Improved Long-term Survival with Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning in a Rat Fixed-Pressure Hemorrhagic Shock Model
We investigated whether bilateral, lower limb remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improved long-term survival using a rat model of hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation.
Rats were anesthetized, intubated and ventilated, and randomly assigned to RIPC, induced by inflating bilateral pressure cuffs around the femoral arteries to 200 mmHg for 5 min, followed by 5-min release of the cuffs (repeated for 4 cycles), or control group (cuffs were inflated to 30 mmHg). Hemorrhagic shock was induced by withdrawing blood to a fixed mean blood pressure of 30 mmHg for 30 min, followed by 30 min of resuscitation with shed blood. Rats remained anesthetized for 1 h during which hemodynamics were monitored then they were allowed to survive for 6 weeks.
The percentage of estimated total blood volume withdrawn to maintain a level of 30 mmHg was similar in both groups. RIPC significantly increased survival at 6 weeks: 5 of 27 (19%) rats in the control group and 13 of 26 (50%; p = 0.02) rats in the RIPC group survived. Blood pressure was higher in the RIPC group. The diastolic internal dimension of the left ventricle, an indicator of circulating intravascular blood volume, was significantly larger in the RIPC group at 1 h after initiation of resuscitation compared to the control group (p = 0.04). Left ventricular function assessed by fractional shortening was comparable in both groups at 1 h after initiation of resuscitation. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was within normal range in the RIPC group (17.3 ± 1.2 mg/dl) but elevated in the control group (22.0 ± 1.7 mg/dl) at 48 h after shock.
RIPC significantly improved short-term survival in rats that were subjected to hemorrhagic shock, and this benefit was maintained long term. RIPC led to greater circulating intravascular blood volume in the early phase of resuscitation and improved BUN.
KeywordsHemorrhagic shock Remote ischemic preconditioning
This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program under Award No.W81XWH-16-1-0606.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Opinions, interpretations, conclusion, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.
- 1.Vital signs: unintentional injury deaths among persons aged 0-19 years - United States, 2000-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012(61):270–6.Google Scholar
- 6.Krausz MM, Ravid A, Izhar U, Feigin E, Horowitz M, Gross D. The effect of heat load and dehydration on hypertonic saline solution treatment of controlled hemorrhagic shock. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177(6):583–92.Google Scholar
- 16.Brzozowski T, Konturek PC, Pajdo R, Kwiecien S, Sliwowski Z, Drozdowicz D, et al. Importance of brain-gut axis in the gastroprotection induced by gastric and remote preconditioning. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;55(1 Pt 2):165–77.Google Scholar
- 26.Song SQ, Gan HL, Zhang JQ, Feng L, Sun JC, Wang SX. Post-conditioning through lower limb ischemia-reperfusion can alleviate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(9):14953–61.Google Scholar
- 28.Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375(9716):727–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, Kharbanda RK, Redington AN, Schmidt M, et al. Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(3):168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Duan C, Yang G, Li T, Liu L. Advances in vascular hyporeactivity after shock: the mechanisms and managements. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2015;44(6):524–34.Google Scholar