased by 50.66%, and lignin by 37.94% in comparison with the chemical components in the raw material after AHP pretreatment. There is 111% increased yield reported for recombinant enzymes expressed in Pichia pastoris after 60 h of degradation as compared to untreated substrates biomass. A total of about 370 mg reducing sugars per gram dehydrated bamboo residues were obtained after AHP treatment. The results revealed that major structural changes take place in the physiology of the substrates after AHP treatment, including elimination of lignin and hemicellulose, and enhance the porous area for easy attack of recombinant cellulases. This investigation contributes in biomass conversion in a friendly environment to fulfil the energy requirement in the future challenges.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment Bamboo biomass Enzymatic hydrolysis Structural changes Fermentable sugars 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21303142 & No. 31170067), the research fund from the Oceans and Fisheries bureau of Xiamen (No. 14GZP59HJ29), and Fujian Provincial Department of Ocean and Fisheries (No. 2014-25). We are also grateful to CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative Program and School of Environment, Tsinghua University for additional financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2829_MOESM1_ESM.docx (294 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 294 kb)

References

  1. Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin DB (2011) Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29:675–685PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues: wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99:1664–1671PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali N, Zhang T, Li H, Xue Y, Gan L, Liu J, Long M (2015) Heterogeneous expression and functional characterization of cellulose-degrading enzymes from Aspergillus niger for enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali pretreated bamboo biomass. Mol Biotechnol 57:859–867PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagga PS, Sandhu DK, Sharma S (1990) Purification and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes produced by Aspergillus nidulans. J Appl Bacteriol 68:61–68PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cara CA, Ruiz E, Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, Castro E (2006) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of olive tree wood by steam explosion and alkaline peroxide delignification. Process Biochem 41:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen S, Yong Q, Xu Y, Yu S (2012) Dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover into fermentable sugars. Adv Mater Res 535:2462–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotana F, Cavalaglio G, Gelosia M, Nicolini A, Coccia V, Petrozzi A (2014) Production of bioethanol in a second-generation prototype from pine wood chips. Energy Procedia 45:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dagnino EP, Chamorro ER, Romano SD, Felissia FE, Area MC (2013) Optimization of the acid pretreatment of rice hulls to obtain fermentable sugars for bioethanol production. Ind Crop Prod 42:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Bari I, Cuna D, Di Matteo V, Liuzzi F (2014) Bioethanol production from steam-pretreated corn stover through an isomerase mediated process. New Biotechnol 31:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Del Campo I, Alegria I, Zazpe M, Echeverria M, Echeverria I (2006) Diluted acid hydrolysis pretreatment of agri-food wastes for bioethanol production. Ind Crop Prod 24:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dien BS, Miller DJ, Hector RE, Dixon RA, Chen F, McCaslin M, Reisen P, Sarath G, Cotta MA (2011) Enhancing alfalfa conversion efficiencies for sugar recovery and ethanol production by altering lignin composition. Bioresour Technol 102:6479–6486PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Eggeman T, Elander RT (2005) Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96:2019–2025PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Esterbauer H, Steiner W, Labudova I, Hermann A, Hayn M (1991) Production of Trichoderma cellulase in laboratory and pilot plant. Bioresour Technol 36:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferreira S, Duarte AP, Ribeiro MHL, Queiroz JA, Domingues FC (2009) Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cistus ladanifer and Cytisus striatus for bioethanol production. Biochem Eng 45:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gadgil NJ, Daginawala HF, Chakarabarti T, Khanna P (1995) Enhanced cellulase production by a mutant of Trichoderma reesei. Enzym Microbial Technol 17:942–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis. Agriculture handbook. Agricultural Research Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp 387–598Google Scholar
  17. Gu F, Wang W, Jiang L, Jin Y (2013) Sulfite formaldehyde pretreatment on rice straw for the improvement of enzymatic sacharification. Bioresour Technol 142:218–224PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Guoqing L, Changsheng C, Song F, Linguo Z (2012) Cloning of a cellobiohydrolase gene (cbh1) from Aspergillus niger and heterogenous expression in Pichia pastoris. Adv Mater Res 353:2443–2447Google Scholar
  19. Hong SH, Lee JT, Lee S, Wi SG, Cho EJ, Singh S, Lee SS, Chung BY (2014) Improved enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw by combined use of gamma ray and dilute acid for bioethanol production. Radiat Phys Chem 94:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jensen JR, Morinelly JE, Gossen KR, Brodeur-Campbell MJ, Shonnard DR (2010) Effects of dilute acid pretreatment conditions on enzymatic hydrolysis monomer and oligomer sugar yields for aspen, balsam, and switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 101:2317–2325PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin Y, Huang T, Geng W, Yang L (2013) Comparison of sodium carbonate pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw stem and leaf to produce fermentable sugars. Bioresour Technol 137:294–301PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiwei Z, Yaohua Z, Xuena Z, Tianhong W (2010) Development of the cellulolytic fungus Trichoderma reesei strain with enhanced b-glucosidase and filter paper activity using strong artificial cellobiohydrolase-1 promoter. Bioresour Technol 101:9815–9818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Juhasz T, Szengyel Z, Reczey K, Siika-Aho M, Viikari L (2005) Characterization of cellulases and hemicellulases produced by Trichoderma reesei on various carbon sources. Process Biochem 40:3519–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kataria R, Ruhal R, Babu R, Ghosh S (2013) Saccharification of alkali treated biomass of kans grass contributes higher sugar in contrast to acid treated biomass. Chem Eng J 230:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim TH, Lee YY (2005) Pretreatment and fractionation of corn stover by ammonia recycle percolation process. Bioresour Technol 96:2007–2013PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristiani A, Abimanyu H, Setiawan AH, Sudiyarmanto Aulia F (2013) Effect of pretreatment process by using diluted acid to characteristic of oil palm’s frond. Energy Procedia 32:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lalak J, Kasprzycka A, Martyniak D, Tys J (2015) Effect of biological pretreatment of Agropyron elongatum ‘BAMAR’ on biogas production by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 200:194–200PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee JW, Kim HY, Koo BW, Choi DH, Kwon M, Choi IG (2008) Enzymatic saccharification of biologically pretreated Pinus densiflora using enzymes from brown rot fungi. Biosci Bioeng 106:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee H, Lim W, Lee J (2013) Improvement of ethanol fermentation from lignocellulosic hydrolysates by the removal of inhibitors. Ind Eng Chem 19:2010–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Z, Jiang Z, Fei B, Liu X, Yu Y (2012) Bioconversion of bamboo to bioethanol using the two-stage organosolv and alkali pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 7:5691–5699Google Scholar
  31. Li H, Long C, Zhou J, Liu J, Wu X, Long M (2013) Rapid analysis of mono-saccharides and oligo-saccharides in hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass by HPLC. Biotechnol Lett 35:1405–1409PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Li H, Xiong L, Chen X, Luo M, Chen X, Wang C, Huang C, Chen X (2019) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw via a combination of alkaline hydrogen peroxide and lithium chloride/N,N-dimethylacetamide pretreatment. Ind Crops Prod 137:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liou JSC, Balkwill DL, Drake GR, Tanner RS (2005) Clostridium carboxidivorans, a solvent-producing clostridium isolated from an agricultural settling lagoon, and reclassification of the acetogen Clostridium scatologenes strain SL1 as Clostridium drakei. Inter J System Evol Microbiol 55:2085–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu YS, Baker JO, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Haas T, Ding SY (2011) Cellobiohydrolase hydrolyzes crystalline cellulose on hydrophobic faces. Biol Chem 286:11195–11201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mao J, Zhang X, Li M, Xu F (2013) Effect of biological pretreatment with white rot fungus Trametus hirsute C7784 on lignin structure in Carex meyeriana Kunth. Bioresour 8:3869–3883Google Scholar
  36. Marimuthu J, Ngoc PN, Hee JM, Sang K, Jung KL (2010) Conversion of woody biomass into fermentable sugars by cellulase from Agaricus arvensis. Bioresour Technol 101:8742–8749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maryana R, Ma’rifatun D, Wheni AI, Satriyo KW, Rizal WA (2014) Alkaline pretreatment on sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Energy Procedia 47:250–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgenstern B, Kammer HW (1996) Solvation in cellulose-LiCl-DMAc solutions. Trends Polym Sci 4:87–92Google Scholar
  39. Perez-Cantu L, Schriiber A, Schutt F, Saake B, Kirsch C, Smirnova I (2013) Comparison of pretreatment methods for rye straw in the second generation biorefinery: effect on cellulose, Hemicellulose and lignin recovery. Bioresour Technol 142:428–435PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Rocha MVP, Rodrigues THS, de Albuquerque TL, Gonc-alves LRB, de Macedo GR (2014) Evaluation of dilute acid pretreatment on cashew apple bagasse for ethanol and xylitol production. Chem Eng 243:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sewalt VJH, Beauchemin KA, Rode LM, Acharya S, Baron VS (1997) Lignin impact on fiber degradation IV. Enzymatic saccharification and in vitro digestibility of alfalfa and grasses following selective solvent delignification. Bioresour Technol 61:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sims RE, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second-generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol 101:1570–1580PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Sindhu R, Kuttiraja M, Preeti WE, Vani S, Sukumaran RK, Binod P (2013) A novel surfactant-assisted ultrasound pretreatment of sugarcane tops for improved enzymatic release of sugars. Bioresour Technol 135:67–72PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun X, Xu F, Sun R, Fowler P, Baird M (2005) Characteristics of degraded cellulose obtained from steam-exploded wheat straw. Carbohydr Res 340:97–106PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Vidmar S, Turk V, Kregar I (1984) Cellulolytic complex of Aspergillus niger under conditions for citric acid production. Isolation and characterization of two β-(1 → 4)-glucan hydrolases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 20:326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams DL, Hodge DB (2014) Impacts of delignification and hot water pretreatment on the water induced cell wall swelling behavior of grasses and its relation to cellulolytic enzyme hydrolysis and binding. Cellulose 21:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xiao B, Sun X, Sun R (2001) Chemical, structural, and thermal characterizations of alkali-soluble lignin and hemicelluloses, and cellulose from maize stems, rye straw, and rice straw. Polym Degrad Stab 74:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao L, Sun Z, Shi Z, Xu F, Sun R (2011) Impact of hot compressed water production. Bioresour 6:1576–1598Google Scholar
  49. Xu Z, Wang QH, Jiang ZH, Yang XX, Ji YZ (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw. Biomass Bioenerg 31:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamashita Y, Shono M, Sasaki C, Nakamura Y (2010) Alkaline peroxide pretreatment for efficient enzymatic saccharification of bamboo. Carbohydr Polym 79:914–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zeng Y, Zhao S, Yang S, Ding SY (2014) Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:38–45PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Q, Cai W (2008) Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali pretreated rice straw by Trichoderma reesei ZM4-F3. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1130–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang ZY, Ohara IM, Doherty WOS (2013) Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse by acidified aqueous polyol solutions. Cellulose 20:3179–3190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life ScienceXiamen UniversityXiamenPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of EnvironmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Green Intelligence Environmental SchoolYangtze Normal UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations