Cross-National Examination of Work-Family in Parents of Children with Disabilities Using a Bioecological Model
Although work-family balance (WFB) has received much attention from researchers, there are relatively few studies exploring WFB in parents of children with disabilities. Such research is necessary because caregiving demands are greater among these parents than those caring for typically developing children.
The objective was to examine the impact of person and context elements of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model (BM) on WFB among employed parents of children with disabilities. Hypotheses stated that personal resources, personal demands, and microsystem, exosystem, and macrosystem variables would impact work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW).
Parents (N = 145) from several English-speaking countries responded to an internet survey. They were recruited through advocacy groups for children with disabilities. They were employed at least part-time with a child under 18 years of age and diagnosed with a disability living with them.
Regression analyses indicated that some personal resources (e.g. work-family enrichment) and some personal demands (e.g. rated severity of child disability) predicted both WIF and FIW in the expected direction. Microsystem (i.e. supervisory support) and exosystem (i.e. organizational culture) variables predicted lower levels of WIF and FIW. However, macrosystem variables (i.e. national family supportive policies) did not.
The BM is useful for understanding WFB among employed parents of children with disabilities. Future research should include incorporating more aspects of the BM when exploring parents’ experiences. For example, examination of the chronosystem may be particularly important as the demands of parenting children with disabilities shift as children age.
KeywordsWork-family conflict Cross-national Employed parents Children Disabilities
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Theresa J. Brown declares that she has no conflict of interest. Kenneth E. Sumner declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Allen, T. D. (2013). The work-family role interface: A synthesis of the research from industrial and organizational psychology. In N. W. Schmitt, S. Highhouse & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 12, 2nd ed.) (2nd ed., pp. 698–718, Chapter xvii, 797 p.) Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. Retrieved from https://library.georgian.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.library.georgian.edu/docview/1230620202?accountid=27354
- Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. (2016). Advancing work-family research and practice. In T. D. Allen, & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 477–485, Chapter xvii, 502 Pages) Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Retrieved from https://library.georgian.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.library.georgian.edu/docview/1883361472?accountid=27354
- Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., Poelmans, S. A. Y., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., et al. (2014). The link between national paid leave policy and work–family conflict among married working parents. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12004.Google Scholar
- Brennan, E. M., Rosenzweig, J. M., Jivanjee, P., & Stewart, L. M. (2016). Challenges and supports for employed parents of children and youth with special needs. In T. D. Allen, & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and family; the oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 165–181, Chapter xvii, 502 p.) Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Retrieved from https://library.georgian.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.library.georgian.edu/docview/1883359241?accountid=27354
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed.): vol 1, Theoretical models of human development. (pp. 793–828) Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/621351974?accountid=27354
- Chan, X. W., Kalliath, T., Brough, P., Siu, O., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Timms, C. (2016). Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1755–1776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1075.Google Scholar
- Crettenden, A., Wright, A., & Skinner, N. (2014). Mothers caring for children and young people with developmental disabilities: Intent to work, patterns of participation in paid employment and the experience of workplace flexibility. Community, Work & Family, 17(3), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2014.923816.Google Scholar
- den Dulk, L., & Peper, B. (2016). The impact of national policy on work-family experiences. In T. D. Allen, & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and family; the oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 300–314, Chapter xvii, 502 p.) Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Retrieved from https://library.georgian.edu/login?url=https://search-proquestcom.library.georgian.edu/docview/1883359566?accountid=27354.
- Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.Google Scholar
- Gosling, S. D., & Mason, W. (2015). Internet research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321.Google Scholar
- Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x.Google Scholar
- Marcus-Newhall, A., Halpern, D. F., & Tan, S. J. (2008). The changing realities of work and family. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2016). Cross-national work-life research: A review at the individual level. In T. D. Allen, & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 315–330, Chapter xvii, 502 p.) Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Scott, E. K. (2010). “I feel as if I am the one who is disabled”: The emotional impact of changed employment trajectories of mothers caring for children with disabilities. Gender & Society, 24(5), 672–696.Google Scholar
- Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017). Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1601–1635. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000246.Google Scholar
- US Department of Labor. (nd). FMLA (Family & Medical Leave) Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/benefits-leave/fmla
- World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70670/1/WHO_NMH_VIP_11.01_eng.pdf
- World Policy Forum. (2017). Adult labor and working conditions. Retrieved from http://worldpolicyforum.org/topics/adult-labor-and-working-conditions/policies