Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Using H2O2 to selectively oxidize recyclable cellulose yarn with high carboxyl content

  • Jianheng Wen
  • Yue Yin
  • Xiangfang Peng
  • Shuidong ZhangEmail author
Original Research
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

A novel and green approach was developed for the fabrication of oxidized recyclable cellulose (ORC) yarns by hydrogen peroxide with high carboxyl content (CC). Herein, recyclable cellulose (RC) yarn was pretreated by NaOH solution, then oxidized by H2O2/CuSO4 system to achieve ORC with CC ranging from 17.9 to 37.1%, depending on the H2O2/RC molar ratios used. The structure and morphology of ORC were carefully characterized by titration, intrinsic viscosity, XRD, FTIR, 13C-NMR, XPS, SEM and GC–MS, respectively. The degree of polymerization, yield and crystallinity of ORC were dependent on CC and varied in different directions. FTIR, 13C-NMR and XPS showed that the selective oxidation for the primary alcohol groups of cellulose was achieved. The results of XRD and SEM showed that oxidation would penetrate the yarn thoroughly and destroy its uniformity and length but not the crystal structure. GC–MS analysis revealed that some proportion of RC suffered hydrolysis and converted into soluble organic compounds. This study provided a green and facile approach to fabricate ORC with high CC by H2O2. A mechanism was proposed for the synchronous selective oxidation of the RC primary alcohol groups by H2O2.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Hydrogen peroxide Recyclable cellulose yarn Selective oxidation Oxidation mechanism Hydrolysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China for 51773068 and U1633102, Key Laboratory of Building Fire Protection Engineering and Technology of MPS (KFKT2016MS01).

Supplementary material

10570_2018_2217_MOESM1_ESM.docx (203 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 202 kb)

References

  1. Amin M, Abbas NS, Hussain MA et al (2015) Cellulose ether derivatives: a new platform for prodrug formation of fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Cellulose 22:2011–2022.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0625-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biliuta G, Fras L, Strnad S et al (2010) Oxidation of cellulose fibers mediated by nonpersistent nitroxyl radicals. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 48:4790–4799.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.24270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carvalho LC, Matias AC, Nomura CS, Cerchiaro G (2011) Radical production by hydrogen peroxide/bicarbonate and copper uptake in mammalian cells: modulation by Cu(II) complexes. J Inorg Biochem 105:189–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2010.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang WS, Chen HH (2016) Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings. Food Hydrocoll 53:75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung C, Lee M, Choe EK (2004) Characterization of cotton fabric scouring by FT-IR ATR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 58:417–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coseri S (2017) Cellulose: to depolymerize… or not to? Biotechnol Adv 35:251–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coseri S, Biliuta G (2012) Bromide-free oxidizing system for carboxylic moiety formation in cellulose chain. Carbohydr Polym 90:1415–1419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui J, Tan J, Deng T et al (2016) Conversion of carbohydrates to furfural via selective cleavage of the carbon–carbon bond: the cooperative effects of zeolite and solvent. Green Chem 18:1619–1624.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5gc01948f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Nooy AEJ, Besemer AC, van Bekkum H (1995) Highly selective nitroxyl radical-mediated oxidation of primary alcohol groups in water-soluble glucans. Carbohydr Res 269:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(94)00343-e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Nooy AEJ, Pagliaro M, Van Bekkum H, Besemer AC (1997) Autocatalytic oxidation of primary hydroxyl functions in glucans with nitrogen oxides. Carbohydr Res 304:117–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6215(97)10004-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El Oudiani A, Chaabouni Y, Msahli S, Sakli F (2011) Crystal transition from cellulose I to cellulose II in NaOH treated Agave americana L. fibre. Carbohydr Polym 86:1221–1229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. French AD, Santiago M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20:583–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habibi Y, Vignon MR (2008) Optimization of cellouronic acid synthesis by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of cellulose III from sugar beet pulp. Cellulose 15:177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9179-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirota M, Tamura N, Saito T, Isogai A (2009) Oxidation of regenerated cellulose with NaClO2 catalyzed by TEMPO and NaClO under acid-neutral conditions. Carbohydr Polym 78:330–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Isogai A, Kato Y (1998) Preparation of polyuronic acid from cellulose by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 5:153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9245-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00583e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jae J, Tompsett GA, Foster AJ et al (2011) Investigation into the shape selectivity of zeolite catalysts for biomass conversion. J Catal 279:257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kazuhiko S (2009) Green oxidation with aqueous hydrogen peroxide. Trends Sci 14:60–63.  https://doi.org/10.5363/tits.14.3_60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim U, Kuga S, Wada M et al (2000) Periodate oxidation of crystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 1:488–492.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0000337 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar V, Yang T (2002) HNO3/H3PO4–NaNO2 mediated oxidation of cellulose—preparation and characterization of bioabsorbable oxidized celluloses in high yields and with different levels of oxidation. Carbohydr Polym 48:403–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(01)00290-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai C, Sheng L, Liao S et al (2013) Surface characterization of TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose. Surf Interface Anal 45:1673–1679.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu SA, Cheng CC, Chen JS et al (2012a) Effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose on the healing of pharyngeal wound: an experimental animal study. J Chin Med Assoc 75:176–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2012.03.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu X, Qian X, Shen J et al (2012b) An integrated approach for Cr(VI)-detoxification with polyaniline/cellulose fiber composite prepared using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant. Bioresour Technol 124:516–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng H, Zhang S, Yin Y et al (2017) Fabrication of C-6 position carboxyl regenerated cotton cellulose by H2O2 and its promotion in flame retardency of epoxy resin. Polym Degrad Stab 142:150–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.05.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–1989.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0497769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sang X, Qin C, Tong Z et al (2017) Mechanism and kinetics studies of carboxyl group formation on the surface of cellulose fiber in a TEMPO-mediated system. Cellulose 24:2415–2425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1279-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharma PR, Chattopadhyay A, Zhan C et al (2018) Lead removal from water using carboxycellulose nanofibers prepared by nitro-oxidation method. Cellulose 25:1961–1973.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1659-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tang Z, Li W, Lin X et al (2017) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose with high degree of oxidation. Polymers (Basel) 9:3–4.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ullah MW, Islam MU, Khan S et al (2017) Recent advancements in bioreactions of cellular and cell-free systems: a study of bacterial cellulose as a model. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34:1591–1599.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0121-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang K, Ye J, Zhou M et al (2017) Selective conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid and furfural in sulfolane/water solvent. Cellulose 24:1383–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1184-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whistler RL, Schweiger R (1959) Oxidation of amylopectin with hydrogen peroxide at different hydrogen ion concentrations. J Am Chem Soc 81:3136–3139.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01521a055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wing RE, Willett JL (1997) Water soluble oxidized starches by peroxide reactive extrusion. Ind Crops Prod 7:45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6690(97)00069-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yackel EC, Kenyon WO (1942) The oxidation of cellulose by nitrogen dioxide. J Am Chem Soc 64:121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01253a032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu J, Chang PR, Ma X (2010) The preparation and properties of dialdehyde starch and thermoplastic dialdehyde starch. Carbohydr Polym 79:296–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang SD, Zhang YR, Wang XL, Wang YZ (2009) High carbonyl content oxidized starch prepared by hydrogen peroxide and its thermoplastic application. Starch/Staerke 61:646–655.  https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200900130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang YR, Wang XL, Zhao GM, Wang YZ (2012) Preparation and properties of oxidized starch with high degree of oxidation. Carbohydr Polym 87:2554–2562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang S, Liu F, Peng H et al (2015) Preparation of novel C-6 position carboxyl corn starch by a green method and its application in flame retardance of epoxy resin. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:11944–11952.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Automotive EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Fire Research Institute of the Ministry of Public SecurityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations