Advertisement

Myocardial work is a predictor of exercise tolerance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dyssynchrony

  • Florian Schrub
  • Frédéric Schnell
  • Erwan Donal
  • Elena GalliEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The assessment of myocardial work (MW) by pressure–strain loops is a recently introduced tool for the assessment of myocardial performance. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between myocardial work and exercise tolerance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). 51 patients with DCM (mean age 57 ± 13 years, left ventricular ejection fraction: 32 ± 9%) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to assess exercise performance. 22 patients (43%) had left or right bundle branch block with QRS duration > 120 ms. Trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed before CPET. The following indices of myocardial work (MW) were measured regionally and globally: constructive work (CW), wasted work (WW), and work efficiency (WE). Left ventricular dyssynchrony (LV-DYS) was defined by the presence of septal flash or apical rocking at TTE. LV-DYS was observed in 16 (31%) patients and associated with lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF), lower global and septal WE, and higher global and septal WW. In patients with LV-DYS, septal WE was the only predictor of exercise capacity at multivariable analysis (β = 0.68, p = 0.03), whereas LVEF (β = 0.47, p = 0.05) and age (β = − 0.42, p = 0.04) were predictors of exercise capacity in patients without LV-DYS. In patients with DCM, LV-DYS is associated with an heterogeneous distribution of myocardial work. Septal WE is the best predictor of exercise performance in these patients.

Keywords

Dilated cardiomyopathy Left ventricular dyssynchrony Myocardial work 

Notes

Author contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the study. FLS participated in the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article; EG participated in the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, critical revision for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be submitted. FS and ED participated in the critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be submitted.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Ethical approval

This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients included in the study gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. All details that might disclose the identity of the subjects have been omitted.

References

  1. 1.
    Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L et al (2012) A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure–strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work. Eur Heart J 33:724–733.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L et al (2013) Assessment of wasted myocardial work: a novel method to quantify energy loss due to uncoordinated left ventricular contractions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 305:H996–H1003.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00191.2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duchenne J, Turco A, Ünlü S et al (2019) Left ventricular remodeling results in homogenization of myocardial work distribution. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007224 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galli E, Leclercq C, Hubert A et al (2017) Role of myocardial constructive work in the identification of responders to CRT. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:1010–1018.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galli E, Hubert A, Le Rolle V et al (2019) Myocardial constructive work and cardiac mortality in resynchronization therapy candidates. Am Heart J 212:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galli E, Vitel E, Schnell F et al (2019) Myocardial constructive work is impaired in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and predicts left ventricular fibrosis. Echocardiography 36:74–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Przewlocka-Kosmala M, Marwick TH, Mysiak A et al (2019) Usefulness of myocardial work measurement in the assessment of left ventricular systolic reserve response to spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez027 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parsai C, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR et al (2009) Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms. Eur Heart J 30:940–949.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szulik M, Tillekaerts M, Vangeel V et al (2010) Assessment of apical rocking: a new, integrative approach for selection of candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:863–869.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V et al (2012) EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation 126:2261–2274.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826fb946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stankovic I, Aarones M, Smith H-J et al (2014) Dynamic relationship of left-ventricular dyssynchrony and contractile reserve in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 35:48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beela AS, Ünlü S, Duchenne J et al (2018) Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony can improve the prognostic value of guideline-based patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP et al (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:277–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L et al (2008) Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial. Circulation 117:2608–2616.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stankovic I, Prinz C, Ciarka A et al (2016) Relationship of visually assessed apical rocking and septal flash to response and long-term survival following cardiac resynchronization therapy (PREDICT-CRT). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:262–269.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Menet A, Greffe L, Ennezat P-V et al (2014) Is mechanical dyssynchrony a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? Am Heart J 168:909–916.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Boeck BWL, Teske AJ, Meine M et al (2009) Septal rebound stretch reflects the functional substrate to cardiac resynchronization therapy and predicts volumetric and neurohormonal response. Eur J Heart Fail 11:863–871.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfp107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lumens J, Tayal B, Walmsley J et al (2015) Differentiating electromechanical from non-electrical substrates of mechanical discoordination to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003744.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moneghetti KJ, Kobayashi Y, Christle JW et al (2017) Contractile reserve and cardiopulmonary exercise parameters in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, the two dimensions of exercise testing. Echocardiography 34:1179–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aalen J, Storsten P, Remme EW et al (2018) Afterload hypersensitivity in patients with left bundle branch block. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:967–977.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zweerink A, de Roest GJ, Wu L et al (2016) Prediction of acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by means of the misbalance in regional left ventricular myocardial work. J Card Fail 22:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hubert A, Le Rolle V, Leclercq C et al (2018) Estimation of myocardial work from pressure–strain loops analysis: an experimental evaluation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:1372–1379.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI – UMR 1099University of RennesRennesFrance
  2. 2.Cardiology DepartmentUniversity Hospital of RennesRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations