Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–28 | Cite as

Recent progress in bio-based aerogel absorbents for oil/water separation

  • Wen-Jie Yang
  • Anthony Chun Yin Yuen
  • Ao Li
  • Bo Lin
  • Timothy Bo Yuan Chen
  • Wei YangEmail author
  • Hong-Dian Lu
  • Guan Heng Yeoh
Review Paper
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Crude oil leakage from tankers, offshore platforms, drilling rigs and wells, causing severe pollution to the environment has led to irreversible damage to ocean habitat and inhabitants. It has become one of the greatest global environmental concerns which has recently attracted major public awareness. In addition, the contamination of sea and inhabitants. It has significantly harmed the fishing and seafood industry, and even raises health and life issues for millions of human beings. Until now, there is still no viable and practical method to effectively reduce the damage from crude oil spill. This has attracted numerous researchers’ attention. For developing an environmentally friendly and cost-effective polymer absorbent for oil spill cleaning. Recently, among all the efforts, it is proven that biomass aerogel can be used as an outstanding absorbent for oil–water separation, which is a feasible solution for tackling the crude oil issue. In this article, a comprehensive review on the current state-of-art for biomass-based aerogels utilised in the field of oil/water separation is provided. This includes the preparation procedures, fabrication processes, and the categorisation of various types of aerogels. Additionally, the future direction and technological advancement will be discussed in detail.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Bio-based aerogel Carbon-based aerogel Oil/water separation Cellulose Chitosan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51403048 and 51276054), Talent Scientific Research Foundation of Hefei University (16-17RC07) and Australian Research Council Industrial Training Transformation Centre (ARC IC170100032).

References

  1. Araby S, Qiu A, Wang R, Zhao Z, Wang C-H, Ma J (2016) Aerogels based on carbon nanomaterials. J Mater Sci 51:9157–9189Google Scholar
  2. Arboleda JC, Hughes M, Lucia LA, Laine J, Ekman K, Rojas OJ (2013) Soy protein–nanocellulose composite aerogels. Cellulose 20:2417–2426Google Scholar
  3. Bi H et al (2014) Carbon microbelt aerogel prepared by waste paper: an efficient and recyclable sorbent for oils and organic solvents. Small 10:3544–3550Google Scholar
  4. Cai T, Wang H, Jin C, Sun Q, Nie Y (2018) Fabrication of nitrogen-doped porous electrically conductive carbon aerogel from waste cabbage for supercapacitors and oil/water separation. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29:4334–4344Google Scholar
  5. Calcagnile P, Caputo I, Cannoletta D, Bettini S, Valli L, Demitri C (2017) A bio-based composite material for water remediation from oily contaminants. Mater Des 134:374–382Google Scholar
  6. Cao N, Lyu Q, Li J, Wang Y, Yang B, Szunerits S, Boukherroub R (2017) Facile synthesis of fluorinated polydopamine/chitosan/reduced graphene oxide composite aerogel for efficient oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 326:17–28Google Scholar
  7. Cervin NT, Aulin C, Larsson PT, Wågberg L (2011) Ultra porous nanocellulose aerogels as separation medium for mixtures of oil/water liquids. Cellulose 19:401–410Google Scholar
  8. Cervin NT, Johansson E, Larsson PA, Wagberg L (2016) Strong, water-durable, and wet-resilient cellulose nanofibril-stabilized foams from oven drying. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:11682–11689Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhary JP, Vadodariya N, Nataraj SK, Meena R (2015) Chitosan-based aerogel membrane for robust oil-in-water emulsion separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:24957–24962Google Scholar
  10. Chen W et al (2014) Comparative study of aerogels obtained from differently prepared nanocellulose fibers. Chemsuschem 7:154–161Google Scholar
  11. Chen B, Ma Q, Tan C, Lim T-T, Huang L, Zhang H (2015) Carbon-based sorbents with three-dimensional architectures for water remediation. Small 11:3319–3336Google Scholar
  12. Chen W et al (2016) Sustainable carbon aerogels derived from nanofibrillated cellulose as high-performance absorption materials. Adv Mater Interfaces 3:1600004Google Scholar
  13. Chen C, Li F, Zhang Y, Wang B, Fan Y, Wang X, Sun R (2018) Compressive, ultralight and fire-resistant lignin-modified graphene aerogels as recyclable absorbents for oil and organic solvents. Chem Eng J 350:173–180Google Scholar
  14. Cheng H, Gu B, Pennefather MP, Nguyen TX, Phan-Thien N, Duong HM (2017) Cotton aerogels and cotton-cellulose aerogels from environmental waste for oil spillage cleanup. Mater Des 130:452–458Google Scholar
  15. Chin SF, Binti Romainor AN, Pang SC (2014) Fabrication of hydrophobic and magnetic cellulose aerogel with high oil absorption capacity. Mater Lett 115:241–243Google Scholar
  16. Dai J et al (2018) 3D macroscopic superhydrophobic magnetic porous carbon aerogel converted from biorenewable popcorn for selective oil-water separation. Mater Des 139:122–131Google Scholar
  17. Dai J et al (2019) TiO2-alginate composite aerogels as novel oil/water separation and wastewater remediation filters. Compos Part B Eng 160:480–487Google Scholar
  18. De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2017) Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem Mater 29:4609–4631Google Scholar
  19. de Oliveira PB, Godinho M, Zattera AJ (2018) Oils sorption on hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogel obtained from the wood furniture industry waste. Cellulose 25:3105–3119Google Scholar
  20. Deuber F, Mousavi S, Federer L, Adlhart C (2017) Amphiphilic nanofiber-based aerogels for selective liquid absorption from electrospun biopolymers. Adv Mater Interfaces 4:1700065Google Scholar
  21. Duan B, Gao H, He M, Zhang L (2014) Hydrophobic modification on surface of chitin sponges for highly effective separation of oil. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:19933–19942Google Scholar
  22. Durgadevi N, Swarnalatha V (2017) Polythiophene functionalized hydrophobic cellulose kitchen wipe sponge and cellulose fabric for effective oil–water separation. RSC Adv 7:34866–34874Google Scholar
  23. Escudero RR, Robitzer M, Di Renzo F, Quignard F (2009) Alginate aerogels as absorbents of polar molecules from liquid hydrocarbons: hexanol as probe molecule. Carbohydr Polym 75:52–57Google Scholar
  24. Fan P et al (2017) Facile and green fabrication of cellulosed based aerogels for lampblack filtration from waste newspaper. Carbohydr Polym 162:108–114Google Scholar
  25. Fan B et al (2018a) Natural cellulose nanofiber extracted from cell wall of bamboo leaf and its derived multifunctional aerogel. Polym Compos 39:3869–3876Google Scholar
  26. Fan J et al (2018b) Robust nanofibrillated cellulose hydro/aerogels from benign solution/solvent exchange treatment. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:6624–6634Google Scholar
  27. Feng J, Nguyen ST, Fan Z, Duong HM (2015) Advanced fabrication and oil absorption properties of super-hydrophobic recycled cellulose aerogels. Chem Eng J 270:168–175Google Scholar
  28. Gao Y et al (2014) Highly efficient and recyclable carbon soot sponge for oil cleanup. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5924–5929Google Scholar
  29. Gao R, Lu Y, Xiao S, Li J (2017) Facile fabrication of nanofibrillated chitin/Ag2O heterostructured aerogels with high iodine capture efficiency. Sci Rep 7:4303Google Scholar
  30. Gao R et al (2018) Mussel adhesive-inspired design of superhydrophobic nanofibrillated cellulose aerogels for oil/water separation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:9047–9055Google Scholar
  31. Guan H, Cheng Z, Wang X (2018) Highly compressible wood sponges with a spring-like lamellar structure as effective and reusable oil absorbents. ACS Nano 12:10365–10373Google Scholar
  32. Guo X, Qu L, Zhu S, Tian M, Zhang X, Sun K, Tang X (2016) Preparation of three-dimensional chitosan-graphene oxide aerogel for residue oil removal. Water Environ Res 88:768–778Google Scholar
  33. Gupta S, Tai N-H (2016) Carbon materials as oil sorbents: a review on the synthesis and performance. J Mater Chem A 4:1550–1565Google Scholar
  34. He Z, Zhang X, Batchelor W (2016) Cellulose nanofibre aerogel filter with tuneable pore structure for oil/water separation and recovery. RSC Adv 6:21435–21438Google Scholar
  35. He J, Zhao H, Li X, Su D, Zhang F, Ji H, Liu R (2018) Superelastic and superhydrophobic bacterial cellulose/silica aerogels with hierarchical cellular structure for oil absorption and recovery. J Hazard Mater 346:199–207Google Scholar
  36. Hou P et al (2019) Hollow carbon spheres/graphene hybrid aerogels as high-performance absorbents for organic pollution. Sep Purif Technol 213:524–532Google Scholar
  37. Hüsing N, Schubert U (1998) Aerogels—airy materials: chemistry, structure, and properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 37:22–45Google Scholar
  38. Jiang F, Hsieh YL (2017) Cellulose nanofibril aerogels: synergistic improvement of hydrophobicity, strength, and thermal stability via cross-linking with diisocyanate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:2825–2834Google Scholar
  39. Jiang F, Hsieh Y-L (2018) Dual wet and dry resilient cellulose II fibrous aerogel for hydrocarbon–water separation and energy storage applications. ACS Omega 3:3530–3539Google Scholar
  40. Jiang J, Zhu J, Zhang Q, Zhan X, Chen F (2019a) A shape recovery zwitterionic bacterial cellulose aerogel with superior performances for water remediation. Langmuir.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04180 Google Scholar
  41. Jiang J, Zhang Q, Zhan X, Chen F (2019b) A multifunctional gelatin-based aerogel with superior pollutants adsorption, oil/water separation and photocatalytic properties. Chem Eng J 358:1539–1551Google Scholar
  42. Jiao Y, Wan C, Li J (2016a) Synthesis of carbon fiber aerogel from natural bamboo fiber and its application as a green high-efficiency and recyclable absorbent. Mater Des 107:26–32Google Scholar
  43. Jiao Y, Wan C, Qiang T, Li J (2016b) Synthesis of superhydrophobic ultralight aerogels from nanofibrillated cellulose isolated from natural reed for high-performance absorbents. Appl Phys A 122:686Google Scholar
  44. Jing Z, Ding J, Zhang T, Yang D, Qiu F, Chen Q, Xu J (2019) Flexible, versatility and superhydrophobic biomass carbon aerogels derived from corn bracts for efficient oil/water separation. Food Bioprod Process 115:134–142Google Scholar
  45. Kildeeva NR, Perminov PA, Vladimirov LV, Novikov VV, Mikhailov SN (2009) About mechanism of chitosan cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. Russ J Bioorgan Chem 35:360–369Google Scholar
  46. Kim CH, Youn HJ, Lee HL (2015) Preparation of cross-linked cellulose nanofibril aerogel with water absorbency and shape recovery. Cellulose 22:3715–3724Google Scholar
  47. Kim CH, Youn HJ, Lee HL (2017) Preparation of surface-charged CNF aerogels and investigation of their ion adsorption properties. Cellulose 24:2895–2902Google Scholar
  48. Kim U-J, Kim D, You J, Choi JW, Kimura S, Wada M (2018) Preparation of cellulose–chitosan foams using an aqueous lithium bromide solution and their adsorption ability for Congo red. Cellulose 25:2615–2628Google Scholar
  49. Kistler SS (1931) Coherent expanded and aerdgels and jellies. Nature 127:741Google Scholar
  50. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem 50:5438–5466Google Scholar
  51. Koebel M, Rigacci A, Achard P (2012) Aerogel-based thermal superinsulation: an overview. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 63:315–339Google Scholar
  52. Korhonen JT, Kettunen M, Ras RH, Ikkala O (2011) Hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogels as floating, sustainable, reusable, and recyclable oil absorbents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1813–1816Google Scholar
  53. Laitinen O, Suopajarvi T, Osterberg M, Liimatainen H (2017) Hydrophobic, superabsorbing aerogels from choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvent pretreated and silylated cellulose nanofibrils for selective oil removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:25029–25037Google Scholar
  54. Lei E, Li W, Ma C, Liu S (2018) An ultra-lightweight recyclable carbon aerogel from bleached softwood kraft pulp for efficient oil and organic absorption. Mater Chem Phys 214:291–296Google Scholar
  55. Li Y-Q, Samad YA, Polychronopoulou K, Alhassan SM, Liao K (2014) Carbon aerogel from winter melon for highly efficient and recyclable oils and organic solvents absorption. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1492–1497Google Scholar
  56. Li A, Lin R, Lin C, He B, Zheng T, Lu L, Cao Y (2016a) An environment-friendly and multi-functional absorbent from chitosan for organic pollutants and heavy metal ion. Carbohydr Polym 148:272–280Google Scholar
  57. Li Y, Zhang H, Fan M, Zhuang J, Chen L (2016b) A robust salt-tolerant superoleophobic aerogel inspired by seaweed for efficient oil-water separation in marine environments. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:25394–25400Google Scholar
  58. Li L, Hu T, Sun H, Zhang J, Wang A (2017) Pressure-sensitive and conductive carbon aerogels from poplars catkins for selective oil absorption and oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:18001–18007Google Scholar
  59. Li Y, Liu X, Cai W, Cao Y, Sun Y, Tan F (2018a) Preparation of corn straw based spongy aerogel for spillage oil capture. Korean J Chem Eng 35:1119–1127Google Scholar
  60. Li Z, Qiu J, Shi Y, Pei C (2018b) Wettability-switchable bacterial cellulose/polyhemiaminal nanofiber aerogels for continuous and effective oil/water separation. Cellulose 25:2987–2996Google Scholar
  61. Li Z, Shao L, Hu W, Zheng T, Lu L, Cao Y, Chen Y (2018c) Excellent reusable chitosan/cellulose aerogel as an oil and organic solvent absorbent. Carbohydr Polym 191:183–190Google Scholar
  62. Li Z, Shao L, Ruan Z, Hu W, Lu L, Chen Y (2018d) Converting untreated waste office paper and chitosan into aerogel absorbent for the removal of heavy metal ions. Carbohydr Polym 193:221–227Google Scholar
  63. Li N, Yue Q, Gao B, Xu X, Su R, Yu B (2019a) One-step synthesis of peanut hull/graphene aerogel for highly efficient oil-water separation. J Clean Prod 207:764–771Google Scholar
  64. Li Y, Zhu L, Grishkewich N, Tam KC, Yuan J, Mao Z, Sui X (2019b) CO2-responsive cellulose nanofibers aerogels for switchable oil–water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:9367–9373Google Scholar
  65. Li Y et al (2019c) Bio-inspired and assembled fungal hyphae/carbon nanotubes aerogel for water–oil separation. Nanotechnology 30:275601Google Scholar
  66. Liao Q, Su X, Zhu W, Hua W, Qian Z, Liu L, Yao J (2016) Flexible and durable cellulose aerogels for highly effective oil/water separation. RSC Adv 6:63773–63781Google Scholar
  67. Lin R, Li A, Zheng T, Lu L, Cao Y (2015) Hydrophobic and flexible cellulose aerogel as an efficient, green and reusable oil sorbent. RSC Adv 5:82027–82033Google Scholar
  68. Liu H, Wang A, Xu X, Wang M, Shang S, Liu S, Song J (2016) Porous aerogels prepared by crosslinking of cellulose with 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether in NaOH/urea solution. RSC Adv 6:42854–42862Google Scholar
  69. Liu B, Zhang L, Wang H, Bian Z (2017a) Preparation of MCC/MC silica sponge and its oil/water separation apparatus application. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:5795–5801Google Scholar
  70. Liu S, Yao F, Oderinde O, Zhang Z, Fu G (2017b) Green synthesis of oriented xanthan gum-graphene oxide hybrid aerogels for water purification. Carbohydr Polym 174:392–399Google Scholar
  71. Liu Y, Peng Y, Zhang T, Qiu F, Yuan D (2018) Superhydrophobic, ultralight and flexible biomass carbon aerogels derived from sisal fibers for highly efficient oil–water separation. Cellulose 25:3067–3078Google Scholar
  72. Lu Y, Yuan W (2017) Superhydrophobic/superoleophilic and reinforced ethyl cellulose sponges for oil/water separation: synergistic strategies of cross-linking, carbon nanotube composite, and nanosilica modification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:29167–29176Google Scholar
  73. Lu Y, Yuan W (2018) Superhydrophobic three-dimensional porous ethyl cellulose absorbent with micro/nano-scale hierarchical structures for highly efficient removal of oily contaminants from water. Carbohydr Polym 191:86–94Google Scholar
  74. Lu Y et al (2016) Coherent-interface-assembled Ag2O-anchored nanofibrillated cellulose porous aerogels for radioactive iodine capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:29179–29185Google Scholar
  75. Lu Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Yuan W (2017) Environmental-friendly and magnetic/silanized ethyl cellulose sponges as effective and recyclable oil-absorption materials. Carbohydr Polym 173:422–430Google Scholar
  76. Lu Y, Niu Z, Yuan W (2019) Multifunctional magnetic superhydrophobic carbonaceous aerogel with micro/nano-scale hierarchical structures for environmental remediation and energy storage. Appl Surf Sci 480:851–860Google Scholar
  77. Luo H, Xie J, Wang J, Yao F, Yang Z, Wan Y (2018) Step-by-step self-assembly of 2D few-layer reduced graphene oxide into 3D architecture of bacterial cellulose for a robust, ultralight, and recyclable all-carbon absorbent. Carbon 139:824–832Google Scholar
  78. Ma H, Wang S, Meng F, Xu X, Huo X (2016) A hydrazone-carboxyl ligand-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogel with high elasticity and fast oil/water separation. Cellulose 24:797–809Google Scholar
  79. Ma Q, Yu Y, Sindoro M, Fane AG, Wang R, Zhang H (2017) Carbon-based functional materials derived from waste for water remediation and energy storage. Adv Mater 29:1605361Google Scholar
  80. Ma S, Zhang M, Nie J, Tan J, Song S, Luo Y (2019) Lightweight and porous cellulose-based foams with high loadings of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks-8 for adsorption applications. Carbohydr Polym 208:328–335Google Scholar
  81. Maleki H (2016) Recent advances in aerogels for environmental remediation applications: a review. Chem Eng J 300:98–118Google Scholar
  82. Maleki H, Whitmore L, Husing N (2018) Novel multifunctional polymethylsilsesquioxane-silk fibroin aerogel hybrids for environmental and thermal insulation applications. J Mater Chem A 6:12598–12612Google Scholar
  83. Meng Y, Young TM, Liu P, Contescu CI, Huang B, Wang S (2015) Ultralight carbon aerogel from nanocellulose as a highly selective oil absorption material. Cellulose 22:435–447Google Scholar
  84. Meng G, Peng H, Wu J, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Guo X (2017) Fabrication of superhydrophobic cellulose/chitosan composite aerogel for oil/water separation. Fibers Polym 18:706–712Google Scholar
  85. Mi H-Y, Jing X, Huang H-X, Peng X-F, Turng L-S (2018a) Superhydrophobic graphene/cellulose/silica aerogel with hierarchical structure as superabsorbers for high efficiency selective oil absorption and recovery. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:1745–1755Google Scholar
  86. Mi H-Y, Jing X, Politowicz AL, Chen E, Huang H-X, Turng L-S (2018b) Highly compressible ultra-light anisotropic cellulose/graphene aerogel fabricated by bidirectional freeze drying for selective oil absorption. Carbon 132:199–209Google Scholar
  87. Mulyadi A, Zhang Z, Deng Y (2016) Fluorine-free oil absorbents made from cellulose nanofibril aerogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:2732–2740Google Scholar
  88. Nguyen ST, Feng J, Le NT, Le ATT, Hoang N, Tan VBC, Duong HM (2013) Cellulose aerogel from paper waste for crude oil spill cleaning. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:18386–18391Google Scholar
  89. Nguyen ST, Feng J, Ng SK, Wong JPW, Tan VBC, Duong HM (2014) Advanced thermal insulation and absorption properties of recycled cellulose aerogels. Colloids Surf A 445:128–134Google Scholar
  90. Peng H et al (2016a) Preparation of superhydrophobic magnetic cellulose sponge for removing oil from water. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:832–838Google Scholar
  91. Peng H, Wu J, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Shi Y, Guo X (2016b) A facile approach for preparation of underwater superoleophobicity cellulose/chitosan composite aerogel for oil/water separation. Appl Phys A 122:516Google Scholar
  92. Phanthong P et al (2018) Fabrication and evaluation of nanocellulose sponge for oil/water separation. Carbohydr Polym 190:184–189Google Scholar
  93. Priyanka M, Saravanakumar MP (2018) Ultrahigh adsorption capacity of starch derived zinc based carbon foam for adsorption of toxic dyes and its preliminary investigation on oil-water separation. J Clean Prod 197:511–524Google Scholar
  94. Rafieian F, Hosseini M, Jonoobi M, Yu Q (2018) Development of hydrophobic nanocellulose-based aerogel via chemical vapor deposition for oil separation for water treatment. Cellulose 25:4695–4710Google Scholar
  95. Rechberger F, Niederberger M (2017) Synthesis of aerogels: from molecular routes to 3-dimensional nanoparticle assembly. Nanoscale Horiz 2:6–30Google Scholar
  96. Ren W, Gao J, Lei C, Xie Y, Cai Y, Ni Q, Yao J (2018) Recyclable metal-organic framework/cellulose aerogels for activating peroxymonosulfate to degrade organic pollutants. Chem Eng J 349:766–774Google Scholar
  97. Sai H et al (2013) Flexible aerogels based on an interpenetrating network of bacterial cellulose and silica by a non-supercritical drying process. J Mater Chem A 1:7963Google Scholar
  98. Sai H et al (2014) Flexible aerogels with interpenetrating network structure of bacterial cellulose–silica composite from sodium silicate precursor via freeze drying process. RSC Adv 4:30453Google Scholar
  99. Sai H, Fu R, Xing L, Xiang J, Li Z, Li F, Zhang T (2015) Surface modification of bacterial cellulose aerogels’ web-like skeleton for oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:7373–7381Google Scholar
  100. Saleem J, Adil Riaz M (2018) Oil sorbents from plastic wastes and polymers: a review. J Hazard Mater 341:424–437Google Scholar
  101. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494Google Scholar
  102. Sirviö JA, Visanko M, Liimatainen H (2016) Synthesis of imidazolium-crosslinked chitosan aerogel and its prospect as a dye removing absorbent. RSC Adv 6:56544–56548Google Scholar
  103. Song S, Zhang Y (2017) Construction of a 3D multiple network skeleton by the thiol-Michael addition click reaction to fabricate novel polymer/graphene aerogels with exceptional thermal conductivity and mechanical properties. J Mater Chem A 5:22352–22360Google Scholar
  104. Su C, Yang H, Zhao H, Liu Y, Chen R (2017) Recyclable and biodegradable superhydrophobic and superoleophilic chitosan sponge for the effective removal of oily pollutants from water. Chem Eng J 330:423–432Google Scholar
  105. Sun F, Liu W, Dong Z, Deng Y (2017) Underwater superoleophobicity cellulose nanofibril aerogel through regioselective sulfonation for oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 330:774–782Google Scholar
  106. Tan S, Xie Q, Lu X, Zhao N, Zhang X, Xu J (2008) One step preparation of superhydrophobic polymeric surface with polystyrene under ambient atmosphere. J Colloid Interface Sci 322:1–5Google Scholar
  107. Thanikaivelan P, Narayanan NT, Pradhan BK, Ajayan PM (2012) Collagen based magnetic nanocomposites for oil removal applications. Sci Rep 2:230Google Scholar
  108. Vadodariya N, Meena R (2019) Protein-functionalized aerogel membranes for gravity-driven separation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:4814–4820Google Scholar
  109. Wan W, Lin Y, Prakash A, Zhou Y (2016) Three-dimensional carbon-based architectures for oil remediation from synthesis and modification to functionalization. J Mater Chem A 4:18687–18705Google Scholar
  110. Wang J, Liu S (2019) Remodeling of raw cotton fiber into flexible, squeezing-resistant macroporous cellulose aerogel with high oil retention capability for oil/water separation. Sep Purif Technol 221:303–310Google Scholar
  111. Wang Y et al (2014) Ultra-light nanocomposite aerogels of bacterial cellulose and reduced graphene oxide for specific absorption and separation of organic liquids. RSC Adv 4:21553Google Scholar
  112. Wang Y, Xia G, Wu C, Sun J, Song R, Huang W (2015) Porous chitosan doped with graphene oxide as highly effective absorbent for methyl orange and amido black 10B. Carbohydr Polym 115:686–693Google Scholar
  113. Wang J et al (2016a) Ultrasoft gelatin aerogels for oil contaminant removal. J Mater Chem A 4:9381–9389Google Scholar
  114. Wang Z, Jin P, Wang M, Wu G, Dong C, Wu A (2016b) Biomass-derived porous carbonaceous aerogel as sorbent for oil-spill remediation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:32862–32868Google Scholar
  115. Wang M et al (2017a) Hierarchical porous chitosan sponges as robust and recyclable absorbents for anionic dye adsorption. Sci Rep 7:18054Google Scholar
  116. Wang Y et al (2017b) Multifunctional bionanocomposite foams with a chitosan matrix reinforced by nanofibrillated cellulose. ChemNanoMat 3:98–108Google Scholar
  117. Wang Y, Zhu L, Zhu F, You L, Shen X, Li S (2017c) Removal of organic solvents/oils using carbon aerogels derived from waste durian shell. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 78:351–358Google Scholar
  118. Wang D, Yu H, Fan X, Gu J, Ye S, Yao J, Ni Q (2018a) High aspect ratio carboxylated cellulose nanofibers cross-linked to robust aerogels for superabsorption–flocculants: paving way from nanoscale to macroscale. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:20755–20766Google Scholar
  119. Wang H, Chen Y, Dang B, Shen X, Jin C, Sun Q, Pei J (2018b) Ultrafine Mn ferrite by anchoring in a cellulose framework for efficient toxic ions capture and fast water/oil separation. Carbohydr Polym 195:117–125Google Scholar
  120. Wang K, Liu X, Tan Y, Zhang W, Zhang S, Li J (2019a) Two-dimensional membrane and three-dimensional bulk aerogel materials via top-down wood nanotechnology for multibehavioral and reusable oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 371:769–780Google Scholar
  121. Wang Y, Feng Y, Yao J (2019b) Construction of hydrophobic alginate-based foams induced by zirconium ions for oil and organic solvent cleanup. J Colloid Interface Sci 533:182–189Google Scholar
  122. Wang Z, Song L, Wang Y, Zhang X-F, Hao D, Feng Y (2019c) Lightweight UiO-66/cellulose aerogels constructed through self-crosslinking strategy for adsorption applications. Chem Eng J 371:138–144Google Scholar
  123. Wei X, Huang T, Yang JH, Zhang N, Wang Y, Zhou ZW (2017) Green synthesis of hybrid graphene oxide/microcrystalline cellulose aerogels and their use as superabsorbents. J Hazard Mater 335:28–38Google Scholar
  124. Wikipedia (2019) Deepwater Horizon oil spill. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
  125. Wu Z et al (2017) Thiol–ene click reaction on cellulose sponge and its application for oil/water separation. RSC Adv 7:20147–20151Google Scholar
  126. Xiao S, Gao R, Lu Y, Li J, Sun Q (2015) Fabrication and characterization of nanofibrillated cellulose and its aerogels from natural pine needles. Carbohydr Polym 119:202–209Google Scholar
  127. Xiao J, Lv W, Song Y, Zheng Q (2018) Graphene/nanofiber aerogels: performance regulation towards multiple applications in dye adsorption and oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 338:202–210Google Scholar
  128. Xie S, Huang S, Wei W, Yang X, Liu Y, Lu X, Tong Y (2016) Chitosan waste-derived Co and N Co-doped carbon electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. ChemElectroChem 2:1806–1812Google Scholar
  129. Xu Z, Jiang X, Zhou H, Li J (2017a) Preparation of magnetic hydrophobic polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)–cellulose nanofiber (CNF) aerogels as effective oil absorbents. Cellulose 25:1217–1227Google Scholar
  130. Xu Z, Zhou H, Jiang X, Li J, Huang F (2017b) Facile synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/trimethyl chlorosilane-coated cellulose nanofibres aerogel for oil absorption. IET Nanobiotechnol 11:929–934Google Scholar
  131. Xu T, Wang Z, Ding Y, Xu W, Wu W, Zhu Z, Fong H (2018a) Ultralight electrospun cellulose sponge with super-high capacity on absorption of organic compounds. Carbohydr Polym 179:164–172Google Scholar
  132. Xu Z, Zhou H, Tan S, Jiang X, Wu W, Shi J, Chen P (2018b) Ultralight super-hydrophobic carbon aerogels based on cellulose nanofibers/poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide (CNFs/PVA/GO) for highly effective oil-water separation. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:508–519Google Scholar
  133. Xu X et al (2019) Preparation and characterization of cellulose grafted with epoxidized soybean oil aerogels for oil-absorbing materials. J Agric Food Chem 67:637–643Google Scholar
  134. Yang X, Cranston ED (2014) Chemically cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels with shape recovery and superabsorbent properties. Chem Mater 26:6016–6025Google Scholar
  135. Yang S, Chen L, Mu L, Hao B, Ma P-C (2015) Low cost carbon fiber aerogel derived from bamboo for the adsorption of oils and organic solvents with excellent performances. RSC Adv 5:38470–38478Google Scholar
  136. Yang H, Sheikhi A, van de Ven TG (2016) Reusable green aerogels from cross-linked hairy nanocrystalline cellulose and modified chitosan for dye removal. Langmuir 32:11771–11779Google Scholar
  137. Yang J, Xia Y, Xu P, Chen B (2018a) Super-elastic and highly hydrophobic/superoleophilic sodium alginate/cellulose aerogel for oil/water separation. Cellulose 25:3533–3544Google Scholar
  138. Yang J, Xu P, Xia Y, Chen B (2018b) Multifunctional carbon aerogels from typha orientalis for oil/water separation and simultaneous removal of oil-soluble pollutants. Cellulose 25:5863–5875Google Scholar
  139. Yang W et al (2018c) Fabrication of fully bio-based aerogels via microcrystalline cellulose and hydroxyapatite nanorods with highly effective flame-retardant properties. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:1921–1931Google Scholar
  140. Yang W et al (2018d) Novel 3D network architectured hybrid aerogel comprising epoxy, graphene, and hydroxylated boron nitride nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:40032–40043Google Scholar
  141. Yang X, Ma J, Ling J, Li N, Wang D, Yue F, Xu S (2018e) Cellulose acetate-based SiO2/TiO2 hybrid microsphere composite aerogel films for water-in-oil emulsion separation. Appl Surf Sci 435:609–616Google Scholar
  142. Yang X, Xie Y, Wang Y, Qi W, Huang R, Su R, He Z (2018f) Self-assembled microporous peptide-polysaccharide aerogels for oil–water separation. Langmuir 34:10732–10738Google Scholar
  143. Yang W et al (2019) Pectin-assisted dispersion of exfoliated boron nitride nanosheets for assembled bio-composite aerogels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 119:196–205Google Scholar
  144. Yin A, Xu F, Zhang X (2016) Fabrication of biomass-derived carbon aerogels with high adsorption of oils and organic solvents: effect of hydrothermal and post-pyrolysis processes. Materials 9:758Google Scholar
  145. Yu M, Han Y, Li J, Wang L (2018) Magnetic carbon aerogel pyrolysis from sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/sodium montmorillonite composite aerogel for removal of organic contamination. J Porous Mater 25:657–664Google Scholar
  146. Yu L, Zhang Z, Tang H, Zhou J (2019) Fabrication of hydrophobic cellulosic materials via gas–solid silylation reaction for oil/water separation. Cellulose 26:4021–4037Google Scholar
  147. Yuan W et al (2017) Ultra-lightweight and highly porous carbon aerogels from bamboo pulp fibers as an effective sorbent for water treatment. Results Phys 7:2919–2924Google Scholar
  148. Yuan D, Zhang T, Guo Q, Qiu F, Yang D, Ou Z (2018a) Recyclable biomass carbon@SiO2@MnO2 aerogel with hierarchical structures for fast and selective oil-water separation. Chem Eng J 351:622–630Google Scholar
  149. Yuan D, Zhang T, Guo Q, Qiu F, Yang D, Ou Z (2018b) Superhydrophobic hierarchical biomass carbon aerogel assembled with TiO2 nanorods for selective immiscible oil/water mixture and emulsion separation. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:14758–14766Google Scholar
  150. Yue X, Zhang T, Yang D, Qiu F, Li Z (2018) Hybrid aerogels derived from banana peel and waste paper for efficient oil absorption and emulsion separation. J Clean Prod 199:411–419Google Scholar
  151. Yun L, Zhao J, Kang X, Du Y, Yuan X, Hou X (2017) Preparation and properties of monolithic and hydrophobic gelatin–silica composite aerogels for oil absorption. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 83:197–206Google Scholar
  152. Zahed MA, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Mohajeri L, Mohajeri S (2010) Optimal conditions for bioremediation of oily seawater. Bioresour Technol 101:9455–9460Google Scholar
  153. Zanata DDM, Battirola LC, Goncalves MDC (2018) Chemically cross-linked aerogels based on cellulose nanocrystals and polysilsesquioxane. Cellulose 25:7225–7238Google Scholar
  154. Zanini M, Lavoratti A, Lazzari LK, Galiotto D, Pagnocelli M, Baldasso C, Zattera AJ (2017) Producing aerogels from silanized cellulose nanofiber suspension. Cellulose 24:769–779Google Scholar
  155. Zhai T, Zheng Q, Cai Z, Xia H, Gong S (2016) Synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose nanofibril hybrid aerogel microspheres and their use as oil/solvent superabsorbents. Carbohydr Polym 148:300–308Google Scholar
  156. Zhang X, Li Z, Liu K, Jiang L (2013) Bioinspired multifunctional foam with self-cleaning and oil/water separation. Adv Funct Mater 23:2881–2886Google Scholar
  157. Zhang Z, Sèbe G, Rentsch D, Zimmermann T, Tingaut P (2014) Ultralightweight and flexible silylated nanocellulose sponges for the selective removal of oil from water. Chem Mater 26:2659–2668Google Scholar
  158. Zhang F, Ren H, Tong G, Deng Y (2016a) Ultra-lightweight poly (sodium acrylate) modified TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril aerogel spheres and their superabsorbent properties. Cellulose 23:3665–3676Google Scholar
  159. Zhang H, Li Y, Xu Y, Lu Z, Chen L, Huang L, Fan M (2016b) Versatile fabrication of a superhydrophobic and ultralight cellulose-based aerogel for oil spillage clean-up. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:28297–28306Google Scholar
  160. Zhang H, Li Y, Lu Z, Chen L, Huang L, Fan M (2017a) A robust superhydrophobic TiO2 NPs coated cellulose sponge for highly efficient oil-water separation. Sci Rep 7:9428Google Scholar
  161. Zhang S, Feng J, Feng J, Jiang Y (2017b) Formation of enhanced gelatum using ethanol/water binary medium for fabricating chitosan aerogels with high specific surface area. Chem Eng J 309:700–707Google Scholar
  162. Zhang Y, Wang F, Zhang D, Chen J, Zhu H, Zhou L, Chen Z (2017c) New type multifunction porous aerogels for supercapacitors and absorbents based on cellulose nanofibers and graphene. Mater Lett 208:73–76Google Scholar
  163. Zhang H, Li Y, Shi R, Chen L, Fan M (2018a) A robust salt-tolerant superoleophobic chitosannanofibrillated cellulose aerogel for highly efficient oilwater separation. Carbohydr Polym 200:611–615Google Scholar
  164. Zhang YG, Zhu YJ, Xiong ZC, Wu J, Chen F (2018b) Bioinspired ultralight inorganic aerogel for highly efficient air filtration and oil-water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:13019–13027Google Scholar
  165. Zhang H et al (2019a) Super light 3D hierarchical nanocellulose aerogel foam with superior oil adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 536:245–251Google Scholar
  166. Zhang T, Yuan D, Guo Q, Qiu F, Yang D, Ou Z (2019b) Preparation of a renewable biomass carbon aerogel reinforced with sisal for oil spillage clean-up: inspired by green leaves to green Tofu. Food Bioprod Process 114:154–162Google Scholar
  167. Zhang X, Wang H, Cai Z, Yan N, Liu M, Yu Y (2019c) Highly compressible and hydrophobic anisotropic aerogels for selective oil/organic solvent absorption. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:332–340Google Scholar
  168. Zhang Y, Yin M, Lin X, Ren X, Huang T-S, Kim IS (2019d) Functional nanocomposite aerogels based on nanocrystalline cellulose for selective oil/water separation and antibacterial applications. Chem Eng J 371:306–313Google Scholar
  169. Zhao L, Li L, Wang Y, Wu J, Meng G, Liu Z, Guo X (2017) Preparation and characterization of thermo- and pH dual-responsive 3D cellulose-based aerogel for oil/water separation. Appl Phys A 124:9Google Scholar
  170. Zhao S, Malfait WJ, Guerrero-Alburquerque N, Koebel MM, Nystrom G (2018) Biopolymer aerogels and foams: chemistry, properties, and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:7580–7608Google Scholar
  171. Zheng Q, Cai Z, Gong S (2014) Green synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)–cellulose nanofibril (CNF) hybrid aerogels and their use as superabsorbents. J Mater Chem A 2:3110–3118Google Scholar
  172. Zhou S, Liu P, Wang M, Zhao H, Yang J, Xu F (2016) Sustainable, reusable, and superhydrophobic aerogels from microfibrillated cellulose for highly effective oil/water separation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:6409–6416Google Scholar
  173. Zhou S, You T, Zhang X, Xu F (2018) Superhydrophobic cellulose nanofiber-assembled aerogels for highly efficient water-in-oil emulsions separation. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:2095–2103Google Scholar
  174. Zhou L, Zhai S, Chen Y, Xu Z (2019) Anisotropic cellulose nanofiberspolyvinyl alcoholgraphene aerogels fabricated by directional freeze-drying as effective oil absorbents. Polymers 11:712Google Scholar
  175. Zhu L, Wang Y, Wang Y, You L, Shen X, Li S (2017) An environmentally friendly carbon aerogels derived from waste pomelo peels for the removal of organic pollutants/oils. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 241:285–292Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Materials EngineeringHefei UniversityHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.College of Chemical EngineeringNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations