Advertisement

The Nine Habits of successful comprehensive cancer control coalitions

  • Karin Hohman
  • Leslie Given
  • Margaret Farrell
  • April Barry
  • Linda Robertson
  • Sarah Kerch
  • Sarah Shafir
Original paper

Abstract

The nine habits of successful comprehensive cancer control coalitions (Nine Habits) is a guide that outlines the key elements of successful comprehensive cancer control (CCC) coalitions. The guide was developed under the auspices of the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership (CCCNP) and is based on evaluation including a literature review, qualitative and quantitative data collection from high-performing comprehensive cancer control coalitions. Comprehensive cancer control coalitions are made up of key stakeholders who come together to create a shared vision and shared plans to fight cancer, improve health outcomes, and reduce the burden from cancer. The CCCNP produced this guide to help coalitions maintain the health of their coalition efforts by providing tools to examine the key elements of successful coalitions, including leadership, membership, organizational structure, shared resources, and efforts in planning and communications. This paper provides information on how the guide was used by two states to rebuild their coalition and ultimately improve their efforts in improving health outcomes and reducing cancer burden. Lastly, the paper outlines future efforts to continue to support CCC coalitions in their work.

Keywords

Comprehensive cancer Cancer coalition Technical assistance Habits Guide Function Operations Partnership 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported in part by the award P30CA047904 from the National Institutes of Health to UPMC Hillman Cancer Center.

References

  1. 1.
    Hohman et al (2010) The CCC national partnership: an example of organizations collaborating on comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 21:1979–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nine habits of successful CCC coalitions: a guide for an effective and efficient coalition. https://www.cccnationalpartners.org/new-resource-9-habits-successful-comprehensive-cancer-control-coalitions
  3. 3.
    Southeastern Program Evaluation, Inc (2011) Comprehensive cancer control program evaluation; appendix 1. American Cancer Society, Southeastern Program Evaluation, Inc., October. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Southeastern Program Evaluation, Inc (2011) Comprehensive cancer control program evaluation. American Cancer Society, Southeastern Program Evaluation, Inc, October. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CCCNP 2012–2013 CCC technical assistance workshops evaluation summary, November 6, 2013. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fields RP, Stamatakis KA, Duggan K, Brownson RC (2015) Importance of scientific resources among local public health practitioners. Am J Public Health 105(suppl 2):S288–S294CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacob R, Allen P, Ahrendt L, Brownson R (2017) Learning about and using research evidence among public health practitioners. Am J Prev Med 52(3S3):S304–S308CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hohman K, Rochester P, Kean T et al (2010) The CCC national partnership: an example of organizations collaborating on comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 21:1979.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9644-0%5D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farrell MM, La Porta M, Gallagher A, Vinson C, Bernal SB (2014) Research to reality: moving evidence into practice through an online community of practice. Prev Chronic Dis 11:130272]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Interview with Sharon Sowers, Section Chief. Comprehensive Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Pennsylvania Department of Health and Bob Durkin, Interim Chair, Pennsylvania Cancer CoalitionGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hohman K (2012) Coalition corner! 9 habits of successful comprehensive cancer control coalitions. https://researchtoreality.cancer.gov/discussions/coalition-corner-9-habits-successful-comprehensive-cancer-control-coalitions. Accessed 17 Oct 2016
  12. 12.
    Rochester P, Adams E, Porterfield D, Holden D, McAleer K, Steele B (2011) Cancer plan index: a measure for assessing the quality of cancer plans. J Public Health Manag Pract 17(6):E12–E17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alberg A, Cartmell K, Sterba K, Bolick S, Daguise V, Hebert J (2013) Outcome evaluation of a state comprehensive cancer control plan: laying the foundation. J Public Health Manag Pract 19(4):300–307CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Given L, Hohman K, Graaf L, Rochester P, Belle-Isle L (2010) From planning to implementation to outcomes: comprehensive cancer control implementation building blocks. Cancer Causes Control 21:1987–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ory M, Sanner B, Vollmer Dahlke D, Melvin C (2015) Promoting public health through state cancer control plans: a review of capacity and sustainability. Front Public Health 3:1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Strategic Health ConceptsArvadaUSA
  2. 2.Strategic Health ConceptsEarlysvilleUSA
  3. 3.National Cancer InstituteRockvilleUSA
  4. 4.Pennsylvania Department of Health, Comprehensive Cancer Control ProgramHarrisburgUSA
  5. 5.University of Pittsburgh UPMC Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghUSA
  6. 6.University of Wisconsin, Carbone Cancer CenterMadisonUSA
  7. 7.American Cancer SocietyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations