Advertisement

Assessment of Functional Capacity of Metallic Articles Following Long-Term Service

  • M. M. MatlinEmail author
  • A. I. Mogunova
  • E. N. Kazankina
  • V. A. Kazankin
SAFETY. DIAGNOSTICS. MAINTENANCE
  • 1 Downloads

A method of non-destructive testing for evaluation of the state of the material of metallic articles in the course of service is described. The method is based on control of plastic hardness.

Keywords

yield strength temporary resistance plastic hardness degree of plastic deformation 

References

  1. 1.
    N. A. Makhutov, “Problems in the determination and management of service life and length of period of safe operation,” in: Fourth Intern. Scientific and Technical Conf. Devoted to 80th Anniversary of IMASh Russian Academy of Sciences, “Viability and Construction Materials Science (2018), p. 170.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    All-Russia State Standard R 57445−2017, Railway Equipment. General Requirements for Methods of Determining Service Life [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Burnashev and A. M. Bol’shakov, “Investigation of the fracture toughness of steels of main pipelines following 50 years of service under the conditions of Far North,” in: VII Intern. Scientific Conf. “Problems of Mechanics of Modern Machines, Ulan-Ude (2018), pp. 156−160.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. S. Kuz’bozhev, R. V. Aginei, and O. V. Smirnov, “Use of electronic microscopy in studies of the deformation ageing of the material of pipelines,” Zavod. Labor. Diagn. Mater., 73, No. 10, 37−41 (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    All-Russia State Standard 1497−84, ISO 6892−84, Metals. Tensile Testing Methods [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    All-Russia State Standard R 56542−2015, Nondestructive Testing. Classification of Types and Methods [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. V. Kolesnikov, M. Ya. Itkis, M. M. Matlin, et al., “Nondestructive methods of testing the elements of drilling equipment,” Khim. Neftegaz. Mashinostr., No. 9, 42−44 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. M. Matyushin, Indentation in the Diagnostics of the Mechanical Properties of Materials [in Russian], Izd. Dom Moscow Energy Institute, Moscow (2015), 288 pp.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. N. Belosludtsev, A. Yu. Kotolomov, V. M. Kovekh,, et al., “Evaluation of the mechanical properties of base metal and metal of welds of pipelines by a nondestructive (deformation) methodfrom hardness measurements,” Territoriya Neftegaz, No. 8, 36−40 (2014).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. G. Sandomirskii, “Generalized correlation dependences between temporary resistance of steels and their hardness,” Zavod. Labor. Diagn. Mater., 83, No. 11, 52−57 (2017).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. V. Budzulyak, V. V. Kudryavtsev, et al., Patent No. 2221231 (Russian Federation), IPC G01 N 3/00, A Method of Determining the Remaining Service Life of the Metal of a Main Pipeline, Byul., No. 1 (Jan. 10, 2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu. I. Slavskii and M. M. Matlin, Patent No. 2086947 (Russian Federation), IPC G01 N 3/40, A Method of Determining the Yield Strength of Materials, Byul., No. 22 (Aug. 10, 1997).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu. I. Slavskii and M. M. Matlin, Patent No. 2011182 (Russian Federation), IPC G01 N 3/40, A method of Determining the Ultimate Strength of a Material, Byul., No. 7 (April 15, 1994).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    All-Russia State Standard 18835−73, Metals. Methods of Measuring Plastic Hardness [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. M. Matlin, S. L. Lebskii, A. I. Mozgunova, and Al. I. Frolova, Patent No. 2386116 (Russian Federation), IPC G01N3/28, A Method of Determining the Relative Degree of Elastoplastic Deformation of a Material, Byul., No. 10 (April 10, 2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Matlin
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. I. Mogunova
    • 1
  • E. N. Kazankina
    • 1
  • V. A. Kazankin
    • 1
  1. 1.Volgograd State Technical UniversityVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations