Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–14 | Cite as

Green and facile fabrication of smart cellulose composites assembled by graphene nanoplates for dual sensing

  • Yixin Liu
  • Lin Liu
  • Zhen Li
  • Yinan Zhao
  • Juming YaoEmail author
Original Research
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Novel, flexible, smart cellulose nanocomposite plates were fabricated by coating graphene nanoplate (GnPs) solution on the surface of cellulose sol, followed by hot pressing, in which GnPs was directly exfoliated and dispersed by PVP as exfoliating and dispersing agent. The structure, properties, and dual sensing (strain and pressure) of the resultant cellulose/GnPs nanocomposite plates (CGP) were systematically investigated. The formed conductive graphene network within the cellulose substrate, and the strong interfacial adhesion between cellulose and GnPs endowed the CGP excellent electromechanical properties, i.e. low electrical resistance (< 270 Ω cm), stable sensitivity on strain (GF 5.87) and pressure (S 0.037 kPa−1), good durability (> 1000 loading/unloading cycles). This work provided a green and facile approach to fabricate smart cellulose sensor responding to different external stimuli like stretch and compress by electrical resistance changes.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Cellulose Graphene nanoplates Smart sensor Casting Hot-press 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was financially supported by the Public Technology Research Plan of Zhejiang Province (LGF18E030003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672251), and 521 Talent Project of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2735_MOESM1_ESM.docx (486 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 486 kb)

References

  1. Ahmadzadeh S, Desobry S, Keramat J (2016) Crystalline structure and morphological properties of porous cellulose/clay composites: the effect of water and ethanol as coagulants. Carbohydr Polym 141:211–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourlinos AB, Georgakilas V, Zboril R, Steriotis T, Stubos AK, Trapalis C (2009) Aqueous-phase exfoliation of graphite in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone for the production of water-soluble graphenes. Solid State Commun 149:2172–2176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2009.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boya K, Weili S, Mingjiang N, Jingbo L (2018) Chemical reduction dependent dielectric properties and dielectric loss mechanism of reduced graphene oxide. Carbon 127:209–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao Y, Li T, Gu Y, Luo H, Wang S, Zhang T (2018) Fingerprint-inspired flexible tactile sensor for accurately discerning surface texture. Small 14(16):1703902.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201703902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Z, Tian M, Goulamaly MM, Yao M, Nezich D, Hempel M, Hofimann M, Kong J (2016) Enhancing the sensitivity of percolative graphene films for flexible and transparent pressure sensor arrays. Adv Funct Mater 26(28):5061–5067.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201503674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Hou X, Song N, Shi L, Ding P (2018a) Cellulose/graphene bioplastic for thermal management: enhanced isotropic thermally conductive property by three-dimensional interconnected graphene aerogel. Compos Part A Appl S 107(4):189–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Pötschke P, Pionteck J, Voit B, Qi H (2018b) Smart cellulose/graphene composites fabricated by in situ chemical reduction of graphene oxide for multiple sensing applications. J Mater Chem A 6:7777–7785.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA00618K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chia-Hung K, Cheng-Kang L (2009) Enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of cellulose by cellulose dissolution pretreatments. Carbohydr Polym 77:41–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choong CL, Shim MB, Lee BS (2014) Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv Mater 26:3451–3458.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das T, Sharma BK, Katiya AK, Ahn JH (2018) Graphene-based flexible and wearable electronics. J Semicond 39:011007/1–011007/19.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/39/1/011007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding YC, Yang J, Tolle CR, Zhu Z (2016) A highly stretchable strain sensor based on electrospun carbon nanofibers for human motion monitorin. RSC Adv 6:79114–79120.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra16236c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng Y, Zhang X, Shen Y (2012) A mechanically strong, flexible and conductive film based on bacterial cellulose/graphene nanocomposite. Carbohydr Polym 87:644–649.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97:187401.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadi A, Zahirifar J, Karimi-Sabet J (2018) Graphene nanosheets preparation using magnetic nanoparticle assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphite: the coupled effect of ultrasound and wedging nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem 44:204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han J, Zhou C, French AD (2013) Characterization of cellulose II nanoparticles regenerated from 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Carbohydr Polym 94:773–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang QB, Xu MM, Sun R, Wang XH (2016) Large scale preparation of graphene oxide/cellulose paper with improved mechanical performance and gas barrier properties by conventional papermaking method. Ind Crop Prod 85:198–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jang H, Park Y, Chen X (2016) Graphene-based flexible and stretchable electronics. Adv Mater 28:4184–4202.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeong YR, Park H, Jin SW, Hong SY, Lee S-S, Ha JS (2015) Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensors using fragmentized graphene foam. Adv Funct Mater 25(27):4228–4236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Josphat P, Leena S-J, Patrick G, Thad M (2018) A comparative study of mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of graphene-, graphene oxide- and reduced graphene oxide-doped microfibrillated cellulose nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 147:104–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim C, Klan W, Kim D, Cho K, Park S (2011) Graphene oxide/cellulose composite using NMMO monohydrate. Carbohydr Polym 86(2):903–909.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kundu S, Sriramdas R, Rafsanjani AK, Bid A, Pratap R, Ravishankar N (2017) Crumpled sheets of reduced graphene oxide as a highly sensitive, robust and versatile strain/pressure sensor. Nanoscale 9:81–95.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr02415k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li YY, Wang B, Ma MG, Wang B (2018) Review of recent development on preparation, properties, and applications of cellulose-based functional material. Int J Polym Sci 8973643:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8973643 Google Scholar
  24. Liu L, Shen Z, Liang S, Yi M, Zhang X, Ma S (2014) Graphene for reducing bubble defects and enhancing mechanical properties of graphene/cellulose acetate composite films. J Mater Sci 49:321–328.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7708-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu L, Xie J, Li J, Zhang Q, Yao J (2016a) Three-dimensional macroporous cellulose-based bioadsorbents for efficient removal of nickel ions from aqueous solution. Cellulose 23(1):723–736.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0837-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y, Zhang D, Wang K (2016b) A novel strain sensor based on graphene composite films with layered structure. Compos Part A Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.010 Google Scholar
  27. Liu Y, Wang H, Zhao W, Zhang M, Qin H, Xie Y (2018) Flexible, stretchable sensors for wearable health monitoring: sensing mechanisms, materials, fabrication strategies and features. Sens Basel 18(2):65.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lv P, Zhou H, Zhao M, Li D, Lu K, Wang D, Huang J, Cai Y, Lucia L, Wei Q (2018) Highly flexible, transparent, and conductive silver nanowire-attached bacterial cellulose conductors. Cellulose 25:3189–3196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1773-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morteza A, Ki-uk K, Inkyu P, Metin S (2016) Stretchable, Skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv Funct Mater 26:1678–1698.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201504755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pang J, Wu M, Zhang Q (2015) Comparison of physical properties of regenerated cellulose films fabricated with different cellulose feedstocks in ionic liquid. Carbohydr Polym 121:71–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinto AM, Moreira JA, Magalhaes FD (2016) Polymer surface adsorption as a strategy to improve the biocompatibility of graphene nanoplatelets. Colloid Surf B 146:818–824.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Puyoo E, Brottet S, Rafael R (2018) Ultrahigh sensitivity to strain of cracked thin films based on metallic nanoparticles in a dielectric matrix. IEEE Sens J 2:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/lsens.2018.2865883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahman R, Foster J, Haque A (2013) Molecular dynamics simulation and characterization of graphene-cellulose nanocomposites. J Phys Chem A 117:5344–5353.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp402814t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryu S, Lee P, Chou JB, Xu R, Zhao R, Hart AJ, Kim SG (2015) Extremely elastic wearable carbon nanotube fiber strain sensor for monitoring of human motion. ACS Nano 9:5929–5936.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryu J, Lim J, Ahm S, Mu S, Ko F, Hwang J (2018) Structure and properties of graphene oxide/cellulose hybrid fibers via divalent metal ions treatment. Cellulose 25(1):517–525.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1535-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sachin M, Golap D, Subash S, Zurita Z, Remi P, Masaki T (2015) Polymer-free graphene transfer on moldable cellulose acetate based paper by hot press technique. Surf Coat Technol 15(275):369–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.04.040 Google Scholar
  37. Sachin A, Michael J, Lucian L, Lokendro P (2018) Cellulose and nanocellulose-based flexible-hybrid printed electronics and conductive composites—a review. Carbohydr Polym 198(15):249–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.045 Google Scholar
  38. Sarute U, Hathaikarn M (2015) A critical review on cellulose: from fundamental to an approach on sensor technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:402–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seyoung Y, Insik I (2011) Role of poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) as stabilizer for dispersion of graphene via hydrophobic interaction. J Mater Sci 46(5):1316–1321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4917-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Si H, Luo H, Xiong G, Yang Z, Roman SR, Guo R, Wan Y (2014) One-step in situ biosynthesis of graphene oxide-bacterial cellulose nanocomposite hydrogels. Macromol Rapid Commun 35:1706–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201400239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soheilmoghaddam M, Pasbakhsh P, Wahit M (2014) Regenerated cellulose nanocomposites reinforced with exfoliated graphite nanosheets using BMIMCL ionic liquid. Polymer 55:3130–3138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stobinski L, Lesiak B, Malolepszy A (2014) Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J Electron Spectrosc 195:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Subhadip M, Sayan G, Poushali D, Poushali B, Tushar KD, Lalatendu N, Dipak K, Narayan CD (2017) High-performance carbon nanofiber coated cellulose filter paper for electromagnetic interference shielding. Cellulose 24(11):5117–5131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1441-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sungwoo C, Yeonhoi C, Wanjun P (2017) All-graphene strain sensor on soft substrate. Carbon 116:753–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tian M, Qu L, Zhang X (2014) Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of regenerated cellulose/graphene composite fibers. Carbohydr Polym 111:456–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wan Y, Wang Y, Guo CF (2017) Recent progresses on flexible tactile sensors. Mater Today Phys 1:61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2017.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang Y, Wang Li, Yang T, Li X, Zang X, Zhu M, Wang K, Wu D, Zhu H (2014) Wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensors for human motion monitoring. Adv Funct Mater 24(29):4666–4670.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201400379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang F, Drzal LT, Qin Y, Huang Z (2015) Multifunctional graphene nanoplatelets/cellulose nanocrystals composite paper. Compos Part B Eng 79:521–529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang D, Lu Q, Liu Y, Zhang T (2016a) High performance flexible strain sensor based on self-locked overlapping graphene sheets. Nanoscale 8:20090–20095.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr07620c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang F, Drzal LT, Qin Y, Huang Z (2016b) Enhancement of fracture toughness, mechanical and thermal properties of rubber/epoxy composites by incorporation of graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 87:10–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu S, Peng S, Wang CH (2018) Stretchable strain sensors based on PDMS composites with cellulose sponges containing one- and two-dimensional nanocarbons. Sensor Actuators A Phys 279:90–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhen YX, Sergio P, Emanuele T, Giuliano G, Franco C, Vittorio M, Alberto Z, Vittorio B (2013) The exfoliation of graphene in liquids by electrochemical, chemical, and sonication-assisted techniques: a nanoscale study. Adv Funct Mater 23(37):4684–4693.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201203686 Google Scholar
  53. Xiao H, Zongyou Y, Shixin Wu, Xiaoying Q, Qiyuan H, Qichun Z, Qingyu Z, Freddy B, Hua Z (2011) Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Small 7(14):1876–1902.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201002009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xiao L, Damien J, Luo J (2012) Crumpled graphene particles for microbial fuel cell electrodes. J Power Sources 208:187–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xiong R, Hu K, Anise MG, Ma R, Xu W, Lu C, Zhang X (2015) Ultrarobust transparent cellulose nanocrystal-graphene membranes with high electrical conductivity. Adv Mater 28(7):1501–1509.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu M, Huang Q, Wang X, Sun R (2015) Highly tough cellulose/graphene composite hydrogels prepared from ionic liquids. Ind Crop Prod 70:56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu H, Lu YF, Xiang JX (2018) A multifunctional wearable sensor based on a graphene/inverse opal cellulose film for simultaneous, in situ monitoring of human motion and sweat. Nanoscale 10:2090–2098.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr07225b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xuesong G, Youna S, Lin W, Xindong M, Hui P, Yijun J (2018) High-strength and morphology-controlled aerogel based on carboxymethyl cellulose and graphene oxide. Carbohydr Polym 197(1):277–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.014 Google Scholar
  59. Yan C, Wang J, Kang W (2014) Highly stretchable piezoresistive graphene-nanocellulose nanopaper for strain sensors. Adv Mater 26:2022–2027.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang H, Zhang Q, Shan C, Li F, Han D, Niu L (2010) Stable, conductive supramolecular composite of graphene sheets with conjugated polyelectrolyte. Langmuir 26(9):6708–6712.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la100365z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang X, Shi K, Zhitomirsky I, Emily D (2015) Cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as universal 3D lightweight substrates for supercapacitor materials. Adv Mater 27:6104–6109.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang T, Jiang X, Zhong YJ, Zhao XL (2017) A wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensor for precise home-based pulse wave monitoring. ACS Sensors 2:967–974.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang X, Liu X, Zheng W, Zhu L (2012) Regenerated cellulose/graphene nanocomposite films prepared in DMAC/LiCl solution. Carbohydr Polym 88:26–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang L, Hou G, Wu Z, Shanov V (2016) Recent advances in graphene-based pressure sensors. Nano Life 06:1642005.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793984416420058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yixin Liu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lin Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhen Li
    • 1
  • Yinan Zhao
    • 1
  • Juming Yao
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Materials and TextilesZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Lab of Textile Fiber Materials and Processing TechnologyHangzhouChina
  3. 3.College of Textiles and ClothingQingdao UniversityQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations