Scanning or desorption isotherms? Characterising sorption hysteresis of wood
- 175 Downloads
Sorption isotherms describe the relation between the equilibrium moisture content of a material and the ambient relative humidity. Most materials exhibits sorption hysteresis, that is, desorption give higher equilibrium moisture contents than absorption at equal ambient climate conditions. Sorption hysteresis is commonly evaluated by determination of an absorption isotherm followed by desorption starting from the highest relative humidity used in the absorption measurement (typically 95%). The latter is often interpreted as the desorption isotherm but is in fact a scanning isotherm, i.e. an isotherm obtained from neither dry nor water-saturated state. In the present study, we investigated the difference between desorption isotherms and scanning isotherms determined by desorption from different high relative humidity levels reached by absorption and how this difference influenced the evaluation of sorption hysteresis. The measurements were performed on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) using automated sorption balances. Hysteresis evaluated from desorption isotherms gave linear absolute sorption hysteresis for the studied relative humidity range (0–96%), whereas hysteresis evaluated from scanning isotherms gave non-linear curves with a peak between 50 and 80% relative humidity. The position of this peak depended on the relative humidity from which desorption was initiated. Consequently, understanding and evaluation of sorption hysteresis might be challenging if scanning isotherms are used instead of desorption isotherms, hereby increasing the risk of misinterpreting the results.
KeywordsSorption isotherm Scanning isotherm Hysteresis Automated sorption balance Dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) Moisture content
Water influences most physical wood properties such as mechanical properties and dimensional stability, and additionally plays an important role in wood degradation processes. The interaction between wood and water has therefore been widely studied, and this is often done by measuring sorption isotherms. These depict the equilibrium moisture content of a material as a function of ambient relative humidity (RH) at constant temperature. Typically, the path to equilibrium, i.e. whether equilibrium is obtained through an increase (absorption) or a decrease (desorption) in moisture content, influences the moisture content at given climatic conditions; desorption to equilibrium results in a higher moisture content than absorption to equilibrium with the same ambient climate conditions (Masson and Richards 1906). This phenomenon is termed sorption hysteresis and can be observed in many chemically and structurally different materials, e.g. polymers (Watt 1980), cement based materials (Espinosa and Franke 2006a), food (Wolf et al. 1972) and wood (Pidgeon and Maass 1930). Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain sorption hysteresis such as the ink-bottle or pore-blocking effect (McBain 1935), differences between absorption and desorption in principal radius of condensation (Cohan 1938), or free volume in swelling polymeric materials (Vrentas and Vrentas 1996). Sorption isotherms initiated from non-extreme conditions (neither dry nor saturated state) are generally referred to as scanning isotherms (Espinosa and Franke 2006a, b; Peralta and Bangi 1998; Velasco et al. 2016). Scanning isotherms connect the desorption and absorption isotherms and describe the moisture content of a material when it is exposed to alternate absorption and desorption.
Sorption hysteresis in wood and cellulosic fibres is commonly evaluated by determination of the absorption isotherm after initially drying the material, followed by determination of an isotherm in desorption starting from the highest RH used in the absorption measurement (Ammer 1963; Higgins 1957; Jeffries 1960a; Kelsey 1957; Peralta 1995; Pidgeon and Maass 1930; Seifert 1972; Sheppard and Newsome 1929; Urquhart and Eckersall 1930; Wahba and Nashed 1957; Wangaard and Granados 1967; Weichert 1963). In recent years, when the use of automated sorption balances has become more wide-spread, the high RH from which desorption is initiated is typically between 90 and 96% (Ceylan et al. 2014, 2012; Cordin et al. 2017; Hill et al. 2009, 2012b; Himmel and Mai 2015; Hosseinpourpia et al. 2016; Jalaludin et al. 2010; Kymäläinen et al. 2015; Okubayashi et al. 2005a, b; Popescu et al. 2014; Popescu and Hill 2013; Shi and Avramidis 2017; Simón et al. 2017; Xie et al. 2011). However, using this measurement procedure, it is not hysteresis between desorption and absorption isotherms that is evaluated, but hysteresis between a scanning isotherm and the absorption isotherm. This difference is important to consider when interpreting a phenomenon like sorption hysteresis. In this study, we show how the use of scanning isotherms instead of desorption isotherms for characterising sorption hysteresis yields complex results which may lead to misinterpretations of the mechanisms behind sorption hysteresis.
Materials and methods
Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) from an experimental forest in Southern Sweden was used, see Fredriksson et al. (2016) for further information. Samples of earlywood tissue from mature sapwood were cut and vacuum saturated with deionised water using the following procedure: The samples were subjected to vacuum (1–2 mbar) in a glass desiccator for 1 h, deionized water was then added while running the vacuum pump (20 mbar), and finally atmospheric pressure was re-established. Specimens corresponding to a dry mass of 3–6 mg were then cut using a razor blade. In addition, some measurements were performed on specimens of latewood from mature sapwood and on early- and latewood specimens from mature heartwood, see Supplementary Information (SI). Before the specimens were placed in the sorption balance, each piece was wiped with a moist cloth to remove excess surface water.
Sorption measurements and hysteresis evaluation
Sorption isotherms were measured at 20 °C using automated sorption balances (DVS Advantage, Surface Measurement Systems Ltd., London) which monitor the mass of a specimen (balance resolution 0.1 µg) while the RH is incrementally changed in pre-programmed steps, see e.g. Williams (1995). The time necessary to reach equilibrium at each RH level is specified either as a fixed period of time or by a mass stability (dm/dt) criterion where the mass change in a given time window is below a threshold value defined by the user. Specific levels of RH are generated by mixing dry and water-saturated streams of nitrogen gas. Here, the accuracy of generated RH was validated using the method described by Wadsö et al. (2009). All measurements started with water-saturated specimens.
Desorption isotherms were determined by conditioning water-saturated specimens to the following RH levels: 97-95-90-85-80-70-60-50-40-20-10-5-0%. Subsequently, absorption isotherms were determined by increasing the RH to 97% followed by a scanning desorption isotherm from 97% RH, both using the same RH levels as for the initial desorption. These measurements were part of the study reported by Fredriksson and Thygesen (2017) and used a dm/dt criterion of 0.001% min−1 over 10 min for defining equilibrium at each step. It should be noted that the dm/dt in the sorption balance used is calculated based on a reference mass. If the measurements starts with absorption, this reference mass is generally the dry mass. However, since desorption isotherms were determined in the present study, the reference sample mass was the mass after the first step at 97% RH. The same experimental protocol was also used on latewood specimens from mature sapwood and early- and latewood specimens from mature heartwood, see SI.
Four additional desorption isotherms were determined after conditioning water-saturated specimens to the following RH levels: 95-80-65-50-35-0%. For two specimens, the absorption isotherms up to 95% RH were then determined followed by a scanning desorption isotherm from 95% RH, both using the same RH levels as for desorption. For two other specimens, the absorption isotherms were determined up to 80% RH before scanning desorption was initiated. Also here, the same RH levels were used. Due to uncertainties related to the use of dm/dt-criteria (Glass et al. 2018, 2017) and the fact that starting with desorption makes the reference mass used to calculate dm/dt more uncertain, fixed periods of time at each RH level were used: 60 h at 95% RH, 24 h at 80% RH and 0% RH, and 12 h at all other RH levels. For all measurements, the specimen was finally dried for 8 h by using the pre-heater to locally increase the temperature while purging with dry nitrogen gas. The temperature was slowly ramped to 60 °C over 1 h and kept constant at this level for 6 h before it was slowly ramped to 20 °C over 1 h. Finally, this drying protocol was followed by a 2 h thermal stabilisation period at 20 °C before the dry mass was taken. The equilibrium moisture content at each RH level was evaluated as mass of water divided by the dry mass of the specimen.
After the measurements had been performed, the dm/dt criteria based on dry mass were calculated for all RH steps in order to estimate the error in moisture content. In absorption, all steps had in the end a dm/dt of less than 3 µg g−1 min−1 with a 2 h regression window, meaning that the moisture contents reported for absorption is less than 0.004 kg kg−1 lower than the true equilibrium value, based upon the errors indicated by Glass et al. (2018). The exception was the absorption step to 95% RH which had a dm/dt of around 6 µg g−1 min−1 with a 2 h regression window which gives an error in moisture content within the range 0.004–0.008 kg kg−1. In desorption, all steps had in the end a dm/dt on average in the range 3–4 µg g−1 min−1 with a 2 h regression window, which indicates that the reported moisture contents are around 0.002–0.008 kg kg−1 higher than the true equilibrium value. Given that the moisture content error for a given dm/dt increases with increasing RH, the calculated absolute sorption hysteresis is estimated to be up to 0.004 kg kg−1 too high at 35% RH and up to 0.012 kg kg−1 too high at 95% RH.
Sorption hysteresis was evaluated between absorption and desorption isotherms as well as between absorption and scanning isotherms. The evaluation was made both as absolute difference in moisture content at each RH level and as relative difference. The latter was determined by dividing the absolute moisture content difference by the absorption equilibrium moisture content at each RH level. For the measurements performed using a dm/dt criterion, the moisture content at 97% RH was not included when evaluating hysteresis due to a lack of equilibrium.
Results and discussion
Figure 2c–f show absolute and relative sorption hysteresis, respectively, evaluated from the sorption isotherm data presented in Fig. 2a, b. The sorption hysteresis calculated from desorption isotherms was markedly different than sorption hysteresis calculated from scanning isotherms. While desorption isotherms in the hygroscopic range gave a linear absolute sorption hysteresis and fairly constant relative sorption hysteresis, the same quantities were complex, non-linear curves when calculated based on scanning isotherms. The latter had a peak in absolute hysteresis around 75% RH when desorption was initiated from 95% RH, but the position of this peak depended on the RH from which the scanning isotherm was initiated (Fig. 2d). That the hysteresis pattern depends on the RH from which desorption is initiated, has also previously been observed by Peralta (1995) who evaluated the ratio between the absorption isotherm and isotherms determined in desorption initiated from different RH levels.
Evaluating sorption hysteresis based on scanning isotherms is not necessarily less correct than by use of desorption isotherms. However, it is important to consider how the sorption isotherms were determined when interpreting the hysteresis curves. The currently favoured theory for sorption hysteresis in polymeric materials (Hill and Beck 2017; Hill et al. 2009, 2012a, b; Vrentas and Vrentas 1996) explains the phenomenon as a result of hysteresis in volumetric swelling due to kinetic retardation during shrinkage/swelling. According to this theory, sorption hysteresis is expected to decrease with increasing temperature and only be seen when the constituent polymers are below their softening point. Several studies on water sorption in various cellulosic materials have shown a decrease in hysteresis with increasing temperature (Hill et al. 2009, 2010; Jeffries 1960b; Kelsey 1957; Salmén and Larsson 2018; Weichert 1963) which supports this theory. However, a few studies on wood report insignificant changes in relative hysteresis between 35 and 50 °C (Esteban et al. 2008a, b, 2009). For wood, the cell wall polymers that undergo softening at normal temperature are the hemicelluloses. This occurs around 65–75% RH at room temperature (Engelund et al. 2013; Irvine 1984; Kelley et al. 1987; Olsson and Salmén 2004). For instance, Keating et al. (2013) reported sorption hysteresis to vanish in man-made hemicellulose (galactomannan) films above 75% RH at 25 °C, and this RH level corresponded with the softening point characterised by dynamic mechanical analysis. It can therefore be tempting to associate the decrease in hysteresis for wood above 75% RH, as observed in several studies when desorption was initiated from 90 to 95% RH, with softening of the hemicelluloses. However, as clearly seen in Fig. 2d, the peak in sorption hysteresis for wood is a result of scanning isotherms being used to calculate hysteresis, and the peak position changes with the RH from which desorption is initiated. Whether this is also the case for other biopolymeric materials remains to be investigated.
Determination of desorption isotherms require that the measurements starts at water-saturation. Desorption from an initial moisture content reached by absorption at high RH will generate a scanning isotherm. Evaluating sorption hysteresis for Norway spruce wood based on scanning isotherms instead of desorption isotherms, gave a non-linear behaviour and a peak in hysteresis, which depended on the RH from which desorption was initiated. No peak in hysteresis was however seen in the studied RH range (0–96%) when the sorption hysteresis evaluation was based on desorption isotherms, i.e. sorption isotherms initiated from water-saturation. Consequently, understanding and evaluating the mechanisms behind sorption hysteresis is further challenged if scanning isotherms are used instead of desorption isotherms, hereby increasing the risk of misinterpreting the results.
Bengt Nilsson is gratefully acknowledged for running the sorption balance measurements. Funding from the Swedish Research Council FORMAS (Grant No. 2013-1024) and the VILLUM FONDEN postdoc programme is gratefully acknowledged.
- Ahlgren L (1972) Fuktfixering i porösa byggnadsmaterial (Moisture fixation in porous building materials). Dissertation, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Esteban LG, de Palacios P, Fernández FG, Guindeo A, Cano NN (2008a) Sorption and thermodynamic properties of old and new Pinus sylvestris wood. Wood Fiber Sci 40:111–121Google Scholar
- Fortin Y (1979) Moisture content—matric potential relationship and water flow properties of wood at high moisture contents. Dissertation, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
- Fredriksson M, Thygesen LG (2017) The states of water in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) studied by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LFNMR) relaxometry: assignment of free-water populations based on quantitative wood anatomy. Holzforschung 71:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2016-0044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Higgins NC (1957) The equilibrium moisture content-relative humidity relationships of selected native and foreign woods. 7:371–377Google Scholar
- Hill CAS, Keating BA, Jalaludin Z, Mahrdt E (2012a) A rheological description of the water vapour sorption kinetics behaviour of wood invoking a model using a canonical assembly of Kelvin–Voigt elements and a possible link with sorption hysteresis. Holzforschung 66:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2011.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Irvine GM (1984) The glass transitions of lignin and hemicellulose and their measurement by differential thermal-analysis. Tappi J 67:118–121Google Scholar
- Keating BA, Hill CAS, Sun D, English R, Davies P, McCue C (2013) The water vapor sorption behavior of a galactomannan cellulose nanocomposite film analyzed using parallel exponential kinetics and the Kelvin–Voigt viscoelastic model. J Appl Polym Sci 129:2352–2359. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelsey KE (1957) The sorption of water vapour by wood. Aust J Appl Sci 8:42–54Google Scholar
- Peralta PN (1995) Sorption of moisture by wood within a limited range of relative humidities. Wood Fiber Sci 27:13–21Google Scholar
- Peralta PN, Bangi AP (1998) Modeling wood moisture sorption hysteresis based on similarity hypothesis. Part 1. Direct approach. Wood Fiber Sci 30:48–55Google Scholar
- Popescu CM, Hill CAS (2013) The water vapour adsorption–desorption behaviour of naturally aged Tilia cordata Mill. wood. Polym Degrad Stabil 98:1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simón C, Esteban LG, Palacios Pd, Fernández FG, García-Iruela A (2017) Sorption/desorption hysteresis revisited. Sorption properties of Pinus pinea L. analysed by the parallel exponential kinetics and Kelvin–Voigt models. Holzforschung 71:171. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2016-0097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sing KSW, Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Llewellyn P (2014) 8—Assessment of mesoporosity. In: Adsorption by powders and porous solids, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097035-6.00008-5
- Williams DR (1995) The characterisation of powders by gravimetric water vapour sorption. Int LABMATE 20:40–42Google Scholar
- Zillig W (2009) Moisture transport in wood using a multiscale approach. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.