Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Estimating the transverse dimensions of cellulose fibres in wood and paper using 2D and 3D microscopy techniques

  • N. J. McIntosh
  • Y. Sharma
  • D. M. Martinez
  • J. A. Olson
  • A. B. Phillion
Original Research
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

We describe a duo of experimental methods for determining the transverse dimensions of individual wood fibres using 2D optical microscopy and 3D X-ray tomography. These non-invasive optical sectioning methods, in conjunction with segmentation through image analysis, enables in situ identification of individual fibres in a paper sheet. The relationship between local fibre dimensions, i.e. diameter and fibre wall thickness, are established for kraft (NBSK) pulp fibres and compared to values obtained from wood. For the first time, we propose a criterion for transverse fibre collapse during the papermaking process that is based on both fibre diameter and wall thickness.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Softwood fibres Paper physics Characterization 2D optical microscopy 3D X-ray tomography Delaunay triangulation Lumen tracking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Canfor Pulp Products Inc. and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for funding this work. A large portion of the optical microscopy work was completed as part of the Energy Reduction in Mechanical Pulping research program at The University of British Columbia, all of the program partners are thanked for their support.

References

  1. Aronsson M (2002) On 3D fibre measurements of digitized paper. Ph.D. thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  2. Bache-Wiig J, Henden P (2005) Individual fiber segmentation of three dimensional microtomograms of paper and fiber-reinforced composite materials. Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloch J-F, Rolland du Roscoat S (2009) Three-dimensional structural analysis. In: 14th fundamental research symposium, Oxford, pp 599–664Google Scholar
  4. Chinga-Carrasco G (2009) Exploring the multi-scale structure of printing paper—a review of modern technology. J Microsc 234:211–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donoser M, Bischof H (2006) Efficient maximally stable extremal region (MSER) tracking. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 553–560Google Scholar
  6. Donoser M, Riemenschneider H, Bischof H (2009) Efficient partial shape matching of outer contours. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5994:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. du Roscoat SR, Decain M, Thibault X, Geindreau C, Bloch J-F (2007) Estimation of microstructural properties from synchrotron X-ray microtomography and determination of the REV size in paper materials. Acta Mater 55:2841–2850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirn U, Bauer W (2006) A review of image analysis based methods to evaluate fiber properties. Lenzing Ber 86:96–105Google Scholar
  9. Horn RA (1978) Morphology of pulp fiber from hardwoods and influence on paper strength. Research report, Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  10. Jang H, Robertson A, Seth R (1992) Transverse dimensions of wood pulp fibres by confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis. J Mater Sci 27:6391–6400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jang HF, Seth RS, Wu CB, Chan BK (2005) Determining the transverse dimensions of fibers in wood using confocal microscopy. Wood Fiber Sci 37(4):615–628Google Scholar
  12. Johansson A (2011) Correlations between fibre properties and paper properties. Masters thesis, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  13. Kontscheider P, Donoser M, Bischof H, Kritzinger K, Bauer W (2010) Detecting paper fibre cross sections in microtomy images. In: 20th International conference on pattern recognition, pp 316–319Google Scholar
  14. Lu C, Latecki L, Adluru N, Yang X, Haibin L (2009) Shape guided contour grouping with particle filters. In: IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision, pp 2288–2295Google Scholar
  15. Matas J, Chum O, Urban M, Pajdla T (2004) Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image Vis Comput 22:761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mithrush TL (2013) An experimental study of fluid flow in a low consistency refiner. Masters thesis, The University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE TransSyst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reme P, Johnsen P, Helle T (2002) Assesment of fibre transverse dimensions using SEM and image analysis. J Pulp Pap Sci 28(4):122–128Google Scholar
  19. Schulgasser K, Page D (1988) The influence of tranverse fibre properties on the in-plane elastic behaviour of paper. Composites Sci Technol 32(4):279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seth R (1990) Fibre quality factors in papermaking, the importance of fibre coarseness. MRS Proc 197:143.  https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-197-143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharma Y, Phillion AB, Martinez DM (2015) Automated segmentation of wood fibres in micro-CT images of paper. J Microsc 260(3):400–410.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Watson P, Bradley M (2009) Canadian pulp fibre morphology: superiority and considerations for end use potential. For Chron 85:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Withers PJ (2007) X-ray nanotomography. Mater Today 10(12):26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70305-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu B, Ting Y-L (1996) Fiber-image analysis part II: measurement of general geometric properties of fibers. J Text Inst 87(2):284–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations