Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 5259–5275 | Cite as

Reductive-co-precipitated cellulose immobilized zerovalent iron nanoparticles in ionic liquid/water for Cr(VI) adsorption

  • Archana Kumari Sharma
  • Rupesh S. Devan
  • Meenu Arora
  • Rabindra Kumar
  • Yuan-Ron Ma
  • J. Nagendra Babu
Original Paper
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Microcrystalline cellulose immobilized zerovalent iron nanoparticles (CI-1-3) with different loading of 6, 12 and 24% w/w Fe0 were synthesized by NaBH4 reduction under simultaneous co-precipitation of cellulose from ionic liquid ([BMIM]Cl)-water binary mixture. SEM, TEM, FTIR, VSM, XRD and XPS analysis were carried out to characterize the material. The electron microscopy studies revealed the immobilization of iron nanoparticle in the bulk and surface of microcrystalline cellulose with a size range of 20–100 nm. CI-1-3 showed strong interaction between cellulose hydroxyl moiety and nZVI, immobilized on the polymer and saturation magnetization of 3 emu/g for CI-2. The materials were studied for Cr(VI) adsorption which revealed the qmax value of 28.57, 58.82 and 38.48 mg Cr(VI)/g of CI-1-3, respectively.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Microcrystalline cellulose nZVI Cr(VI) adsorption Reductive regeneration [BMIM]Cl Ionic liquid 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Archana Kumari Sharma is thankful to CUPB for providing university fellowship for carrying out the proposed research. We are all thankful to CSMCRI, CIL-CUPB for the analytical services provided. J. N. Babu is thankful to CUPB for research seed money grant and to DST, New Delhi, India for providing funds through DST Fast Track Young Scientist as Project Ref. No. 240/2010 for research support. The authors’ acknowledge Electron Microscope Division, AIIMS, New Delhi for TEM facility.

Supplementary material

10570_2018_1932_MOESM1_ESM.docx (245 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 244 kb)

References

  1. Alidokht L, Khataee AR, Reyhanitabar A, Oustan S (2011) Reductive removal of Cr(VI) by starch-stabilized Fe0 nanoparticles in aqueous solution. Desalination 270:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anirudhan TS, Jalajamony S, Suchithra PS (2009) Improved performance of a cellulose-based anion exchanger with tertiary amine functionality for the adsorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf A 335:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 3-67–3-68Google Scholar
  4. Bezbaruah AN, Krajangpan S, Chisholm BJ, Khan E, Bermudez JJE (2009) Entrapment of iron nanoparticles in calcium alginate beads for ground water remediation application. J Hazard Mater 166:1339–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai J, Kimura S, Wada M, Kuga S (2008) Nanoporous cellulose as metal nanoparticles support. Biomacromol 10:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi K, Lee S, Park JO, Park JA, Cho SH, Lee SY, Lee JH, Choi JW (2018) Chromium removal from aqueous solution by a PEI-silica nanocomposite. Sci Rep 8:1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crane RA, Scott TB (2012) Nanoscale zero-valent iron: future prospects for an emerging water treatment technology. J Hazard Mater 211:112–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowhurst L, Mawdsley PR, Perez JM (2003) Solvent-solute interaction in ionic liquid. Phys Chem Chem Phys 5:2790–2794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dafader NC, Rahman N, Majumdar SK, Khan MM, Rahman MM (2018) Preparation and characterization of iminodiacetate group containing nonwoven polyethylene fabrics and its application in chromium adsorption. J Polym Environ 26:740–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalla Vecchia E, Coisson M, Appino C, Vinai F, Sethi R (2009) Magnetic characterization and interaction modeling of zerovalent iron nanoparticles for the remediation of contaminated aquifers. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:3210–3218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Datta KKR, Petala E, Datta KJ, Perman JA, Tucek J, Bartak P, Zboril R (2014) NZVI modified magnetic filter paper with high redox and catalytic activities for advanced water treatment technologies. Chem Commun 50:15673–15676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Morais Teixeira E, Corrêa AC, Manzoli A, de Lima Leite F, de Oliveira CR, Mattoso LHC (2010) Cellulose nanofibers from white and naturally colored cotton fibers. Cellulose 17(3):595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devan RS, Ho WD, Chen CH, Shiu HW, Ho CH, Cheng CL, Wu SY, Liou Y, Ma YR (2009) High room-temperature photoluminescence of one-dimensional Ta2O5 nanorod arrays. Nanotechnology 20:445708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devan RS, Lin JH, Ho WD, Wu SY, Liou Y, Ma YR (2010) Investigation of high-temperature phase transformation in one-dimensional Ta2O5 nanorods. J Appl Crystallogr 43:1062–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devan RS, Lin CL, Gao SY, Cheng CL, Liou Y, Ma YR (2011) Enhancement of green-light photoluminescence of Ta2O5 nanoblock stacks. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:13441–13446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devan RS, Ma YR, More MA, Khare RT, Antad VV, Patil RA, Thakare VP, Dhayal RS, Schmidt-Mende L (2016) Promising field electron emission performance of vertically aligned one dimensional (1D) brookite (β) TiO2 nanorods. RSC Adv 6:98722–98729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devan RS, Thakare VP, Antad VV, Chikate PR, Khare RT, More MA, Dhayal RS, Patil SI, Ma YR, Schmidt-Mende L (2017) Nano-heteroarchitectures of two-dimensional MoS2@ one-dimensional brookite TiO2 nanorods: prominent electron emitters for displays. ACS Omega 2:2925–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duan J, He X, Zhang L (2015) Magnetic cellulose–TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres for highly selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. Chem Commun 51:338–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eliodorio KP, Andolfatto VS, Martins MR, de Sá BP, Umeki ER, de Araújo Morandim-GiannettiA (2017) Treatment of chromium effluent by adsorption on chitosan activated with ionic liquids. Cellulose 24:2559–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitz-Patrick M, Champagne P, Cunningham MF, Whitney RA (2010) A biorefinery processing perspective: treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products. Bioresour Technol 101:8915–8922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fu F, Ma J, Xie L, Tang B, Han W, Lin S (2013) Chromium removal using resin supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. J Environ Manag 128:822–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu R, Yang Y, Xu Z, Zhang X, Guo X, Bi D (2015) The removal of chromium(VI) and lead(II) from groundwater using sepiolite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (S-NZVI). Chemosphere 138:726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galan B, Castañeda D, Ortiz I (2005) Removal and recovery of Cr(VI) from polluted ground waters: a comparative study of ion-exchange technologies. Water Res 39:4317–4324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gelesky MA, Scheeren CW, Foppa L, Pavan FA, Dias SL, Dupont J (2009) Metal nanoparticle/ionic liquid/cellulose: new catalytically active membrane materials for hydrogenation reactions. Biomacromol 10:1888–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geng B, Jin Z, Li T, Qi X (2009) Kinetics of hexavalent chromium removal from water by chitosan-Fe0 nanoparticles. Chemosphere 75:825–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gheju M (2011) Hexavalent chromium reduction with zero-valent iron (ZVI) in aquatic system. Water Air Soil Pollut 222:103–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Golder AK, Samanta AN, Ray S (2007) Removal of trivalent chromium by electrocoagulation. Sep Purif Technol 53:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guo ZR, Zhang G, Fang J, Dou X (2006) Enhanced chromium recovery from tanning wastewater. J Clean Prod 14:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gurgel LVA, de Melo JCP, de Lena JC, Gil LF (2009) Adsorption of chromium(VI) ion from aqueous solution by succinylated-mercerized cellulose functionalized with quaternary ammonium groups. Bioresour Technol 100:3214–3220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hafez A, El-Mariharawy S (2004) Design and performance of the two-stage/two-pass RO membrane system for chromium removal from tannery wastewater. Desalination 165:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halada GP, Clayton CR (1991) Photoreduction of hexavalent chromium during X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of electrochemical and thermal films. J Electrochem Soc 138:2921–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harvey AE Jr, Smart JA, Amis ES (1955) Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of iron(II) and total iron with 1,10-phenanthroline. Anal Chem 27:26–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. He F, Zhao D, Liu J, Roberts CB (2007) Stabilization of Fe–Pd nanoparticles with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose for enhanced transport and dechlorination of trichloroethylene in soil and groundwater. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hines JH, Wanigasekara E, Rudkevich DM, Rogers RD (2008) Calix[4]arenes immobilized in a cellulose-based platform for entrapment and detection of NO x gases. J Mater Chem 18:4050–4055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horzum N, Demir MM, Nairat M, Shahwan T (2013) Chitosan fiber-supported zero-valent iron nanoparticles as a novel sorbent for sequestration of inorganic arsenic. RSC Adv 3:7828–7837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hu XJ, Wang JS, Liua YG, Li X, Zenga GM, Bao ZL, Zeng XX, Chen AW, Long F (2011) Adsorption of chromium(VI) by ethylenediamine-modified cross-linked magnetic chitosan resin: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. J Hazard Mater 185:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jabeen H, Chandra V, Jung S, Lee JW, Kim KS, Kim SB (2011) Enhanced Cr(VI) removal using iron nanoparticle decorated graphene. Nanoscale 3:3583–3585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones F, Farrow JB, Van Bronswijk W (1998) An infrared study of a polyacrylate flocculant adsorbed on hematite. Langmuir 14:6512–6517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim UJ, Kuga S (2001) Thermal decomposition of dialdehyde cellulose and its nitrogen-containing derivatives. Thermochim Acta 369:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim UJ, Wada M, Kuga S (2004) Solubilization of dialdehyde cellulose by hot water. Carbohydr Polym 56:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim JH, Kim JH, Bokare V, Kim EJ, Chang YY, Chang YS (2012) Enhanced removal of chromate from aqueous solution by sequential adsorption-reduction on mesoporous iron–iron oxide nanocomposite. J Nanopart Res 14:1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Simmons BA, Blanch HW (2011) Techno-economic analysis of a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery with ionic liquid pre-treatment. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5:562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kotelnikova N, Vainio U, Pirkkalainen K, Serimaa R (2007) Novel approaches to metallization of cellulose by reduction of cellulose-incorporated copper and nickel Ions. Macromol Symp 254:74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koujalagi PS, Divekar SV, Kulkarni RM, Nagarale RK (2013) Kinetics, thermodynamic, and adsorption studies on removal of chromium(VI) using Tulsion A-27(MP) resin. Desalin Water Treat 51:3273–3283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kumar AS, Jiang SJ, Tseng WL (2015) Effective adsorption of chromium(VI)/Cr(III) from aqueous solution using ionic liquid functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a super sorbent. J Mater Chem A 3:7044–7057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kwak HW, Kim MK, Lee JY, Yun H, Kim MH, Park YH, Lee KH (2015) Preparation of bead-type biosorbent from water-soluble Spirulina platensis extracts for chromium(VI) removal. Algal Res 7:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Li XQ, Zhang WX (2007) Sequestration of metal cations with zerovalent iron nanoparticles a study with high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HR-XPS). J Phys Chem C 111:6939–6946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li XQ, Cao J, Zhang WX (2008) Stoichiometry of Cr(VI) immobilization using nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI): a study with high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HR-XPS). Ind Eng Chem Res 47:2131–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li L, Li Y, Cao L, Yang C (2015) Enhanced chromium(VI) adsorption using nanosized chitosan fibers tailored by electrospinning. Carbohydr Polym 125:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li Q, Xu B, Zhuang L, Xu X, Wang G, Zhang X, Chen J, Tang Y (2018) Preparation, characterization, adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of chitosan adsorbent grafted with a hyperbranched polymer designed for Cr(VI) removal. Cellulose 25:3471–3486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu Z, Wang H, Liu C, Jiang Y, Yu G, Mu X, Wang X (2012) Magnetic cellulose–chitosan hydrogels prepared from ionic liquids as reusable adsorbent for removal of heavy metal ions. Chem Commun 48:7350–7352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu X, Zhou W, Qian X, Shen J, An X (2013) Polyaniline/cellulose fiber composite prepared using persulfate as oxidant for Cr(VI)-detoxification. Carbohydr Polym 92:659–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lu P, Hsieh YL (2010) Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr Polym 82:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manning BA, Kiser JR, Kwon H, Kanel SR (2007) Spectroscopic investigation of Cr(III)-and Cr(VI)-treated nanoscale zerovalent iron. Environ Sci Technol 41:586–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Matuana LM, Balatinecz JJ, Sodhi RNS, Park CB (2001) Surface characterization of esterified cellulosic fibers by XPS and FTIR spectroscopy. Wood Sci Technol 35:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miao Q, Yan J (2013) Comparison of three ornamental plants for phytoextraction potential of chromium removal from tannery sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moulder J (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard spectra for identification and interpretation of XPS data. Chastain J, King RC (eds) Eden Prairie, Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  59. Mukherjee R, Kumar R, Sinha A, Lama Y, Saha AK (2015) A review on synthesis, characterization and applications of nano-zero valent iron (nZVI) for environmental remediation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:443–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Narayani M, Vidya SK (2012) Chromium-resistant bacteria and their environmental condition for hexavalent chromium removal: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 43:955–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. National Toxicology Program, Department of Health and Human Services (NIEHS) (2011) Report on Carcinogens, 12th ed. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/twelfth/roc12.pdf
  62. Owlad M, Aroua MK, Daud WAW, Baroutian S (2009) Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 200:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parlayici S, Pehlivan E (2015) Natural biosorbents (garlic stem and horse chesnut shell) for removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions. Environ Monit Assess 187:763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Patterson JW, Passino R (1987) Metals separation and recovery. In: Patterson JW (ed) Metal speciation separation and recovery. Lewis, USA, pp 63–96Google Scholar
  65. Perez-González A, Urtiaga AM, Ibáñez R, Ortiz I (2012) State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates. Water Res 46:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ponder SM, Darab JG, Mallouk TE (2000) Remediation of Cr(VI) and Pb(II) aqueous solutions using supported nanoscale zerovalent iron. Environ Sci Technol 34:2564–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Powell RM, Plus RW, Hightower SK, Sabatini DA (1995) Coupled iron corrosion and chromate reduction: mechanisms for subsurface remediation. Environ Sci Technol 29:1913–1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Qiu B, Xu C, Sun D, Wang Q, Gu H, Zhang X, Weeks BL, Hopper J, Ho T, Guo Z, Wei S (2015) Polyaniline coating with various substrates for hexavalent chromium removal. Appl Surf Sci 334:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Raychoudhury T, Tufenkji N, Ghoshal S (2012) Aggregation and deposition kinetics of carboxymethyl cellulose-modified zero-valent iron nanoparticles in porous media. Water Res 46:1735–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sajana TK, Ghangrekar MM, Mitra A (2014) Effect of presence of cellulose in the freshwater sediment on the performance of sediment microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 155:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saliba R, Gauthier H, Gauthier R, Petit-Ramel M (2000) Adsorption of copper(II) and chromium(III) ions onto amidoximated cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 75:1624–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seid KA, Badot JC, Dubrunfaut O, Levasseur S, Guyomard D, Lestriez B (2012) Influence of the carboxymethyl cellulose binder on the multiscale electronic transport in carbon–LiFePO4 nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 22:24057–24066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sharma YC, Srivastava V, Weng CH, Upadhyay SN (2009) Removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater by adsorption on iron nanoparticles. Can J Chem Eng 87:921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharma P, Bihari V, Agarwal SK, Verma V, Kesavachandran CN, Pangtey BS, Mathur N, Singh PK, Shrivastava M, Goel SK (2012) Groundwater contaminated with hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: a health survey and clinical examination of community inhabitants (Kanpur, India). PLoS ONE 7:e47877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sharma AK, Kumar R, Mittal S, Hussain S, Arora M, Sharma RC, Babu JN (2015) In-situ reductive regeneration of zerovalent iron nanoparticles immobilized on cellulose for atom efficient Cr(VI) adsorption. RSC Adv 5:89441–89446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shi LN, Zhang X, Chen ZL (2011) Removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater using bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Water Res 45:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Singh R, Misra V, Singh RP (2011) Synthesis, characterization and role of zero-valent iron nanoparticle in removal of hexavalent chromium from chromium-spiked soil. J Nanopart Res 13:4063–4073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Singha AS, Guleria A (2014) Use of low cost cellulosic biopolymer based adsorbent for the removal of toxic metal ions from the aqueous solution. Sep Sci Technol 49:2557–2567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stefaniuk M, Oleszczuk P, Ok YS (2016) Review on nanozerovalent iron (nZVI): from synthesis to environmental applications. Chem Eng J 287:618–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbery JD, Rogers RD (2002) Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 124:4974–4975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trujillo-Reyes J, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2014) Supported and unsupported nanomaterials for water and soil remediation: Are they a useful solution for worldwide pollution? J Hazard Mater 280:487–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Uzum C, Shahwan T, Eroğlu AE, Hallam KR, Scott TB, Lieberwirth I (2009) Synthesis and characterization of kaolinite-supported zero-valent iron nanoparticles and their application for the removal of aqueous Cu2+ and Co2+ ions. Appl Clay Sci 43:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vaid U, Mittal S, Babu JN (2013) Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution using biomass derived fly ash from waste-to-energy power plant. Desalin Water Treat 52:7845–7855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wen Z, Zhang Y, Dai C (2014) Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution using nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI). Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 457:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Xiao S, Shen M, Guo R, Wang S, Shi X (2009) Immobilization of zerovalent iron nanoparticles into electrospun polymer nanofibers: synthesis, characterization, and potential environmental applications. J Phys Chem C 113:18062–18068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Xie P, Hao X, Mohamad OA, Liang J, Wei G (2013) Comparative study of chromium biosorption by mesorhizobiumamorphae strain CCNWGS0123 in single and binary mixtures. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169:570–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yadav R, Sharma AK, Babu JN (2016) Sorptive removal of arsenite [As(III)] and arsenate [As(V)] by fuller’s earth immobilized nanoscale zero-valent iron nanoparticles (F-nZVI): effect of Fe0 loading on adsorption activity. J Environ Chem Eng 4:681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yu X, Tong S, Ge M, Zuo J, Cao C, Song W (2013) One-step synthesis of magnetic composites of cellulose@ iron oxide nanoparticles for arsenic removal. J Mater Chem A 1:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang Y, Xu L, Zhao L, Peng J, Li C, Li J, Zhai M (2012) Radiation synthesis and Cr(VI) removal of cellulose microsphere adsorbent. Carbohydr Polym 88:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhu S, Wu Y, Chen Q, Yu Z, Wang C, Jin S, Ding Y, Wu G (2006) Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids and its application: a mini-review. Green Chem 8:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Environment and Earth ScienceCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia
  2. 2.Discipline of Metallurgy Engineering and Materials ScienceIndian Institute of Technology IndoreSimrolIndia
  3. 3.Department of Applied ChemistryMaharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical UniversityBathindaIndia
  4. 4.Department of PhysicsNational Dong Hwa UniversityHualienTaiwan
  5. 5.Department of Chemical Sciences, School of Basic and Applied ScienceCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia

Personalised recommendations