Advertisement

Rheology of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspensions: influence of the degree of fibrillation and residual fibre content on flow and viscoelastic properties

  • 311 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

The influence of the degree of fibrillation (DoF), i.e. the fibril width distribution, on the rheological properties of microfibrilated cellulose (MFC) suspensions was investigated. To extend the understanding of the dominating effect of either fibril diameter alone or diameter size distribution, flow curves (viscosity against shear rate) and viscoelastic measurements were performed on single, double and ternary component mixtures of medium and highly fibrillated MFCs and pulp fibres across a range of solids content. The data were quantified using classical and recently introduced descriptors, and presented in comprehensive 3D/ternary contour plots to identify qualitative trends. It was found that several rheological properties followed the trends that are generally described in the literature, i.e. that an increasing DoF increases the MFC suspension network strength. It was, however, also found that coarse pulp fibres can have additional effects that cannot be explained by the increased fibril widths alone. It is hypothesised that the increased stiffness (directly caused by the larger fibril width) as well as the reduced mobility of the pulp fibres are additional contributors. The data are discussed in relation to recent findings in the field of rheology and related morphological models of MFC suspension flow behaviour.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Agoda-Tandjawa G, Durand S, Berot S, Blassel C, Gaillard C, Garnier C, Doublier JL (2010) Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions after freezing. Carbohydr Polym 80:677–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.045

  2. Barnes HA (2000) Measuring the viscosity of large-particle (and flocculated) suspenions: a note on the necessary gap size of rotational viscometers. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 94:213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(00)00162-2

  3. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84:975–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.052

  4. Bounoua S, Lemaire E, Férec J, Ausias G, Kuzhir P (2016) Shear-thinning in concentrated rigid fiber suspensions: aggregation induced by adhesive interactions. J Rheol 60:1279–1300. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4965431

  5. Buscall R (2010) Letter to the editor: wall slip in dispersion rheometry. J Rheol 54:1177–1183. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.3495981

  6. Chaouche M, Koch DL (2001) Rheology of non-Brownian fibres with adhesive contacts. J Rheol 42:369–382. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.1343876

  7. Cloitre M, Bonnecaze RT (2017) A review on wall slip in high solid dispersions. Rheol Acta 56:283–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-017-1002-7

  8. Colson J, Bauer W, Mayr M, Fischer W, Gindl-Altmutter W (2016) Morphology and rheology of cellulose nanofibrils derived from mixtures of pulp fibres and papermaking fines. Cellulose 23:2439–2448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0987-x

  9. Haavisto S, Salmela J, Jäsberg A, Saarinen T, Karppinen A, Koponen A (2015) Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspension using optical coherence tomography. Tappi J 14:291–302

  10. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci 37:797–813

  11. Hubbe MA, Tayeb P, Joyce M, Tyagi P, Kehoe M, Dimic-Misic K, Pal L (2017) Rheology of nanocellulose-rich aqueous suspensions: a review. BioResources 12:9556–9661

  12. Iotti M, Gregersen OW, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2

  13. Jia X et al (2014) Rheological properties of an amorphous cellulose suspension. Food Hydrocoll 39:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.12.026

  14. Kangas H, Lahtinen P, Sneck A, Saariaho AM, Laitinen O, Hellén E (2014) Characterization of fibrillated celluloses. A short review and evaluation of characteristics with a combination of methods. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:129–143. https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p129-143

  15. Karppinen A, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Laukkanen A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19:1807–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9766-5

  16. Kataja M, Haavisto S, Salmela J, Lehto R, Koponen A (2017) Characterization of micro-fibrillated cellulose fiber suspension flow using multi scale velocity profile measurements. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 32:473–482. https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2017-32-03-p473-482

  17. Korhonen M, Mohtaschemi M, Puisto A, Illa X, Alava MJ (2017) Start-up inertia as an origin for heterogeneous flow. Phys Rev E 95:022608. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022608

  18. Kumar V, Nazari B, Bousfield D, Toivakka M (2016) Rheology of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions in pressure-driven flow. Appl Rheol 26:43534. https://doi.org/10.3933/ApplRheol-26-43534

  19. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15:425–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9184-2

  20. Lauri J, Koponen A, Haavisto S, Czajkowski J, Fabritius T (2017) Analysis of rheology and wall depletion of microfibrillated cellulose suspension using optical coherence tomography. Cellulose 24:4715–4728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1493-5

  21. Martoïa F, Perge C, Dumont PJJ, Orgéas L, Fardin MA, Manneville S, Belgacem MN (2015) Heterogeneous flow kinematics of cellulose nanofibril suspensions under shear. Soft Matter 11:4742–4755. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm00530b

  22. Missoum K, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: a review. Materials 6:1745–1766. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6051745

  23. Moberg T, Rigdahl M (2012) On the viscoelastic properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspension. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 20:123–130

  24. Moberg T et al (2017) Rheological properties of nanocellulose suspensions: effects of fibril/particle dimensions and surface characteristics. Cellulose 24:2499–2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1283-0

  25. Mohtaschemi M, Dimic-Misic K, Puisto A, Korhonen M, Maloney T, Paltakari J, Alava MJ (2014a) Rheological characterization of fibrillated cellulose suspensions via bucket vane viscosimeter. Cellulose 21:1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0235-1

  26. Mohtaschemi M, Sorvari A, Puisto A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J, Alava MJ (2014b) The vane method and kinetic modeling: shear rheology of nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 21:3913–3925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0409-x

  27. Naderi A, Lindström T (2015) Rheological measurements on nanofibrillated cellulose systems: a science in progress. In: Mondal MIH (ed) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, pp 187–202

  28. Nazari N, Kumar V, Bousfield DW, Toivakka M (2016) Rheology of cellulose nanofibers suspensions: boundary driven flow. J Rheol 60:1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.4960336

  29. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2014) Rheological properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions: wall-slip and shear banding phenomena. Carbohydr Polym 112:432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.092

  30. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2015) Concentration effect of TEMPO-oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose aqueous suspensions on the flow instabilities and small-angle X-ray scattering structural characterization. Cellulose 22:2197–2210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0640-0

  31. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016a) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016

  32. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2016b) Current progress in rheology of cellulose nanofibril suspensions. Biomacromolecules 17:2311–2320. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00668

  33. Onyianta AJ, Williams R (2018) The use of sedimentation for the estimation of aspect ratios of charged cellulose nanofibrils. In: Fangueiro R, Rana S (eds) Advances in natural fibre composites. Springer, Cham, pp 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64641-1_17

  34. Orts WJ, Godbout L, Marchessault RH, Revol J-F (1998) Enhanced ordering of liquid crystalline suspensions of cellulose microfibrils: a small angle neutron scattering study. Macromolecules 31:5717–5725. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9711452

  35. Pääkkö M et al (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm061215p

  36. Puisto A, Mohtaschemi M, Alava MJ (2015) Dynamic hysteresis in the rheology of complex fluids. Phys Rev E 91:042314. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042314

  37. Pyrgiotakis G et al (2018) Development of high throughput, high precision synthesis platforms and characterization methodologies for toxicological studies of nanocellulose. Cellulose 25:2303–2319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1718-2

  38. Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behaviour. Cellulose 19:647–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9661-0

  39. Saarinen T, Lille M, Seppälä J (2009) Technical aspects on rheological characterization of microfibrillar cellulose water suspensions. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 17:121–128

  40. Schenker M, Schoelkopf J, Mangin P, Gane P (2016a) Rheological investigation of complex micro and nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) suspensions: discussion of flow curves and gel stability. Tappi J 15:405–416

  41. Schenker M, Schoelkopf J, Mangin P, Gane P (2016b) Rheological investigation of pigmented micro-nano-fibrillated cellulose (MNFC) suspensions: discussion of flow curves. In: Tappi international conference on nanotechnology for renewable materials, Grenoble

  42. Schenker M, Schoelkopf J, Mangin P, Gane PAC (2017) Influence of shear rheometer measurement system selection on rheological properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspensions. Cellulose 25:961–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1642-x

  43. Schenker M, Schoelkopf J, Mangin P, Gane P (2018) Quantification of flow curve hysteresis data: a novel tool for characterising microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspensions. Appl Rheol 28:22945. https://doi.org/10.3933/ApplRheol-28-22945

  44. Servais C, Ranc H, Sansonnens C, Ravji S, Romoscanu A, Burbidge A (2003) Rheological methods for multiphase materials. In: International symposium on food rheology and structure, Zürich

  45. Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos G (2012) Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28:17124–17133. https://doi.org/10.1021/la303380v

  46. Shafiei-Sabet S, Martinez M, Olson J (2016) Shear rheology of micro-fibrillar cellulose aqueous supensions. Cellulose 23:2943–2953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1040-9

  47. Shogren RL, Peterson SC, Evans KO, Kenar JA (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose gels from corn cobs. Carbohydr Polym 86:1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.035

  48. Stenstad P, Andresen M, Steiner TB, Stenius P (2008) Chemical surface modifications of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 15:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9143-y

  49. Taheri H, Samyn P (2016) Effect of homogenization (microfluidization) process parameters in mechanical production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose on its rheological and morphological properties. Cellulose 23:1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0866-5

  50. Veen SJ, Versluis P, Kuijk A, Velikov KP (2015) Microstructure and rheology of microfibril-polymer networks. Soft Matter 11:8907–8912. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM02086G

  51. Yoshimura A, Prud’homme RK (1988) Wall slip corrections for Couette and parallel disk viscometers. J Rheol 32:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549963

Download references

Acknowledgments

Omya International AG and FiberLean Technologies Ltd. are acknowledged for their financial and in-kind support of this work. Dr. Johannes Kritzinger (FiberLean Technologies Ltd.) is thanked for his valuable inputs on image analysis and data presentation as well as Silvan Fischer (Omya International AG) for the microscopical imaging work. We would like to also acknowledge Dr. Antti Puisto for helpful discussions.

Author information

Correspondence to Michel Schenker.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 15037 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 16073 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (AVI 16033 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (AVI 14322 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (AVI 13464 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (AVI 16077 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (AVI 15884 kb)

Supplementary material 9 (AVI 16979 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1197 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 15037 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 16073 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (AVI 16033 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (AVI 14322 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (AVI 13464 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (AVI 16077 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (AVI 15884 kb)

Supplementary material 9 (AVI 16979 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schenker, M., Schoelkopf, J., Gane, P. et al. Rheology of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspensions: influence of the degree of fibrillation and residual fibre content on flow and viscoelastic properties. Cellulose 26, 845–860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2117-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)
  • Rheology
  • Vane
  • Degree of fibrillation (DoF)
  • Flow curve
  • Viscoelasticity