Advertisement

Cybernetics and Systems Analysis

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 752–759 | Cite as

Upper Bounds on the Imbalance of Discrete Functions Implemented by Sequences of Finite Automata

  • A. N. AlekseychukEmail author
  • S. M. Koniushok
  • M. V. Poremskyi
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

A matrix representation and upper bounds on the imbalance of an arbitrary discrete function implemented by a sequence of finite automata are obtained. The obtained results generalize a number of previously known statements about matrix (linear) representations of the imbalance of functions of special form and can be used to solve problems of proving the security of stream or block ciphers against a number of statistical attacks.

Keywords

correlation cryptanalysis imbalance of a discrete function finite automaton addition modulo 2n operation SNOW 2.0 Strumok 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O. Staffelbach and W. Meier, “Cryptographic significance of the carry for ciphers based on integer addition,” in: Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO’90; LNCS, Vol. 537, 601–615 (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Sherstnev, “The joint distribution of carries for integer addition,” Theory of Probability and Its Applications, Vol. 91(2), 467–473 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Wallén, “Linear approximation of addition modulo 2n,” in: Fast Software Encryption (FSE 2003); LNCS, Vol. 2887, 261–273 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Lipmaa and S. Moriai, “Efficient algorithms for computing differential properties of addition,” in: Fast Software Encryption (FSE 2001); LNCS, Vol. 2355, 336–350 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Lipmaa, J. Wallén, and P. Dumas, “On the additive differential probability of exclusive-or,” in: Fast Software Encryption (FSE 2004); LNCS, Vol. 3017, 317–331 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Lipmaa, “On differential properties of pseudo-hadamard transform and related mappings,” in: Progress in Cryptology-INDOCRYPT 2002; LNCS, Vol. 2551, 48–61 (2002).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. V. Kovalchuk and O. A. Sirenko, “Analysis of mixing properties of the operations of modular addition and bitwise addition defined on one carrier,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, Vol. 47, No. 5, 741–753 (2011).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. N. Alekseychuk and L. V. Kovalchuk, “Upper bounds of maximum values of average differential and linear characteristic probabilities of Feistel cipher with adder modulo 2m,” Theory of Stochastic Processes, Vol. 12(28), Nos. 1–2, 20–32 (2006).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. N. Alekseychuk, L. V. Kovalchuk, A. S. Shevtsov, and S. V. Yakovliev, “Cryptographic properties of a new national encryption standard of Ukraine,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, Vol. 52, No. 3, 351–364 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. N. Alekseychuk and L. V. Kovalchuk, “Towards a theory of security evaluation for GOST-like ciphers against differential and linear cryptanalysis,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2011/489. URL: http://eprint.iacr.org/2011/489.
  11. 11.
    L. V. Kovalchuk and V. T. Bezditnyi, “Upper bounds for the average probabilities of difference characteristics of block ciphers with alternation of Markov transformations and generalized Markov transformations,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, Vol. 50, No. 3, 386–393 (2014).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Watanabe, A. Biryukov, and C. de Canniére, “A distinguishing attack of SNOW 2.0 with linear masking method,” in: Selected Areas in Cryptography, SAC 2003; LNCS, Vol. 3006, 222–233 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Nyberg and J. Wallén, “Improved linear distinguishers for SNOW 2.0,” in: Fast Software Encryption (FSE 2006); LNCS, Vol. 4047, 144–162 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Maximov and Th. Johansson, “Fast computation for large distribution and its cryptographic application,” in: Advanced in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT 2005; LNCS, Vol. 3788, 313–332 (2005).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.-K. Lee, D. H. Lee, and S. Park, “Cryptanalysis of SOSEMANUC and SNOW 2.0 using linear masks,” in: Advanced in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT 2008; LNCS, Vol. 5350, 524–538 (2008).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Zhang, C. Xu, and W. Meier, “Fast correlation attacks over extension fields, large-unit linear approximation and cryptanalysis of SNOW 2.0,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/311. URL: http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/311.
  17. 17.
    P. Ekdahl and T. Johansson, “A new version of the stream cipher SNOW,” in: Selected Areas in Cryptography (SAC 2002); LNCS, Vol. 2295, 47–61 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. Gorbenko, A. Kuznetsov, Yu. Gorbenko, A. Alekseychuk, and V. Timchenko, “Strumok Keystream Generator,” in: 9th IEEE Intern. Conf. on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT’2018), Kyiv, Ukraine (2018), pp. 292–299.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. E. Zhukov and V. P. Chistyakov, “Matrix approach to the study of the number of preimages of the output sequence of a finite automaton,” Review of Applied and Industrial Mathematics, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 108–117 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Alekseychuk
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. M. Koniushok
    • 2
  • M. V. Poremskyi
    • 1
  1. 1.National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”KyivUkraine
  2. 2.Institute of Special Communication and Information Security of the of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”KyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations