, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 3655–3669 | Cite as

Structure–property relations in regenerated cellulose fibers: comparison of fibers manufactured using viscose and lyocell processes

  • Aakash Sharma
  • Shailesh Nagarkar
  • Shirish Thakre
  • Guruswamy KumaraswamyEmail author
Original Research


Regenerated cellulose fibers are produced using two industrially dominant technologies: the viscose and lyocell processes. Here, we compare commercially available fibers, prepared using the viscose and lyocell processes. Single fibers are subjected to a variety of mechanical deformations to obtain stress–strain, stress relaxation and stress recovery data. These are fitted to a phenomenological model, whose parameters are interpreted in terms of the fiber semicrystalline microstructure. This simple model does not incorporate the complexities of semicrystalline microstructure. Rather, it represents structure in a semicrystalline polymer fiber in terms of an elastic crystalline phase that coexists with a viscoelastic Voigt-like glassy amorphous phase. Lyocell fibers are characterized by higher values of crystalline modulus relative to viscose. Lyocell fibers also have a higher amorphous phase modulus and a wider relaxation spectrum than viscose, suggesting that amorphous and crystalline phases are dispersed in close connectivity in lyocell. Viscose and lyocell fibers exhibit qualitative similarities in their mechanical response. On stretching, there is a transition in the stress–strain curve from a low strain elastic response at a critical value of strain. This critical strain has been incorrectly attributed to yielding of the fiber. We establish that this critical value corresponds to an apparent yield. When subjected to strains higher than this apparent yield point, the fibers develop a memory of the mechanical deformation. This memory decays slowly, logarithmically with time and is lost over about a day as the fiber structure transitions back to the original as spun fiber. Finally, we demonstrate that on wetting the fibers with water, there is an increase in the apparent yield strain for viscose fibers, but not for lyocell. We interpret these results in terms of the semicrystalline microstructure of the fibers.

Graphical abstract


Regenerated cellulose Mechanical properties Model Yielding 



AS acknowledges Aditya Birla Science and Technology Company for funding. We dedicate this manuscript to Prof. VA Juvekar who has just superannuated as a professor of chemical engineering at IIT-Bombay, India. Prof. Juvekar was and continues to be an inspirational teacher, with a unique ability to simplify difficult topics in his lectures and research talks. In more recent times, we have interacted with him as a professional colleague and have had the privilege of sharing his delight in solving research problems in soft matter science and engineering. Prof. Juvekar has worked on structure formation in regenerated cellulose fibers in the recent past. Therefore, we felt that it was especially appropriate to dedicate this manuscript to him.


  1. Abu-Rous M, Ingolic E, Schuster KC (2006) Visualisation of the nano-structure of Tencel®(lyocell) and Other cellulosics as an approach to explaining functional and wellness properties in textiles. Lenzing Ber 85:31–37Google Scholar
  2. Adusumalli R-B, Muller U, Weber H, Roeder T, Sixta H, Gindl W (2006) Tensile testing of single regenerated cellulose fibres. Macromol Symp 244:83–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergenstråhle M, Berglund LA, Mazeau K (2007) Thermal response in crystalline Ibeta cellulose: a molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem B 111:9138–9145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant GM, Walter AT (1959) Stiffness and resiliency of wet and dry fibers as a function of temperature. Text Res J 29:211–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai J, Zhang L, Zhou J, Qi H, Chen H, Kondo T, Chen X, Chu B (2007) Multifilament fibers based on dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution: structure and properties. Adv Mater 47:8676–8683. Google Scholar
  6. Chen X, Burger C, Fang D, Ruan D, Zhang L, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2006) X-ray studies of regenerated cellulose fibers wet spun from cotton linter pulp in NaOH/thiourea aqueous solutions. Polymer 47:2839–2848. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dulmage WJ, Contois LE (1958) A study of the elastic modulus and extensibility of the crystalline regions in highly oriented polymers. J Polym Sci 28:275–284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eichhorn SJ, Young RJ, Davies GR (2005) Modeling crystal and molecular deformation in regenerated cellulose fibers. Biomacromol 6:507–513. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Einfeldt J, Kwasniewski A, Meißner D, Gruber E, Henricks R (2000) Dielectric spectroscopic results and chemical accessibility of sulfite pulps. Macromol Mater Eng 283:7–14.;2-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Einfeldt J, Meißner D, Kwasniewski A (2003) Contributions to the molecular origin of the dielectric relaxation processes in polysaccharides—the high temperature range. J Non Cryst Solids 320:40–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fink HP, Philipp B, Paul D, Serimaa R, Paakkari T (1987) The structure of amorphous cellulose as revealed by wide-angle X-ray scattering. Polymer 28:1265–1270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fink HP, Weigel P, Purz HJ, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci 26:1473–1524. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganser C, Kreiml P, Morak R, Weber F, Paris O, Schennach R, Teichert C (2015) The effects of water uptake on mechanical properties of viscose fibers. Cellulose 22:2777–2786. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gindl W, Keckes J (2006) Strain hardening in regenerated cellulose fibres. Compos Sci Technol 66:2049–2053. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gindl W, Martinschitz KJ, Boesecke P, Keckes J (2006a) Orientation of cellulose crystallites in regenerated cellulose fibres under tensile and bending loads. Cellulose 13:621–627. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gindl W, Martinschitz KJ, Boesecke P, Keckes J (2006b) Changes in the molecular orientation and tensile properties of uniaxially drawn cellulose films. Biomacromol 7:3146–3150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang G, Huang W, Li L, Wang X, Pang F, Zhang Y, Wang H (2012a) Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose fibers from different technology processes. Carbohydr Polym 87:2012–2018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang G, Yuan Y, Wang B, Yin X, Mukuze KS, Huang W, Zhang Y, Wang H (2012b) Analysis of regenerated cellulose fibers with ionic liquids as a solvent as spinning speed is increased. Cellulose 19:1075–1083. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato K (1959) Reactive dye staining for differentiation of skin and core of viscose rayon fibers. Text Res J 15:661–664. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim DB (2005) Dry jet-wet spinning of cellulose/N-Methylmorpholine N-oxide hydrate solutions and physical properties of lyocell fibers. Text Res J 75:331–341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kong K, Eichhorn SJ (2005) The influence of hydrogen bonding on the deformation micromechanics of cellulose fibers the influence of hydrogen bonding on the deformation micromechanics of cellulose fibers. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys 44:1123–1136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kong K, Davies RJ, McDonald MA, Young RJ, Wilding MA, Ibbett RN, Eichhorn SJ (2007) Influence of domain orientation on the mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose fibers. Biomacromol 8:624–630. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kong K, Wilding MA, Ibbett RN, Eichhorn SJ (2008) Molecular and crystal deformation of cellulose: uniform strain or uniform stress? Faraday Discuss 139:283–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krasnov I, Diddens I, Hauptmann N, Helms G, Ogurreck M, Seydel T, Funari SS, Muller M (2008) Mechanical properties of silk: interplay of deformation on macroscopic and molecular length scales. Phys Rev Lett 100:2–5. Google Scholar
  25. Kreze T, Strnad S, Stana-Kleinschek K, Ribitsch V (2001) Influence of aqueous medium on mechanical properties of conventional and new environmentally friendly regenerated cellulose fibers. Mater Res Innov 4:107–114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenz J, Schurz J, Wrentschur E (1993) Properties and structure of solvent-spun and viscose-type fibres in the swollen state. Colloid Polym Sci 271:460–468. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manabe S, Iwata M, Kamide K (1986) Dynamic mechanical absorptions observed for regenerated cellulose solids in the temperature range from 280 to 600 K. Polym J 18:1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manich AM, Marino PN, Castellar MDDE, Saldivia M, Sauri RM (2000) Viscoelastic modeling of natural and synthetic textile yarns. J Appl Polym Sci 76:2062–2067.;2-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mann J, Roldan-Gonzales L (1962) X-ray measurements of the elastic modulus of cellulose crystals. Polymer 3:549–553. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meißner D, Einfeldt J, Kwasniewski A (2000) Contributions to the molecular origin of the dielectric relaxation processes in polysaccharides—the low temperature range. J Non Cryst Solids 275:199–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meredith R (1945a) 12—a comparison of the tensile elasticity of some textile fibres. J Text Inst Trans 36:T147–T164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meredith R (1945b) 10—the tensile behaviour of raw cotton and other textile fibres. J Text Inst Trans 36:T107–T130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morehead FF, Sisson WA (1945) Skin effect in viscose rayon. Text Res J 15:443–450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nishino T, Takano K, Nakamae K (1995) Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of cellulose polymorphs. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 33:1647–1651. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rous MA, Manian AP, Röder T, Lichtscheidl I, Schuster KC (2004) Fluoresent molecular probes for the characterization of fibre structure and distribution of textile resin finishing on lyocell. Lenzing Ber 83:92–98Google Scholar
  36. Sakurada I, Nukushina Y, Ito T (1962) Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers. J Polym Sci 57:651–660. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sakurada I, Ito T, Nakamae K (1964) Elastic moduli of polymer crystals for the chain axial direction. Die Makromol Chem 75:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sakurada I, Ito T, Nakamae K (1966) Elastic moduli of the crystal lattices of polymers. J Polym Sci Part C Polym Symp 15:75–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schuster KC, Aldred P, Villa M, Baron M, Loidl R, Biganska O, Patlazhan S, Navard P, Rüf H, Jericha E (2003) Characterising the emerging lyocell fibres structures by ultra small angle neutron scattering (USANS). Lenzing Ber 82:107–117Google Scholar
  40. Sharma A, Kumaraswamy G, Thakre S (2018) Modeling the universal viscoelastic response of polymer fibers. Phys Rev Mater 2:062601. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sirichaisit J, Brookes VL, Young RJ, Vollrath F (2003) Analysis of structure/property relationships in silkworm (Bombyx mori) and spider dragline (Nephila edulis) silks using raman spectroscopy. Biomacromol 4:387–394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilding MA, Ward IM (1984) Creep and stress-relaxation in ultra-high modulus linear polyethylene. J Mater Sci 19:629–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodings C (2001) Regenerated cellulose fibres. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yeh WY, Young RJ (1998) Molecular deformation processes in aromatic high modulus polymer fibres. Polymer 40:857–870. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Young RJ (1995) Monitoring deformation processes in high-performance fibres using raman spectroscopy. J Text Inst 86:360–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang S, Wang W, Li F, Yu J (2013) Non-linear viscoelastic behavior of novel regenerated cellulose fiber in dry and wet condition. Cellul Chem Technol 47:353–358Google Scholar
  47. Zhang S, Chen C, Duan C, Hu H, Li H (2018) Regenerated cellulose by the lyocell process, a brief review of the process and properties. BioResources 13(2):4577–4592Google Scholar
  48. Zhou S, Tashiro K, Hongo T, Shirataki H, Yamane C, Ii T (2001) Influence of water on structure and mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose studied by an organized combination of infrared spectra, X-ray diffraction, and dynamic viscoelastic data measured as functions of temperature and humidity. Macromolecules 34:1274–1280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aakash Sharma
    • 1
  • Shailesh Nagarkar
    • 2
  • Shirish Thakre
    • 2
  • Guruswamy Kumaraswamy
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Academy of Scientific and Innovative ResearchCSIR-National Chemical LaboratoryPuneIndia
  2. 2.Fiber and TextilesAditya Birla Science and Technology Company Pvt. LtdMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations