Advertisement

Single versus double pass technique for preparation of ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues from donated whole eyes

  • Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi
  • Tahereh Chamani
  • Bahareh Kheiri
  • Mohammad Ali Javadi
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the preoperative thickness profile and endothelial rating of ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) tissues prepared with a single versus double microkeratome pass from donated whole eyes and corresponding eye bank postoperative results. Microkeratome-assisted UT-DSAEK tissues were prepared from freshly donated whole eyes with single-pass (SP) and double-pass (DP) technique in the Central Eye Bank of Iran. Preoperative thickness profiles and endothelial cell densities of UT-DSAEK tissues were obtained from optical coherence tomography and specular microscopy, respectively, and compared between groups. Corneal perforation rates during the eye bank preparation and postoperative reports of transplanted UT-DSAEK tissues were also compared. Over a 15-month period, 342 UT-DSAEK tissues were prepared: 248 via SP and 94 with DP technique. Mean donor corneal central thickness was 610 ± 58 µm with SP and 790 ± 100 µm with DP technique. Mean central thickness of UT-DSAEK tissues was not statistically different between the groups (84.8 ± 11.0 µm with SP and 85.1 ± 10.5 µm with DP technique, P = 0.857). Mean increase of UT-DSAEK thickness from central to pericentral and peripheral cornea was not significantly different with both techniques. Mean differences between thicknesses of 2 pericentral locations and between those of 2 peripheral locations were not statistically different in the study groups. Corneal perforation of 1.6 and 1.1% occurred in SP and DP groups, respectively. Failed graft was reported 6 months postoperatively in 4 (1.6%) cases with SP and in 1 (1.1%) case with DP technique. Preoperative thickness profiles of UT-DSAEK tissues prepared from donated whole eyes via SP technique were not significantly different from those prepared with DP, showing a symmetric increase of thickness towards peripheral locations.

Keywords

UT-DSAEK Single-pass Double-pass Endothelial keratoplasty Microkeratome 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Bachmann B, Schaub F, Cursiefen C (2016) Treatment of corneal endothelial disorders by DMEK and UT-DSAEK: indications, complications, results and follow-up. Ophthalmologe 113:196–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boynton GE, Woodward MA (2014) Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25(4):319–324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Busin M, Albé E (2014) Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25(4):312–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Busin M, Patel AK, Scorcia V, Ponzin D (2012) Microkeratome- assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(1):521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Beltz J (2013) Ultrathin descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology 120(6):1186–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleary C, Liu Y, Tang M, Stoeger C, Huang D (2012) Excimer laser smoothing of endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea 31:431–436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitry MES, Lewis AD, Zacharaki F, Chandran M, Robson D, Menon G, Poole TRG (2017) Simple single-pass technique for ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a pilot study. Cornea 36(10):1178–1183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Guerra F, Anshu A, Price M, Price F (2011) Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30(12):1382–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsu M, Hereth WL, Moshirfar M (2012) Double-pass microkeratome technique for ultra-thin graft preparation in Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol 6:425–432PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanavi MR, Javadi MA, Javadi F, Chamani T (2014) Preparation of pre-cut corneas from fresh donated whole globes for Descemet’s stripping automated keratoplasty: 3-year results at the Central Eye Bank of Iran. Cell Tissue Bank 15(3):369–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanavi MR, Nemati F, Chamani T, Kheiri B, Javadi MA (2017) Measurements of donor endothelial keratoplasty lenticules prepared from fresh donated whole eyes by using ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Cell Tissue Bank 18(1):99–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mootha VV, Heck E, Verity SM, Petroll WM, Lakshman N, Muftuoglu O, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Cavanagh HD (2011) Comparative study of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by Moria CBm microkeratome, horizon microkeratome, and Intralase FS60. Cornea 30:320–324CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Nahum Y, Leon P, Busin M (2015) Postoperative graft thickness obtained with single-pass microkeratome-assisted ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 34:1362–1364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Parekh M, Salvalaio G, Ruzza A, Camposampiero D, Griffoni C, Zampini A, Ponzin D, Ferrari S (2013) Posterior lamellar graft preparation: a prospective review from an eye bank on current and future aspects. J Ophthalmol 2013:769860.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/769860 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Romano V, Steger B, Myneni J, Batterbury M, Willoughby CE, Kaye SB (2017) Preparation of ultrathin grafts for Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty with a single microkeratome pass. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(1):12–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schaub F, Enders P, Roters S, Cursiefen C, Bachmann BO (2017) Single-pass Ultrathin DSAEK (UT-DSAEK) with the SLc Expert Microkeratome®. Acta Ophthalmol 95(2):e160–e161.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13211 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sikder S, Nordgren RN, Neravetla SR, Moshirfar M (2011) Ultra-thin donor tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty with a double-pass microkeratome. Am J Ophthalmol 152(2):202–208.e2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.051 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tausif HN, Johnson L, Titus M, Mavin K, Chandrasekaran N, Woodward MA, Shtein RM, Mian SI (2014) Corneal donor tissue preparation for Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Vis Exp 91:51919.  https://doi.org/10.3791/51919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE (2012) Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 153:1082–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Woodward MA, Titus M, Mavin K, Shtein RM (2012) Corneal donor tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty. J Vis Exp.  https://doi.org/10.3791/3847 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ocular Tissue Engineering Research CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Central Eye Bank of IranTehranIran
  3. 3.Ophthalmic Research CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations