Advertisement

Coronary artery calcium scoring with photon-counting CT: first in vivo human experience

  • Rolf Symons
  • Veit Sandfort
  • Marissa Mallek
  • Stefan Ulzheimer
  • Amir PourmortezaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) score imaging at standard and reduced radiation doses compared to conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. A dedicated cardiac CT phantom, ten ex vivo human hearts, and ten asymptomatic volunteers underwent matched EID and PCD CT scans at different dose settings without ECG gating. CAC score, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in the cardiac CT phantom. CAC score accuracy and reproducibility was assessed in the ex vivo hearts. Standard radiation dose (120 kVp, reference mAs = 80) in vivo CAC scans were compared against dose-reduced CAC scans (75% dose reduction; reference mAs = 20) for image quality and CAC score reproducibility. Interstudy agreement was assessed by using intraclass correlation (ICC), linear regression, and Bland–Altman analysis with 95% confidence interval limits of agreement (LOA). Calcium-soft tissue contrast and CNR were significantly higher for the PCD CAC scans in the cardiac CT phantom (all P < 0.01). Ex vivo hearts: CAC score reproducibility was significantly higher for the PCD scans at the lowest dose setting (50 mAs) (P = 0.002); score accuracy was similar for both detector systems at all dose settings. In vivo scans: the agreement between standard dose and low dose CAC score was significantly better for the PCD than for the EID with narrower LOA in Bland–Altman analysis, linear regression slopes closer to 1 (0.96 vs. 0.84), and higher ICC values (0.98 vs. 0.93, respectively). Phantom and in vivo human studies showed PCD may significantly improve CAC score image quality and/or reduce CAC score radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality.

Keywords

Coronary artery calcium score Photon-counting CT Radiation dose reduction 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by the NIH intramural research program (ZIACL090019; ZIAEB000072), and a collaborative research agreement with Siemens Healthcare GmbH (Forchheim, Germany).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ et al (2008) Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 358:1336–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP et al (2004) Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim KP, Einstein AJ, de González AB (2009) Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk. Arch Intern Med 169:1188–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yin W-H, Lu B, Hou Z-H et al (2013) Detection of coronary artery stenosis with sub-milliSievert radiation dose by prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral CT angiography and iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 23:2927–2933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taguchi K, Iwanczyk JS (2013) Vision 20/20: single photon counting X-ray detectors in medical imaging. Med Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4820371 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A et al (2018) Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology 289:293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gutjahr R, Halaweish AF, Yu Z et al (2016) Human imaging with photon counting-based computed tomography at clinical dose levels: contrast-to-noise ratio and cadaver studies. Investig Radiol 51:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Symons R, Cork TE, Sahbaee P et al (2016) Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 62:202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Symons R, Pourmorteza A, Sandfort V et al (2017) Feasibility of dose-reduced chest CT with photon-counting detectors: initial results in humans. Radiology 285:980–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pourmorteza A, Symons R, Reich DS et al (2017) Photon-counting CT of the brain: in vivo human results and image-quality assessment. Am J Neuroradiol 38:2257–2263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Symons R, Reich DS, Bagheri M et al (2018) Photon-counting computed tomography for vascular imaging of the head and neck: first in vivo human results. Investig Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pourmorteza A, Symons R, Schoek F et al (2018) Dose efficiency of quarter-millimeter photon-counting CT: first-in-human results. Investig Radiol 53:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA (2003) Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:484–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kappler S, Henning A, Kreisler B et al (2014) Photon counting CT at elevated X-ray tube currents: contrast stability, image noise and multi-energy performance. Proc SPIE Med Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2043511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bland JM, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlomka JP, Roessl E, Dorscheid R et al (2008) Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 53:4031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Symons R, De Bruecker Y, Roosen J et al (2018) Quarter-millimeter spectral coronary stent imaging with photon-counting CT: initial experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer M, Haubenreisser H, Schoepf UJ et al (2014) Closing in on the K edge: coronary CT angiography at 100, 80, and 70 kV—initial comparison of a second-versus a third-generation dual-source CT system. Radiology 273:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandfort V, Lima JAC, Bluemke DA (2015) Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerotic plaque progression. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Symons R, Morris JZ, Wu CO et al (2016) Coronary CT angiography: variability of CT scanners and readers in measurement of plaque volume. Radiology 281:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahesh M, Zimmerman SL, Fishman EK (2014) Radiation dose shift in relative proportion: the case of coronary artery calcium studies. J Am Coll Radiol 11:634–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA et al (2013) Coronary artery calcium scoring: influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol 167:2932–2937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willemink MJ, den Harder AM, Foppen W et al (2016) Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pourmorteza A, Symons R, Schoeck F et al (2018) Dose efficiency of quarter-millimeter photon-counting CT: first-in-human results. Investig Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Symons R, Cork TE, Lakshmanan MN et al (2017) Dual-contrast agent photon-counting computed tomography of the heart: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1104-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mannil M, Hickethier T, von Spiczak J et al (2017) Photon-counting Ct: high-resolution imaging of coronary stents. Investig Radiol 53:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Symons R, Krauss B, Sahbaee P et al (2017) Photon-counting CT for simultaneous imaging of multiple contrast agents in the abdomen: an in vivo study. Med Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12301 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muenzel D, Bar-Ness D, Roessl E et al (2016) Spectral photon-counting CT: initial experience with dual–contrast agent K-edge colonography. Radiology 283:723–728.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160890 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muenzel D, Daerr H, Proksa R et al (2017) Simultaneous dual-contrast multi-phase liver imaging using spectral photon-counting computed tomography: a proof-of-concept study. Eur Radiol Exp 1:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cormode DP, Si-Mohamed S, Bar-Ness D et al (2017) Multicolor spectral photon-counting computed tomography: in vivo dual contrast imaging with a high count rate scanner. Sci Rep 7:4784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dangelmaier J, Bar-Ness D, Daerr H et al (2018) Experimental feasibility of spectral photon-counting computed tomography with two contrast agents for the detection of endoleaks following endovascular aortic repair. Eur Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5252-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radiology and Imaging Sciences - National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Imaging & PathologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Siemens Healthcare GmbHForchheimGermany
  4. 4.Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesWinship Cancer Institute of Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations