Advertisement

Z-score reference ranges for pulsed-wave Doppler indices of the cardiac outflow tracts in normal fetuses

  • Yan Kai Mao
  • Bo Wen ZhaoEmail author
  • Li Zhou
  • Bei Wang
  • Ran Chen
  • Shan Shan Wang
Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

To determine Z-score equations and reference ranges for Doppler flow velocity indices of cardiac outflow tracts in normal fetuses. A prospective cross-sectional echocardiographic study was performed in 506 normal singleton fetuses from 18 to 40 weeks. Twelve pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) measurements were derived from fetal echocardiography. The regression analysis of the mean and the standard deviation (SD) for each parameter were performed against estimated fetal weight (EFW) and gestational age (GA), in order to construct Z-score models. The correlation between these variables and fetal heart rate were also investigated. Strong positive correlations were found between the twelve PWD indices and the independent variables. A linear-quadratic regression model was the best description of the mean and SD of most parameters, with the exception of the velocity time interval (VTI) of ascending aorta against EFW, which was best fitted by a fractional polynomial. Z-score equations and reference values for PWD indices of fetal cardiac outflow tracts were proposed against GA and EFW, which may be useful for quantitative assessment of potential hemodynamic alternations, particularly in cases of intrauterine growth retardation and structural cardiac defects.

Keywords

Z-score Reference ranges Doppler flow velocity waveform Fetal echocardiography Fetal cardiac outflow tract 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from Zhejiang Province Medical Science and Technology planning projects (Grant No. 2017203109), and we thank everyone in the study group for their efforts and devotion.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from Zhejiang Province Medical Science and Technology planning projects (Grant No. 2017203109).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Shenker L, Reed KL, Marx GR et al (1988) Fetal cardiac Doppler flow studies in prenatal diagnosis of heart disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:1267–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Groenenberg IAL, Wladimiroff JW, Hop WCJ (1989) Fetal cardiac and peripheral flow velocity waveforms in intrauterine growth retardation. Circulation 80:1711–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moety GAFA, Gaafar HM, Rifai NME (2015) Can fetal pulmonary artery doppler indices predict neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol 35:1015–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeVore GR (1994) Color Doppler examination of the outflow tracts of the fetal heart: a technique for identification of cardiovascular malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hata T, Makihara K, Aoki S et al (1990) Prenatal diagnosis of valvar aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:1068–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Severi FM, Rizzo G, BocchiC et al (2000) Intrauterine growth retardation and fetal cardiac function. Fetal Diagn Ther 15:8–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peyvandi S, Rychik J, McCann M et al (2014) Pulmonary blood flow patterns in fetuses with pulmonary outflow tract obstruction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gagnon C, Bigras JL, Fouron JC, Dallaire F (2016) Reference values and Z scores for pulsed-wave Doppler and M-Mode measurements in fetal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Mooren K, Barendregt LG, Wladimiroff JW (1991) Fetal atrioventricular and outflow tract flow velocity waveforms during normal second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hata T, Aoki S, Hata K, Kitao M (1987) Intracardiac blood flow velocity waveforms in normal fetuses in utero. Am J Cardiol 59:464–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurihara Y, Tachibana D, Yanai S et al (2015) Characteristic differences and reference ranges for mitral, tricuspid, aortic, and pulmonary Doppler velocity waveforms during fetal life. Prenat Diagn 35:236–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hata T, Senoh D, Makihara K et al (1989) Fetal cardiac time intervals determined by Doppler echocardiography. J Perinat Med 17:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaoui R, Taddei F, Rizzo G et al (1998) Doppler echocardiography of the main stems of the pulmonary arteries in the normal human fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mielke G, Benda N (2000) Blood flow velocity waveforms of the fetal pulmonary artery and the ductus arteriosus: reference ranges from 13 weeks to term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vimpeli T, Huhtala H, Wilsgaard T, Acharya G (2009) Fetal cardiac output and its distribution to the placenta at 11–20 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mielke G, Benda N (2001) Cardiac output and central distribution of blood flow in the human fetus. Circulation 103:1662–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li XY, Zhou QC, Huang H, Tian XX, Peng QH (2015) Z-score reference ranges for normal fetal heart sizes throughout pregnancy derived from fetal echocardiography. Prenat Diagn 35:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee W, Riggs T, Amula V et al (2010) Fetal echocardiography: Z-score reference ranges for a large patient population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu LH, Wang N, Xie HN, Du L, Peng R (2014) Cardiovascular Z-scores in fetuses with tetralogy of Fallot. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schneider C, McCrindle BW, Carvalho JS et al (2005) Development of Z-scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiserud T, Ebbing C, Kessler J, Rasmussen S (2006) Fetal cardiac output, distribution to the placenta and impact of placental compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robinson HP, Sweet EM, Adam AH (1979) The accuracy of radiological estimates of gestational age using early fetal crown–rump length measurements by ultrasound as a basis for comparison. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86:525–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (2006) Cardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the ‘basic’ and ‘extended basic’ cardiac scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:107–113Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hernandez-Andrade E, Lopez-Tenorio J, Figueroa-Diesel H et al (2005) A modified myocardial performance (Tei) index based on the use of valve clicks improves reproducibility of fetal left cardiac function assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK (1984) Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 150:535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Royston P, Wright EM (1998) How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Devore GR (2017) Computing the Z score and centiles for cross-sectional analysis: a practical approach. J Ultrasound Med 36(3):459–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Machado MV, Chita SC, Allan LD (1987) Acceleration time in the aorta and pulmonary artery measured by Doppler echocardiography in the mid trimester normal human fetus. Br Heart J 58:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rizzo G, Arduini D, Romanini C, Mancuso S (1990) Doppler echocardiographic assessment of time to peak velocity in the aorta and pulmonary artery of small for gestational age fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:603–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ (1985) Fetal umbilical artery waveform and placental resistance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van den Wijngaard JA, van Eyck J, Noordam MJ, Wladimiroff JW, van Strik R (1988) The Doppler flow velocity waveform in the fetal internal carotid artery with respect to fetal behavioural states. A longitudinal study. Biol Neonate 53:274–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sutton MS, Gill T, Plappert T, Saltzman DH, Doubilet P (1991) Assessment of right and left ventricular function in terms of force development with gestational age in the normal human fetus. Br Heart J 66:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rozmus-Warcholinska W, Wloch A, Acharya G et al (2010) Reference values for variables of fetal cardiocirculatory dynamics at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Girsen A, Ala-Kopsala M, Makikallio K, Vuolteenaho O, Rasanen J (2007) Cardiovascular hemodynamics and umbilical artery N-terminal peptide of proB-type natriuretic peptide in human fetuses with growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK (1984) Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 152:497–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kenny J, Plappert T, Doubilet P, Salzman D, Sutton MG (1987) Effects of heart rate on ventricular size, stroke volume, and output in the normal human fetus: a prospective Doppler echocardiographic study. Circulation 76:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reed KL, Sahn DJ, Marx GR, Anderson CF, Shenker L (1987) Cardiac Doppler flows during fetal arrhythmias: physiological consequences. Obstet Gynecol 70:1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound & Echocardiography, Sir Run Run Shaw HospitalZhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Ultrasonic MedicineTongde Hospital of Zhejiang ProvinceHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of UltrasonographyHangzhou Xixi Hospital of Zhejiang ProvinceHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations