Advertisement

Catalysis Letters

, Volume 150, Issue 3, pp 781–793 | Cite as

Methane Decomposition Over Modified Carbon Fibers as Effective Catalysts for Hydrogen Production

  • K. Sisáková
  • A. OriňakEmail author
  • R. Oriňaková
  • M. Strečková
  • J. Patera
  • A. Welle
  • Z. Kostecká
  • V. Girman
Article
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

Catalyzed thermal decomposition of methane to produce hydrogen was studied. The carbon microfibers with embedded Ni, Cu and Co metals and metal phosphides were introduced as the novel catalysts. The catalysts were prepared by needle-less electrospinning being a versatile method for fibers production in large scale. The efficiency of methane decomposition by utilization of micro fiber carbon supported metal catalysts was studied by the pyrolysis-capillary gas chromatography method. The experiment was carried out in the temperature range from 973.15 to 1073.15 K. Kinetic parameters were calculated based on the Demitcheli kinetic model. It was found that the morphology, schedule of heat treatment and type and content of incorporated transition metals and metal phosphides may be the controlling parameter in the catalytic decomposition of methane. The highest conversion rates about 54% were achieved using carbon microfibers doped with cobalt and cobalt phosphide nanoparticles. The catalyst was heat treated in argon atmosphere followed by the hydrogen reduction. The second highest conversion rates were achieved with carbon microfibers doped with nickel and nickel phosphide nanoparticles carbonized only under argon atmosphere.

Graphic Abstract

Keywords

Pyrolysis Catalysts Methane Hydrogen Carbon microfibers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research, and Sport of the Slovak Republic Projects No. VEGA 1/0074/17, and Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Contract No. APVV 16-0029.

References

  1. 1.
    Colmati F, Alonso CG, Martins TD et al (2018) Production of hydrogen and their use in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Adv Hydrog Gener Technol.  https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou L, Enakonda LR, Harb M et al (2017) Fe catalysts for methane decomposition to produce hydrogen and carbon nano materials. Appl Catal B 208:44–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Syed Muhammad ad AF, Awad A, Saidur R et al (2018) Recent advances in cleaner hydrogen productions via thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane: admixture with hydrocarbon. Int J Hydrog Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou L, Enakonda LR, Li S et al (2018) Iron ore catalysts for methane decomposition to make COx free hydrogen and carbon nano material. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 87:54–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou L, Harb M, Hedhili MN et al (2017) Microemulsion prepared Ni 88 Pt 12 for methane cracking. RSC Adv 7:4078–4082.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA25069F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou L, Enakonda LR, Saih Y et al (2016) Catalytic methane decomposition over Fe-Al2 O3. Chemsuschem 9:1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600310 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou L, Basset JM (2016) Unsupported NiPt alloy metal catalysts prepared by water-in-oil (W/O) microemulsion method for methane cracking. Fuel 181:805–810.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reshetenko TV, Avdeeva LB, Ushakov VA et al (2004) Coprecipitated iron-containing catalysts (Fe-Al2O3, Fe-Co-Al2O3, Fe-Ni-Al2O3) for methane decomposition at moderate temperatures: part II. Evolution of the catalysts in reaction. Appl Catal A 270:87–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.04.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C Deniz, N Karatepe (2013) Hydrogen and carbon nanotube production via catalytic decomposition of methane. In: Proceedings of the Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Associated Devices, vol 8814, SPIE.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2023968
  10. 10.
    Torres D, De Llobet S, Pinilla JL et al (2012) Hydrogen production by catalytic decomposition of methane using a Fe-based catalyst in a fluidized bed reactor. J Nat Gas Chem 21:367–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(11)60378-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li Y, Zhang B, Xie X et al (2006) Novel Ni catalysts for methane decomposition to hydrogen and carbon nanofibers. J Catal 238:412–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takenaka S, Kobayashi S, Ogihara H, Otsuka K (2003) Ni/SiO2catalyst effective for methane decomposition into hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. J Catal 217:79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00185-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang G, Jin Y, Liu G, Li Y (2013) Production of hydrogen and nanocarbon from catalytic decomposition of methane over a Ni-Fe/Al2O3 catalyst. Energy Fuels 27:4448–4456.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef3019707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunker AM, Kumar S, Mulawa PA (2006) Production of hydrogen by thermal decomposition of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor—effects of catalyst, temperature, and residence time. Int J Hydrog Energy 31:473–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muradov N (2001) Catalysis of methane decomposition over elemental carbon. Catal Commun 2:89–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-7367(01)00013-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Urdiana G, Valdez R, Lastra G et al (2018) Production of hydrogen and carbon nanomaterials using transition metal catalysts through methane decomposition. Mater Lett 217:9–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christian B, Lødeng R, Holmen A (2008) A review of catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas with emphasis on reaction mechanisms over transition metal catalysts. Appl Catal A 346:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang L, Aboagye A, Kelkar A (2014) A review: carbon nanofibers from electrospun polyacrylonitrile and their applications. J Mater Sci 49:463–480.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7705-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Inagaki M, Yang Y, Kang F (2012) Carbon nanofibers prepared via electrospinning. Adv Mater 24:2547–2566.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104940 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garg K, Bowlin GL, Garg K, Bowlin GL (2014) Electrospinning jets and nanofibrous structures. Biomicrofluidics 5:013403.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3567097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu W, Zhang H, Li D et al (2013) Study on needle and needleless electrospinning for nanofibers. Adv Mater Res 752:276–279.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.750-752.276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jirsak O, Petrik S (2015) Recent advances in nanofibre technology: needleless electrospinning. Int J Nanotechnol 9:8–9.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNT.2012.046756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Streckova M, Orinakova R, Mudra E et al (2018) Design of electroactive carbon fibers decorated with metal and metal-phosphide nanoparticles for hydrogen evolution technology. Energy Technol 6:1310–1331.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201700879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tang Yufeng, Huang Fugiang, Zhao Wei, Liu Zhangiang, Wan Dongyun (2012) Synthesis of graphene-supported Li4Ti5O12 nanosheets for high rate battery application. J Mater Chem 22:11257–11260.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm30624g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang L, Lachawiec AJ, Yang RT (2013) Nanostructured adsorbents for hydrogen storage at ambient temperature: high-pressure measurements and factors in fluencing hydrogen spillover. RSC Adv 3:23935–23952.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44216k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Syed Muhammad ad AF, Awad A, Saidur R et al (2018) Recent advances in cleaner hydrogen productions via thermo-catalytic decomposition of methane: admixture with hydrocarbon. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:18713–18734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suelves I, Pinilla JL, Lázaro MJ et al (2009) Effects of reaction conditions on hydrogen production and carbon nanofiber properties generated by methane decomposition in a fixed bed reactor using a NiCuAl catalyst. J Power Sour 192:35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muradov N, Smith F, T-Raissi A (2005) Catalytic activity of carbons for methane decomposition reaction. Catal Today 102–103:225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dufour A, Celzard A, Ouartassi B et al (2009) Effect of micropores diffusion on kinetics of CH4 decomposition over a wood-derived carbon catalyst. Appl Catal A 360:120–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Demicheli MC, Ponzi EN, Ferretti OA, Yeramian AA (1991) Kinetics of carbon formation from CH4-H2mixtures on nickel-alumina catalyst. Chem Eng J 46:129–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(91)87004-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kuvshinov GG, Mogilnykh YI, Kuvshinov DG (1998) Kinetics of carbon formation from CH4-H2mixtures over a nickel containing catalyst. Catal Today 42:357–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00115-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borghei M, Karimzadeh R, Rashidi A, Izadi N (2010) Kinetics of methane decomposition to COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber over Ni-Cu/MgO catalyst. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:9479–9488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moliner R, Suelves I, Lázaro MJ, Moreno O (2005) Thermocatalytic decomposition of methane over activated carbons: influence of textural properties and surface chemistry. Int J Hydrog Energy 30:293–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Presland AEB, Walker PL Jr (1969) Growth of single-crystal graphite by pyrolysis of acetylene. Carbon 7:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(69)90002-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baird T, Fryer JR, Grant B (1974) Carbon formation on iron and nickel foils by hydrocarbon pyrolysis- reactions at 700°C. Carbon 12:591–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(74)90060-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li Y, Li D, Wang G (2011) Methane decomposition to COx -free hydrogen and nano-carbon material on group 8–10 base metal catalysts: a review. Catal Today 162:1–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.12.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Konieczny A, Mondal K, Wiltowski T, Dydo P (2008) Catalyst development for thermocatalytic decomposition of methane to hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:264–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sisáková
    • 1
  • A. Oriňak
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Oriňaková
    • 1
  • M. Strečková
    • 2
  • J. Patera
    • 3
  • A. Welle
    • 4
  • Z. Kostecká
    • 5
  • V. Girman
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Physical Chemistry, Chemistry Institute, Faculty of ScienceP. J. Šafárik University in KošiceKošiceSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of Materials ResearchSlovak Academy of ScienceKosiceSlovakia
  3. 3.Department of Organic TechnologyUniversity of Chemistry and Technology PraguePragueCzech Republic
  4. 4.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG) and Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF)Eggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany
  5. 5.Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and BiophysicsUniversity of Veterinary Medicine and PharmacyKosiceSlovakia
  6. 6.Institute of Physics, Faculty of ScienceP. J. Šafárik UniversityKosiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations