Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 6379–6391 | Cite as

Salt-free and environment-friendly reactive dyeing of cotton in cottonseed oil/water system

  • Bingnan Mu
  • Wei Li
  • Helan Xu
  • LaRee Emanuel
  • Yiqi YangEmail author
Original Research
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

This research studies the reactive dyeing in cottonseed oil/water dual-phase solvents system (CWDS) and establishes sustainable industrial dyeing procedures using cottonseed oil. The conventional aqueous dyeing generates large quantities of wastewater containing high concentrations of salts and dyes and has very low dye-fixation. Substituted dyeing technologies not only failed to completely solve problems of aqueous dyeing but also generated new problems such as high cost for modifications of dyeing facilities and new environmental pollution. Using cottonseed oil as external dyeing phase notably increases the dye concentration in the internal solvent phase via raising the chemical potential of dyes at outer phase without the use of salts. The dye fixation based on the total dye added to the dyebath for CWDS increases by up to 30% compared to aqueous dyeing. Besides, the external phase in CWDS is recyclable and biodegradable. Furthermore, using CWDS, fabrics are dyed in current jet-dyeing facilities on a pilot scale and have the same levelness and colorfastness as those from aqueous dyeing. Dye fixation using pilot-scale jet dyeing machines in CWDS achieves 90%+. The materials and energy costs of CWDS are lower than those of aqueous dyeings.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Dual phases Cottonseed oil Chemical potential Low discharge Pilot-scale dyeing 

Abbreviations

ScCO2

Supercritical CO2

D5

Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane

CWDS

Cottonseed oil/water dual-phase solvents system

RR 120

Reactive Red 120

RR24

Reactive Red 24

COD

Chemical oxygen demand

BOD5

The 5-day biochemical oxygen demand

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Cotton Incorporated Grant (18-098), National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Multi-State Project S1054, NEB37-037), USDA Hatch Act, and the Agricultural Research Division at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Authors are grateful to China Scholarship Council for its financial support to Wei Li, and the John and Louise Skala Fellowship and American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists Students Grant for their financial support to Bingnan Mu. The research was performed in part in the Nebraska Nanoscale Facility: National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure and the Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, which are supported by the National Science Foundation under Award ECCS: 1542182, and the Nebraska Research Initiative. We also thank the Lincoln Wastewater System for providing activated sludges.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 4985 kb)

10570_2019_2541_MOESM2_ESM.docx (92 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 92 kb)

References

  1. Abu-Arabi M, Allawzi M, Al-Zoubi H, Tamimi A (2000) Extraction of jojoba oil by pressing and leaching. Chem Eng J 76:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayadi I, Souissi Y, Jlassi I, Peixoto F, Mnif W (2016) Chemical synonyms, molecular structure and toxicological risk assessment of synthetic textile dyes: a critical review. J Dev Drugs 5:2Google Scholar
  3. Baker BP, Grant JA (2018) Cottonseed oil profile. Cornell University. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/56123. Accessed 30 May 2019
  4. Bomgardner MM (2018) These new textile dyeing methods could make fashion more sustainable. Chem Eng 96:28–33Google Scholar
  5. Brooke D, Crookes M, Gray D, Robertson S (2009) Environmental risk assessment report: decamethylcyclopentasiloxane. Environment Agency of England and Wales, BristolGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen L, Wang B, Chen J, Ruan X, Yang Y (2015) Comprehensive study on cellulose swelling for completely recyclable nonaqueous reactive dyeing. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:2439–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chequer FMD, de Oliveira GAR, Ferraz ERA, Cardoso JC, Zanoni MVB, de Oliveira DP (2013) Textile dyes: dyeing process and environmental impact. In: Eco-friendly textile dyeing and finishing. InTechGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez Cid M, Van Spronsen J, Van der Kraan M, Veugelers W, Woerlee G, Witkamp G (2005) Excellent dye fixation on cotton dyed in supercritical carbon dioxide using fluorotriazine reactive dyes. Green Chem 7:609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez Cid M, Gerstner K, Van Spronsen J, Van der Kraan M, Veugelers W, Woerlee G, Witkamp G (2007) Novel process to enhance the dyeability of cotton in supercritical carbon dioxide. Text Res J 77:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu S, Hinks D, Hauser P, Ankeny M (2013) High efficiency ultra-deep dyeing of cotton via mercerization and cationization. Cellulose 20:3101–3110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu C, Wang J, Shao J, Pu D, Chen J, Liu J (2015) A non-aqueous dyeing process of reactive dye on cotton. J Text Inst 106:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghaly A, Ananthashankar R, Alhattab M, Ramakrishnan V (2014) Production, characterization and treatment of textile effluents: a critical review. J Chem Eng Process Technol 5:1–19Google Scholar
  13. Hao L, Wang R, Wang L, Fang K, Liu J, Men Y (2016) The influences of enzymatic processing on physico-chemical and pigment dyeing characteristics of cotton fabrics. Cellulose 23:929–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khatri A, Peerzada MH, Mohsin M, White M (2015) A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. J Clean Prod 87:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim Y et al (2017) Environmentally sound textile dyeing technology with nanofibrillated cellulose. Green Chem 19:4031–4035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li W, Mu B, Yang Y (2019) Feasibility of industrial-scale treatment of dye wastewater via bio-adsorption technology. Bioresour Technol 277:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu L, Mu B, Li W, Yang Y (2019) Cost-effective reactive dyeing using spent cooking oil for minimal discharge of dyes and salts. J Clean Prod 227:1023–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu L, Hu C, Zhu Y, Zhang H, Li R, Xing Y (2018) Multi-functional finishing of cotton fabrics by water-based layer-by-layer assembly of metal–organic framework. Cellulose 25:4223–4238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo J, Gao Y, Tan K, Wei W, Liu X (2016) Preparation of a magnetic molecularly imprinted graphene composite highly adsorbent for 4-nitrophenol in aqueous medium. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:3316–3326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma M, Hussain M, Memon H, Zhou W (2016) Structure of pigment compositions and radical scavenging activity of naturally green-colored cotton fiber. Cellulose 23:955–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mu B, Xu H, Yang Y (2017) Improved mechanism of polyester dyeing with disperse dyes in finite dyebath. Color Technol 133:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mu B, Li W, Xu H, Xu L, Yang Y (2018) Freeze-extrusion for controllable assembly of 3-dimensional ultra-fine and amorphous fibrous matrices: potential applications in sorption. J Mater Chem A 6:10320–10330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mu B, Liu L, Li W, Yang Y (2019) High sorption of reactive dyes onto cotton controlled by chemical potential gradient for reduction of dyeing effluents. J Enviorn Manag 239:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramalingam S, Sreeram KJ, Raghava Rao J, Unni Nair B (2016) Organic nanocolorants: self-fixed, optothermal resistive, silica-supported dyes for sustainable dyeing of leather. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:2706–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosa JM, Fileti AM, Tambourgi EB, Santana JC (2015) Dyeing of cotton with reactive dyestuffs: the continuous reuse of textile wastewater effluent treated by ultraviolet/hydrogen peroxide homogeneous photocatalysis. J Clean Prod 90:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sawada K, Ueda M, Kajiwara K (2004) Simultaneous dyeing and enzyme processing of fabrics in a non-ionic surfactant reverse micellar system. Dyes Pigment 63:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sparham C, Van Egmond R, O’Connor S, Hastie C, Whelan M, Kanda R, Franklin O (2008) Determination of decamethylcyclopentasiloxane in river water and final effluent by headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1212:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tam VW, Tam CM (2006) A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 47:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wan PJ, Zarins ZM (2003) Specific heats of cottonseed and its co‐products. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang B, Ruan X, Chen L, Chen J, Yang Y (2014) Heterogeneous chemical modification of cotton cellulose with vinyl sulfone dyes in non-nucleophilic organic solvents. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:15802–15810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xie W, Zhang M, Liu D, Lei W, Sun L, Wang X (2016) Reactive yellow 161 decolorization by TiO2/porous boron nitride nanosheet composites in cotton dyeing effluent. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:1392–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao J et al (2018) A heterogeneous binary solvent system for recyclable reactive dyeing of cotton fabrics. Cellulose 25:7381–7392CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion DesignUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological Systems EngineeringUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  3. 3.Nebraska Center for Materials and NanoscienceUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations