, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 6977–6988 | Cite as

Production of bacterial cellulose from byproduct of citrus juice processing (citrus pulp) by Gluconacetobacter hansenii

  • Yan Cao
  • Shengmin LuEmail author
  • Ying Yang
Original Paper


In this study, bacterial cellulose (BC) was produced by Gluconacetobacter hansenii and Gluconacetobacter xylinum using citrus pulp water (CPW) and coconut water (CW). The productivity and the characteristics of the BCs produced by different strains and media were investigated. The results showed that BC production could reach more than 8.0 g DW L−1 by both G. hansenii and G. xylinum (8.42 ± 0.54 and 8.77 ± 0.64 g L−1) using CPW medium, which was close to the industrial level (9.91 ± 0.42 g L−1) by G. xylinum in CW medium. Therefore, CPW medium had strong universal utilization ability for BC production by both G. hansenii and G. xylinum. On the other hand, BC produced by G. hansenii in CPW medium had low hardness and high water holding capacity, and the preferred orientation of microfiber crystallites in BCs obtained by G. hansenii and G. xylinum using CPW was different. This difference enabled the production of BC products with different physicochemical features based on the requirements. In addition, the economics of BC production using CPW and CW as the raw fermentation materials was analyzed and compared, and the result indicated that the former was more economical and would be a promising candidate for producing BC. Finally, producing BC using CPW to replace the traditional CW medium would expand the raw material collection regions, reduce transportation cost, and realize BC products diversity.


Bacterial cellulose Gluconacetobacter hansenii Citrus pulp Characteristics 



The authors would like to thank Dr. Lihua Fan, a Research Scientist at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and her technician, Craig Doucette, for their technical suggestions and language revision. This work was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture in China (Grant No. 201303076-05) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31401676).


  1. Abeer MM, Mohd Amin MCI, Martin C (2014) A review of bacterial cellulose-based drug delivery systems: their biochemistry, current approaches and future prospects. J Pharm Pharmacol 66(8):1047–1061PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barud HS, Ribeiro CA, Crespi MS, Martines MAU, Dexpert-Ghys J, Marques RFC, Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJL (2007) Thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose–phosphate composite membranes. J Therm Anal Calorim 87(3):815–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bi JC, Liu SX, Li CF, Li J, Liu LX, Deng J, Yang YC (2014) Morphology and structure characterization of bacterial celluloses produced by different strains in agitated culture. J Appl Microbiol 117:1305–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Çakar F, Kat G, Özer I, Demirbağ DD, Şahin F, Aytekin GÖ (2014) Newly developed medium and strategy for bacterial cellulose production. Biochem Eng J 92:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Czaja W, Romanovicz D, Brown RM (2004) Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture. Cellulose 11(3–4):403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dayal MS, Catchmark JM (2016) Mechanical and structural property analysis of bacterial cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 144:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dayal MS, Goswami N, Sahai A, Jain V, Mathur G, Mathur A (2013) Effect of media components on cell growth and bacterial cellulose production from Acetobacter aceti MTCC 2623. Carbohydr Polym 94(1):12–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esa F, Tasirin SM, Rahman NA (2014) Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric Agric Sci Proc 2:113–119Google Scholar
  10. Fan X, Gao Y, He W, Hu H, Tian M, Wang K, Pan S (2016) Production of nano bacterial cellulose from beverage industrial waste of citrus peel and pulp using Komagataeibacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 151:1068–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58(2):345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y, Zhu C, Yang J, Nie Y, Chen C, Sun D (2014) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21(1):1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang C, Guo HJ, Xiong L, Wang B, Shi SL, Chen XF, Lin XQ, Wang C, Luo J, Chen XD (2016) Using wastewater after lipid fermentation as substrate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 136:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hwang JW, Yang YK, Hwang JK, Pyun YR, Kim YS (1999) Effects of pH and dissolved oxygen on cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum BRC5 in agitated culture. J Biosci Bioeng 88(2):183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jozala GF, de Lencastre-Novaes LC, Lopes GM, de Carvalho S-EV, Mazzola PG, Pessoa-Jr G, Grotto D, Gerenutti M, Chaud MV (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(5):2063–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelebek H (2010) Sugars, organic acids, phenolic compositions and antioxidant activity of Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) cultivars grown in Turkey. Ind Crop Prod 32:269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurosumi G, Sasaki C, Yamashita Y, Nakamura Y (2009) Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym 76(2):333–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Z, Wang L, Hua J, Jia S, Zhang J, Liu H (2015) Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using Acetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr Polym 120:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, Li Z (2014) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol 151:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Millon LE, Guhados G, Wan W (2008) Anisotropic polyvinyl alcohol–bacterial cellulose nanocomposite for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B 86(2):444–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A (2015) Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym 117:518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nayar NM (2017) The coconut in the world. In: The coconut. Academic Press, Salt Lake City, pp 1–8 Google Scholar
  25. Nishiyama Y, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Langan P (2003) Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Iα from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 125:14300–14306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Padmanaban S, Balaji N, Muthukumaran C, Tamilarasan K (2015) Statistical optimization of process parameters for exopolysaccharide production by Aureobasidium pullulans using sweet potato based medium. Biotech 5(6):1067–1073Google Scholar
  27. Seifert M, Hesse S, Kabrelian V, Klemm D (2004) Controlling the water content of never dried and reswollen bacterial cellulose by the addition of water-soluble polymers to the culture medium. J Polym Sci Polym Chem 42(3):463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Setyawati MI, Chien L, Lee C (2007) Expressing Vitreoscilla hemoglobin in statically cultured Acetobacter xylinum with reduced O2 tension maximizes bacterial cellulose pellicle production. J Biotechnol 132(1):38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shah N, Ha JH, Park JK (2010) Effect of reactor surface on production of bacterial cellulose and water soluble oligosaccharides by Gluconacetobacter hansenii PJK. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 15(1):110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Park JK (2013) Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym 98:1585–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shan Y (2016) Comprehensive utilization of citrus by-product. Academic Press, Elsevier, New York, pp 86–91Google Scholar
  32. Shoda M, Sugano Y (2005) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 10(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sulaeva I, Henniges U, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2015) Bacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: properties and modifications. A review. Biotechnol Adv 33(8):1547–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takai M, Tsuta Y, Watanabe S (1975) Biosynthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. I. Characterizations of bacterial cellulose. Polym J 7(2):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tokoh C, Takabe K, Fujita M, Saiki H (1998) Cellulose synthesized by Acetobacter Xylinum in the presence of acetyl glucomannan. Cellulose 5(4):249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. USDG (2015) Citrus fruit 2015 summary. Available in Sept 2015
  37. Watanabe K, Tabuchi M, Morinaga Y, Yoshinaga F (1998) Structural features and properties of bacterial cellulose produced in agitated culture. Cellulose 5(3):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu JM, Liu RH (2012) Thin stillage supplementation greatly enhances bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 90(1):116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan Z, Chen S, Wang H, Wang B, Jiang J (2008) Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose/multi-walled carbon nanotubes in agitated culture. Carbohydr Polym 74(3):659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang Y, Jia J, Xing J, Chen J, Lu S (2013) Isolation and characteristics analysis of a novel high bacterial cellulose producing strain Gluconacetobacter intermedius CIs26. Carbohydr Polym 92(2):2012–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang XY, Huang C, Guo HJ, Xiong L, Luo J, Wang B, Lin XQ, Chen XF, Chen XD (2014) Bacterial Cellulose Production from the litchi extract by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Prep Biochem Biotech 46(1):39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang Y, Li C, Deng J, Liu L, Hu Q (2015) Changes of chemical composition and microbial community during naturally fermented coconut water used in nata de coco production. Food Res Dev 36(21):168–171Google Scholar
  43. Yao W, Wu X, Zhu J, Sun B, Zhang YY, Miller C (2011) Bacterial cellulose membrane—a new support carrier for yeast immobilization for ethanol fermentation. Process Biochem 46(10):2054–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yue YY, Zhou CJ, French AD, Xia G, Han GP, Wang QW, Wu QL (2012) Comparative properties of cellulose nano-crystals from native and mercerized cotton fibers. Cellulose 19:1173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Food ScienceZhejiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Post-Harvest Handling of FruitsMinistry of Agriculture and Rural AffairsHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Fruits and Vegetables Postharvest and Processing Technology Research of Zhejiang ProvinceHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations