Advertisement

Assessment of global and regional strain left ventricular in patients with preserved ejection fraction after Fontan operation using a tissue tracking technique

  • Liwei Hu
  • Aimin Sun
  • Chen Guo
  • Rongzhen Ouyang
  • Qian Wang
  • Xiaofen Yao
  • Yumin ZhongEmail author
Original Paper
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

To evaluate the use of the tissue tracking (TT) technique to measure myocardial strain left ventricular in post-Fontan children with preserved ejection fraction (pEF). Nineteen (male/female, 10/9) patients with univentricular hearts after completion of the Fontan circulation (post-Fontan group) and 19 age- and gender-matched healthy children (control group) were retrospectively enrolled. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was conducted on a 1.5-T MRI scanner. Global and regional strains of the left ventricle in post-Fontan patients (EF > 55%) and controls were obtained using CMR-TT software. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare parameters between the two groups. Correlation between EF and strain was investigated using Pearson correlation coefficients. The Bland–Altman method was used to identify the inter- and intra-observer agreement in measurement of global strain. Global longitudinal strain was lower in post-Fontan patients than in healthy controls (− 18.87 ± 4.61 vs. −19.72 ± 1.58; P = 0.54), though the difference was not statistically significant. Global circumferential strain and global radial strain were significantly lower in post-Fontan patients than in healthy controls (− 14.55 ± 3.79 vs. −19.91 ± 1.97; P < 0.001; and 29.62 ± 8.41 vs. 36.85 ± 5.95; P = 0.01; respectively). The regional circumferential strain (RCS) decrease was marked in regional segments compare with post-Fontan patients and controls (basal, − 11.81 ± 2.98 vs. − 16.21 ± 2.72, P < 0.001; mid, − 15.05 ± 3.31 vs. − 20.17 ± 2.28, P = 0.005; apical, − 16.86 ± 3.09 vs. − 23.37 ± 2.62, P < 0.001). All circumferential and longitudinal parameters had an inter-observer ICC of ≥ 0.85, but this coefficient was lower for radial parameters. CMR-TT appears to be a feasible technique for identification of early myocardial dysfunction in post-Fontan with pEF.

Keywords

Fontan Cardiac magnetic resonance Strain Pediatric 

Abbreviations

CMR

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

EF

Ejection fraction

TT

Tissue tracking

GCS

Global circumferential strain

GLS

Global longitudinal strain

GRS

Global radial strain

LVEF

Left ventricular ejection fraction

pEF

Preserved ejection fraction

RCS

Regional circumferential strain

RRS

Regional radial strain

SSFP

Steady-state free procession

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate Hai-Tao You and Tong–Tong Han at the Circle Imaging Systems, Circle CVI Corporation Canada for their technical assistance.

Author contribution

LH—Study concepts and design; LH, AS—Clinical studies; YZ, LH, RO, CG, AS—Experimental studies/data analysis; YZ, LH, QW, AS—Statistical analysis; LH, AS, RO—Manuscript preparation; LH—Manuscript editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant No. 20164Y0150); the Medical Engineering Cross Research Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Grant No. YG2015QN25); and the Shanghai Hospital Development Center New Technology and Joint Research Projects (Grant No. SHDC12015128).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by ethics committees of the University of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SCMCIRB-K2017062). This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital, and all procedures were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

The parents gave informed consent to the participation of their children.

References

  1. 1.
    Mair DD, Puga FJ, Danielson GK (2001) The Fontan procedure for tricuspid atresia: early and late results of a 25-year experience with 216 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(3):933–939.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01164-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paridon SM, Mitchell PD, Colan SD et al (2008) A cross-sectional study of exercise performance during the first 2 decades of life after the Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(2):99–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piran S, Veldtman G, Siu S et al (2002) Heart failure and ventricular dysfunction in patients with single or systemic right ventricles. Circulation 105(10):1189–1194.  https://doi.org/10.1161/hc1002.105182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 121(22):2462–2508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C et al (2010) Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. JACC 3(2):144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.006 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Augustine D, Lewandowski AJ, Lazdam M et al (2013) Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15(1):8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 105(4):539–542.  https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0402.102975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khairy P, Fernandes SM, Mayer JE et al (2008) Long-term survival, modes of death, and predictors of mortality in patients with Fontan surgery. Circulation 117(1):85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.738559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sutton MSJ, Pfeffer MA, Moye L et al (1997) Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction. Circulation 96(10):3294–3299.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.96.10.3294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hurlburt HM, Aurigemma GP, Hill JC et al (2007) Direct ultrasound measurement of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain using 2-dimensional strain imaging in normal adults. Echocardiography 24(7):723–731.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00460.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah AM, Claggett B, Sweitzer NK, Shah SJ, Deswal A, Anand IS et al (2015) Prognostic importance of changes in cardiac structure and function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and the impact of spironolactone. Circ Heart Fail 8(6):1052–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho GY, Marwick TH, Kim HS et al (2009) Global 2-dimensional strain as a new prognosticator in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(7):618–624.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith BCF, Dobson G, Dawson D et al (2014) Three-dimensional speckle tracking of the right ventricle. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(1):41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haeck MLA, Scherptong RWC, Marsan NA et al (2012) Prognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal peak systolic strain in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5(5):628–636.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fine NM, Chen L, Bastiansen PM et al (2013) Outcome prediction by quantitative right ventricular function assessment in 575 subjects evaluated for pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6(5):711.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kutty S, Rangamani S, Venkataraman J et al (2013) Reduced global longitudinal and radial strain with normal left ventricular ejection fraction late after effective repair of aortic coarctation: a CMR feature tracking study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(1):141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0061-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berganza FM, de Alba CG, Özcelik N et al (2017) Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking biventricular two-dimensional and three-dimensional strains to evaluate ventricular function in children after repaired tetralogy of fallot as compared with healthy children. Pediatr Cardiol 38(3):566–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1549-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsiao JF, Koshino Y, Bonnichsen CR et al (2013) Speckle tracking echocardiography in acute myocarditis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29(2):275–284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0085-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moore CC, Lugo-Olivieri CH, McVeigh ER, Zerhouni EA (2000) Three-dimensional systolic strain patterns in the normal human left ventricle: characterization with tagged MR imaging. Radiology 214:453–466.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe17453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Truong UT, Li X, Broberg CS et al (2010) Significance of mechanical alterations in single ventricle patients on twisting and circumferential strain as determined by analysis of strain from gradient cine magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Am J Cardiol 105(10):1465–1469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moore RA, Taylor M, Mazur W et al (2013) Assessment of strain and mechanical dyssynchrony indices in single ventricle populations by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking techniques. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15(Suppl 1):1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-E89 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Torrent-Guasp F, Kocica MJ, Corno AF et al (2005) Towards new understanding of the heart structure and function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27(2):191–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dilorenzo MP, Elci OU, Wang Y et al (2018) Longitudinal changes in right ventricular function in tetralogy of Fallot in the initial years after surgical repair. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31(7):816–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2018.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wen H, Liang Z, Zhao Y et al (2011) Feasibility of detecting early left ventricular systolic dysfunction using global area strain: a novel index derived from three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 12(12):910–916.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harrild DM, Han Y, Geva T et al (2012) Comparison of cardiac MRI tissue tracking and myocardial tagging for assessment of regional ventricular strain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(8):2009–2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0035-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leitman M, Lysiansky M, Lysyansky P et al (2010) Circumferential and longitudinal strain in 3 myocardial layers in normal subjects and in patients with regional left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(1):64–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2009.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pedrizzetti G, Claus P, Kilner PJ, Nagel E (2016) Principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and echocardiographic speckle tracking for informed clinical use. J Cardiovasc Magn Resonance 18(1):51.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0269-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morton G, Schuster A, Jogiya R et al (2012) Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-14-43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    André F, Robbersvisser D, Hellingbakki A et al (2017) Quantification of myocardial deformation in children by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: determination of reference values for left ventricular strain and strain rate. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19(1):8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0310-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Diagnostic Imaging Center of Shanghai Children’s Medical CenterShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations