Value of early rest myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT in patients with chest pain and non-diagnostic ECG in emergency department
Evaluation of atypical presentation of angina chest pain in emergency department is difficult. Hospitalization of this patient may impose additional costs and waste the time, early discharge may lead to miss the patients. The aim of this study was to determine volubility of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in management of patients admitted to emergency department with atypical manifestations of angina pain, un-diagnostic Electrocardiogram (ECG) and negative enzyme. Half of 100 patients admitted to emergency department with atypical chest pain and un-diagnostic ECG who were candidate for admission, underwent ECG gated resting SPECT. According to the results of SPECT, low risk patient discharged after negative stress SPECT. All discharged patients were followed up for major cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and repeat admission for congestive heart failure) for 12 months. According to rest SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI), about 70% of patients in case group was low risk and 30% of them had moderate or high risk. Case group represented lower hospitalization rate and lower need for Coronary Artery Angiography (CAG) in comparison with control group. Mean cost in case group was significantly lower than control group (175.15$ vs. 391.33$, P < 0.001). In one year follow- up no cases of mortality or major cardiovascular events as cardiac infraction were found in discharged patients in case group. our study showed that rest SPECT fulfillment in admitted patients in emergency department was validated method for assessing patients’ risk which avoids unnecessary hospitalizations and additional costs.
KeywordsChest pains SPECT scan Treatment cost
The authors thank all of the patients who eagerly participated in the current study. The authors also wish to thank the Research Vice Chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 1.Willemsen RT, Buntinx F, Winkens B, Glatz JF, Dinant GJ (2014) The value of signs, symptoms and plasma heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in evaluating patients presenting with symptoms possibly matching acute coronary syndrome: background and methods of a diagnostic study in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 15(1):203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Marill KA (2017) Identifying emergency department patients with chest pain who are at low risk for acute coronary syndromes. Emerg Med Pract 19(7):1–24Google Scholar
- 10.Ben-Gal T, Zafrir N (2001) The utility and potential cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial perfusion thallium SPECT imaging in hospitalized patients with chest pain and normal or non-diagnostic electrocardiogram. IMAJ-RAMAT GAN- 3(10):725–730Google Scholar
- 11.Husmann L, Herzog BA, Gaemperli O, Tatsugami F, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Veit-Haibach P, Wyss CA, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. Eur Heart J 30(5):600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Candell-Riera J, Oller-Martínez G, Pereztol-Valdés O, Castell-Conesa J, Aguadé-Bruix S, García-Alonso C, Segura R, Murillo J, Moreno R, Suriñach J (2004) Early myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT in patients with chest pain and non-diagnostic ECG in the emergency department. Rev Esp Cardiol 57(3):225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Stowers SA, Eisenstein EL, Berman DS, Blackshear JL, Jones AD Jr, Szymanski TJ Jr, Lam LC, Simons TA, Natale D, Paige KA (2000) An economic analysis of an aggressive diagnostic strategy with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and early exercise stress testing in emergency department patients who present with chest pain but nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: results from a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 35(1):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, Feldman JA, Griffith JL, Heller GV, Hendel RC, Pope JH, Ruthazer R, Spiegler EJ (2002) Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(21):2693–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez J, Bertomeu-González V, Gómez C, Bosch MJ, Consuegra L, Bosch X, Chorro FJ, Llàcer À (2005) New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Elhendy A, Schinkel AF, van Domburg RT, Bax JJ (2005) Risk stratification of patients with angina pectoris by stress^ sup 99m^ Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 46(12):2003Google Scholar
- 21.Fesmire FM, Hughes AD, Fody EP, Jackson AP, Fesmire CE, Gilbert MA, Stout PK, Wojcik JF, Wharton DR, Creel JH (2002) The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 40(6):584–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Forberg JL, Hilmersson CE, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Björk J, Hjalte K, Ekelund U (2009) Negative predictive value and potential cost savings of acute nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging in low risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a prospective single blinded study. BMC Emerg Med 9(1):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar