Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Morphological and property characteristics of surface-quaternized nanofibrillated cellulose derived from bamboo pulp

  • Jing Ru
  • Congcong Tong
  • Ning Chen
  • Pengjia Shan
  • Xingke Zhao
  • Xuying Liu
  • Jinzhou Chen
  • Qian Li
  • Xiaohuan Liu
  • Hongzhi Liu
  • Ying Zhao
Original Research
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, quaternized nanofibrillated cellulose (Q-NFC) was isolated from bamboo bleached kraft pulp through the pre-treatment using 2, 3-epoxy-propyltrimethylammonium chloride (EPTAC) in an aqueous alkaline media and subsequent high-pressure homogenization. A series of aqueous Q-NFC dispersions with different contents of positively charged trimethylammonium groups on the surfaces of fibrils were obtained. With the amount of added EPTAC increased, the solid recovery ratio, surface charge contents, zeta potential values, and extent of nanofibrillation gradually increased for the as-obtained Q-NFCs. TEM images of Q-NFCs revealed that the incorporation of quaternary ammonium groups contributed to the defibrillation into finer nanofibrils with more uniform width distribution. With an increase in the positive charge contents, both degree of polymerization and decomposition temperature of the Q-NFC films decreased slowly. Steady-state rheological result demonstrated that the maximum shear viscosity was achieved for the Q-NFC0.6 dispersion with the medium charge content. The Q-NFC films with higher charge content displayed superior transparency and tensile strength. Furthermore, the oxygen transmission rate of PLA films was remarkably decreased dramatically from 216.0 to 10.3 mL m−2 day−1 after laminating a thin layer of Q-NFC0.6 on the one side. As compared to TEMPO-oxidized NFC from the same pulp, the surface-charged Q-NFC exhibited higher optical transmittance, shear viscosity, and thermal stability as well as comparable oxygen-barrier properties.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Bamboo Quaternized Nanofibrillated cellulose Morphologies Properties 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial supports from the Public Welfare Projects of Zhejiang Province (No. 2017C33113), Opening Project from CAS Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics& Institute of Chemistry, National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51603189), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M612000), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LQ14C160004), and Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang A & F University (No. 2013FR088).

Supplementary material

10570_2018_2146_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2628 kb)

References

  1. Abbott AP, Bell TJ, Handa S, Stoddart B (2006) Cationic functionalisation of cellulose using a choline based ionic liquid analogue. Green Chem 8:784–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdul Khalil HP, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN, Mustapha A, Sudesh K, Dungani R, Jawaid M (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99:649–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andresen M, Stenstad P, Møretrø T, Langsrud S, Syverud K, Johansson LS, Stenius P (2007) Nonleaching antimicrobial films prepared from surface-modified microfibrillated cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:2149–2155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aulin C, Johansson E, Wågberg L, Lindström T (2010a) Self-organized films from cellulose I nanofibrils using the Layer-by-Layer technique. Biomacromolecules 11:872–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010b) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azeredo HMC, Rosa MF, Mattoso LHC (2017) Nanocellulose in bio-based food packaging applications. Ind Crops Prod 97:664–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belbekhouche S, Bras J, Siqueira G, Chappey C, Lebrun L, Khelifi B, Marais S, Dufresne A (2011) Water sorption behavior and gas barrier properties of cellulose whiskers and microfibrils films. Carbohydr Polym 83:1740–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011a) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84:975–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Besbes I, Vilar MR, Boufi S (2011b) Nanofibrillated cellulose from Alfa, Eucalyptus and Pine fibres: preparation, characteristics and reinforcing potential. Carbohydr Polym 86:1198–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boufi S, González I, Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrès Q, Pèlach MÀ, Mutjé P (2016) Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process: a review. Carbohydr Polym 154:151–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter AW, de Lannoy C, Wiesner MR (2015) Cellulose nanomaterials in water treatment technologies. Environ Sci Technol 49:5277–5287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Carr ME Jr, Shen LL, Hermans J (1977) Mass–length ratio of fibrin fibers from gel permeation and light scattering. Biopolymers 16:1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaker A, Boufi S (2015) Cationic nanofibrillar cellulose with high antibacterial properties. Carbohydr Polym 131:224–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaker A, Alila S, Mutjé P, Vilar MR, Boufi S (2013) Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cellulose 20:2863–2875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Y, Geng B, Ru J, Tong C, Liu H, Chen J (2017a) Comparative characteristics of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers and resulting nanopapers from bamboo, softwood, and hardwood pulps. Cellulose 24:4831–4844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Liu H, Geng B, Ru J, Cheng C, Zhao Y, Wang L (2017b) A reusable surface-quaternized nanocellulose-based hybrid cryogel loaded with N-doped TiO2 for self-integrated adsorption/photo-degradation of methyl orange dye. RSC Adv 7:17279–17288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen Y, Ru J, Geng B, Wng H, Tong C, Du C, Wu S, Liu H (2017c) Charge-functionalized and mechanically durable composite cryogels from Q-NFC and CS for highly selective removal of anionic dyes. Carbohydr Polym 174:841–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dufresne A (2012) Nanocellulose: from nature to high performance tailored materials. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 373–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang Z, Zhu H, Yuan Y, Ha D, Zhu S, Preston C, Chen Q, Li Y, Han X, Lee S, Chen G, Li T, Munday J, Huang J, Hu L (2014) Novel nanostructured paper with ultrahigh transparency and ultrahigh haze for solar cells. Nano Lett 14:765–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Feng J, Esker AR, Roman M (2010) Acid-catalyzed and solvolytic desulfation of H2SO4-hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir ACS J Surf Colloids 26:17919–17925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujisaki Y, Koga H, Nakajima Y, Nakata M, Tsuji H, Yamamoto T, Kurita T, Nogi M, Shimidzu N (2014) Transparent nanopaper-based flexible organic thin-film transistor array. Adv Funct Mater 24:1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fujisawa S, Okita Y, Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Preparation and characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films with free carboxyl groups. Carbohydr Polym 84:579–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10:162–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2010) Thermal stabilization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 95:1502–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A (2013) Influence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril length on film properties. Carbohydr Polym 93:172–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Geng B, Wang H, Wu S, Ru J, Tong C, Chen Y, Liu H, Wu S, Liu X (2017) Surface-tailored nanocellulose aerogels with thiol-functional moieties for highly efficient and selective removal of Hg(II) ions from water. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:11715–11726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilbert RD, Kadla JF (2000) Cellulose modification. In: Meister JJ (ed) Polymer modification: principles, techniques and applications, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 32Google Scholar
  29. Hasani M, Cranston ED, Westman G, Gray DG (2008) Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 4:2238–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9:1579–1585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ho TTT, Zimmermann T, Hauert R, Caseri W (2011) Preparation and characterization of cationic nanofibrillated cellulose from etherification and high-shear disintegration processes. Cellulose 18:1391–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu L, Zheng G, Yao J, Liu N, Weil B, Eskilsson M, Karabulut E, Ruan Z, Fan S, Bloking JT, McGehee MD, Wågberg L, Cui Y (2013) Transparent and conductive paper from nanocellulose fibers. Energy Environ Sci 6:513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hubbe MA, Ferrer A, Tyagi P, Yin Y, Salas C, Pal L, Rojas OJ (2017) Nanocellulose in thin films, coatings, and plies for packaging applications: a review. Bioresources 12:2143–2233Google Scholar
  35. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AH, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys A 89:461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jiang F, Hsieh Y-L (2014) Super water absorbing and shape memory nanocellulose aerogels from TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils via cyclic freezing–thawing. J Mater Chem A 2:350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klemm D, Philpp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (2004a) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry, vol 2. Wiley, New York, p 257Google Scholar
  39. Klemm D, Philpp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (2004b) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry, vol 1. Wiley, New York, p 83Google Scholar
  40. Klemm D, Philpp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (2004c) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry, vol 1. Wiley, New York, p 106Google Scholar
  41. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:5438–5466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kumar V, Bollström R, Yang A, Chen Q, Chen G, Salminen P, Bousfield D, Toivakka M (2014) Comparison of nano- and microfibrillated cellulose films. Cellulose 21:3443–3456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Li F, Mascheroni E, Piergiovanni L (2015) The potential of nanocellulose in the packaging field: a review. Packag Technol Sci 28:475–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liimatainen H, Suopajärvi T, Sirviö J, Hormi O, Niinimäki J (2014) Fabrication of cationic cellulosic nanofibrils through aqueous quaternization pretreatment and their use in colloid aggregation. Carbohydr Polym 103:187–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindström T (2017) Aspects on nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) processing, rheology and NFC-film properties. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 29:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Littunen K, Castro J, Samoylenko A, Xu Q, Quaggin S, Vainio S, Seppälä J (2016) Synthesis of cationized nanofibrillated cellulose and its antimicrobial properties. Eur Polym J 75:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu H, Geng B, Chen Y, Wang H (2016a) Review on the aerogel-type oil sorbents derived from nanocellulose. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu H, Chen Y, Geng B, Ru J, Du C, Jin C, Han J (2016b) Research progress in the cellulose based aerogel-type oil sorbents. Acta Polym Sin 5:545–559Google Scholar
  50. Naderi A (2017) Nanofibrillated cellulose: properties reinvestigated. Cellulose 24:1933–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naderi A, Lindström T, Erlandsson J, Sundström J, Flodberg G (2016a) A comparative study of the properties of three nano-fibrillated cellulose systems that have been produced at about the same energy consumption levels in the mechanical delamination step. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Naderi A, Lindström T, Christoph FW, Flodberg G, Sundström J, Junel K, Erlandsson J, Runebjörk A (2016b) Phosphorylated nanofibrillated cellulose: production and properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 31:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nakagaito AN, Nogi M, Yano H (2010) Displays from transparent film of natural nanofibers. MRS Bull 35:214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2016a) Current progress in rheology of cellulose nanofibril suspensions. Biomacromolecules 17:2311–2320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016b) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Nogi M (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21:1595–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nogi M, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber sheets by deposition of transparent materials: a concept for a roll-to-roll processing. Appl Phys Lett 94:233117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nogi M, Kim C, Sugahara T, Inui T, Takahashi T, Suganuma K (2013) High thermal stability of optical transparency in cellulose nanofiber paper. Appl Phys Lett 102:181911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Okahisa Y, Yoshida A, Miyaguchi S, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent wood–cellulose nanocomposite as a base substrate for flexible organic light-emitting diode displays. Compos Sci Technol 69:1958–1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oleksandr N, Mohamed NB, Julien B (2015) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25Google Scholar
  62. Olszewska A, Eronen P, Johansson L-S, Malho J-M, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Österberg M (2011) The behaviour of cationic nanofibrillar cellulose in aqueous media. Cellulose 18:1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Osterberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pei A, Butchosa N, Berglund LA, Zhou Q (2013) Surface quaternized cellulose nanofibrils with high water absorbency and adsorption capacity for anionic dyes. Soft Matter 9:2047–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Puangsin B, Yang Q, Saito T, Isogai A (2013) Comparative characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films prepared from non-wood resources. Int J Biol Macromol 59:208–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodionova G, Lenes M, Eriksen Ø, Gregersen Ø (2011) Surface chemical modification of microfibrillated cellulose: improvement of barrier properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 18:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodionova G, Saito T, Lenes M, Eriksen Ø, Gregersen Ø, Fukuzumi H, Isogai A (2012) Mechanical and oxygen barrier properties of films prepared from fibrillated dispersions of TEMPO-oxidized Norway spruce and Eucalyptus pulps. Cellulose 19:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ru J, Geng B, Tong C, Wang H, Wu S, Liu H (2017) Nanocellulose-based adsorption materials. Prog Chem 10:1228–1251Google Scholar
  70. Saini S, Yücel FÇ, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Surface cationized cellulose nanofibrils for the production of contact active antimicrobial surfaces. Carbohydr Polym 135:239–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saito Tsuguyuki, Kimura Satoshi, Yoshiharu Nishiyama A, Isogai Akira (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-Mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:2485–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N, Kimura S, Fukuzumi H, Heux L, Isogai A (2009) Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromolecules 10:1992–1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Scherrer P (1918) Estimation of the size and internal structure of colloidal particles by means of rontgen. NachrGeswiss Gottingen 2:98–112Google Scholar
  75. Segal LC, Creely J, Martin AEJ, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2012) Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 13:842–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Siró I, Plackett D, Hedenqvist MS, Ankerfors M, Lindström T (2011) Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties. J Appl Polym Sci 119:2652–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith DK, Bampton RF, Alexander WJ (1963) Use of new solvents for evaluating chemical cellulose for the viscose process. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 2:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stelte W, Sanadi A (2009) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from two commercial hardwood and softwood pulps. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:11211–11219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Takaichi S, Saito T, Tanaka R, Isogai A (2014) Improvement of nanodispersibility of oven-dried TEMPO-oxidized celluloses in water. Cellulose 21:4093–4103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Voisin H, Bergström L, Liu P, Mathew AP (2017) Nanocellulose-based materials for water purification. Nanomaterials 7:57CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Wei J, Chen Y, Liu H, Du C, Yu H, Ru J, Zhou Z (2016a) Effect of surface charge content in the TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers on morphologies and properties of poly (N -isopropylacrylamide)-based composite hydrogels. Ind Crops Prod 92:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wei J, Chen Y, Liu H, Du C, Yu H, Zhou Z (2016b) Thermo-responsive and compression properties of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber-modified PNIPAm hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 147:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu W, Tassi NG, Zhu H, Fang Z, Hu L (2015) Nanocellulose-based translucent diffuser for optoelectronic device applications with dramatic improvement of light coupling. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:26860–26864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu B, Geng B, Chen Y, Liu H, Li G, Wu Q (2017) Preparation and characteristics of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils from bamboo pulp and their oxygen-barrier application in PLA films. Front Chem Sci Eng 11:554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yagyu H, Saito T, Isogai A, Koga H, Nogi M (2015) Chemical modification of cellulose nanofibers for the production of highly thermal resistant and optically transparent nanopaper for paper devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:22012–22017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Yao Y, Tao J, Zou J, Zhang B, Li T, Dai J, Zhu M, Wang S, Fu K, Henderson D, Hitz E, Peng J, Hu L (2016) Light management in plastic-paper hybrid substrate towards high-performance optoelectronics. Energy Environ Sci 9:2278–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhu H, Zhu S, Jia Z, Parvinian S, Li Y, Vaaland O, Hu L, Li T (2015) Anomalous scaling law of strength and toughness of cellulose nanopaper. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:8971–8976CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringZhejiang A & F UniversityLin’an District, HangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Zhejiang Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Bamboo Resources and High-efficiency UtilizationLin’an District, HangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Chemical and Material EngineeringHefei UniversityHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Packaging Engineering in the College of Material and EngineeringZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations