Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Increasing wet adhesion between cellulose surfaces with polyvinylamine

  • Dong Yang
  • Taylor C. Stimpson
  • Joel Soucy
  • Anton Esser
  • Robert H. PeltonEmail author
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The conditions are elucidated whereby strong adhesive joints between two wet cellulose surfaces can be achieved with a polyelectrolyte adhesive. Adhesion results were obtained with wet, TEMPO oxidized, regenerated cellulose membranes that were laminated with polyvinylamine (PVAm) adhesive. Wet adhesion was determined as the 90° wet-peel delamination force. Aldehyde groups on the oxidized cellulose form imine and aminal covalent linkages with PVAm, covalently grafting PVAm onto the cellulose surfaces. From these results we conclude that the adhesive polymer must be covalently grafted to the cellulose surface—physically adsorbed polymers give weak polymer/cellulose interfaces in water. There are two cases which are remarkably different—never-dried joints versus dried and rewetted joints, we call once-dried. The strength of never-dried joints is important in paper manufacturing and is likely to be critical in the manufacture of the new nanocellulose composites and foams described in the recent literature. Only one adhesive joint architecture gave significant never-dried strength—joints with only a monolayer of polyelectrolyte adhesive sandwiched between two cellulose surfaces. We propose that polymeric chains are simultaneously covalently grafted onto both cellulose surfaces. In the usual case of bringing together two polymer coated cellulose surfaces in water, there is no never-dried wet adhesion because electrosteric stabilization inhibits significant molecular contact between opposing adsorbed polymers. By contrast, high once-dried wet adhesion is easier to achieve because polymer–polymer molecular contact is promoted by water removal. The requirements for once-dried wet adhesion are polyelectrolyte grafting to cellulose and cohesion within polymer layers, either due to covalent crosslinking, or attractive physical interactions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Adhesion Hydrogel TEMPO oxidation Polyvinylamine Never-dried strength Polyelectrolyte 

Notes

Acknowledgments

BASF Canada is acknowledged for funding this project through a grant to RP entitled “Understanding Cellulose Interactions with Reactive Polyvinylamines”. Dr. Emil Gustafsson is thanked for useful discussions and Dr. Lina Liu for help with the radio isotope experiments in Professor Sheardown’s laboratory. Some measurements were performed in the McMaster Biointerfaces Institute funded by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation. R.P. holds the Canada Research Chair in Interfacial Technologies.

Supplementary material

10570_2018_2165_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (587 kb)
The file contains—a table of membrane physical properties—details for the aldehyde assay—moisture content vs relative humidity for a membrane and a PVAm film—viscosity data used to estimate c*—the influence of PVAm adsorption concentration of αα wet adhesion—the influence of NaCl concentration of adsorption and adhesion—the influence of rewetting solution pH—the influence of rewetting time on wet adhesion (PDF 587 kb)

References

  1. Aarne N, Vesterinen A-H, Kontturi E, Seppälä JV, Laine J (2013) A systematic study of non-crosslinking wet strength agents. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:12010–12017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alince B, Vanerek A, de Oliveira MH, van de Ven TGM (2006) The effect of polyelectrolytes on the wet-web strength of paper. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 21:653–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan GG, Fox JR, Crosby GD, Sarkanen KV (1978) Chitosan, a mediator for fibre-water interactions in paper. Fibre–water interactions in papermaking, Oxford, UK, 1978. Technical Division, The British Paper and Board Fed., London, UK, pp 765–794Google Scholar
  4. Capron I, Rojas OJ, Bordes R (2017) Behavior of nanocelluloses at interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 29:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cervin NT, Aulin C, Larsson PT, Wagberg L (2012) Ultra porous nanocellulose aerogels as separation medium for mixtures of oil/water liquids. Cellulose 19:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DiFlavio J-L (2013) The wet adhesion of polyvinylamine to cellulose. Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. DiFlavio J-L, Bertoia R, Pelton R, Leduc M (2005) The mechanism of polyvinylamine wet-strengthening. I’Anson S (ed) Advances in paper science and technology: transactions of the 13th fundamental research symposium, Cambridge, UK, 2005. Pulp & Paper Fundamental Research Society, pp 1293–1316. ISBN 978-0-9545272-3-5Google Scholar
  8. DiFlavio J-L, Pelton R, Leduc M, Champ S, Essig M, Frechen T (2007) The role of mild TEMPO-NaBr-NaClO oxidation on the wet adhesion of regenerated cellulose membranes with polyvinylamine. Cellulose 14:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dufresne A (2012) Nanocellulose: From nature to high performance tailored materials. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erlandsson J, Pettersson T, Ingverud T, Granberg H, Larsson PA, Malkoch M, Wågberg L (2018) On the mechanism behind freezing-induced chemical crosslinking in ice-templated cellulose nanofibril aerogels. J Mater Chem A 6:19371–19380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Espy HH (1995) The mechanism of wet-strength development in paper: a review. Tappi J 78:90–99Google Scholar
  12. Gustafsson E, Pelton R, Wågberg L (2016) Rapid development of wet adhesion between carboxymethylcellulose modified cellulose surfaces laminated with polyvinylamine adhesive. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:24161–24167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin H, Nishiyama Y, Wada M, Kuga S (2004) Nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. Colloids Surf A 240:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katchalsky A, Mazur J, Spitnik P (1957) Polybase properties of polyvinylamine. J Polym Sci 23:513–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitaoka T, Isogai A, Onabe F (1999) Chemical modification of pulp fibers by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 14:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurosu K, Pelton R (2004) Simple lysine-containing polypeptide and polyvinylamine adhesives for wet cellulose. J Pulp Paper Sci 30:228–232Google Scholar
  18. Laleg M, Pikulik II (1991a) Improving paper machine runnability and paper properties by a polymeric additive. J Pulp Paper Sci 17:J206–J216Google Scholar
  19. Laleg M, Pikulik II (1991b) Wet-web strength increase by chitosan. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 6(99–103):109Google Scholar
  20. Liu J, Pelton R, Obermeyer JM, Esser A (2013) Laccase complex with polyvinylamine bearing grafted TEMPO is a cellulose adhesion primer. Biomacromol 14:2953–2960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Myllytie P, Holappa J, Laine J (2009a) Effect of polymers on aggregation of cellulose fibrils and its implication on strength development in wet paper web. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 24:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Myllytie P, Salmi J, Laine J (2009b) The influence of ph on the adsorption and interaction of chitosan with cellulose. BioResources 4:1647–1662Google Scholar
  23. Myllytie P, Yin J, Holappa S, Laine J (2009c) The effect of different polysacharides on the development of paper strength during drying. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 24:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Österberg M (2000) The effect of a cationic polyelectrolyte on the forces between two cellulose surfaces and between one cellulose and one mineral surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 229:620–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pelton R, Yang D, Gustafsson E (2018) Polymers that strengthen never-dried joints between wet cellulose surfaces—a review (Bioresources submitted)Google Scholar
  26. Poptoshev E, Rutland MW, Claesson PM (1999) Surface forces in aqueous polyvinylamine solutions. I. Glass surfaces. Langmuir 15:7789–7794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saito T, Isogai A (2006) Introduction of aldehyde groups on surfaces of native cellulose fibers by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Colloids Surf A 289:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saito T, Isogai A (2007) Wet strength improvement of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose sheets prepared with cationic polymers. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:773–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Ikkala O, Berglund LA (2011) Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromol 12:3638–3644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shallhorn PM (2002) Effect of moisture content on wet-web tensile properties. J Pulp Paper Sci 28:384–387Google Scholar
  31. Sharpe LH (1998) Some fundamental issues in adhesion: a conceptual view. J Adhesion 67:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Syverud K, Pettersen SR, Draget K, Chinga-Carrasco G (2015) Controlling the elastic modulus of cellulose nanofibril hydrogels—scaffolds with potential in tissue engineering. Cellulose 22:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tejado A, van de Ven TGM (2010) Why does paper get stronger as it dries? Mater Today 13:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vishtal A, Retulainen E (2014) Improving the extensibility, wet web and dry strength of paper by addition of agar. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 29:434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagberg L, Bjorklund M (1993) On the mechanism behind wet strength development in papers containing wet strength resins. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 8:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weeks A, Boone A, Luensmann D, Jones L, Sheardown H (2013) The effects of hyaluronic acid incorporated as a wetting agent on lysozyme denaturation in model contact lens materials. J Biomater Appl 28:323–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wicklein B, Kocjan A, Salazar-Alvarez G, Carosio F, Camino G, Antonietti M, Bergström L (2015) Thermally insulating and fire-retardant lightweight anisotropic foams based on nanocellulose and graphene oxide. Nat Nano 10:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu T, Farnood R (2014) Cellulose fibre networks reinforced with carboxymethyl cellulose/chitosan complex layer-by-layer. Carbohydr Polym 114:500–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang D, Gustafsson E, Stimpson TC, Esser A, Pelton RH (2017) Hydrazide-derivatized microgels bond to wet, oxidized cellulose giving adhesion without drying or curing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:21000–21009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang D, DiFlavio J-L, Gustafsson E, Pelton R (2018) Wet-peel: A tool for comparing wet-strength resins. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 33(4):632–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Yang
    • 1
  • Taylor C. Stimpson
    • 1
  • Joel Soucy
    • 2
  • Anton Esser
    • 3
  • Robert H. Pelton
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.BASF CanadaMississaugaCanada
  3. 3.BASF AG, EVW/MILudwigshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations