Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 1257–1263 | Cite as

Lung cancer screening: an emerging cancer control issue presents opportunities for an awareness campaign in rural Michigan

  • Steven M. SpringerEmail author
  • Angela McFall
  • Polly Hager
  • Antoinette Percy-Laury
  • Cynthia A. Vinson
Original paper
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States representing about 25% of all cancer deaths. The risk from smoking has increased over time with racial/ethnic minorities and disadvantaged populations having higher smoking rates and experiencing greater burden of lung cancer compared to other populations. Rural populations, in particular, experience higher rates of tobacco usage associated with increased incidence of lung cancer. National efforts to identify lung cancer in its early stage would greatly benefit high-risk populations, consequently reducing advanced cancers and potentially decreasing smoking rates. In 2013, lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography was recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for early detection of lung cancer. These guidelines were developed after the results of the National Lung Screening Trial. The National Lung Screening Trial study showed a 20% reduction in deaths of participants who were current or former heavy smokers who were screened with low-dose computed tomography versus those screened by chest X-ray. In response to this evidence and using state lung cancer burden data and local smoking rates as a guide, Michigan implemented a lung cancer screening awareness campaign in the rural northern, lower peninsula. Awareness of lung cancer screening was increased through the use of a variety of media including gas station/convenience store small media, digital media, radio broadcast media, and the use and marketing of a website that provided lung cancer screening information and resources.

Keywords

Cancer screening Lung cancer screening Lung cancer Smoking Lung cancer test Lung cancer screening guideline 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Maria George, M.P.H., for her technical assistance with the formatting of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). (1975–2015). SEER cancer statistics review. National Cancer Institute, Rockville. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/
  2. 2.
    A Report of the Surgeon General (2014) The health consequences of smoking: 50 years of progress. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkins GT, Kim T, Munson J (2017) Residence in rural areas of the United States and lung cancer mortality. Disease incidence, treatment disparities, and stage-specific survival. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14(3):403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berge CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Faggerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sticks JD (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engelman A (2017) Health coalition forms national lung cancer roundtable to increase screening and reduce lung cancer deaths. American Cancer Society, Atlanta. http://pressroom.cancer.org/2017-03-23-Health-coalition-forms-National-Lung-Cancer-Roundtable-to-increase-screening-and-reduce-lung-cancer-deaths. Accessed 25 June 2018
  6. 6.
    U.S. National Cancer Institute (2017) A socioecological approach to addressing tobacco related health disparities. National cancer institute tobacco control monograph 22. U.S. National Cancer Institute, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. National Cancer Institute (2018) State cancer profiles combined data from CDC’s national program of cancer registries and NCI’s surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 2011–2015. U.S. National Cancer Institute, Rockville. http://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov. Accessed 25 June 2018
  8. 8.
    Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (2016) Age-adjusted invasive cancer incidence rates by county in Michigan, 2010–2014. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing. http://cancer-rates.info/mi/. Accessed 25 June 2018
  9. 9.
    U.S. Census Bureau (2017) Quick facts, population estimates July 1, 2017. U.S. department of commerce. U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217# Accessed 25 June 2018
  10. 10.
    Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (2017) Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data health indicators and risk estimates by community health assessment regions and local health departments, 2014–2016. State of Michigan. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdhhs/2014-2016_MiBRFSS_Reg__LHD_Tables_608878_7.pdf. Accessed June 25 2018
  11. 11.
    Michigan Cancer Consortium (2017) Comprehensive cancer control plan for Michigan, 2016–2020. Michigan Cancer Consortium, Suitland. http://www.michigancancer.org/PDFs/CancerPlan/Michigan'sComprehensiveCancerControlPlan2016-2020Aug2017.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2018
  12. 12.
    AllOver Media Products (2018) Gas pump advertising. AllOver Media, Minneapolis. https://allovermedia.com/products/gas-pump-advertising/. Accessed 25 June 2018
  13. 13.
    Leung S (2014) Gas stations need to kick the habit, too. Boston GlobeGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The Nielsen Company (2015) State of the media: audio today—how America listens. Nielsen Insights. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2015/state-of-the-media-audio-today-how-america-listens.html. Accessed 25 June 2018
  15. 15.
    Frost P (2017) The Difference between Google AdWords Search and Display Networks. Main Street ROI. https://www.mainstreetroi.com/google-adwords-search-vs-display-networks/. Accessed 25 June 2018
  16. 16.
    The Nielsen Company (2013) Terminology and definitions for the Nielsen Radio Diary Service. http://www.arbitron.com/downloads/terms_brochure.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2018
  17. 17.
    Google (2018) Clickthrough rate (CTR): definition. Google AdWords Help. https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2615875?hl=en. Accessed 25 June 2018
  18. 18.
    Campbell K (2015) A guide to Google analytics benchmarking, for ecommerce. Practical ecommerce. http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/90061-A-Guide-to-Google-Analytics-Benchmarking-for-Ecommerce. Accessed 25 June 2018
  19. 19.
    Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (2016) behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey. State of Michigan. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, LansingGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pham D, Bhandari S, Oechsli M, Pinkston CM, Kloecker GH (2018) Lung cancer screening rates: data from the lung cancer screening registry (abstract). In: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, 2018 June 1–5, Chicago, IL, Abstract nr 6504Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Springer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Angela McFall
    • 1
  • Polly Hager
    • 1
  • Antoinette Percy-Laury
    • 2
  • Cynthia A. Vinson
    • 2
  1. 1.Michigan Department of Health and Human ServicesLansingUSA
  2. 2.National Cancer InstituteRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations