Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 3725–3734 | Cite as

Obtaining nanofibers from lignocellulosic residues after bioethanol production

  • Liu Liu
  • Xiaojun Sun
  • Lin Zhang
  • Yan QingEmail author
  • Ning Yan
  • Jienan Chen
  • Yiqiang WuEmail author
Original Research
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

With wide use of biomass in various industries and enterprises, large amounts of biomass waste are being produced. This causes severe environmental issues and inadequate utilization of renewable resources. In this work, a sustainable and green process approach is proposed to utilize lignocellulosic biomass residues from biofuel conversion proceeding via direct mechanical treatments. The obtained nanofibers containing cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose were directly isolated from lignocellulosic biomass residues and had diameters of approximately 21 nm. After being treated via ultra-micro grinding for 0.5 h with a millstone gap of approximately 5 μm, and undergoing ultrasonication for 20 min at 1000 W as well as high-pressure homogenization shearing for 15 times in a chamber with 87 μm diameter, partially hydrogen and covalent bonds between cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose chains could be broken down. Lignin and hemicellulose were wrapped around the cellulose bundles, thus the residue nanofiber aerogels became easy to redisperse and redry in water. Additionally, the specific capacitance of carbonized nanofiber aerogels was up to 73.2 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1. A remarkable reduction of specific capacitance happened along with the fermentation process prolongation and which is mainly related to the fermentation degree. With characteristics, such as special composite texture, high specific surface area, and excellent electrochemical performances, lignocellulosic biomass residue nanofibers displayed positive attributes in terms of energy storage and nanomaterials.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biomass residues Nanofiber Mechanical nanofibrillation Energy storage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31530009, 31500476, and 31890771), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0600804), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2016QNRC001), Outstanding Innovative Youth Training Program of Changsha (KQ1707019) and Hunan Provincial Technical Innovation Platform and Talent Program in Science and Technology (2018RS3092, 2018WK4028, and 2016TP1013).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2333_MOESM1_ESM.doc (2.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 2912 kb)

References

  1. Arantes V, Saddler JN (2011) Cellulose accessibility limits the effectiveness of minimum cellulase loading on the efficient hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby MF, Gibson LJ, Wegst U, Olive R (1995) The mechanical properties of natural materials. I. Material property charts. Proc Math Phys Sci 450:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atalla RH, Agarwal UP (1985) Raman microprobe evidence for lignin orientation in the cell walls of native woody tissue. Science 227:636–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishopp A, Bennett MJ (2015) Seeing the wood and the trees. Nature 517:558–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Couret L, Irle M, Belloncle C, Cathala B (2017) Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from post-consumer wood fiberboard waste. Cellulose 24:2125–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demirbas A (2001) Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag 42:1357–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Detroy RW, Cunningham RL, Bothast RJ, Bagby MO, Herman A (1982) Bioconversion of wheat straw cellulose/hemicellulose to ethanol by Saccharomyces uvarum and Pachysolen tannophilus. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dieter K, Brigitte H, Hans-Peter F, Andreas B (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diniz JMBF, Gil MH, Castro JAAM (2004) Hornification—its origin and interpretation in wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol 37:489–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang Y et al (2012) Renewing functionalized graphene as electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. Adv Mater 24:6348–6355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson LJ (2012) The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials. J R Soc Interface 9:2749–2766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Güvenatam B, Heeres EHJ, Pidko EA, Hensen EJM (2015) Decomposition of lignin model compounds by Lewis acid catalysts in water and ethanol. J Mol Catal A Chem 410:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamad WY (1997) Some microrheological aspects of wood-pulp fibres subjected to fatigue loading. Cellulose 4:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kasuya N, Iiyama K, Meshitsuka G, Okano T (1997) A structural study of fluorinated cellulose: crystallization of fluorinated cellulose by conversion treatments used for cellulose. Carbohyd Polym 34:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim SD, Dale BE (2005) Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 29:426–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kissinger PT, Heineman WR (1983) Cyclic voltammetry. J Chem Educ 60:702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leite AL, Zanon CD, Menegalli FC (2017) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from cassava root bagasse and peelings. Carbohyd Polym 157:962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Samad Y, Polychronopoulou K, Alhassan S, Liao K (2014) From biomass to high performance solar-thermal and electric-thermal energy conversion and storage materials. J Mater Chem A 2:7759–7765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Y, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang Q, Liu Y, Li J, Yu H (2016) Facile extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from wood using ethanol and peroxide solvothermal pretreatment followed by ultrasonic nanofibrillation. Green Chem 18:1010–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Hu H (2008) X-ray diffraction study of bamboo fibers treated with NaOH. Fibers Polym 9:735–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nobuta K et al (2016) Characterization of cellulose nanofiber sheets from different refining processes. Cellulose 23:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21:1595–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oksanen T, Buchert J, Viikari L (1997) The role of hemicelluloses in the hornification of bleached kraft pulps. Holzforschung 51:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peng C, Lang J, Xu S, Wang X (2014) Oxygen-enriched activated carbons from pomelo peel in high energy density supercapacitors. RSC Adv 4:54662–54667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund LA, Isogai A (2013) An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules 14:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salmén L, Stevanic JS (2018) Effect of drying conditions on cellulose microfibril aggregation and “hornification”. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2039-1 Google Scholar
  27. Santos VTDO, Siqueira G, Milagres AMF, Ferraz A (2018) Role of hemicellulose removal during dilute acid pretreatment on the cellulose accessibility and enzymatic hydrolysis of compositionally diverse sugarcane hybrids. Ind Crops Prod 111:722–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Santucci BS, Bras J, Belgacem MN, Curvelo AADS, Pimenta MTB (2016) Evaluation of the effects of chemical composition and refining treatments on the properties of nanofibrillated cellulose films from sugarcane bagasse. Ind Crops Prod 91:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheldon RA (2014) ChemInform abstract: green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: state of the art. Cheminform 45:950–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun RC, Sun XF, Tomkinson J (2003) Hemicelluloses and their derivatives. ACS Symp 864:2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thybring EE, Thygesen LG, Burgert I (2017) Hydroxyl accessibility in wood cell walls as affected by drying and re-wetting procedures. Cellulose 24:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tian C, Yi J, Wu Y, Wu Q, Qing Y, Wang L (2016) Preparation of highly charged cellulose nanofibrils using high-pressure homogenization coupled with strong acid hydrolysis pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym 136:485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tischer PCF, Sierakowski MR, Westfahl H Jr, Tischer CA (2010) Nanostructural reorganization of bacterial cellulose by ultrasonic treatment. Biomacromolecules 11:1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Wei X, Li J, Wang F, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Kong L (2017) Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from eucalyptus pulp by high pressure homogenization. Ind Crops Prod 104:237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weise U, Hiltunen E, Paulapuro H (1998) Hornification of pulp and means of its reversal. Papier 52:V14–V19Google Scholar
  37. Wochnik AS, Handloser M, Durach D, Hartschuh A, Scheu C (2013) Increasing crystallinity for improved electrical conductivity of TiO2 blocking layers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:5696–5699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu ZY et al (2014) Dyeing bacterial cellulose pellicles for energetic heteroatom doped carbon nanofiber aerogels. Nano Res 7:1861–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu GY et al (2015) Biomass-derived porous carbon materials with sulfur and nitrogen dual-doping for energy storage. Green Chem 17:1668–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Dong HL, Zheng C (2010) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ye R, Harte F (2014) High pressure homogenization to improve the stability of casein–hydroxypropyl cellulose aqueous systems. Food Hydrocoll 35:670–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zu G, Shen J, Zou L, Wang F, Wang X, Zhang Y, Yao X (2016) Nanocellulose-derived highly porous carbon aerogels for supercapacitors. Carbon 99:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and TechnologyCentral South University of Forestry and TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.Hunan Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for High-efficiency Utilization of Wood and Bamboo ResourcesCentral South University of Forestry and TechnologyChangshaChina
  3. 3.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.School of Materials Science and EngineeringCentral South University of Forestry and TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations