Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Characteristic microcrystalline cellulose extracted by combined acid and enzyme hydrolysis of sweet sorghum

  • Haiwei Ren
  • Jiali Shen
  • Jiawen Pei
  • Zhiye Wang
  • Zhangpu Peng
  • Shanfei FuEmail author
  • Yi Zheng
Original Research
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) has been widely used in medicine, food and cosmetic industries. In this study, a combination method by using hydrochloric acid hydrolysis and fibrolytic enzyme purification was studied to extract MCC from sweet sorghum. The response surface methodology was employed to optimize the hydrochloric acid hydrolysis condition and therefore to maximize the MCC yield and cellulose content (purity). The optimal conditions for the hydrochloric acid hydrolysis were determined to be acid concentration of 7.0%, liquid–solid ratio of 17.3:1, time of 90 min, and temperature of 40 °C. Under such conditions, the yield and cellulose content of acid-extracted MCC were 81.8% and 93.2%, respectively. For enzyme refining of acid-extracted MCC, the optimum conditions were enzyme dosage of 4000 U/g substrate and time of 2 h, with which the yield, cellulose content and DP of the refined MCC were 80.03%, 99.80% and 287, respectively which were comparable to that of the commercial MCC (Lowa®PH101). Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transmission infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and 13C NMR were used to characterize the refined MCC. The refined MCC demonstrated rod-shaped morphologies, and had a series of characteristic absorption peaks and chemical groups pertain to cellulose as similar to the Lowa®PH101. The X-ray diffraction pattern and 13C NMR spectrum reflected that the refined MCC had typical cellulose I structure. TGA indicated that the refined MCC had good thermal stability. This study showed sweet sorghum is a potential low-cost raw material for MCC production, and the combined acid-enzyme extraction method is promising to extract high purity MCC from cellulosic substrate.

Keywords

Sweet sorghum Microcrystalline cellulose Response surface methodology Structural characterization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51666010, 51366009), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2018M631217), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (17JR5RA117, 18JR3RA150), and Hong Liu Excellent Young Cultivation Project of Lanzhou University of Technology (YQ2018). Thanks for kindly help from Dr. Zhe Ling (Nanjing Forestry University) on XRD analysis.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2712_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1500 kb)
10570_2019_2712_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (734 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 734 kb)

References

  1. Agblevor FA, Ibrahim MM, El-Zawawy WK (2007) Coupled acid and enzyme mediated production of microcrystalline cellulose from corn cob and cotton gin waste. Cellulose 14:247–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9103-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues: wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99(6):1664–1671.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anglani C (1998) Sorghum for human food—a review. Plant Food Hum Nutr 52(1):85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008065519820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ariyajaroenwong P, Laopaiboon P, Jaisil P, Laopaiboon L (2012) Repeated-batch ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on sweet sorghum stalks. Energies 5(4):559–566.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en5041215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azubuike CP, Okhamafe AO (2012) Physicochemical, spectroscopic and thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose derived from corn cobs. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 1(1):106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7715-1-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13(2):171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9061-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuayjuljit S, Su-Uthai S, Charuchinda S (2010) Poly (vinyl chloride) film filled with microcrystalline cellulose prepared from cotton fabric waste: properties and biodegradability study. Waste Manag Res 28(2):109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x09339324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collazo-Bigliardi S, Ortega-Toro R, Boix AC (2018) Isolation and characterisation of microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals from coffee husk and comparative study with rice husk. Carbohydr Polym 191:205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das K, Ray D, Bandyopadhyay NR, Ghosh T, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2009) A study of the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of microcrystalline cellulose particles prepared from cotton slivers using different acid concentrations. Cellulose 16(5):783–793.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9280-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elsakhawy M, Hassan ML (2007) Physical and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from agricultural residues. Carbohydr Polym 67(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fazaeli H, Golmohhammadi HA, Almoddarres A, Mosharraf S, Shoaei AA (2006) Comparing the performance of sorghum silage with maize silage in feedlot calves. Pak J Biol Sci 9(13):2450–2455.  https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.2450.2455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gañán P, Cruz J, Garbizu S, Arbelaiz A, Mondragon I (2004) Stem and bunch banana fibers from cultivation wastes: effect of treatments on physico-chemical behavior. J Appl Polym Sci 94(4):1489–1495.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gu P, Xu S, Zhou S, Liu Z, Sun Y, Ou N, Hu Y, Liu J, Wu Y, Wang X, Wang D (2017) Optimization of angelica sinensis polysaccharide-loaded poly (lactic-co-glycolicacid) nanoparticles by RSM and its immunological activity in vitro. Int J Biol Macromol 107:222–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamid SBA, Chowdhury ZZ, Karim MZ, Karim MZ (2014) Catalytic extraction of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) from Elaeis guineensis using central composite design (CCD). Bioresources 9(4):7403–7426.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.4.7403-7426 Google Scholar
  16. Hou WS, Ling C, Shi S, Yan ZF (2019) Preparation and characterization ofmicrocrystalline cellulose fromwaste cotton fabrics by using phosphotungstic acid. Int J Biol Macromol 123:363–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibrahim MM, El-Zawawy WK, Jüttke Yvonne, Koschella A, Heinze T (2013) Cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from rice straw and banana plant waste: preparation and characterization. Cellulose 20(5):2403–2416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9992-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilindra A, Dhake JD (2008) Notes microcrystalline cellulose from bagasse and rice straw. Indian J Chem Technol 15(5):497–499.  https://doi.org/10.2298/hemind0805313l Google Scholar
  19. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR (2018) Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibres (Arenga pinnata). Carbohydr Polym 181:1038–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang D, Hao MM, Fu JY, Liu K, Yan XX (2019) Potential bioethanol production from sweet sorghum on marginal land in China. J Clean Prod 220:225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A (2012) Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Ind Crop Prod 37(1):93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalita RD, Kalita RD, Nath Y, Ochubiojo ME, Buragohain AK (2013) Extraction and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from fodder grass; Setaria glauca (L) P. Beauv, and its potential as a drug delivery vehicle for isoniazid, a first line antituberculosis drug. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 108(4):85–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kambli ND, Mageshwaran V, Patil PG, Saxena S, Deshmukh RR (2017) Synthesis and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose powder from corn husk fibres using bio-chemical route. Cellulose 24(12):5355–5369.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1522-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaushik A, Singh M, Verma G (2010) Green nanocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and steam exploded cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw. Carbohydr Polym 82(2):337–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kian LK, Jawaid M, Ariffin H, Alothman OY (2017) Isolation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from roselle fibers. Int J Biol Macromol 103:931–940.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiziltas A, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Yang HS (2014) Mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) filled engineering thermoplastic composites. J Polym Environ 22(3):365–372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-014-0676-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44(22):3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200536238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ko WC, Chang CK, Wang HJ, Wang SJ, Hsieh CW (2015) Process optimization of microencapsulation of curcumin in γ-polyglutamic acid using response surface methodology. Food Chem 172(172):497–503.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leppänen K, Andersson S, Torkkeli M, Knaapila M, Kotelnikova N, Serimaa R (2009) Structure of cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from variouswood species, cotton and flax studied by X-ray scattering. Cellulose 16(6):999–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9298-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li M, Feng SQ, Wu LM et al (2014) Sugar-rich sweet sorghum is distinctively affected by wall polymer features for biomass digestibility and ethanol fermentation in bagasse. Bioresour Technol 167:14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ling Z, Tuo Wang, Makarem M, Cintron MS, Cheng HN, Kang X, Bacher M, Potthast A, Rosenau T, King H, Delhom CD, Nam S, Edwards JV, Kim SH, Xu F, French AD (2019) Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose. Cellulose 26:305–328.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-02230-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luo X, Guan R, Chen X, Tao M, Ma J, Zhao J (2014) Optimization on condition of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) nanoliposomes by response surface methodology and cellular uptake studies in Caco-2 cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 9(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276x-9-291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mansaray KG, Ghaly AE (1998) Thermal degradation of rice husks in nitrogen atmosphere. Bio Resour Technol 65(1–2):13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(98)00031-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merci A, Urbano A, Grossmann MVE, Tischer CA, Mali S (2015) Properties of microcrystalline cellulose extracted from soybean hulls by reactive extrusion. Food Res Int 73:38–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murray SC, Rooney WL, Hamblin MT, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (2009) Sweet sorghum genetic diversity and association mapping for brix and height. Plant Genome 2(1):48–62.  https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nsor-Atindana J, Chen M, Goff HD, Zhong F, Sharif HR, Li Y (2017) Functionality and nutritional aspects of microcrystalline cellulose in food. Carbohydr Polym 172(9):159–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qiang D, Zhang M, Li J, Xiu H, Liu Q (2016) Selective hydrolysis of cellulose for the preparation of microcrystalline cellulose by phosphotungstic acid. Cellulose 23(2):1199–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0858-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Regassa TH, Wortmann CS (2014) Sweet sorghum as a bioenergy crop: literature review. Biomass Bioenergy 64:348–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ren HW, Zhao T, Xing JM, Zhang Y, Li ZZ, Wang YG, Ma WP (2015) Isolation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from distillers grains. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 9(5):515–522.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2015.1550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sain M, Panthapulakkal S (2006) Bioprocess preparation of wheat straw fibers and their characterization. Ind Crops Prod 23(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seehra MS, Popp BV, Goulay F, Pyapalli SK, Gullion T, Poston J (2014) Hydrothermal treatment of microcrystalline cellulose under mild conditions: characterization of solid and liquid-phase products. Cellulose 21(6):4483–4495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0424-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheng S, Zhang M, Chen L, Hou W, Yan Z (2018) Extraction and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics via hydrothermal method. Waste Manage 82:139–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi S, Zhang M, Chen L, Hou W, Yan Z (2018) Extraction and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics via hydrothermal method. Waste Manag 82:139–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun G, French CR, Martin GR, Younghusband B, Green RC, Xie Y, Mathews M, Barron JR, Fitzpatrick DG, Gulliver W, Zhang H (2005) Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population1-3. Am J Clin Nutr 81(1):74–78.  https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2004668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trache D, Donnot A, Khimeche K, Benelmir R, Brosse N (2014) Physico-chemical properties and thermal stability of microcrystalline cellulose isolated from Alfa fibres. Carbohydr Polym 104(1):223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trache D, Hussin MH, Hui Chuin CT, Sabar S, Fazita MRN, Taiwo OFA, Hassan TM, Haafiz MKM (2016) Microcrystalline cellulose: isolation, characterization and bio-composites application—a review. Int J Biol Macromol 93(Pt A):789–804.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Updegraff DM (1969) Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological material. Anal Biochem 32(3):420–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2697(69)80009-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vanhatalo K, Lundin T, Koskimäki A, Lillandt M, Dahl O (2016) Microcrystalline cellulose property–structure effects in high-pressure fluidization: microfibril characteristics. J Mater Sci 51(12):6019–6034.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9907-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang D, Shang SB, Song ZQ, Lee MK (2010) Evaluation of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from kenaf fibers. J Ind Eng Chem 16(1):152–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2010.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang J, Zhao Y, Li W, Wang Z, Shen L (2015) Optimization of polysaccharides extraction from Tricholoma mongolicum Imai and their antioxidant and antiproliferative activities. Carbohydr Polym 131:322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu LM, Li M, Huang JF et al (2015) A near infrared spectroscopic assay for stalk soluble sugars, bagasse enzymatic saccharification and wall polymers in sweet sorghum. Bioresour Technol 177:118–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xiao B, Xiao B, Sun XF, Sun RC (2001) Chemical, structural, and thermal characterizations of alkali-soluble lignins and hemicelluloses, and cellulose from maize stems, rye straw, and rice straw. Polym Degrad Stab 74(2):307–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00163-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xiong R, Zhang X, Tian D, Zhou ZH, Lu CH (2012) Comparing microcrystalline with spherical nanocrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics. Cellulose 19:1189–1198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9730-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yamamoto H, Horii F, Hirai A (2006) Structural studies of bacterial cellulose through the solid-phase nitration and acetylation by cp/mas 13C NMR spectroscopy. Cellulose 13(3):327–342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-9034-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yue XP, He JC, Xu Y, Yang MX, Xu YJ (2019) A novel method for preparing microcrystalline cellulose from bleached chemical pulp using transition metal ions enhanced high temperature liquid water process. Carbohydr Polym 208:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao T, Chen Z, Lin X, Ren Z, Li B, Zhang Y (2017) Preparation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) from tea waste. Carbohydr Polym 184:164–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhuang XZ, Zhan H, Song YP, He C, Huang YP, Yin XL, Wu CZ (2019) Insights into the evolution of chemical structures in lignocellulose and non-lignocellulose biowastes during hydrothermal carbonization (HTC). Fuel 236:960–974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life Science and EngineeringLanzhou University of TechnologyLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of BiologyGansu Academy of SciencesLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Environment and Civil EngineeringJiangnan UniversityWuxiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Grain Science and IndustryKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations