Advertisement

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 591–600 | Cite as

Predictors of Major Bleeding Among Working-Age Adults with Atrial Fibrillation: Evaluating the Effects of Potential Drug-drug Interactions and Switching from Warfarin to Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants

  • Xue Feng
  • Usha Sambamoorthi
  • Kim Innes
  • Gregory Castelli
  • Traci LeMasters
  • Lianjie Xiong
  • Michael U. Williams
  • Xi Tan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the associations between switching from warfarin to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), exposure to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and major bleeding events in working-age adults with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the claims database of commercially insured working-age adults with AF from 2010 to 2015. Switchers were defined as patients who switched from warfarin to NOAC; non-switchers were defined as those who remained on warfarin. We developed novel methods to calculate the number and proportion of days with potential DDIs with NOAC/warfarin. Multivariate logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate the associations between switching to NOACs, exposure to potential DDIs, and major bleeding events.

Results

Among a total of 4126 patients with AF, we found a significantly lower number of potential DDIs and the average proportion of days with potential DDIs in switchers than non-switchers. The number of potential DDIs (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02–1.27) and the HAS-BLED score (AOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.82) were significantly and positively associated with the likelihood of a major bleeding event. The proportion of days with potential DDIs was also significantly and positively associated with risk for bleeding (AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03, 1.96). We did not find significant associations between switching to NOACs and major bleeding events.

Conclusions

The number and duration of potential DDIs and patients’ comorbidity burden are important factors to consider in the management of bleeding risk in working-age AF adults who take oral anticoagulants.

Keywords

Drug-drug interactions Atrial fibrillation Bleeding Switching Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We used an adjudicated claims database of commercially insured individuals, which is made available through a license to IQVIA’s Real World Data: Adjudicated Claims - US (also known as PharMetrics Plus), 10% sample. All Rights Reserved. The statements, findings, conclusions, views, and opinions contained and expressed herein are not necessarily those of IQVIA or any of its affiliated or subsidiary entities.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54GM104942.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of West Virginia University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10557_2018_6825_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, Singer DE, Simon T, Liu X. Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the US adult population. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:1142–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110:1042–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Conti JB, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Food & Drug administration (FDA). Drugs@FDA: FDA approved drug products. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm. Accessed 21 August 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nutescu E, Chuatrisorn I, Hellenbart E. Drug and dietary interactions of warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants: an update. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011;31:326–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howard PA, Ellerbeck EF, Engelman KK, Patterson KL. The nature and frequency of potential warfarin drug interactions that increase the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002;11:569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV. How warfarin interacts with common antibiotics. Emerg Med. 2004;36:30C-I.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baillargeon J, Holmes HM, Lin YL, Raji MA, Sharma G, Kuo YF. Concurrent use of warfarin and antibiotics and the risk of bleeding in older adults. Am J Med. 2012;125:183–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stöllberger C, Finsterer J. Concerns about the use of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Drugs Aging. 2013;30:949–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Hacke W, Oldgren J, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013;15:625–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, De Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010;138:1093–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016;353:i3189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adeboyeje G, Sylwestrzak G, White J, Rosenberg A, Abarca J, Crawford G, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:A2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, Bellolio MF, McBane RD, Shah ND, et al. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003725.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bengtson LG, Lutsey PL, Chen LY, MacLehose RF, Alonso A. Comparative effectiveness of dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2017;69:868–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IBM Micromedex® Drug Interaction Checking (electronic version). Truven Health Analytics, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA. 2018. http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/ Accessed 21 August 2018.
  21. 21.
    Nau DP. Proportion of days covered (PDC) as a preferred method of measuring medication adherence. Springfield, VA: Pharmacy Quality Alliance. 2012. http://ep.yimg.com/ty/cdn/epill/pdcmpr.pdf Accessed 21 August 2018.
  22. 22.
    Goodman RA, Posner SF, Huang ES, Parekh AK, Koh HK. Peer reviewed: defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E66.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news. 2002;2:18–22.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weber C, Neeser K. Using individualized predictive disease modeling to identify patients with the potential to benefit from a disease management program for diabetes mellitus. Dis Manag. 2006;9:242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Au AG, McAlister FA, Bakal JA, Ezekowitz J, Kaul P, van Walraven C. Predicting the risk of unplanned readmission or death within 30 days of discharge after a heart failure hospitalization. Am Heart J. 2012;164:365–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ha NB, Yang K, Hanigan S, Kurtz B, Dorsch MP, Mak H, et al. Impact of a guideline for the management of antimicrobial/warfarin interactions in the inpatient setting and across transition of care. Ann Pharmacother. 2016;50:734–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smithburger PL, Kane-Gill SL, Seybert AL. Drug-drug interactions in cardiac and cardiothoracic intensive care units. Drug Saf. 2010;33:879–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horn JR, Gumpper KF, Hardy JC, McDonnell PJ, Phansalkar S, Reilly C. Clinical decision support for drug–drug interactions: improvement needed. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:905–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prochaska JH, Göbel S, Keller K, Coldewey M, Ullmann A, Lamparter H, et al. e-Health based management of patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy: results from the observational thrombEVAL study. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15:1375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xue Feng
    • 1
  • Usha Sambamoorthi
    • 1
  • Kim Innes
    • 2
  • Gregory Castelli
    • 3
  • Traci LeMasters
    • 1
  • Lianjie Xiong
    • 4
  • Michael U. Williams
    • 5
  • Xi Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of PharmacyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) St. MargaretPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.College of PharmacyCalifornia Health Sciences UniversityClovisUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineSan Antonio Military Medical CenterSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations