Advertisement

Contributions of Positive Youth Development to Intervention Science

  • Kyle EichasEmail author
  • Laura Ferrer-Wreder
  • Tina M. Olsson
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Advances in knowledge of how to promote positive youth development (PYD) have significant potential to enrich intervention science. As part of a broader movement in the direction of a more fully integrated intervention science, PYD intervention research can provide practitioners in youth behavioral and mental health with an updated set of intervention tools beyond problem-focused strategies for reducing or preventing dysfunction.

Objective

The objective of this commentary is to highlight potential contributions of PYD research to the development of more complete models of youth intervention, as well as to identify directions for future PYD intervention research.

Method

This commentary discusses and expands on findings from the present articles that contribute to an empirical foundation for connecting PYD promotion with the science and practice of treatment and prevention.

Results

The findings point to practical advantages that result from understanding the empirical links among PYD, treatment, and prevention on the way to achieving a more fully integrated intervention science, as well as methodological challenges involved in pursuing this agenda.

Conclusions

In this context, the next generation of intervention science will be driven by integrating PYD’s contextual, cultural, relational, global, and participatory values into the science of building and testing youth interventions.

Keywords

Positive youth development intervention Implementation Change process research Cascade effects Integrated intervention science 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Adams, B. G., Wiium, N., & Abubakar, A. (2018). Developmental assets and academic performance of adolescents in Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa. Child & Youth Care Forum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9480-z.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, P. L. (2007). Developmental assets: an overview of theory, research, and practice. In R. Silbereisen & R. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to positive youth development (pp. 33–59). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonds, D. D., Wolchik, S. A., Winslow, E., Tein, J., Sandler, I. N., & Millsap, R. E. (2010). Developmental cascade effects of the New Beginnings Program on adolescent adaptation outcomes. Developmental Psychopathology, 22, 771–784.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, B., Wiium, N., & Dimitrova, R. (2018). A life history approach to understanding developmental assets among Chinese adolescents. Child & Youth Care Forum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9433-y.Google Scholar
  6. Ciocanel, O., Power, K., Eriksen, A., & Gillings, K. (2017). Effectiveness of positive youth development interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 483–504.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0555-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickson, K., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Fletcher, A., Hinds, K., Thomas, J., Stansfield, C., et al. (2018). How do contextual factors influence implementation and receipt of positive youth development programs addressing substance use and violence? A qualitative meta-synthesis of process evaluations. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32, 1110–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116670302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durlak, J. A., & DuPree, E. P. (2009). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutra-Thomé, L., DeSousa, D., & Koller, S. H. (2018). Promotive and risk factors for positive youth development among emerging adults in Brazil. Child & Youth Care Forum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9475-9.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrer-Wreder, L. (2013). Advancing child and adolescent well-being through positive youth development and prevention programs. In A. Ben-Arieh, I. Frones, F. Casas, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), The handbook of child well-being (pp. 3025–3041). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Guerra, N. G., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2008). Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention. In N. G. Guerra & C. P. Bradshaw (Eds.), Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and promote positive youth development. New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 122, pp. 1–17). Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.225.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., Stanton, C. E., Carpenter, J. K., Sandfor, B. T., Curtiss, J. E., et al. (2018). The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005.Google Scholar
  14. Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2018). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618772296.Google Scholar
  15. Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 418–428.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802448899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozina, A., Wiium, N., Gonzalez, J., & Dimitrova, R. (2018). Positive youth development and academic achievement in Slovenia. Child & Youth Care Forum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9457-y.Google Scholar
  17. Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Bowers, E. P., & Geldhof, G. J. (2015). Positive youth development and relational-developmental-systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (eds.), Theory and method (Chapter 16, pp. 607–651), (Volume 1: handbook of child psychology and developmental science, 7th edition). R. M. Lerner, series editor. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, R. M., & Overton, W. F. (2008). Exemplifying the integrations of the relational developmental system: Synthesizing theory, research, and application to promote positive development and social justice. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(3), 245–255.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558408314385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Llewelyn, S., MacDonald, J., & Doorn, Aafjes-van. (2016). Process-outcome studies. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 451–463). Worcester: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Developmental Psychopathology, 22, 491–495.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mejia, A., Leijten, P., Lachman, J. M., & Parra-Cardona, J. (2017). Different strokes for different folks? Contrasting approaches to cultural adaptation of parenting interventions. Prevention Science, 18(6), 630–639.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0671-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Overton, W. F. (2010). Life-span development: Concepts and issues. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), The handbook of lifespan development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94–111.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0702_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2016). Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied Developmental Science, 20, 188–202.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1113879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2011). Adolescent thriving: The role of sparks, relationships, and empowerment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 1156–1171.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tirrell, J. M., Geldhof, G. J., King, P. E., Dowling, E. M., Sim, A. T. R., Williams, K., et al. (2018). Measuring spirituality, hope, and thriving among Salvadoran youth: Initial findings from the compassion international study of positive youth development. Child & Youth Care Forum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9454-1.Google Scholar
  29. Tolan, P. (2014). Future directions for positive development intervention research. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 686–694.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.936604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tolan, P. (2016). Positive youth development interventions: advancing evaluation theory and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 20, 147–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1014485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tolan, P., Ross, K., Arkin, N., Godine, N., & Clark, E. (2016). Toward an integrated approach to positive development: Implications for intervention. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 214–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1146080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weisz, J. R., Sandler, I. N., Durlak, J. A., & Anton, B. S. (2005). Promoting and protecting youth mental health through evidence-based prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 60, 628–648.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiium, N., Dost-Gözkan, A., & Kosic, M. (2018). Developmental assets among young people in three European contexts: Italy. Norway: Child & Youth Care Forum.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-018-9446-1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tarleton State UniversityStephenvilleUSA
  2. 2.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations