Texture Evolution of Hard-Templated Hierarchically Porous Alumina Catalyst in Heavy Oil Hydroprocessing
- 13 Downloads
The study is devoted to the deactivation behavior of alumina “guard-type” mesoporous and hierarchical catalysts in long-term 800 h hydroprocessing of heavy oil under conditions close to industrial ones. The purely mesoporous sample had only 10–15 nm mesopores by Hg porosimetry whereas the hierarchical catalyst possessed a bimodal pore size distribution with maximum at 15 nm (55 vol%) and 40 nm (45 vol%, related to the mouths of 200 nm spherical macropores). Both catalysts had similar activities for the first 200 h of hydroprocessing. The mesoporous catalyst underwent the rapid deactivation in hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodemetallization (HDM) of V after 200 h on stream, and the remarkable decrease in hydrodeaspaltenization (HDAs) and Ni removal after 300–400 h on stream due to the intensive mesopore plugging by 55% of the total volume. The hierarchical catalyst did not show any decline in HDS and HDAs during the 800 h experiment, though its HDM activity also reduced due to the surface poisoning and coke deposition, albeit to a lesser extent. The intrinsic mesopores of the hierarchical alumina were shown to narrow down to 10 nm but did not experience substantial blocking observed for the mesoporous catalyst. Hierarchical texture seems not only to provide wide macro- and mesopores less prone to plugging by coke species, but to ensure effective transport of reaction products out of the small pores which prevents them from blockage.
KeywordsHeavy oil Hydroprocessing Deactivation Hierarchical Heterogeneous catalysis Texture
The work was carried out within the framework of the budget project АААА-А17-117041710077-4 for Boreskov Institute of Catalysis. The authors would like to thank S. V. Cherepanova, N. A. Rudina, T. Ya. Efimenko, V. A., L. N. Atamanova, N. N. Malyarchuk, Trunova, G. S. Lytvak for the characterization of the catalysts and Yu. V. Larichev, P. P. Dik, D. D. Uvarkina and D. O. Novikov for their help with the characterization of the feed and oil products.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
- 1.Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (2017) Annual statistical bulletin. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ancheyta J, Speight JG (2007) Hydroprocessing of heavy oils and residua. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ancheyta J (2016) Deactivation of hydroprocessing catalysts. Deactivation of heavy oil hydroprocessing catalysts: fundamentals and modeling. Wiley, New York. pp 89–126Google Scholar
- 11.Liu ZY, Chen SL, Dong P, Ge XJ (2012) Diffusion of heavy oil in SiO2 model catalyst and FCC catalyst. Adv Mater Res 550–553:158–163. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.550-553.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Khaleel A, Al-Mansouri S (2010) Meso-macroporous γ-alumina by template-free sol-gel synthesis: The effect of the solvent and acid catalyst on the microstructure and textural properties. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 369:272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dupin T, Lavina J, Poisson R (1993) Process for the preparation of alumina agglomerates. United States patent USGoogle Scholar
- 31.Su B-L, Sanchez C, Yang X-Y (2012) Hierarchically structured porous materials: from nanoscience to catalysis, separation, optics, energy, and life science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 32.Li H, Sheng-Li C, Peng D (2009) Preparation, characterization and catalytic performance of novel macroporous catalysts for heavy oil hydrogenation. Ranliao Huaxue Xuebao 37:444–447Google Scholar
- 33.Zi L, Sheng C, Peng D (2012) Novel macroporous residua FCC catalysts. Fuel Chem Technol 40Google Scholar
- 35.Liu Z, Dong P (2012) Preparation of macroporous catalysts and their performance in catalytic cracking of heavy oil. J Fuel Chem Technol 40:1092–1097Google Scholar