Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Production and characterization of dialdehyde cellulose through green and sustainable approach

  • Xugang Dang
  • Peng Liu
  • Mao Yang
  • Hangxia Deng
  • Zhihua ShanEmail author
  • Wenjuan Zhen
Original Research
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop the efficient methods for dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) production, in which periodate solution was used as oxidant, and an electrochemically assisted system was applied to achieve green, efficient, low-cost and sustainable oxidization of cellulose. The microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) was pre-treated by alkali or ultrasound, and then oxidized to prepare DAC in the electrolyzer with aqueous solution of sodium periodate. Finally, the DAC was obtained by centrifugation and lyophilization. The prepared DAC materials were characterized by FTIR, XRD and SEM, and analyzed via aldehyde group contents, crystallinity index, water solubility index and water retention value. The introduction of active functional groups promoted cellulose hydration and swelling. Compared to the ultrasound pretreatment, the alkaline pretreatment had a great influence on the water solubility index and water retention value of cellulose. The aldehyde group contents of DAC increased after the MCC was oxidized by sodium periodate in the electrolyzer. Electrochemically assisted oxidation significantly decreased the crystallinity of the DAC, and the surface structure was smooth and soft, which can be attributed to the electrochemically assisted reaction that could regenerate the spent periodate in anode electrolytic chamber. When DAC was prepared under optimal conditions (current density: 0.075 A/cm2, periodate concentration: 0.6 mol/L, reaction time: 30 min), the regeneration efficiency of spent periodate reached about 93.4%.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Electrochemical oxidation Periodate oxidation Microcrystalline cellulose Dialdehyde cellulose 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Graduate Student’s Research and Innovation Fund of Sichuan University (2018YJSY087). The authors are also grateful for the Key Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education for financial aid and machinery equipment that supported the research work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA, Reiner RS, Baez C (2018) New cellulose crystallinity estimation method that differentiates between organized and crystalline phases. Carbohydr Polym 190:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banumathi B, Vaseeharan B, Malaikozhundan B, Ramasamy P, Govindarajan M, Alharbi NS, Kadaikunnan S, Canale A, Benelli G (2018) Green larvicides against blowflies, Lucilia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae): screening of seven plants used in Indian ethno-veterinary medicine and production of green-coated zinc oxide nanoparticles. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 101:214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown M (2010) Going for silver: green plastic production. Chem World 7(5):27Google Scholar
  4. Brumer H, Zhou Q, Baumann MJ, Carlsson K, Teeri TT (2004) Activation of crystalline cellulose surfaces through the chemoenzymatic modification of xyloglucan. J Am Chem Soc 126(18):5715–5721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caliari IP, Barbosa MH, Ferreira SO, Teofilo RF (2017) Estimation of cellulose crystallinity of sugarcane biomass using near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis methods. Carbohydr Polym 158:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahman Y, Ugwu CU (2014) Production of green biodegradable plastics of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from renewable resources of agricultural residues. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37(8):1561–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dang X, Chen H, Shan Z, Zhen W, Yang M (2018a) The oxidation of potato starch by electro-Fenton system in the presence of Fe(II) ions. Int J Biol Macromol 121:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dang XG, Chen H, Dai R, Wang YJ, Shan ZH (2018b) Electrochemically assisted synthesis, spray granulation and characterization of oxidized corn starch–gelatin. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(21):7099–7104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demircan D, Zhang B (2017) Facile synthesis of novel soluble cellulose-grafted hyperbranched polymers as potential natural antimicrobial materials. Carbohydr Polym 157:1913–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Errezma M, Mabrouk AB, Magnin A, Dufresne A, Boufi S (2018) Surfactant-free emulsion Pickering polymerization stabilized by aldehyde-functionalized cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 202:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foresti ML, Vazquez A, Boury B (2017) Applications of bacterial cellulose as precursor of carbon and composites with metal oxide, metal sulfide and metal nanoparticles: a review of recent advances. Carbohydr Polym 157:447–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller ME, Andaya C, McClay K (2018) Evaluation of ATR–FTIR for analysis of bacterial cellulose impurities. J Microbiol Methods 144:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glasser WG, Atalla RH, Blackwell J, Malcolm Brown Jr R, Burchard W, French A, Klemm DO, Nishiyama Y (2012) About the structure of cellulose: debating the Lindman hypothesis. Cellulose 19:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta VK, Carrott PJ, Singh R, Chaudhary M, Kushwaha S (2016) Cellulose: a review as natural, modified and activated carbon adsorbent. Bioresour Technol 216:1066–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habibi N (2014) Preparation of biocompatible magnetite-carboxymethyl cellulose nanocomposite: characterization of nanocomposite by FTIR, XRD, FESEM and TEM. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 131:55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamou KB, Kaddami H, Dufresne A, Boufi S, Magnin A, Erchiqui F (2018) Impact of TEMPO-oxidization strength on the properties of cellulose nanofibril reinforced polyvinyl acetate nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 181:1061–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Isogai A, Bergstrom L (2018) Preparation of cellulose nanofibers using green and sustainable chemistry. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 12:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jausovec D, Vogrincic R, Kokol V (2015) Introduction of aldehyde vs. carboxylic groups to cellulose nanofibers using laccase/TEMPO mediated oxidation. Carbohydr Polym 116:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jia L, Ma JZ, Gao DG, Tait WRT, Sun LY (2019) A star-shaped POSS-containing polymer for cleaner leather processing. J Hazard Mater 361:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44(22):3358–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kljun A, Benians TA, Goubet F, Meulewaeter F, Knox JP, Blackburn RS (2011) Comparative analysis of crystallinity changes in cellulose I polymers using ATR-FTIR, X-ray diffraction, and carbohydrate-binding module probes. Biomacromolecules 12(11):4121–4126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koprivica S, Siller M, Hosoya T, Roggenstein W, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2016) Regeneration of aqueous periodate solutions by ozone treatment: a sustainable approach for dialdehyde cellulose production. ChemSusChem 9(8):825–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar V, Kang J, Yang T (2001) Preparation and characterization of spray-dried oxidized cellulose microparticles. Pharm Dev Technol 6(3):449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai C, Sheng LY, Liao SB, Xi TF, Zhang ZX (2013) Surface characterization of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose. Surf Interface Anal 45(11–12):1673–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirvio JA, Hormi OE, Niinimaki J (2012) Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate-chlorite oxidation. Biomacromolecules 13(5):1592–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindh J, Carlsson DO, Stromme M, Mihranyan A (2014) Convenient one-pot formation of 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose beads via periodate oxidation of cellulose in water. Biomacromolecules 15(5):1928–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu DY, Shi F, Liu JX, Hu SC, Yu L, Liu SH, Wang YQ, Shan ZJ, Liu J, Tian XM (2017) Synthesis of SiO2-WxTiO2 composite aerogels via solvothermal crystallization under the guidance of bacterial cellulose followed by freeze drying method. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 84(1):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu P, Pang B, Tian L, Schafer T, Gutmann T, Liu H, Volkert CA, Buntkowsky G, Zhang K (2018) Efficient, self-terminating isolation of cellulose nanocrystals through periodate oxidation in Pickering emulsions. ChemSusChem 11(20):3581–3585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopez-Sanchez P, Martinez-Sanz M, Bonilla MR, Wang D, Gilbert EP, Stokes JR, Gidley MJ (2017) Cellulose-pectin composite hydrogels: intermolecular interactions and material properties depend on order of assembly. Carbohydr Polym 162:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyu B, Cheng K, Ma JZ, Hou XY, Gao DG, Gao H, Zhang J, Qi YL (2017) A cleaning and efficient approach to improve wet-blue sheepleather quality by enzymatic degreasing. J Clean Prod 148:701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ma JZ, Gao JJ, Wang HD, Lyu B, Gao DG (2017) Dissymmetry gemini sulfosuccinate surfactant from vegetable oil: a kind of environmentally friendly fatliquoring agent in the leather industry. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(11):10693–10701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meza-Contreras JC, Manriquez-Gonzalez R, Gutierrez-Ortega JA, Gonzalez-Garcia Y (2018) XRD and solid state (13)C-NMR evaluation of the crystallinity enhancement of (13)C-labeled bacterial cellulose biosynthesized by Komagataeibacter xylinus under different stimuli: a comparative strategy of analyses. Carbohydr Res 461:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mu CD, Guo JM, Li XY, Lin W, Li DF (2012) Preparation and properties of dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose crosslinked gelatin edible films. Food Hydrocoll 27(1):22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nikolakakis I, Tsarvouli K, Malamataris S (2006) Water retention and drainage in different brands of microcrystalline cellulose: effect of measuring conditions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 63(3):278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose 1 beta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124(31):9074–9082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nishiyama Y, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Langan P (2003) Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose 1(alpha), from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 125(47):14300–14306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rathna GVN, Rao DVM, Chatterji PR (1996) Hydrogels of gelatin-sodium carboxymethyl cellulose: synthesis and swelling kinetics. J Macromol Sci Pure Appl Chem A 33(9):1199–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roy D, Semsarilar M, Guthrie JT, Perrier S (2009) Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: a review. Chem Soc Rev 38(7):2046–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruan CQ, Stromme M, Lindh J (2016) A green and simple method for preparation of an efficient palladium adsorbent based on cysteine functionalized 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose. Cellulose 23(4):2627–2638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruan CQ, Stromme M, Lindh J (2018) Preparation of porous 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose beads crosslinked with chitosan and their application in adsorption of Congo red dye. Carbohydr Polym 181:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siller M, Amer H, Bacher M, Roggenstein W, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2015) Effects of periodate oxidation on cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 22(4):2245–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh M, Ray AR, Vasudevan P (1982) Biodegradation studies on periodate oxidized cellulose. Biomaterials 3(1):16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tolonen LK, Bergenstrahle-Wohlert M, Sixta H, Wohlert J (2015) Solubility of cellulose in supercritical water studied by molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 119(13):4739–4748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trache D, Hussin MH, Hui Chuin CT, Sabar S, Fazita MR, Taiwo OF, Hassan TM, Haafiz MK (2016) Microcrystalline cellulose: isolation, characterization and bio-composites application—a review. Int J Biol Macromol 93(Pt A):789–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Varma AJ, Kulkarni MP (2002) Oxidation of cellulose under controlled conditions. Polym Degrad Stab 77(1):25–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vinodhini PA, Sangeetha K, Gomathi T, Sudha PN, Venkatesan J, Anil S (2017) FTIR, XRD and DSC studies of nanochitosan, cellulose acetate and polyethylene glycol blend ultrafiltration membranes. Int J Biol Macromol 104(Pt B):1721–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang W, Liang T, Zhang B, Bai H, Ma P, Dong W (2018) Green functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals for application in reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 202:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yan GH, Zhang XQ, Li MZ, Zhao XY, Zeng XH, Sun Y, Tang X, Lei TZ, Lin L (2019) Stability of soluble dialdehyde cellulose and the formation of hollow microspheres: optimization and characterization. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(2):2151–2159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang D, Kumar V (2012) Preparation and characterization of novel oxidized cellulose acetate methyl esters. Carbohydr Polym 90(4):1486–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang J, Li J (2018) Self-assembled cellulose materials for biomedicine: a review. Carbohydr Polym 181:264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yao MJ, Wang Z, Liu Y, Yang GH, Chen JC (2019) Preparation of dialdehyde cellulose graftead graphene oxide composite and its adsorption behavior for heavy metals from aqueous solution. Carbohydr Polym 212:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang KD, Li W, Wang YF, Zheng YL, Tan FC, Ma XQ, Yao LS, Bayer EA, Wang LS, Li FL (2018a) Processive degradation of crystalline cellulose by a multimodular endoglucanase via a wirewalking mode. Biomacromolecules 19(5):1686–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang X, Qu T, Mosier NS, Han L, Xiao W (2018b) Cellulose modification by recyclable swelling solvents. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xugang Dang
    • 1
  • Peng Liu
    • 1
  • Mao Yang
    • 2
  • Hangxia Deng
    • 1
  • Zhihua Shan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wenjuan Zhen
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Biomass Science and Engineering, National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture, The Key Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.School of Light Industry and EngineeringQilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences)JinanChina
  3. 3.Department of Sports MedicineChengdu Sport UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations