Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 305–328 | Cite as

Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose

  • Zhe Ling
  • Tuo Wang
  • Mohamadamin Makarem
  • Michael Santiago Cintrón
  • H. N. Cheng
  • Xue Kang
  • Markus Bacher
  • Antje Potthast
  • Thomas Rosenau
  • Holly King
  • Christopher D. Delhom
  • Sunghyun Nam
  • J. Vincent Edwards
  • Seong H. Kim
  • Feng Xu
  • Alfred D. FrenchEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Cellulose is often described as a mixture of crystalline and amorphous material. A large part of the general understanding of the chemical, biochemical and physical properties of cellulosic materials is thought to depend on the consequences of the ratio of these components. For example, amorphous materials are said to be more reactive and have less tensile strength but comprehensive understanding and definitive analysis remain elusive. Ball milling has been used for decades to increase the ratio of amorphous material. The present work used 13 techniques to follow the changes in cotton fibers (nearly pure cellulose) after ball milling for 15, 45 and 120 min. X-ray diffraction results were analyzed with the Rietveld method; DNP (dynamic nuclear polarization) natural abundance 2D NMR studies in the next paper in this issue assisted with the interpretation of the 1D analyses in the present work. A conventional NMR model’s paracrystalline and inaccessible crystallite surfaces were not needed in the model used for the DNP studies. Sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy also showed profound changes as the cellulose was decrystallized. Optical microscopy and field emission-scanning electron microscopy results showed the changes in particle size; molecular weight and carbonyl group analyses by gel permeation chromatography confirmed chemical changes. Specific surface areas and pore sizes increased. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy also indicated progressive changes; some proposed indicators of crystallinity for FTIR were not in good agreement with our results. Thermogravimetric analysis results indicated progressive increase in initial moisture content and some loss in stability. Although understanding of structural changes as cellulose is amorphized by ball milling is increased by this work, continued effort is needed to improve agreement between the synchrotron and laboratory X-ray methods used herein and to provide physical interpretation of the SFG results.

Keywords

Amorphous cellulose Ball milling Cellulose degradation Crystal structure Rietveld refinement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledged the support by Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC No. 201706510045) for ZL. The NMR work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF OIA-1833040). The SFG work was supported by the Center for Lignocellulose Structure and Formation, Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under Award Number DE-SC0001090. Prof. Nathaniel C. Gilbert at CAMD kindly helped with the synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysis, and Dr. Dongmei Cao at the Louisiana State University Shared Instrument Facility provided the FE-SEM micrographs. Stephanie Beck of FPInnovations and Hee Jin Kim of the Southern Regional Research Center reviewed the manuscript. Acknowledgements are also made to Catrina Ford for technical assistance. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Supplementary material

10570_2018_2230_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1818 kb)

References

  1. Agarwal UP (2014) 1064 nm FT-Raman spectroscopy for investigations of plant cell walls and other biomass materials. Front Plant Sci 5:490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA (1997) FT-Raman spectroscopy of wood: identifying contributions of lignin and carbohydrate polymers in the spectrum of black spruce (Picea mariana). Appl Spectrosc 51:1648–1655.  https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702971939316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA, Reiner RS, Baez C (2016) Probing crystallinity of never-dried wood cellulose with Raman spectroscopy. Cellulose 23:125–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0788-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahvenainen P, Kontro I, Svedström K (2016) Comparison of sample crystallinity determination methods by X-ray diffraction for challenging cellulose I materials. Cellulose 23:1073–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL (1984) Native cellulose: a composite of two distinctive crystalline forms. Science 223:283–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atalla RH, Gast JC, Sindorf DW, Bartuska VJ, Maciel GE (1980) Carbon-13 NMR spectra of cellulose polymorphs. J Am Chem Soc 102(9):3249–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnette AL, Bradley LC, Veres BD, Schreiner EP, Park J, Park S, Kim SH (2011) Selective detection of crystalline cellulose in plant cell walls with sum frequency generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 12:2434–2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnette AL, Lee C, Bradley LC, Schreiner EP, Park H, Shin H, Cosgrove DJ, Park S, Kim SH (2012) Quantification of crystalline cellulose in lignocellulosic biomass using sum frequency generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy and comparison with other analytical methods. Carbohydr Polym 89:802–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertran MS, Dale BE (1986) Determination of cellulose accessibility by differential scanning calorimetry. J Appl Polym Sci 32:4241–4253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen L, Wang Q, Hirth K, Baez C, Agarwal UP, Zhu JY (2015) Tailoring the yield and characteristics of wood cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) using concentrated acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 22:1753–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dollase WA (1986) Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model. J Appl Crystallogr 19(4):267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driemeier C (2014) Two-dimensional Rietveld analysis of celluloses from higher plants. Cellulose 21:1065–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Driemeier C, Calligaris GA (2011) Theoretical and experimental developments for accurate determination of crystallinity of cellulose I materials. J Appl Cryst 44:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Driemeier C, Francisco LH (2014) X-ray diffraction from faulted cellulose I constructed with mixed Iα–Iβ stacking. Cellulose 21:3161–3169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duchemin B (2017) Size, shape, orientation and crystallinity of cellulose Iβ by X-ray powder diffraction using a free spreadsheet program. Cellulose 24:2727–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forziati FH, Stone WK, Rowen JW, Appel WD (1950) Cotton powder for infrared transmission measurements. J Res Nat Bur Stand 45:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foston MB, Hubbell CA, Ragauskas AJ (2011) Cellulose isolation methodology for NMR analysis of cellulose ultrastructure. Materials 4:1985–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. French AD (2012) Combining computational chemistry and crystallography for a better understanding of the structure of cellulose. Horton D, ed. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 67:19–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. French AD, Kim HJ (2018) Cotton fiber structure. In: Fang D (ed) Cotton fiber, physics and biology. Springer, New York, pp 13–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. French AD, Pérez S, Bulone V, Rosenau T, Gray D (2018) Cellulose, in encyclopedia of polymer science and technology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst042.pub2
  24. Harris DM, Corbin K, Wang T, Gutierrez R, Bertolo AL, Petti C, Smilgies D-M, Estevez JM, Bonetta D, Urbanowicz BR, Ehrhardt DW, Somerville CR, Rose JKC, Hong M, Debolt S (2012) Cellulose microfibril crystallinity is reduced by mutating C-terminal transmembrane region residues CESA1A903V and CESA3T942I of cellulose synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:4098–4103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hearle JWS (1958) A fringed fibril theory of structure in crystalline polymers. J Polym Sci 28:432–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holzwarth U, Gibson N (2011) The Scherrer equation versus the ‘Debye–Scherrer equation’. Nat Nanotechnol 6:534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howell C, Hastrup ACS, Jara R, Larsen FH, Goodell B, Jellison J (2011) Effects of hot water extraction and fungal decay on wood crystalline cellulose structure. Cellulose 18:1179–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang S, Makarem M, Kiemle SN, Hamedi H, Sau M, Cosgrove DJ, Kim SH (2018a) Inhomogeneity of cellulose microfibril assembly in plant cell walls revealed with sum frequency generation microscopy. J Phys Chem B 122:5006–5019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang S, Makarem M, Kiemle SN, Zheng Y, Xin H, Ye D, Gomez EW, Gomez ED, Cosgrove DJ, Kim SH (2018b) Investigating dehydration-induced physical strains of cellulose microfibrils in plant cell walls. Carbohydr Polym 197:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ilharco LM, Garcia AR, Silva JL, Ferreira FV (1997) Infrared approach to the study of adsorption on cellulose: influence of cellulose crystallinity on the adsorption of benzophenone. Langmuir 13(15):4126–4132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Isogai A, Atalla RH (1991) Amorphous celluloses stable in aqueous media: regeneration from SO2–amine solvent systems. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 29:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim U-J, Eom SH, Wada M (2010) Thermal decomposition of native cellulose: influence on crystallite size. Polym Degrad Stab 95:778–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirui A, Ling Z, Kang X, Dickwella Widanage MC, Mentink-Vigier F, French AD, Wang T (2019) Atomic resolution of cotton cellulose structure enabled by dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2095-6 Google Scholar
  34. Klug HP, Alexander LE (1974) X-ray diffraction procedures: for polycrystalline and amorphous materials, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, New York, p 992. ISBN 0-471-49369-4Google Scholar
  35. Kono H, Numata Y (2006) Structural investigation of cellulose Iα and Iβ by 2D RFDR NMR spectroscopy: determination of sequence of magnetically inequivalent d-glucose units along cellulose chain. Cellulose 13:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2001) X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromolecules 2:410–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larsson PT, Hult EL, Wickholm K, Pettersson E, Iversen T (1999) CP/MAS 13C NMR spectroscopy applied to structure and interaction studies on cellulose I. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 15:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee CM, Mohamed NMA, Watts HD, Kubicki JD, Kim SH (2013) Sum-frequency-generation vibration spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations with dispersion corrections (DFT-D2) for cellulose Iα and Iβ. J Phys Chem B 117:6681–6692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee C, Kafle K, Park Y-B, Kim SH (2014) Probing crystal structure and mesoscale assembly of cellulose microfibrils in plant cell walls, tunicate tests, and bacterial films using vibrational sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:10844–10853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee CM, Kafle K, Huang S, Kim SH (2015a) Multimodal broadband vibrational sum frequency generation (MM-BB-V-SFG) spectrometer and microscope. J Phys Chem B 120:102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee CM, Kubicki JD, Xin B, Zhong L, Jarvis MC, Kim SH (2015b) Hydrogen bonding network and OH stretch vibration of cellulose: comparison of computational modeling with polarized IR and SFG spectra. J Phys Chem B 119:15138–15149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee CM, Chen X, Weiss PA, Jensen L, Kim SH (2016a) Quantum mechanical calculations of vibrational sum-frequency-generation (SFG) spectra of cellulose: dependence of the CH and OH peak intensity on the polarity of cellulose chains within the SFG coherence domain. J Phys Chem Lett 8:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee CM, Dazen K, Kafle K, Moore A, Johnson DK, Park S, Kim SH (2016b) Correlations of apparent cellulose crystallinity determined by XRD, NMR, IR, Raman, & and SFG. Adv Polym Sci 27:115–131Google Scholar
  44. Liu Y, Kim HJ (2015) Use of attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared (ATR FT-IR) Spectroscopy in direct, nondestructive, and rapid assessment of developmental cotton fibers grown in planta and in culture. Appl Spectrosc 69:1004–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu Y, Thibodeaux D, Gamble G, Bauer P, VanDerveer D (2012) Comparative investigation of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) in the determination of cotton fiber crystallinity. Appl Spectrosc 66:983–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lutterotti L, Bortolotti M, Ischia G, Lonardelli I, Wenk H-R (2007) Rietveld texture analysis from diffraction images. Z Kristallogr Suppl 26:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Makarem M, Lee CM, Sawada D, O’Neill HM, Kim SH (2017) Distinguishing surface versus bulk hydroxyl groups of cellulose nanocrystals using vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy. J Phys Chem Letts 9:70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Makarem M, Lee CM, Kafle K, Huang S, Chae I, Yang H, Kubicki JD, Kim SH (2019) Probing cellulose structures with vibrational spectroscopy. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0788-7 Google Scholar
  49. Massiot D, Fayon F, Capron M, King I, Le Calvé S, Alonso B, Durand J-O, Bujoli B, Gan Z, Hoatson G (2002) Modelling one-and two-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra. Magn Reson Chem 40:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mihranyan A, Llagostera AP, Karmhag R, Strømme M, Ek R (2004) Moisture sorption by cellulose powders of varying crystallinity. Int J Pharm 269:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Millett MA, Effland MJ, Caulfield DF (1979) Influence of fine grinding on the hydrolysis of cellulosic materials-acid vs. enzymatic. Adv Chem Ser 181:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964a) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type. Part I. Spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1311–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964b) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type. Part II. A new infrared ratio for estimation of crystallinity in celluloses I and II. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1325–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Newman RH, Hemmingson JA (1990) Determination of the degree of cellulose crystallinity in wood by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Holzforschung 44:351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Newman RH, Hill SJ, Harris PJ (2013) Wide-angle X-ray scattering and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance data combined to test models for cellulose microfibrils in mung bean cell walls. Am Soc Plant Biol 163:1558–1567Google Scholar
  56. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nishiyama Y, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Langan P (2003a) Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Iα from synchrotron x-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 125:14300–14306.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja037055w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nishiyama Y, Kim U-J, Kim D-Y, Katsumata KS, May RP, Langan P (2003b) Periodic disorder along ramie cellulose microfibrils. Biomacromolecules 4:1013–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oh SY, Yoo D, Shin Y, Kim HC, Kim HY et al (2005) Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 340:2376–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parrilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park YB, Lee CM, Koo B-W, Park S, Cosgrove DJ, Kim SH (2013) Monitoring meso-scale ordering of cellulose in intact plant cell walls using sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy. Plant Physiol 163:907–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Phyo P, Wang T, Yang Y, O’Neill H, Hong M (2018) Direct determination of hydroxymethyl conformations of plant cell wall cellulose using 1H polarization transfer solid-state NMR. Biomacromolecules 19:1485–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Popa NC, Balzar D (2008) Size‐broadening anisotropy in whole powder pattern fitting. Application to zinc oxide and interpretation of the apparent crystallites in terms of physical models. J Appl Cryst 41:615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reyes DCA, Skoglund N, Svedberg A, Eliasson B, Sundman O (2016) The influence of different parameters on the mercerisation of cellulose for viscose production. Cellulose 23:1061–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rietveld H (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 2:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodriguez-Navarro AB (2006) XRD2DScan: new software for polycrystalline materials characterization using two-dimensional X-ray diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr 39:905–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Röhrling J, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Lange T, Borgards A, Sixta H, Kosma P (2002) A novel method for the determination of carbonyl groups in cellulosics by fluorescence labeling. 2. Validation and applications. Biomacromolecules 3:969–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rollin JA, Zhu Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhang YP (2011) Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarko A, Nishimura H, Okano T (1987) Crystalline alkali-celllulose complexes as intermediates during mercerization. ACS Symp Ser 340:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schenzel K, Fischer S, Brendler E (2005) New method for determining the degree of cellulose I crystallinity by means of FT Raman spectroscopy. Cellulose 12:223–231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-3885-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schroeder LR, Gentile VM, Atalla RH (1986) Nondegradative preparation of amorphous cellulose. J Wood Chem Technol 6:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schultz TP, McGinnis GD, Bertran MS (1985) Estimation of cellulose crystallinity using Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy and dynamic thermogravimetry. J Wood Chem Technol 5:543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2011) High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Compos Sci Technol 71:1593–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shibazaki H, Kuga S, Okano T (1997) Mercerization and acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 4:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Solala I, Henniges U, Pirker KF, Rosenau T, Potthast A, Vuorinen T (2015) Mechanochemical reactions of cellulose and styrene. Cellulose 22:3217–3224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stefanovic B, Pirker KF, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2014) Effects of tribochemical treatments on the integrity of cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 111:688–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sugiyama J, Persson J, Chanzy H (1991) Combined infrared and electron diffraction study of the polymorphism of native celluloses. Macromolecules 24:2461–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Takahashi H, Lee D, Dubois L, Bardet M, Hediger S, De Paëpe G (2012) Rapid natural-abundance 2D 13C–13C correlation spectroscopy using dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced solid-state NMR and matrix-free sample preparation. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:11766–11769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H, Thomsen AB, Ståhl K (2005) On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12:563–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vanderfleet OM, Reid MS, Bras J, Heux L, Godoy-Vargas J, Panga MKR, Cranston ED (2019) Insight into thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals from new hydrolysis methods with acid blends. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2175-7 Google Scholar
  82. Vieira FS, Pasquini C (2014) Determination of cellulose crystallinity by terahertz-time domain spectroscopy. Anal Chem 86:3780–3786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Viëtor RJ, Newman RH, Ha MA, Apperley DC, Jarvis MC (2002) Conformational features of crystal-surface cellulose from higher plants. Plant J 30(6):721–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang T, Hong M (2016) Solid-state NMR investigations of cellulose structure and interactions with matrix polysaccharides in plant primary cell walls. J Exp Bot 67:503–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wertz J-L, Mercier JP, Bédué O (2010) Cellulose science and technology. Routledge, Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
  86. Wickholm K, Larsson PT, Iversen T (1998) Assignment of non-crystalline forms in cellulose I by CP/MAS 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 312:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiley JH, Atalla RH (1987) Band assignments in the Raman spectra of celluloses. Carbohydr Res 160:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Xiaohui J, Bowden M, Brown EE, Zhang X (2015) An improved X-ray diffraction method for cellulose crystallinity measurement. Carbohydr Polym 123:476–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yang H, Wang T, Oehme D, Petridis L, Hong M, Kubicki JD (2018) Structural factors affecting 13C NMR chemical shifts of cellulose: a computational study. Cellulose 25:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Young RA (ed) (1993) The Rietveld method. IUCr Monographs in crystallography. 5. International Union of Crystallography. Oxford University Press, New York, p 298Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhe Ling
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tuo Wang
    • 3
  • Mohamadamin Makarem
    • 4
  • Michael Santiago Cintrón
    • 2
  • H. N. Cheng
    • 2
  • Xue Kang
    • 3
  • Markus Bacher
    • 5
  • Antje Potthast
    • 5
  • Thomas Rosenau
    • 5
  • Holly King
    • 2
  • Christopher D. Delhom
    • 2
  • Sunghyun Nam
    • 2
  • J. Vincent Edwards
    • 2
  • Seong H. Kim
    • 4
  • Feng Xu
    • 1
  • Alfred D. French
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Lignocellulosic ChemistryBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDANew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  4. 4.Department of Chemical Engineering, Materials Science Research InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  5. 5.Department of Chemistry, Division of Chemistry of Renewable ResourcesUniversity of Natural Resources and Life SciencesTullnAustria

Personalised recommendations