Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 121, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

Revisiting Lambert’s problem

Original Article

Abstract

The orbital boundary value problem, also known as Lambert problem, is revisited. Building upon Lancaster and Blanchard approach, new relations are revealed and a new variable representing all problem classes, under L-similarity, is used to express the time of flight equation. In the new variable, the time of flight curves have two oblique asymptotes and they mostly appear to be conveniently approximated by piecewise continuous lines. We use and invert such a simple approximation to provide an efficient initial guess to an Householder iterative method that is then able to converge, for the single revolution case, in only two iterations. The resulting algorithm is compared, for single and multiple revolutions, to Gooding’s procedure revealing to be numerically as accurate, while having a significantly smaller computational complexity.

Keywords

Lambert’s problem Orbital boundary value problem  Interplanetary trajectories Time of flight Lambert solver Gooding algorithm 

References

  1. Arora, N., Russell, R.: A fast and robust multiple revolution Lambert algorithm using a cosine transformation. In: Paper AAS 13–728, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  2. Arora, N., Russell, R.P.: A gpu accelerated multiple revolution Lambert solver for fast mission design. In: AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, pp. 10–198. San Diego, CA, No. AAS (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Bate, R., Mueller, D., White, J.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics. Courier Dover Publications, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  4. Battin, R.H.: An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics. AIAA, New York (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Gauss, C.: Theory of the motion of the heavenly bodies moving about the Sun in conic sections: a translation of Carl Frdr. Gauss “Theoria motus”: With an appendix. By Ch. H. Davis. Little, Brown and Comp (1857)Google Scholar
  6. Gooding, R.: A procedure for the solution of Lambert’s orbital boundary-value problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 48(2), 145–165 (1990)ADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Izzo, D.: Lambert’s problem for exponential sinusoids. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 29(5), 1242–1245 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klumpp, A.: Relative Performance of Lambert Solvers 1: Zero Revolution Methods. Tech. rep, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, No. 19930013090 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. Lancaster, E., Blanchard, R.: A Unified Form of Lambert’s Theorem. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington (1969)Google Scholar
  10. Luo, Q., Meng, Z., Han, C.: Solution algorithm of a quasi-Lambert’s problem with fixed flight-direction angle constraint. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 109(4), 409–427 (2011)ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Parrish N.L. (2012) Accelerating Lambert’s problem on the gpu in Matlab. PhD thesis, California Polytechnic State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Peterson, G., et al.: Relative performance of Lambert solvers 1: zero revolution methods. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 136(1), 1495–1510 (1991)Google Scholar
  13. Rauh, A., Parisi, J.: Near distance approximation in astrodynamical applications of Lambert’s theorem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 118(1), 49–74 (2014)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Wagner, S., Wie, B.: GPU accelerated Lambert solution methods for the orbital targeting problem. Spacefl. Mech. 140 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESTECNoordwijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations