Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Functional divergence of cellulose synthase orthologs in between wild Gossypium raimondii and domesticated G. arboreum diploid cotton species

  • Hee Jin KimEmail author
  • Gregory N. Thyssen
  • Xianliang Song
  • Christopher D. Delhom
  • Yongliang Liu
Original Research
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Cellulose synthase (CESA) synthesizes cellulose for plant cell walls and determines plant morphology and biomass amount. The recently sequenced cotton genomes of two diploid species, Gossypium raimondii and G. arboreum have become references for study of agriculturally important cotton fibers composed nearly exclusively of cellulose. To better understand the roles of functionally divergent CESAs, we compared physical properties and CESA expression patterns from various tissues at different developmental stages of the two diploid cottons. Chemical and phenotypic analyses showed that the domesticated G. arboreum fibers with high cellulose content, thick cell wall, and long length were superior to the wild G. raimondii fibers. Among the seventeen orthologous CESA pairs sharing > 98% identity between the two diploid genomes, putatively nonfunctional CESAs lacking structural integrity or conserved catalytic motifs were identified. Transcript expression patterns of functional CESA family genes sharing high sequence similarities in each genome were determined by RNA-seq and a PCR method that distinguished specific CESAs based on single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our results showed that mutational events causing non-functionalization and tissue specific expression patterns of the redundant CESA genes occurred in the domesticated G. arboreum more frequently than the wild G. raimondii. The results provide insight on how cellulose biosynthesis has been altered during diploid cotton evolution and domestication process, and contributed to the diversity of cotton species that differ in fiber quality and cellulose content.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Cellulose synthase (CESACotton fiber Gene expression Non-functionalization Sub-functionalization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the USDA-ARS Research Project # 6054-21000-017-00D, and Cotton Incorporated-sponsored project #19-858. Authors thank Dr. Marina Naoumkina of USDA-ARS, Southern Regional Research Center, and Dr. Maojun Wang of Huazhong Agricultural University for their inputs and feedbacks on the manuscript. Authors acknowledge Ms. Tracy Condon for fiber sample preparation, Ms. Holly King for microscopic images, and Mr. Wilson Buttram and Keith Stevenson for preparing cotton fields. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U. S. Department of Agriculture which is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2744_MOESM1_ESM.docx (745 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 745 kb)

References

  1. Abidi N, Cabrales L, Hequet E (2010) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic approach to the study of the secondary cell wall development in cotton fiber. Cellulose 17:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betancur L, Singh B, Rapp RA, Wendel JF, Marks MD, Roberts AW, Haigler CH (2010) Phylogenetically distinct cellulose synthase genes support secondary wall thickening in Arabidopsis shoot trichomes and cotton fiber. J Integr Plant Biol 52:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown DM, Zeef LAH, Ellis J, Goodacre R, Turner SR (2005) Identification of novel genes in Arabidopsis involved in secondary cell wall formation using expression profiling and reverse genetics. Plant Cell 17:2281–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll A et al (2012) Complexes with mixed primary and secondary cellulose synthases are functional in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 160:726–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delmer DP (1999) Cellulose biosynthesis: exciting times for a difficult field of study. Annu Rev Plan Biol 50:245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delmer DP, Amor Y (1995) Cellulose biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7:987–1000Google Scholar
  7. Djerbi S, Lindskog M, Arvestad L, Sterky F, Teeri TT (2005) The genome sequence of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) reveals 18 conserved cellulose synthase (CesA) genes. Planta 221:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drenkard E et al (2000) A simple procedure for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms facilitates map-based cloning in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 124:1483–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Du X et al (2018) Resequencing of 243 diploid cotton accessions based on an updated A genome identifies the genetic basis of key agronomic traits. Nat Genet 50:796–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flagel LE, Wendel JF, Udall JA (2012) Duplicate gene evolution, homoeologous recombination, and transcriptome characterization in allopolyploid cotton. BMC Genom 13:302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y-l, Postlethwait J (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531–1545Google Scholar
  12. Haigler CH, Roberts AW (2019) Structure/function relationships in the rosette cellulose synthesis complex illuminated by an evolutionaly perspective. Cellulose 26:227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haigler CH, Betancur L, Stiff MR, Tuttle JR (2012) Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Front Plant Sci 3:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill JL, Hammudi MB, Tien M (2014) The Arabidopsis cellulose synthase complex: a proposed hexamer of CESA trimers in an equimolar stoichiometry. Plant Cell 26:4834–4842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirsch CD, Springer NM, Hirsch CN (2015) Genomic limitations to RNA sequencing expression profiling. Plant J 84:491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu H et al (2018) Three AtCesA6-like members enhance biomass production by distinctively promoting cell growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J 16:976–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu Y et al (2019) Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton. Nat Genet 51:739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacob-Wilk D, Kurek I, Hogan P, Delmer DP (2006) The cotton fiber zinc-binding domain of cellulose synthase A1 from Gossypium hirsutum displays rapid turnover in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12191–12196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiao Y et al (2011) Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL (2008) NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W5–W9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joshi CP, Bhandari S, Ranjan P, Kalluri UC, Liang X, Fujino T, Samuga A (2004) Genomics of cellulose biosynthesis in poplars. New Phytol 164:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim HJ (2015) Fiber biology. In: Fang DD, Percy RG (eds) Cotton. Agronomy monograph, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 97–127Google Scholar
  23. Kim HJ (2018) Cotton fiber biosynthesis. In: Fang DD (ed) Cotton fiber: physics, chemistry and biology. Springer, Cham, pp 133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim HJ, Triplett BA (2001) Cotton fiber growth in planta and in vitro. Models for plant cell elongation and cell wall biogenesis. Plant Physiol 127:1361–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim H, Triplett BA (2007) Cellulose synthase catalytic subunit (CESA) genes associated with primary or secondary wall biosynthesis in developing cotton fibers (Gossypium hirsutum). In: World cotton research conference-4, Lubbock, Texas, USA. International Cotton Advisory CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim HJ, Liu Y, Dowd M, Frelichowski J, Delhom C, Rodgers J, Thibodeaux D (2016) Comparative phenotypic analysis of Gossypium raimondii with Upland cotton. J Cotton Sci 20:132–144Google Scholar
  27. Kim HJ et al (2017) Comparative physical and chemical analyses of cotton fibers from two near isogenic upland lines differing in fiber wall thickness. Cellulose 24:2385–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim HJ, Liu Y, French AD, Lee CM, Kim SH (2018) Comparison and validation of Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopic methods for monitoring secondary cell wall cellulose from cotton fibers. Cellulose 25:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar M et al (2009) An update on the nomenclature for the cellulose synthase genes in Populus. Trends Plant Sci 14:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar M, Mishra L, Carr P, Pilling M, Gardner P, Mansfield SD, Turner S (2018) Exploiting CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) class specificity to probe cellulose microfibril biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 177:151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kurek I, Kawagoe Y, Jacob-Wilk D, Doblin M, Delmer D (2002) Dimerization of cotton fiber cellulose synthase catalytic subunits occurs via oxidation of the zinc-binding domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11109–11114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li F et al (2014) Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum. Nat Genet 46:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li F et al (2015) Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat Biotechnol 33:524–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu Y, Kim HJ (2015) Use of Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infared (ATR FT-IR) spectroscopy in direct, non-destructive, and rapid assessment of developmental cotton fibers grown in planta and in culture. Appl Spectrosc 69:1004–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Kim H-J (2019) Comparative investigation of secondary cell wall development in cotton fiber near isogenic lines using Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR FT-IR). Appl Spectrosc 73:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu X et al (2015) Gossypium barbadense genome sequence provides insight into the evolution of extra-long staple fiber and specialized metabolites. Sci Rep 5:14139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan JL, Strumillo J, Zimmer J (2013) Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature 493:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nixon BT et al (2016) Comparative structural and computational analysis supports eighteen cellulose synthases in the plant cellulose synthesis complex. Sci Rep 6:28696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Otto SP (2007) The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131:452–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozsolak F, Milos PM (2011) RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet 12:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paterson AH et al (2012) Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature 492:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pear JR, Kawagoe Y, Schreckengost WE, Delmer DP, Stalker DM (1996) Higher plants contain homologs of the bacterial celA genes encoding the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12637–12642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Persson S, Wei H, Milne J, Page GP, Somerville CR (2005) Identification of genes required for cellulose synthesis by regression analysis of public microarray data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8633–8638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Polko J, Kieber JJ (2019) The regulation of cellulose biosynthesis in plants. Plant Cell 31:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Proost S, Mutwil M (2017) PlaNet: comparative co-expression network analyses for plants. In: van Dijk ADJ (ed) Plant genomics databases. Humana Press, New York, pp 213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quinlan AR, Hall IM (2010) BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Renny-Byfield S et al (2013) Diploidization and genome size change in allopolyploids is associated with differential dynamics of low-and high-copy sequences. Plant J 74:829–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Renny-Byfield S et al (2014) Ancient gene duplicates in Gossypium (cotton) exhibit near-complete expression divergence. Genome Biol Evol 6:559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richmond TA, Somerville CR (2000) The cellulose synthase superfamily. Plant Physiol 124:495–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saski CA et al (2017) Sub genome anchored physical frameworks of the allotetraploid Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genome, and an approach toward reference-grade assemblies of polyploids. Sci Rep 7:15274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sethaphong L, Davis JK, Slabaugh E, Singh A, Haigler CH, Yingling YG (2016) Prediction of the structures of the plant-specific regions of vascular plant cellulose synthases and correlated functional analysis. Cellulose 23:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Song D, Shen J, Li L (2010) Characterization of cellulose synthase complexes in Populus xylem differentiation. New Phytol 187:777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stiff MR, Haigler CH (2012) Recent advances in cotton fiber development. In: Oosterhuis DM, Cothren JT (eds) Flowering and fruiting in cotton. The Cotton Foundation, Cordova, pp 163–192Google Scholar
  54. Suzuki S, Li L, Sun YH, Chiang VL (2006) The cellulose synthase gene superfamily and biochemical functions of xylem-specific cellulose synthase-like genes in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Physiol 142:1233–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thibodeaux DP, Evans JP (1986) Cotton fiber maturity by image analysis. Text Res J 56:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner S, Gallois P, Brown D (2007) Tracheary element differentiation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:407–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Updegraff DM (1969) Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem 32:420–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang M et al (2017) Asymmetric subgenome selection and cis-regulatory divergence during cotton domestication. Nat Genet 49:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang M et al (2019) Reference genome sequences of two cultivated allotetraploid cottons, Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense. Nat Genet 51:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu TD, Nacu S (2010) Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 26:873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xi W, Song D, Sun J, Shen J, Li L (2017) Formation of wood secondary cell wall may involve two type cellulose synthase complexes in Populus. Plant Mol Biol 93:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu B, Huang Y (2004) Image analysis for cotton fibers Part II: cross-sectional measurements. Text Res J 74:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL (2012) Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform 13:134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu J et al (2013) CottonGen: a genomics, genetics and breeding database for cotton research. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D1229–D1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yuan D et al (2015) The genome sequence of Sea-Island cotton (Gossypium barbadense) provides insights into the allopolyploidization and development of superior spinnable fibres. Sci Rep 5:17662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang S et al (2017) A comparative phylogenetic analysis and SNP identification of cellulose synthase gene family in cotton. In: Beltwide cotton conferences, Dallas, TX. National Cotton Council, pp 491–499Google Scholar
  67. Zhang T et al (2015) Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol 33:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cotton Fiber Bioscience Research UnitUSDA-ARS-SRRCNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Cotton Chemistry and Utilization UnitUSDA-ARS-SRRCNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.College of Agronomy, State Key Laboratory of Crop BiologyShandong Agricultural UniversityTai’anChina
  4. 4.Cotton Structure and Quality Research UnitUSDA-ARS-SRRCNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations