Microstructural development and mechanical performance of PLA/TPU blends containing geometrically different cellulose nanocrystals
- 25 Downloads
Microstructural development and mechanical performance of poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) (80/20) blends containing single but geometrically different cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were investigated. The CNCs used in this study include cylindrical CNCs (ultrasonic treated), spherical CNCs (chemical treated) and rod-like CNCs (commercial), all characterized by particle size analyzer, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray diffraction. The melt viscoelastic results obtained for the melt compounded CNCs with PLA/TPU blend have implied a fine dispersion of both spherical and cylindrical CNCs which are preferentially localized in the PLA matrix and/or interface, while poorly dispersed rod-like CNCs were mostly accumulated in the TPU phase. These results were supported by AFM micrographs. More evidence was provided by scanning electron microscope micrographs which showed a decrease in TPU particle size in the blends filled with spherical and cylindrical CNCs, as a result of the nanoparticles’ localization in the PLA matrix and/or interface. The results of dynamic mechanical thermal analysis have revealed that the addition of spherical and cylindrical CNCs into the blends not only has compensated the reducing effect of TPU on the storage modulus but also has enhanced the modulus up to values even higher than that of PLA matrix. In contrast, the rod-like CNCs did not enhance the storage modulus of the blend significantly. More interestingly, the blend nanocomposite containing 3 wt% spherical CNCs exhibited a highly enhanced yield stress as well as significant elongation at break. This behavior could be explained by the induction of an interconnected type microstructure of spherical CNCs in which the nanoparticles are localized in PLA matrix, allowing the overlapping of stress counters around TPU particles and facilitating the stress transformation throughout the loaded sample. A similar enhancing effect but to a lesser extent, was obtained for those blend nanocomposites filled with cylindrical CNCs. In contrast to the other two types of CNCs, rod-like CNCs have weakened the mechanical performance of the blends. The results of fracture toughness obtained from single edge notch bending experiments have shown almost similar enhancing effect of the three types of CNCs on toughening. However, the sensitivity of the fracture test was not high enough to distinguish the effect of different CNCs on mechanical behavior of CNCs-filled blend nanocomposites.
KeywordsPLA Cellulose nanocrystals Morphology Rheology Toughening Blend nanocomposites
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Iranian National Nanotechnology network. The authors are also grateful to FPInnovations for providing the rod-like CNCs.
- Bitinis N, Verdejo R, Bras J, Fortunati E, Kenny JM, Torre L, López-Manchado MA (2013) Poly(lactic acid)/natural rubber/cellulose nanocrystal bionanocomposites Part I. Processing and morphology. Carbohydr Polym 96:611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.068 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen JJ, Liu HY, Zhang GZ, Qu JP (2013) Mechanical properties and thermal behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane toughening polylactide prepared by vane extruder. Appl Mech Mater 431:110–115. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.431.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fortunati E, Armentano I, Zhou Q, Iannoni A, Saino E, Visai L, Berglund LA, Kenny JM (2012) Multifunctional bionanocomposite films of poly (lactic acid), cellulose nanocrystals and silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 87:1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goffin AL, Raquez JM, Duquesne E, Siqueira G, Habibi Y, Dufresne A, Dubois P (2011) From interfacial ring-opening polymerization to melt processing of cellulose nanowhisker-filled polylactide-based nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 12:2456–2465. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200581h CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Raquez JM, Habibi Y, Murariu M, Dubois Ph (2013) Polylactide (PLA)-based nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 38:1504–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siqueira G, Tapin-Lingua S, Bras J, Perez DS, Dufresne A (2011) Mechanical properties of natural rubber nanocomposites reinforced with cellulosic nanoparticles obtained from combined mechanical shearing, and enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of sisal fibers. Cellulose 18:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9463-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner JF, Riga A, O’Connor A, Zhang J, Collis J (2004) Characterization of drawn and undrawn poly-l-lactide films by differential scanning calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim 75:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JTAN.0000017347.08469.b1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vilay V, Todo M, Jaafar M, Ahmad Z, Pasomsouk K (2010) Characterization of microstructure and mechanical properties of biodegradable polymer blends of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(butylene succinate-co-e-caprolactone) with lysine triisocyanate. Polym Eng Sci 50:1485–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2013.763350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xiu H, Bai HW, Huang CM, Xu CL, Li XY, Fu Q (2013) Selective localization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles at the interface and its effect on the impact toughness of poly (l-lactide)/poly(ether)urethane blends. Express Polym Lett 7:261–271. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xiu H, Huang C, Bai H, Jiang J, Chen F, Deng H, Wang K, Zhang Q, Fu Q (2014) Improving impact toughness of polylactide/poly(ether)urethane blends via designing the phase morphology assisted by hydrophilic silica nanoparticles. Polymer 55:1593–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.01.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yu F, Huang HX (2015) Simultaneously toughening and reinforcing poly(lactic acid)/thermoplastic polyurethane blend via enhancing interfacial adhesion by hydrophobic silica nanoparticles. Polym Test 45:107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar