Brothers as Playmates for Their Siblings with Developmental Disabilities: A Multiple-Baseline Design Study
- 9 Downloads
The feasibility of using typically developing siblings as social interaction intervention agents has been suggested in the literature addressing interactions and relationships between children with disabilities and their siblings. However, the outcomes are not completely understood.
This study evaluated an intervention that targeted the social play of children with developmental disabilities (DD) that was implemented by typically developing brothers in the children’s home settings.
A multiple-baseline design across three sibling dyads was used to examine the effectiveness of the social interaction intervention.
The findings resulted in a moderate change in social behaviors of children with DD and increased social skill strategies used by typically developing boy siblings. Percentage of non-overlapping data and Tau-U indices were provided and discussed for the use of sibling-mediated social play intervention with children with DD.
The goal of sibling-mediated social interaction intervention is to provide typically developing siblings with specific techniques to engage children with disabilities in play, with the intention of encouraging their active participation to improve the quality of their interaction. By individually fine-tuning the activities to meet the interests of both children with disabilities and their siblings, typically developing siblings can be taught some social competencies that have value not only for children with disabilities, but also for themselves. They can become cognitively aware of their own thought processes.
KeywordsTypically developing boys Brothers with developmental disabilities Sibling-implemented social interaction intervention
This research report was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under award 5R03HD58800-2. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the Protection of Human Subjects (Protocol: 09-157).
Informed parental consent and child assent were obtained for all study participants.
- Abramovitch, R., Stanhope, L., Pepler, D., & Corter, C. (1987). The influence of Down’s syndrome on sibling interaction. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1987.tb00675.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ansbacher, H., & Ansbacher, R. (1956). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Chengappa, K., Stokes, J. O., Costello, A. H., Norman, M. A., Travers, R. M., & McNeil, C. B. (2013). Parent-child interaction therapy for severe sibling conflict in young children. Journal of Communications Research,5(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
- Corcoran, E. P. (2013). The influence of gender and birth order on adult sibling attachment relationships. Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology. Unpublished dissertation, UMI 3595218, Published by ProQuest LLC.Google Scholar
- Dirks, M. A., Persram, R., Recchia, H. E., & Howe, N. (2015). Sibling relationships as sources of risk and resilience in the development and maintenance of internalizing and externalizing problems during childhood and adolescence. Child Psychology Review,42, 145–155.Google Scholar
- Jackson, N. F., Jackson, D. A., & Monroe, C. (1983). Getting along with others: Teaching social effectiveness to children. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,30, 205–223.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). Siblings of youth with autism spectrum disorders: Theoretical perspectives on sibling relationships and individual adjustment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2611-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning (AGS ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.Google Scholar
- Odom, S. L., & McConnell, S. R. (1997). Play time/social time: Organizing your classroom to build interaction skills. Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration (UIAP).Google Scholar
- Wetherby, A., Prizant, M., & Barry, M. (2002). Communication and symbolic behavior scales: Developmental profile (CSBS DP) manual. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub.Google Scholar
- White, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.Google Scholar