, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 3325–3337 | Cite as

Ammonia-sensing ability of differently structured hydroxyapatite blended cellulose nanofibril composite films

  • Vijaykiran N. Narwade
  • Shaikh R. Anjum
  • Vanja KokolEmail author
  • Rajendra S. KhairnarEmail author
Original Research


Fully bio-based, flexible and lightweight nanocomposite films of different porosity/density were fabricated by integrating variable weight percentages of hydroxyapatite (HAp) nanoparticles within a matrix of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) using the one-directional freeze-drying technique, and utilised for study as ammonia sensors. Structural, morphological and thermal-stability characterizations of the samples were assessed by using X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The sensing ability of the films was studied at low operating temperature (25 °C) in the presence of ambient air and 5 ppm of ammonia vapour by two probe electrodes. The results for gas sensing characteristics revealed that the amount and morphology of HAp, its distribution within the micro-porous CNF matrix, and doping on its surface, are the most important parameters which influence the gas sensing performance. It was observed that the film with integrated 5 wt% of HAp exhibited the detection limit of ammonia at a concentration as low as 5 ppm, remarkable high sensitivity (up to 575%) and fast response/recovery (210/30 s) as compared to the HAp (160%, 720/120 s) or CNF (382%, 540/160 s) samples. The designed nanocomposite sensors may be used as gas filters in technological applications using ammonia as indicators for freshness in smart and biodegradable food packaging materials or in high-tech protection clothing.

Graphical abstract


Cellulose nanofibrils Hydroxyapatite particles Porous composite film Sensor Ammonia 



The authors are grateful to the Erasmus Mundus Project Euphrates (2013-2540/001-001-EMA2) as well as the Slovenia Research Agency (BI-IN/15-17-008) for their financial support.


  1. Anjum SR, Narwade VN, Bogle KA, Khairnar RS (2018) Graphite doped hydroxyapatite nanoceramic: selective alcohol sensor. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bochenkov VE, Sergeev GB (2010) Sensitivity, selectivity, and stability of gas-sensitive metal-oxide nanostructures. Metal Oxide Nanostruct Appl 3:31–52Google Scholar
  3. Chambers P, Lyons WB, Sun T, Grattan KTV (2011) Applications and optoelectronic methods of detection of ammonia. In: Predeep P (ed) Optoelectronics—devices and applications. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 189–204Google Scholar
  4. Chopra S, Pham A, Gaillard J et al (2002) Carbon-nanotube-based resonant-circuit sensor for ammonia. Appl Phys Lett 80:4632–4634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clifford PK, Tuma DT (1983) Characteristics of semiconductor gas sensor II. Transient response to temperature change. Sens Actuators 3:255–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drost S (1991) Tin oxide gas sensors: an analytical comparison of gas-sensitive and non-gas-sensitive thin films. Sens Actuators B Chem 4:463–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards JV, Prevost N, French A et al (2013) Nanocellulose-based biosensors: design, preparation, and activity of peptide-linked cotton cellulose nanocrystals having fluorimetric and colorimetric elastase detection sensitivity. Engineering 2013:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fihri A, Len C, Varma RS, Solhy A (2017) Hydroxyapatite: a review of syntheses, structure and applications in heterogeneous catalysis. Coord Chem Rev 347:48–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gautam M, Jayatissa AH (2012) Solid-state electronics ammonia gas sensing behavior of graphene surface decorated with gold nanoparticles. Solid State Electron 78:159–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gong J, Li Y, Hu Z et al (2010) Ultrasensitive NH3 gas sensor from polyaniline nanograin enchased TiO2 fibers. J Phys Chem 114:9970–9974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals : chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Haron TJ (1980) United States Patent (19) 54. 96:62–66. US005485919AGoogle Scholar
  15. Heli B, Golmohammadi H, Ajji A, Merkoçi A (2016) Modulation of population density and size of silver ammonia exposure : visual detection of volatile compounds in a piece of plasmonic nanopaper. Nanoscale. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang X, Hu N, Gao R et al (2012) Reduced graphene oxide-polyaniline hybrid: preparation, characterization and its applications for ammonia gas sensing. J Mater Chem 22:22488–22495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huixia L, Yong L, Yanni T et al (2015) Room temperature gas sensing properties of tubular hydroxyapatite. New J Chem. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hussain G, Silvester DS (2016) Detection of sub-ppm concentrations of ammonia in an ionic liquid : enhanced current density using ‘Filled’ recessed microarrays. Anal Chem. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Imawan C, Solzbacher F, Steffes H, Obermeier E (2000) Gas-sensing characteristics of modified-MoO3 thin films using Ti-overlayers for NH3 gas sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 64:193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiaqiang X (2005) Gas sensing properties of ZnO nanorods prepared by hydrothermal method. J Mater Sci 40:2919–2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiaqiang X, Yuping C, Daoyong C, Jianian S (2017) Hydrothermal synthesis and gas sensing characters of ZnO nanorods. Sens Actuators B Chem. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Julkapli NM, Bagheri S (2017) Nanocellulose as a green and sustainable emerging material in energy applications : a review. Polym Adv Technol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karunagaran B, Uthirakumar P (2007) TiO2 thin film gas sensor for monitoring ammonia. Mater Charect 122:122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katiyar P, Patra TK, Singh JK et al (2016) Understanding adsorption behavior of silica nanoparticles over a cellulose surface in an aqueous medium. Chem Eng Sci 141:293–303. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khairnar RS, Anjum SR, Mahabole MP (2014) Development of CNT doped nano-HAp thick film gas sensor. Development 3:253–261Google Scholar
  26. Khalil HPSA, Bhat AH, Yusra AFI (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–979. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim J, Shim BS, Kim HS et al (2015) Review of nanocellulose for sustainable future materials. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 2:197–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kokol V, Bozic M (2015) Characterization and properties of homo- and heterogenously phosphorylated nanocellulose. Carbohydr Polym 125:301–313. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Laghzizil A, El Herch N, Bouhaouss A et al (2001) Comparison of electrical properties between fluoroapatite and hydroxyapatite materials. J Solid State Chem 156(1):57–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin N, Dufresne A (2012) Nanoscale preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 4:3274–3294. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Llobet E (2013) Gas sensors using carbon nanomaterials: a review. Sens Actuators B Chem 179:32–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maneerung T, Tokura S, Rujiravanit R (2007) Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohyd Polym 72(1):43–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mene RU, Mahabole MP, Khairnar RS (2011a) Surface modified hydroxyapatite thick films for CO2 gas sensing application: effect of swift heavy ion irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 80:682–687. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mene RU, Mahabole MP, Sharma R, Khairnar RS (2011b) Enhancement in CO gas sensing properties of hydroxyapatite thick films: effect of swift heavy ion irradiation. Vacuum 86:66–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mene RU, Mahabole MP, Mohite KC, Khairnar RS (2013) Fe doped hydroxyapatite thick films modified via swift heavy ion irradiation for CO and CO2 gas sensing application. J Alloys Compd. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mirzaei A, Neri G (2016) Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing application : a review. Sensors Actuators B Chem. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Morales-narváez E, Golmohammadi H, Naghdi T et al (2015) Nanopaper as an optical sensing platform. ACS Nano 9(7):7296–7305. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mossalamy EH, Harbi LM, Obaid AY (2013) Chemical treatment, characterization and electrical properties of utilization biowaste hydroxyapatite nanocrystalline. Orient J Chem 29:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mun S, Chen Y, Kim J (2012) Chemical cellulose—titanium dioxide—multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid nanocomposite and its ammonia gas sensing properties at room temperature. Sensors Actuators B Chem 171–172:1186–1191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naghdi T, Merkoc A (2017) Nanocellulose in sensing and biosensing. Chem Mater 29(13):5426–5446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nanomaterials G, Klemm D, Klemm D et al (2011) Reviews nanocelluloses : a new family of nature-based materials. Angewandte 50:5438–5466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nanto H, Minami T, Takata S et al (1986) Zinc oxide thin film ammonia gas sensors with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity. J Appl Phys 60:482. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Narwade VN, Khairnar RS (2017) Cobalt adsorption on the nano-hydroxyapatite matrix : isotherm and kinetic studies. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci 65(2):131–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Narwade VN, Khairnar RS, Kokol V (2018) In situ synthesized hydroxyapatite—cellulose nanofibrils as biosorbents for heavy metal ions removal. J Polym Environ 26:2130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nguyen ST, Feng J, Ng SK et al (2014) Advanced thermal insulation and absorption properties of recycled cellulose aerogels. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 445:128–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olthuis W, Van Den Berg A (2005) Ammonia sensors and their applications—a review. Sens Actuators B Chem 107(2):666–677. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pacquit A, Frisby J, Diamond D et al (2007) Development of a smart packaging for the monitoring of fish spoilage. Food Chem 102:466–470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pawar SG, Patil SL, Chougule MA et al (2011) New method for fabrication of CSA doped PANi-TiO2 thin-film ammonia sensor. IEEE Sens J 11(11):2980–2985. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rao GST, Rao DT (1999) Gas sensitivity of ZnO based thick film sensor to NH3 at room temperature. Sens Actuators B Chem 55:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sberveglieri G (1995) Recent developments in semiconducting thin-film gas sensors. Sens Actuators B 23:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharifi S, Behzadi S, Laurent S, Forrest ML (2012) Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 41:2323–2343. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Shingaya Y, Kubo H, Ito M (1999) Coadsorption of ammonia and electrolyte anions on a Pt (111) electrode. Surf Sci 428:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sofla MRK, Brown RJ, Tsuzuki T, Rainey TJ (2016) A comparison of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibres extracted from bagasse using acid and ball milling methods. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 7(3):035004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soni B, Hassan EB, Mahmoud B (2015) Ac ce pt e us cr t. Carbohydr Polym. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sun Z, Liu L, Zhang L, Jia D (2006) Rapid synthesis of ZnO nano-rods by reaction and their gas-sensing properties. Nanotechnology 17:2266–2270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tang H, Yan M, Zhang H et al (2006) A selective NH3 gas sensor based on Fe2O3–ZnO nanocomposites at room temperature. Sens Actuators B Chem 114:910–915. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tank KP, Sharma P, Kanchan DK, Joshi MJ (2011) FTIR, powder XRD, TEM and dielectric studies of pure and zinc doped nano-hydroxyapatite. Cryst Res Technol 1316:1309–1316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Hieu N, Thi L, Thuy B, Duc N (2008) Highly sensitive thin film NH3 gas sensor operating at room temperature based on SnO2/MWCNTs composite. Sens Actuators B Chem 129:888–895. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Rie J, Thielemans W (2017) Cellulose–gold nanoparticle hybrid materials. Nanoscale 9:8525–8554. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Tuan C, Anh M, Van Hieu N, Trung T (2012) Electrochemical synthesis of polyaniline nanowires on Pt interdigitated microelectrode for room temperature NH 3 gas sensor application. Curr Appl Phys 12:1011–1016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang SG, Zhang Q, Yang DJ et al (2004) Multi-walled carbon nanotube-based gas sensors for NH 3 detection. Diam Related Mater 13(4-8):1327–1332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang JX, Sun XW, Yang Y et al (2011) Free-standing ZnO–CuO composite nanowire array films and their gas sensing. Nanotechnology 22:325704. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Xiang Q, Meng G, Zhang Y et al (2010) Ag nanoparticle embedded-ZnO nanorods synthesized via a photochemical method and its gas-sensing properties. Sens Actuators B Chem 143:635–640. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu K, Fu C, Gao Z et al (2017) Nanomaterial-based gas sensors: a review. Inst Sci Technol 46(2):15–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zakrzewska K (2001) Mixed oxides as gas sensors. Thin Solid Films 391(2):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang J, Liu X, Wang L et al (2011) Synthesis and gas sensing properties of α-Fe2O3 @ ZnO core–shell nanospindles. Nanotechnology 22(18):185501. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Q, Liu Y, Zhang Y et al (2015) Facile and controllable synthesis of hydroxyapatite/graphene hybrid materials with enhanced sensing performance towards ammonia. Analyst 140:5235–5242. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical SciencesSwami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada UniversityNandedIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations