Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 6107–6119 | Cite as

Conversion of paper to film by ionic liquids: manufacturing process and properties

  • Atsushi Tanaka
  • Alexey Khakalo
  • Lauri Hauru
  • Antti Korpela
  • Hannes Orelma
Original Paper
  • 222 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the “chemical welding” of paper with the ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIM]OAc) using a two-step process. First, the IL is transported into the structure of the paper as a water solution. Then, partial dissolution is achieved by activation with heat (80–95 °C), where the water evaporates and the surfaces of the fibres partially dissolve. The activated paper is washed with water to remove IL, and dried to fuse fibre surfaces into each other. The “chemically welded” paper structure has both elevated dry and wet strength. The treatment conditions can be adjusted to produce both paper-like materials and films. The most severe treatment conditions produce films that are fully transparent and their oxygen and grease barrier properties are excellent. As an all-cellulose material, the “chemically welded” paper is fully biodegradable and is a potential alternative to fossil fuel-based plastics.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Cellulose Partial dissolution Paper Ionic liquids All-cellulose composite 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out in the CellFi (Conversion of cellulose to plastic) project funded by Business Finland and Finnish industries companies (Metsä Fibre Ltd, Metsä Board Ltd, Stora Enso Ltd, FL Pipe Ltd, Pölkky Ltd, and Versoul Ltd). Mika Vähä-Nissi is acknowledged for his comments on the barrier measurements, Heikki Pajari is thanked for performing viscosity analyses, and Tommi Virtanen is thanked for performing the NMR analyses. Professor Ilkka Kilpeläinen (University of Helsinki) is thanked for active participation in the CellFi project.

Author contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all the authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL (1984) Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 223(80):283–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Borodulina S, Kulachenko A, Galland S, Nygårds M (2012) Stress-strain curve of paper revisited. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27:318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cammarata L, Kazarian SG, Salter PA, Welton T (2001) Molecular states of water in room temperature ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3:5192–5200.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B106900D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. da Cruz NF, Ferreira S, Cabral M et al (2014) Packaging waste recycling in Europe: Is the industry paying for it? Waste Manag 34:298–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N et al (2001) Review: current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J Mater Sci 36:2107–2131.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017512029696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M et al (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fink H-P, Weigel P, Purz H, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci 26:1473–1524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foston M (2014) Advances in solid-state NMR of cellulose. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:176–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner D, Tajvidi M (2016) Hydrogen bonding in wood-based materials: an update. Wood Fiber Sci 48:234–244Google Scholar
  10. Graenacher C (1934) Cellulose solutions. Patent US1943176Google Scholar
  11. Gurnagul N, Howard RC, Zou X et al (1993) The mechanical permanence of paper: a literature review. J Pulp Pap Sci 19:J160–J160Google Scholar
  12. Hao W, Chen Z, Wang J, Liu X (2004) Modeling of protein adsorption in membrane affinity chromatography. Anal Lett 37:1319–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haverhals LM, Reichert WM, De Long HC, Trulove PC (2010) Natural fiber welding. Macromol Mater Eng 295:425–430.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201000005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haward M (2018) Plastic pollution of the world’s seas and oceans as a contemporary challenge in ocean governance. Nat Commun 9:667.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03104-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Huber T, Müssig J, Curnow O et al (2011) A critical review of all-cellulose composites. J Mater Sci 47:1171–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5774-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ichiura H, Hirose Y, Masumoto M, Ohtani Y (2017) Ionic liquid treatment for increasing the wet strength of cellulose paper. Cellulose 24:3469–3477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1340-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Isogai A, Usuda M, Kato T et al (1989) Solid-state CP/MAS carbon-13 NMR study of cellulose polymorphs. Macromolecules 22:3168–3172.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00197a045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson C, Bras J, Mondragon I et al (2012) Renewable fibers and bio-based materials for packaging applications–a review of recent developments. BioResources 7:2506–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson DL (1969) Strengthening swellable fibrous material with an amine oxide. US Patent US3447956AGoogle Scholar
  20. Katekawa ME, Silva MA (2006) A Review of Drying Models Including Shrinkage Effects. Dry Technol 24:5–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930500538519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilpeläinen I, Xie H, King A et al (2007) Dissolution of Wood in Ionic Liquids. J Agric Food Chem 55:9142–9148.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf071692e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klemm D (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry, vol 1. Fundamentals and analytical methods. Wiley, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liebert T (2010) Cellulose solvents —remarkable history, bright future. In: Liebert T (ed) Cellulose solvents: for analysis, shaping and chemical modification. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindström T, Wågberg L, Larsson T (2005) On the nature of joint strength in paper-A review of dry and wet strength resins used in paper manufacturing. In: 13th fundamental research symposium. The Pulp and Paper Fundamental Research Society Cambridge, UK, pp 457–562Google Scholar
  25. Nishino T, Arimoto N (2007) All-cellulose composite prepared by selective dissolving of fiber surface. Biomacromol 8:2712–2716.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0703416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Orelma H, Korpela A, Kunnari V et al (2017) Improving the mechanical properties of CNF films by NMMO partial dissolution with hot calender activation. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1229-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paunonen S (2013) Strength and barrier enhancements of cellophane and cellulose derivative films: a review. BioResources 8:3098–3121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quijada-Maldonado E, van der Boogaart S, Lijbers JH et al (2012) Experimental densities, dynamic viscosities and surface tensions of the ionic liquids series 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and dicyanamide and their binary and ternary mixtures with water and ethanol at T = (298.15–343.15 K). J Chem Thermodyn 51:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2012.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shibata M, Teramoto N, Nakamura T, Saitoh Y (2013) All-cellulose and all-wood composites by partial dissolution of cotton fabric and wood in ionic liquid. Carbohydr Polym 98:1532–1539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Simon J, Müller HP, Koch R, Müller V (1998) Thermoplastic and biodegradable polymers of cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 59:107–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00151-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Siracusa V, Rocculi P, Romani S, Rosa MD (2008) Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:634–643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sjöström E (1993) Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  33. Tan X, Li X, Chen L, Xie F (2016) Solubility of starch and microcrystalline cellulose in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ionic liquid and solution rheological properties. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:27584–27593.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP04426C CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vähä-Nissi M, Laine C, Rautkoski H, Pitkänen M, Vartiainen J, Ohra-Aho T, Sneck A, Gestranius M, Ketoja J (2016) Test methods for evaluating grease and mineral oil barriers. In: TAPPI Place Conference, 10–13 April, Fort Worth, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Virtanen T, Maunu SL (2014) NMR spectroscopic studies on dissolution of softwood pulp with enhanced reactivity. Cellulose 21:153–165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0144-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang L, Ruan D, Zhou J (2001) Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose films prepared from cotton linters in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:5923–5928.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0010417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang B, Azuma J, Uyama H (2015) Preparation and characterization of a transparent amorphous cellulose film. RSC Adv 5:2900–2907.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA14090G CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VTT - Technical Research Centre of Finland LtdEspooFinland
  2. 2.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations