Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 3935–3954 | Cite as

Synergistic impact of graphene and carbon nanotubes on waste paper for hybrid nanocomposite substrates

  • Osman F. Damnalı
  • Volkan EskizeybekEmail author
Original Research
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

Recent progress towards the development of lightweight, flexible, wearable, and foldable portable electronics has promoted the increasing demand for high-performance substrates. However, eco-friendly materials with low cost and remarkable performance are still under investigation. In this study, a kind of lightweight, flexible, and electrically conductive multi-walled nanotube (MWCNT) and a few layered graphene (GR) reinforced hybrid recycled papers were obtained by a facile and scalable papermaking process. The influence of nanofiller type and concentration on the mechanical, electrical, thermal performance of the nanocomposite paper were investigated. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy revealed the formation of molecular interactions between the MWCNTs, GR, and the cellulose fibers. Scanning electron microscopy proved the continuous network of nanofiller phase within the cellulose matrix. Tensile tests revealed that the tensile strength of MWCNTs reinforced recycled paper increased about 276%, while the GR reinforced recycled paper exhibited the highest Young modulus with 425% increase compared to the neat waste paper. The highest electrical conductivity was measured around 0.219 S/cm for the GR/CNT10 hybrid recycled paper. A positive synergetic effect of the MWCNTs and GR nanofillers was observed in the case of hybrid nanocomposite papers. More importantly, adjusting the microstructure of the waste paper with the introduction of carbon-based 1D/2D nanofillers led to higher improvement in the mechanical properties, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity. These regenerated properties made the hybrid nanocomposite paper a promising substrate material with considerable potential applications for various flexible and portable electronic devices.

Keywords

Multi-walled carbon nanotube Graphene Cellulose Conductivity Flexible substrate Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Scientific Research Council for its financial support under the contract FYL-2016-948. Technical support from the Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Science and Technology Application and Research Center (COBILTUM) is much appreciated.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2339_MOESM1_ESM.docx (790 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 790 kb)

References

  1. Alamri H, Low IM (2012) Mechanical properties and water absorption behaviour of recycled cellulose fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Polym Test 31:620–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameen S, Seo HK, Akhtar MS, Shin HS (2012) Novel graphene/polyaniline nanocomposites and its photocatalytic activity toward the degradation of rose Bengal dye. Chem Eng J 210:220–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beeran PTY, Bobnar V, Gorgieva S, Grohens Y, Finsgar M, Thomas S, Kokol V (2016) Mechanically strong, flexible and thermally stable graphene oxide/nanocellulosic films with enhanced dielectric properties (vol 6, p 49138, 2016). RSC Adv 6:57473–57474.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra90052f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohyd Polym 84:975–983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J (2010) Barley husk and coconut shell reinforced polypropylene composites: the effect of fibre physical, chemical and surface properties. Compos Sci Technol 70:840–846.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee S, Nafezarefi F, Tai NH, Schlagenhauf L, Nuesch FA, Chu BTT (2012) Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 50:5380–5386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen W, Tao XM, Liu YY (2006) Carbon nanotube-reinforced polyurethane composite fibers. Compos Sci Technol 66:3029–3034.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen H, Muller MB, Gilmore KJ, Wallace GG, Li D (2008) Mechanically strong, electrically conductive, and biocompatible graphene paper. Adv Mater 20:3557.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen HY, Zeng S, Chen MH, Zhang YY, Li QW (2015) Fabrication and functionalization of carbon nanotube films for high-performance flexible supercapacitors. Carbon 92:271–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen CC, Mo MM, Chen WS, Pan MZ, Xu ZY, Wang HY, Li DG (2018) Highly conductive nanocomposites based on cellulose nanofiber networks via NaOH treatments. Compos Sci Technol 156:103–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng HH et al (2013) Textile electrodes woven by carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid fibers for flexible electrochemical capacitors. Nanoscale 5:3428–3434.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00320e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi HY, Lee TW, Lee SE, Lim J, Jeong YG (2017) Silver nanowire/carbon nanotube/cellulose hybrid papers for electrically conductive and electromagnetic interference shielding elements. Compos Sci Technol 150:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman JN, Khan U, Blau WJ, Gun’ko YK (2006) Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon 44:1624–1652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dichiara AB, Song A, Goodman SM, He D, Bai J (2017) Smart papers comprising carbon nanotubes and cellulose microfibers for multifunctional sensing applications. J Mater Chem A 5:20161–20169.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta04329e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong LY, Hu CG, Song L, Huang XK, Chen N, Qu LT (2016) A large-area, flexible, and flame-retardant graphene paper. Adv Funct Mater 26:1470–1476.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201504470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eskizeybek V, Avci A, Gulce A (2014) The mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of chemically carbon nanotube grafted glass fabric/epoxy multi-scale composite structures. Compos Part A Appl Sci 63:94–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eskizeybek V, Avci A, Gulce A (2017) Preparation and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube grafted glass fabric/epoxy multi-scale composites. Adv Compos Mater 26:169–180.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2015.1052188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eskizeybek V, Yar A, Avci A (2018) CNT-PAN hybrid nanofibrous mat interleaved carbon/epoxy laminates with improved mode I interlaminar fracture toughness. Compos Sci Technol 157:30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esmaeili A, Entezari MH (2014) Facile and fast synthesis of graphene oxide nanosheets via bath ultrasonic irradiation. J Colloid Interface Sci 432:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.06.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forrest SR (2004) The path to ubiquitous and low-cost organic electronic appliances on plastic. Nature 428:911–918.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fugetsu B, Sano E, Sunada M, Sambongi Y, Shibuya T, Wang XS, Hiraki T (2008) Electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding efficiency of carbon nanotube/cellulose composite paper. Carbon 46:1256–1258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao KZ et al (2013) Cellulose nanofibers/reduced graphene oxide flexible transparent conductive paper. Carbohyd Polym 97:243–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghobadi S, Sanli LI, Bakhtiari R, Gursel SA (2017) Green composite papers via use of natural binders and graphene for PEM fuel cell electrodes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8407–8415.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghule K, Ghule AV, Chen BJ, Ling YC (2006) Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study. Green Chem 8:1034–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b605623g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gui XC et al (2010) Soft, highly conductive nanotube sponges and composites with controlled compressibility. ACS Nano 4:2320–2326.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100114d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo BQ, Chen WF, Yan LF (2013) Preparation of flexible, highly transparent, cross-linked cellulose thin film with high mechanical strength and low coefficient of thermal expansion. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:1474–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400252e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. He GS, Zhou XY, Liu JH, Zhang JH, Pan LP, Liu SJ (2018) Synergetic enhancement of thermal conductivity for highly explosive-filled polymer composites through hybrid carbon nanomaterials. Polym Compos 39:E1452–E1462.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang L, Huang Y, Liang JJ, Wan XJ, Chen YS (2011) Graphene-based conducting inks for direct inkjet printing of flexible conductive patterns and their applications in electric circuits and chemical sensors. Nano Res 4:675–684.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-011-0123-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ju HM, Choi SH, Huh SH (2010) X-ray diffraction patterns of thermally-reduced graphenes. J Korean Phys Soc 57:1649–1652.  https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.57.1649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kang YR, Li YL, Hou F, Wen YY, Su D (2012) Fabrication of electric papers of graphene nanosheet shelled cellulose fibres by dispersion and infiltration as flexible electrodes for energy storage. Nanoscale 4:3248–3253.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30318c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kavinkumar T, Manivannan S (2018) Improved dielectric behaviour of graphene oxide-multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposite. Vacuum 148:149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khang DY, Jiang HQ, Huang Y, Rogers JA (2006) A stretchable form of single-crystal silicon for high-performance electronics on rubber substrates. Science 311:208–212.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim BJ, Jang H, Lee SK, Hong BH, Ahn JH, Cho JH (2010) High-performance flexible graphene field effect transistors with ion gel gate dielectrics. Nano Lett 10:3464–3466.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101559n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim DH et al (2015) Conductive carbon nanotube paper by recycling waste paper. RSC Adv 5:32118–32123.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra02010g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim KW, Kim JH, Cho S, Shin K, Kim SH (2017) Scalable high-performance graphene paper with enhanced electrical and mechanical properties. Thin Solid Films 632:50–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2017.04.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koga H, Tonomura H, Nogi M, Suganuma K, Nishina Y (2016) Fast, scalable, and eco-friendly fabrication of an energy storage paper electrode. Green Chem 18:1117–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc01949d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kong D, Le LT, Li Y, Zunino JL, Lee W (2012) Temperature-dependent electrical properties of graphene inkjet-printed on flexible materials. Langmuir 28:13467–13472.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la301775d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lani NS, Ngadi N, Johari A, Jusoh M (2014) Isolation, characterization, and application of nanocellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber as nanocomposites. J Nanomater.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/702538 Google Scholar
  41. Lay M, Mendez JA, Pelach MA, Bun KN, Vilaseca F (2016) Combined effect of carbon nanotubes and polypyrrole on the electrical properties of cellulose-nanopaper. Cellulose 23:3925–3937.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1060-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee SH, Lee DH, Lee WJ, Kim SO (2011) Tailored assembly of carbon nanotubes and graphene. Adv Funct Mater 21:1338–1354.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201002048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee TW, Han M, Lee SE, Jeong YG (2016) Electrically conductive and strong cellulose-based composite fibers reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotube containing multiple hydrogen bonding moiety. Compos Sci Technol 123:57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li D, Muller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallace GG (2008) Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 3:101–105.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li XM et al (2013a) Flexible all solid-state supercapacitors based on chemical vapor deposition derived graphene fibers. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:17752–17757.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52908h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li YQ, Umer R, Isakovic A, Samad YA, Zheng LX, Liao K (2013b) Synergistic toughening of epoxy with carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide for improved long-term performance. RSC Adv 3:8849–8856.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra22300k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lian PC, Zhu XF, Liang SZ, Li Z, Yang WS, Wang HH (2010) Large reversible capacity of high quality graphene sheets as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 55:3909–3914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu LQ, Ma WJ, Zhang Z (2011) Macroscopic carbon nanotube assemblies: preparation, properties, and potential applications. Small 7:1504–1520.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201002198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu YY, Liu DY, Ma YL, Sui GX (2016) Characterization and properties of transparent cellulose nanowhiskers-based graphene nanoplatelets/multi-walled carbon nanotubes films. Compos Part A Appl Sci 86:77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu F et al (2017) Investigation on the interfacial mechanical properties of hybrid graphene-carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites. Carbon 115:694–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu LL, Niu ZQ, Chen J (2018) Flexible supercapacitors based on carbon nanotubes. Chin Chem Lett 29:571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2018.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ma LN, Liu R, Niu HJ, Zhao M, Huang YD (2016) Flexible and freestanding electrode based on polypyrrole/graphene/bacterial cellulose paper for supercapacitor. Compos Sci Technol 137:87–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mao L, Li M, Xue JM, Wang J (2016) Bendable graphene/conducting polymer hybrid films for freestanding electrodes with high volumetric capacitances. RSC Adv 6:2951–2957.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra24606g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mianehrow H, Sabury S, Bazargan AM, Sharif F, Mazinani S (2017) A flexible electrode based on recycled paper pulp and reduced graphene oxide composite. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:4990–4996.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-6153-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mohamed MA, Salleh WNW, Jaafar J, Asri SEAM, Ismail AF (2015) Physicochemical properties of “green” nanocrystalline cellulose isolated from recycled newspaper. RSC Adv 5:29842–29849.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra17020b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moniruzzaman M, Winey KI (2006) Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 39:5194–5205.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma060733p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moran JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, Vazquez A (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15:149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ni JF, Li Y (2016) Carbon nanomaterials in different dimensions for electrochemical energy storage. Adv Energy Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600278 Google Scholar
  59. Niu ZQ, Liu LL, Zhang L, Zhou WY, Chen XD, Xie SS (2015) Programmable nanocarbon-based architectures for flexible supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500677 Google Scholar
  60. O’Connell MJ et al (2001) Reversible water-solubilization of single-walled carbon nanotubes by polymer wrapping. Chem Phys Lett 342:265–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00490-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Connell MJ et al (2002) Band gap fluorescence from individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 297:593–596.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ouyang WZ, Sun JH, Memon J, Wang C, Geng JX, Huang Y (2013) Scalable preparation of three-dimensional porous structures of reduced graphene oxide/cellulose composites and their application in supercapacitors. Carbon 62:501–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oya T, Ogino T (2008) Production of electrically conductive paper by adding carbon nanotubes. Carbon 46:169–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pan TW, Kuo WS, Tai NH (2017) Tailoring anisotropic thermal properties of reduced graphene oxide/multi-walled carbon nanotube hybrid composite films. Compos Sci Technol 151:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pang ZP, Sun XG, Wu XY, Nie YY, Liu ZH, Yue LF (2015) Fabrication and application of carbon nanotubes/cellulose composite paper. Vacuum 122:135–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parlayici S, Eskizeybek V, Avci A, Pehlivan E (2015) Removal of chromium (VI) using activated carbon-supported-functionalized carbon nanotubes. J Nanostruct Chem 5:255–263.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-015-0156-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Petrone N, Meric I, Hone J, Shepard KL (2013) Graphene field-effect transistors with gigahertz-frequency power gain on flexible substrates. Nano Lett 13:121–125.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303666m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Qi HS, Liu JW, Gao SL, Mader E (2013) Multifunctional films composed of carbon nanotubes and cellulose regenerated from alkaline-urea solution. J Mater Chem A 1:2161–2168.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ta00882c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Raghunathan SP, Narayanan S, Joseph R (2016) Carbon nanotube reinforced flexible multifunctional regenerated cellulose films for nonlinear optical application. RSC Adv 6:107029–107039.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra21126g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ramesh S, Khandelwal S, Rhee KY, Hui D (2018) Synergistic effect of reduced graphene oxide, CNT and metal oxides on cellulose matrix for supercapacitor applications. Compos Part B Eng 138:45–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rinaldi A, Proietti A, Tamburrano A, De Bellis G, Mulattieri M, Sarto MS (2014) Multilayer graphene-based films for strain sensing. In: 2014 IEEE 14th international conference on nanotechnology. IEEE-Nano, pp 585–589Google Scholar
  72. Rogers JA, Someya T, Huang YG (2010) Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327:1603–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Salajkova M, Valentini L, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2013) Tough nanopaper structures based on cellulose nanofibers and carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol 87:103–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Song SQ, Zhang Y (2017) Carbon nanotube/reduced graphene oxide hybrid for simultaneously enhancing the thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of styrene-butadiene rubber. Carbon 123:158–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Song KL, Ganguly I, Eastin I, Dichiara AB (2017) Lignin-modified carbon nanotube/graphene hybrid coating as efficient flame retardant. Int J Mol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112368 Google Scholar
  76. Subagia IDGA, Jiang Z, Tijing LD, Kim Y, Kim CS, Lim JK, Shon HK (2014) Hybrid multi-scale basalt fiber-epoxy composite laminate reinforced with electrospun polyurethane nanofibers containing carbon nanotubes. Fiber Polym 15:1295–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1295-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sun XG, Cai MY, Chen L, Qiu ZW, Liu ZH (2017) Electrodes of carbonized MWCNT-cellulose paper for supercapacitor. J Nanopart Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3941-4 Google Scholar
  78. Tijing LD et al (2013) Antibacterial tourmaline nanoparticles/polyurethane hybrid mat decorated with silver nanoparticles prepared by electrospinning and UV photoreduction. Curr Appl Phys 13:205–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2012.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tong X, Wang H, Wang G, Wan LJ, Ren ZY, Bai JT, Bai JB (2011) Controllable synthesis of graphene sheets with different numbers of layers and effect of the number of graphene layers on the specific capacity of anode material in lithium-ion batteries. J Solid State Chem 184:982–989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2011.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ummartyotin S, Manuspiya H (2015) An overview of feasibilities and challenge of conductive cellulose for rechargeable lithium based battery. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:204–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ustun T, Ulus H, Karabulut SE, Eskizeybek V, Sahin OS, Avci A, Demir O (2016) Evaluating the effectiveness of nanofillers in filament wound carbon/epoxy multiscale composite pipes. Compos Part B Eng 96:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wang YH, Zeng JR, Li J, Cui XQ, Al-Enizi AM, Zhang LJ, Zheng GF (2015a) One-dimensional nanostructures for flexible supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 3:16382–16392.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta03467a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang ZH, Tammela P, Stromme M, Nyholm L (2015b) Nanocellulose coupled flexible polypyrrole@graphene oxide composite paper electrodes with high volumetric capacitance. Nanoscale 7:3418–3423.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr07251k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang CC, Yang SD, Ma Q, Jia X, Ma PC (2017) Preparation of carbon nanotubes/graphene hybrid aerogel and its application for the adsorption of organic compounds. Carbon 118:765–771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weng Z, Su Y, Wang DW, Li F, Du JH, Cheng HM (2011) Graphene-cellulose paper flexible supercapacitors. Adv Energy Mater 1:917–922.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Xu Z, Gao C (2011) Graphene chiral liquid crystals and macroscopic assembled fibres. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1583 Google Scholar
  87. Xu Z, Liu Z, Sun HY, Gao C (2013) Highly electrically conductive Ag-doped graphene fibers as stretchable conductors. Adv Mater 25:3249–3253.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yang SY et al (2011) Synergetic effects of graphene platelets and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 49:793–803.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yoon T, Shin WC, Kim TY, Mun JH, Kim TS, Cho BJ (2012) Direct measurement of adhesion energy of monolayer graphene As-grown on copper and its application to renewable transfer process. Nano Lett 12:1448–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204123h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Youssef AM, El-Samahy MA, Rehim MHA (2012) Preparation of conductive paper composites based on natural cellulosic fibers for packaging applications. Carbohyd Polym 89:1027–1032.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yu AP, Ramesh P, Sun XB, Bekyarova E, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2008) Enhanced thermal conductivity in a hybrid graphite nanoplatelet—carbon nanotube filler for epoxy composites. Adv Mater 20:4740.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhang DM, Cao DX, Ye K, Yin JL, Cheng K, Wang GL (2014a) Cobalt nano-sheet supported on graphite modified paper as a binder free electrode for peroxide electrooxidation. Electrochim Acta 139:250–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhang DM, Ye K, Yin JL, Cheng K, Cao DX, Wang GL (2014b) Low-cost and binder-free, paper-based cobalt electrode for sodium borohydride electro-oxidation. New J Chem 38:5376–5381.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj00677a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zhang CL, Cha RT, Yang LM, Mou KW, Jiang XY (2018) Fabrication of cellulose/graphene paper as a stable-cycling anode materials without collector. Carbohyd Polym 184:30–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhbankov RG, Firsov SP, Buslov DK, Nikonenko NA, Marchewka MK, Ratajczak H (2002) Structural physico-chemistry of cellulose macromolecules. Vibrational spectra and structure of cellulose. J Mol Struct 614:117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2860(02)00252-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhou Y, Roy VAL, Xu ZX, Kwong HY, Wang HB, Lee CS (2011) Low temperature processed bilayer dielectrics for low-voltage flexible saturated load inverters. Appl Phys Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3558913 Google Scholar
  97. Zhu WJ et al (2013) Graphene radio frequency devices on flexible substrate. Appl Phys Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4810008 Google Scholar
  98. Zhuo QQ et al (2013) Facile synthesis of graphene/metal nanoparticle composites via self-catalysis reduction at room temperature. Inorg Chem 52:3141–3147.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ic302608g CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical Sciences Vocational SchoolÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityÇanakkaleTurkey
  2. 2.Science and Technology Application and Research Center (ÇOBİLTUM)Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityÇanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations