Advertisement

Numerical Simulation of Photocatalytic Reduction of Gas Phase CO2 in Optofluidic Microreactor

  • Min ChengEmail author
  • Yi Huang
  • Rui Gao
  • Shuxia Bai
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Emission reduction of CO2 is an urgent global environmental problem. The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 has attracted lots of interest as a novel method for producing organic fuel, and this technology does not require the consumption of additional energy. So in this paper, the photocatalytic reduction processes of gas phase CO2 in the different optofluidic microreactors were simulated to analyze the reaction mechanism and the reactants transfer process. Firstly, the applicability of the classical Langmuir–Hinshelwood equilibrium adsorption model and the self-defined dynamic mass transfer model for the numerical simulation of optofluidic planar reactor were initially verified. The results of the simulation based on the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model were not consistent with the experimental results when the flow rate were high, while those of the simulation based on the self-defined dynamic mass transfer model were consistent with the experimental results. The result indicates that the mass transfer process of the reactants is the dominant factor which affects the reaction efficiency of the photocatalytic process in the microreactor. Then, the corresponding Sherwood number was calculated according to the mass transfer coefficient under different inlet flow rates, and the mass transfer characteristic correlation was established. Finally, the planar microreactor was optimized to be an inverted convex cylinders microreactor, and the numerical simulation of photocatalytic reduction process of gas phase CO2 was carried out by using self-defined dynamic mass transfer model. It was found that the inverted convex cylinders in the microreactor could significantly enhance the transfer effect of reactants during the reaction process and improve the conversion efficiency of CO2.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Photocatalysis CO2 Mass transfer Optofluidic planar microreactor Inverted convex cylinders microreactor 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (No. 51606019).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References

  1. 1.
    PCC fifth assessment report: climate change 2013[EB/OL]. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/ (2013)
  2. 2.
    Furler P, Scheffe JR, Steinfeld A (2012) Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H2O and CO2 via ceria redox reactions in a high temperature solar reactor. Energy Environ Sci 5(3):6098–6103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murugananthan M, Kumaravel M, Katsumata H et al (2015) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 using Cu electrode in methanol/LiClO4 electrolyte. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(21):6740–6744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Razzak SA, Hossain MM, Lucky RA et al (2013) Integrated CO2 capture, wastewater treatment and biofuel production by microalgae culturing: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27(6):622–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seng ST, Linda Z (2006) Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide into gaseous hydrocarbon using TiO2 pellets. Catal Today 115(1–4):269–273Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roy SC, Varghese OK, Paulose M et al (2010) Toward solar fuels: photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons. ACS Nano 4(3):1259–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dhakshinamoorthy A, Navalon S, Corma A et al (2012) Photocatalytic CO2 reduction by TiO2 and related titanium containing solids. Energy Environ Sci 5(11):9217–9233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koci K, Obalova L, Lacny Z (2008) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 over TiO2 based catalysts. Chem Pap 62(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shown I, Hsu HC, Chang YC et al (2014) Highly efficient visible light photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to hydrocarbon fuels by Cu-nanoparticle decorated graphene oxide. Nano Lett 14(11):6097–6103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li Z, Zhou Y, Zhang J et al (2012) Hexagonal nanoplate-textured micro-octahedron Zn2SnO4: combined effects toward enhanced efficiencies of dye-sensitized solar cell and photoreduction of CO2 into hydrocarbon fuels. Cryst Growth Des 12(3):1476–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kimfung L, Handoko AD, Majeda K et al (2014) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 and protons using water as an electron donor over potassium tantalate nanoflakes. Nanoscale 6(16):9767–9773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tahir B, Tahir M, Amin NAS (2015) Gold-indium modified TiO2 nanocatalysts for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2 as reductant in a monolith photoreactor. Appl Surf Sci 338:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campbell TJ (2013) Photochemical reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous and ionic liquid solutions in a microreactor with TiO2 catalyst: experiment and modeling. Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tahir M, Amin NAS (2013) Photocatalytic CO2 reduction and kinetic study over In/TiO2 nanoparticles supported microchannel monolith photoreactor. Appl Catal A 467(10):483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng X, Chen R, Zhu X et al (2016) Optofluidic membrane microreactor for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(4):2457–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng X, Chen R, Zhu X et al (2016) An optofluidic planar microreactor for photo catalytic reduction of CO2 in alkaline environment. Energy 11(081):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zou L (2011) Numerical simulation of photocatalytic degradation of benzene with carbon nanotubes-titanium dioxide chitosan. Civil Engineering, Hunan University, HunanGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Serge C, Nidhal B, Orfan Z et al (2012) Modelling and design of microchannel reactor for photocatalysis. Virtual Phys Prototyp 07(03):203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Serge C, Nidhal B, Orfan Z et al (2014) Mass transfer measurements and modeling in a microchannel photocatalytic reactor. Chem Eng Res Des 92(4):657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang X (2014) Numerical simulation of light radiation field and photocatalytic surface reaction in photocatalytic reactor. Chemical Engineering, Tianjin University, TianjinGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ignasi SE, Alberto B, Gianluca LP (2007) Two-dimensional modeling of a flat-plate photocatalytic reactor for oxidation of indoor air pollutants. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(23):7489–7496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Serpone N, Pelizzetti E (1989) Adsorption desorption, related mobility and reactivity in photocatalysis. Photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 217–250Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peral J, Domenech X, Oilis DF (1997) Heterogeneous photocatalysis for purification, decontamination and deodorization of air. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 70(2):117–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fu X, Shen W, Yao T (1990) Physical chemistry, 4th edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 971–978Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng M, Yang S, Chen R et al (2017) Copper-decorated TiO2 nanorod thin films in optofluidic planar reactors for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(15):9722–9732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhu G, Sun Y (2009) Transmission principle, 1st edn. Metallurgical Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xu Y, Zhu H (2013) The role of Kn number in the study of micro-scale similar flow characteristics. J Aeronaut Dyn 28(8):1752–1758Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao J, Yang X (2003) Photocatalytic oxidation for indoor air purification: a literature review. Build Environ 38(5):645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sang BK, Sung CH (2002) Kinetic study for photocatalytic degradation of volatile organic compounds in air using thin film TiO2 photocatalyst. Appl Catal B 35(2):305–315Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu J, Wang Z, Shen J et al (2009) The L–H model in the photocatalytic oxidation kinetics of volatile organicpollutants. Progress Chem 21(10):2037–2043Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang H, Iovenitti P, Harvey E (2002) Optimizing layout of obstacles for enhanced mixing in microchannels. Smart Mater 11:662–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Low-Grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems (Chongqing University)Ministry of EducationChongqingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Engineering ThermophysicsChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations