Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–17 | Cite as

Three-dimensional cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite enriched with dexamethasone loaded metal–organic framework: a local drug delivery system for bone tissue engineering

  • Chandrani Sarkar
  • Angshuman Ray Chowdhuri
  • Subhadra Garai
  • Jui Chakraborty
  • Sumanta Kumar SahuEmail author
Original Research
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Three-dimensional cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite integrated with dexamethasone loaded metal organic framework (HA/DMOF) has been synthesized as a local drug delivery system for bone tissue engineering. Initially, in situ dexamethasone encapsulated metal–organic frameworks (DMOFs) were developed and characterized. The synthesized DMOFs are 60–80 nm in size with rhombohedral morphology. Results showed that nearly 16% dexamethasone (Dex) was loaded in DMOFs. These synthesized DMOF nanoparticles were efficiently integrated with carboxymethyl cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for the development of three dimensional localized drug delivery system, namely, HA/DMOF. The synthesized HA/DMOF nanocomposite was structurally characterized using various techniques. The mechanical properties of HA/DMOFs were also measured by means of compression test. It was found that the compressive strength and compressive modulus of HA/DMOF nanocomposite are 16.3 ± 1.57 MPa and 0.54 ± 0.073 GPa respectively, which are in the range of cancellous bone. In-vitro release behaviour of Dex from both DMOFs and HA/DMOFs was examined in phosphate buffered solution. It was found that Dex molecules have been released very slowly from HA/DMOF nanocomposite compared to DMOF nanoparticles, and it was sustained for 4 weeks. Cytocompatibility of HA/DMOF nanocomposite was evaluated against pre-osteoblast MC3T3 cells. It was found that the synthesized HA/DMOF nanocomposite is compatible to MC3T3 cells. Moreover, the ALP activity and extracellular mineralization capability of cells were enhanced when cultured with HA/DMOF nanocomposite. Results showed that the synthesized HA/DMOF nanocomposite is a promising material for possible therapeutic as well as load-bearing orthopedic applications.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Hydroxyapatite Carboxymethyl cellulose Dexamethasone Metal organic framework Local drug delivery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the financial supports from project supporting group (OLP-0231) of CSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory, India. The first author is also thankful to University Grant Commission for her fellowship. Funding was provided by University Grants Commission (Grant No. 061310230).

References

  1. Adeosun SO, Lawal GI, Balogun SA, Akpan EI (2012) Review of green polymer nanocomposites. J Miner Mater Char Eng 11:385–416.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2012.114028 Google Scholar
  2. Ali H, Kalashnikova I, White MA, Sherman M, Rytting E (2013) Preparation, characterization and transport of dexamethasone-loaded polymeric nanoparticles across a human placental in vitro model. Int J Pharm 454:149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amjadian S, Seyedjafari E, Zeynali B, Shabani I (2016) The synergistic effect of nano-hydroxyapatite and dexamethasone in the fibrous delivery system of gelatin and poly(L-lactide) on the osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Pharm 507:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azzaoui K, Mejdoubi E, Lamhamdi A, Zaoui S, Berrabah M, Elidrissi A, Hammouti B, Fouda MMG, Deyab SSA (2015) Structure and properties of hydroxyapatite/Hydroxyethyl cellulose acetate composite films. Carbohydr Polym 115:170–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azzaoui K, Mejdoubi E, Lamhamdi A, Jodeh S, Hamed O, Berrabah M, Jerdioui S, Salghi R, Akartasse N, Errich A, Ríos Á, Zougagh M (2017) Preparation and characterization of biodegradable nanocomposites derived from carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxyapatite. Carbohydr Polym 167:59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basta AH, Saied HE, Deftar MME, Henawy AAE, Sheikh HHE, Shakour EHA, Hasanin MS (2016) Properties of modified carboxymethyl cellulose and its use as bioactive compound. Carbohydr Polym 153:641–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bharti C, Nagaich U, Pal AK, Gulati N (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in target drug delivery system: a review. Int J Pharm Investig 5:124–133.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973X.160844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen B, Yang Z, Zhu Y, Xia Y (2014) Zeolitic imidazolate framework materials: recent progress in synthesis and applications. J Mater Chem A 2:16811–16831.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA02984D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Kawazoe N, Chen G (2018) Preparation of dexamethasone-loaded biphasic calcium phosphate nanoparticles/collagen porous composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 67:341–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherian BM, Leao AL, de-Souza SF, Thomas S, Pothan LA, Kottaisamy M (2011) Cellulose nanocomposites for high-performance applications. In: Kalia S, Kaith B, Kaur I (eds) Cellulose fibers: bio- and nano-polymer composites. Springer, Berlin, pp 539–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chowdhuri AR, Das B, Kumar A, Tripathy S, Roy S, Sahu SK (2017) One-pot synthesis of multifunctional nanoscale metal-organic frameworks as an effective antibacterial agent against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nanotechnology 28:095102.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa57af CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Espanol L, Larrea A, Andreu V, Mendoza G, Arruebo M, Sebastian V, Prado MSA, Hackmann ERMK, Santoro MIRM, Santamari J (2016) Dual encapsulation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs in PLGA nanoparticles by a single-step method: drug delivery and cytotoxicity assays. RCS Adv 6:111060–111069.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA23620K Google Scholar
  13. Favi PM, Ospina SP, Kachole M, Gao M, Atehortua L, Webster TJ (2016) Preparation and characterization of biodegradable nano hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose composites with well-defined honeycomb pore arrays for bone tissue engineering applications. Cellulose 23:1263–1282.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0867-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fayyazbakhsh F, Hashjin MS, Keshtkar A, Shokrgozar MA, Dehghan MM, Larijani B (2017) Novel layered double hydroxides-hydroxyapatite/gelatin bone tissue engineering scaffolds: fabrication, characterization and in vivo study. Mater Sci Eng C 76:701–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fratoddi I, Venditti I, Cametti C, Palocci C, Chronopoulou L, Marino M, Acconcia F, Russo MV (2012) Functional polymeric nanoparticles for dexamethasone loading and release. Colloids Surf B 93:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu LH, Qi C, Liu YJ, Cao WT, Ma MG (2018) Sonochemical synthesis of cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and their application in protein adsorption. Sci Rep 8:8292–8304.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25566-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garai S, Sinha A (2014) Biomimetic nanocomposites of carboxymethyl cellulose-hydroxyapatite: novel three dimensional load bearing bone grafts. Colloids Surf B 115:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gentile P, Nandagiri VK, Daly J, Chiono V, Mattu C, Turo CT, Ciardelli G, Ramtool Z (2016) Localised controlled release of simvastatin from porous chitosan–gelatin scaffolds engrafted with simvastatin loaded PLGA-microparticles for bone tissue engineering application. Mater Sci Eng C 59:249–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghorbani F, Nojehdehianb H, Zamanian A (2016) Physicochemical and mechanical properties of freeze cast hydroxyapatite-gelatin scaffolds with dexamethasone loaded PLGA microspheres for hard tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 69:208–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gouma P, Xue R, Goldbeck CP, Perrotta P, Balázsi C (2012) Nano-hydroxyapatite—cellulose acetate composites for growing of bone cells. Mater Sci Eng C 32:607–612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo X, Xue L, Lv W, Liu Q, Rumin Li, Li Z, Wang J (2015) Facile synthesis of magnetic carboxymethylcellulose nanocarriers for pH-responsive delivery of doxorubicin. New J Chem 39:7340–7347.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ01190F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta N, Santhiya D (2017) Role of cellulose functionality in bio-inspired synthesis of nano bioactive glass. Mater Sci Eng C 75:1206–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammonds RL, Harrison MS, Cravanas TC, Gazzola WH, Stephens CP, Benson RS (2012) Biomimetic hydroxyapatite powder from a bacterial cellulose scaffold. Cellulose 19:1923–1932.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9767-4 Google Scholar
  24. He L, Li L, Zhang L, Xing S, Wang T, Li G, Wu X, Sua Z, Wang C (2014) ZIF-8 templated fabrication of rhombic dodecahedron-shaped ZnO@SiO2, ZIF-8@SiO2 yolk–shell and SiO2 hollow nanoparticles. CrystEngComm 16:6534–6537.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CE00755G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hur W, Park M, Lee JY, Kim MH, Lee SH, Park CG, Kim SN, Min HS, Min HJ, Chai JH, Lee SJ, Kim S, Choi TH, Choy YB (2016) Bioabsorbable bone plates enabled with local, sustained delivery of alendronate for bone regeneration. J Control Release 222:97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joshi MK, Pant HR, Tiwari AP, Maharjan B, Liao N, Kim HJ, Park CH, Kim CS (2016) Three-dimensional cellulose sponge: fabrication, characterization, biomimetic mineralization, and in vitro cell infiltration. Carbohydr Polym 136:154–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar AP, Mohaideen KK, Alariqi SAS, Singh RP (2010) Preparation and characterization of bioceramic nanocomposites based on hydroxyapatite (HA) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). Macromol Res 18:1160–1167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-010-1208-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuo ZK, Lai PL, Toh EKW, Weng CH, Tseng HW, Chang PZ, Chen CC, Cheng CM (2016) Osteogenic differentiation of preosteoblasts on a hemostatic gelatin sponge. Sci Rep 6:32884–32896.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leena RS, Vairamani M, Selvamurugan N (2017) Alginate/gelatin scaffolds incorporated with Silibinin-loaded Chitosan nanoparticles for bone formation in vitro. Colloids Surf B 158:308–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.06.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang K, Wang R, Boutter M, Doherty CM, Mulet X, Richardson JJ (2017) Biomimetic mineralization of metal-organic frameworks around polysaccharides. Chem Commun 53:1249–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CC09680H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lim HC, Nam OH, Kim M, Fiqi AE, Yun HM, Lee YM, Jin GZ, Lee HH, Kim HW, Kim EC (2016) Delivery of dexamethasone from bioactive nanofiber matrices stimulates odontogenesis of human dental pulp cells through integrin/BMP/mTOR signaling pathways. Int J Nanomed 11:2557–2567.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S97846 Google Scholar
  33. Liuyun J, Yubao L, Chengdong X (2009) A novel composite membrane of chitosan-carboxymethyl cellulose polyelectrolyte complex membrane filled with nano-hydroxyapatite I. Preparation and properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20:1645–1652.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3720-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin V, Bettencourt A (2018) Bone regeneration: biomaterials as local delivery systems with improved osteoinductive properties. Mater Sci Eng C 82:363–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mondal MIH (2019) Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. Springer, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mourino V, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds. J R Soc Interface 7:209–227.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mourino V, Cattalini JP, Roether JA, Dubey P, Roy I, Boccaccini AR (2013) Composite polymer-bioceramic scaffolds with drug delivery capability for bone tissue engineering. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 10:1353–1365.  https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2013.808183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadim A, Khorasani SN, Kharaziha M, Davoodi SM (2017) Design and characterization of dexamethasone-loaded poly (glycerol sebacate)-poly caprolactone/gelatin scaffold by coaxial electro spinning for soft tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 78:47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Narwade VN, Khairnar RS, Kokol V (2017) In-situ synthesised hydroxyapatite-loaded films based on cellulose nanofibrils for phenol removal from wastewater. Cellulose 24:4911–4925.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1435-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nishio Y (2006) Material functionalization of cellulose and related polysaccharides via diverse microcompositions. In: Klemm D (ed) Polysaccharides II. Advances in polymer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Park H, Kim MH, Yoon YI, Park WH (2017) One-pot synthesis of injectable methylcellulose hydrogel containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 157:775–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parulkar A, Brunelli NA (2017) High-yield synthesis of ZIF-8 nanoparticles using stoichiometric reactants in a jet-mixing reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:10384–10392.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pei Y, Ye D, Zhao Q, Wang X, Zhang C, Huang W, Zhang N, Liu S, Zhang L (2015) Effectively promoting wound healing with cellulose/gelatin sponges constructed directly from a cellulose solution. J Mater Chem B 3:7518–7528.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00477B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Porter JR, Ruckh TT, Popat KC (2009) Bone tissue engineering: a review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies. Biotechnol Prog 25:1539–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.246 Google Scholar
  45. Qi P, Ohba S, Hara Y, Fuke M, Ogawa T, Ohta S, Ito T (2018) Fabrication of calcium phosphate-loaded carboxymethyl cellulose non-woven sheets for bone regeneration. Carbohydr Polym 189:322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Qiu K, Chen B, Nie W, Zhou X, Feng W, Wang W, Chen L, Mo X, Wei Y, He C (2016) Electrophoretic deposition of dexamethasone-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles onto poly(L–lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone) composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:4137–4148.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ran J, Zeng H, Cai J, Jiang P, Yan P, Zheng L, Bai Y, Shen X, Shi B, Tong H (2018) Rational design of a stable, effective, and sustained dexamethasone delivery platform on a titanium implant: an innovative application of metal organic frameworks in bone implants. Chem Eng J 333:20–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rubler A, Sakakibara K, Rosenau T (2011) Cellulose as matrix component of conducting films. Cellulose 18:937–944.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9555-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rumian L, Tiainen H, Cibor U, Borkowicz MK, Wloch MB, Haugen HJ, Pamula E (2016) Ceramic scaffolds enriched with gentamicin loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles for prevention and treatment of bone tissue infections. Mater Sci Eng C 69:856–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salama A, Sakhawy ME, Kamel S (2016) Carboxymethyl cellulose based hybrid material for sustained release of protein drugs. Int J Biol Macromol 93:1647–1652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sarkar C, Kumari P, Anuvrat K, Sahu SK, Chakraborty J, Garai S (2018) Synthesis and characterization of mechanically strong carboxymethyl cellulose–gelatin–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for load-bearing orthopedic application. J Mater Sci 53:230–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1528-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Silva RF, Sasso GRS, Cerri ES, Simoes MJ, Cerri PS (2015) Biology of bone tissue: Structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. BioMed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/421746 Google Scholar
  53. Son JS, Appleford M, Ong JL, Wenke JC, Kim JM, Choi SH, Oh DS (2011) Porous hydroxyapatite scaffold with three-dimensional localized drug delivery system using biodegradable microspheres. J Control Release 153:133–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Subhapradha N, Abudhahir M, Aathira A, Srinivasan N, Moorthi A (2018) Polymer coated mesoporous ceramic for drug delivery in bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 110:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Varma DM, Gold GT, Taub PJ, Nicoll SB (2014) Injectable carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels for soft tissue filler applications. Acta Biomater 10:4996–5004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KWK, Liu C, Yang X (2014) Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng R 80:1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wuttke S, Lismont M, Escudero A, Rungtaweevoranit B, Parak WJ (2017) Positioning metal-organic framework nanoparticles within the context of drug delivery—a comparison with mesoporous silica nanoparticles and dendrimers. Biomaterials 123:172–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu F, Yin M, Wu Y, Ding H, Song F, Wang J (2014) Effects of drying methods on the preparation of dexamethasone-loaded chitosan microspheres. Biomed Mater 9:055003.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/9/5/055003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yao MZ, Huang-Fu MY, Liu HN, Wang XR, Sheng X, Gao JQ (2016) Fabrication and characterization of drug-loaded nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 scaffolds modified with carbon nanotubes and silk fibroin. Int J Nanomed 11:6181–6194.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S106929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang B, Li H, He L, Han Z, Zhou T, Zhi W, Lu X, Lu X, Weng J (2018) Surface-decorated hydroxyapatite scaffold with on-demand delivery of dexamethasone and stromal cell derived factor-1 for enhanced osteogensis. Mater Sci Eng C 89:355–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhou X, Feng W, Qiu K, Chen L, Wang W, Nie W, Mo X, He C (2015) BMP-2 derived peptide and dexamethasone incorporated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:15777–15789.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b02636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology (ISM)DhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Advanced Material and Processes DivisionCSIR-National Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Mahila CollegeKolhan UniversityChaibasaIndia
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology, MadrasChennaiIndia
  5. 5.CSIR-Central Glass and Ceramic Research InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations