Analyzing Leadership Attributes in Faith-Based Organizations: Idealism Versus Reality
This paper aims to contribute to the growing discussion about leadership in the contemporary Church of England with a particular interest in the complex interaction between social context and leadership practices. Implicit leadership theory (ILT) is used to explore mutual expectations around distributed models of lay and ordained leadership as well as ‘ordinary’ members’ of congregation. Applying a qualitative research method, we conducted 32 semi-structured interviews in 6 Church of England parishes. Through the systematic analysis of relevant contextual factors at multiple levels, we identify limited congruence between ideal leadership attributes and actual behavior. We contribute to the ILT literature by identifying ethical attributes, such as the ability to help others flourish, as particularly pertinent to the religious setting. We also identify the malleability of some leadership attributes. We further contribute to the literature on organizational studies in faith-based organizations by offering novel insights into the relationship between leadership, followership and contextual factors at local parish level which have significant practical implications for recruiting and training church leaders and followers.
KeywordsContextual factors Ethical leadership Implicit leadership theory Leadership attributes Faith-based organizations Qualitative
We are very grateful for the time and effort taken by the editor and reviewers who provided constructive and insightful suggestions to improve our paper in a substantial way. We also thank Dr. Gloria Appiah for her very helpful comments on drafts of the paper.
Funding for this research has been received from the University of Kent and the University of Surrey.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they are aware of no conflict of interest.
All procedures were carried out in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional Research Committee.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Alexander, L., & Higton, M. (Eds.). (2016). Faithful improvisation: Theological reflections on church leadership. London: Church House Publishing.Google Scholar
- Brown, D., & Lord, R. (2001). Leadership and perceiver cognition: Moving beyond first order constructs. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 181–202). Mahwah, NJ: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Brown, A., & Woodhead, L. (2016). That was the church that was: How the Church of England lost the English people. London: Bloomsbury Continuum.Google Scholar
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Chaves, M. (1998). Denominations as dual structures: An organizational analysis. In N. J. Demerath III, P. Hall, P. Schmitt, & R. Williams (Eds.), Sacred companies. Organizational aspects of religion and religious aspects of organizations (pp. 175–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Church of England. (2007). Common worship ordination services. Retrieved January 29, 2019, from https://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-and-worship/worship-texts-and-resources/common-worship/ministry/common-worship-ordination-services.
- Church Times. (2019). A middle-class culture dominates the Church. Retrieved July, 5, 2019, from https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2019/1-march/comment/opinion/a-middle-class-culture-dominates-the-church.
- Davie, G. (2008). The sociology of religion. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Davie, G. (2015). Religion in Britain: A persistent paradox (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Demerath, N. J., III, Hall, P., Schmitt, P., & Williams, R. (1998). Sacred companies. Organizational aspects of religion and religious aspects of organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Demerath, N. J., III, & Schmitt, T. (1998). Transcending sacred and secular: Mutual benefits in analyzing religious and non-religious organizations. In N. J. Demerath III, P. Hall, P. Schmitt, & R. Williams (Eds.), Sacred companies. Organizational aspects of religion and religious aspects of organizations (pp. 381–400). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self schemas, and leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Journal,40, 988–1010.Google Scholar
- Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly,24(6), 858–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Greenleaf, R. (1977). Servant Leadership. A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
- Hansson, P. (2012). The clerical ethos: The Church of Sweden authorities and clerical ethical standards. In K. Niemelä (Ed.), Church work and management in change (pp. 76–100). Tampere: Church Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Harris, M. (1998b). Religious congregations as nonprofit organizations: Four English Case Studies. In N. J. Demerath III, P. Hall, P. Schmitt, & R. Williams (Eds.), Sacred companies. Organizational aspects of religion and religious aspects of organizations (pp. 307–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hovorun, C. (2017). Scaffolds of the Church: Towards post-structural ecclesiology. Oregon: Cascade.Google Scholar
- Humanist. (2019). Religion and belief: Some surveys and statistics. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/religion-and-belief-some-surveys-and-statistics/.
- Iszatt-White, M., Kelly, S., & Rouncefield, M. F. (2006). Ethnography and leadership. In Ethnography conference. University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
- Jung, C. (1921). Psychological types. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
- Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,38, 283–357.Google Scholar
- Keyes, C., & Haidt, J. (Eds.). (2002). Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Lord Green Steering Group. (2014). Talent management for future leaders and leadership development for bishops and deans: A new approach. Retrieved September 8, 2018, from www.thinkinganglicans.org.uk/uploads/TalentManagement.pdf.
- Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
- Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal,41(4), 441–452.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- O’Keeffe, J. (2000). Leadership in the Parish. The Furrow,51(10), 557–562.Google Scholar
- Owen, J. (1834). Spiritual mindedness. Louisville: GLH Publishing.Google Scholar
- Peel, D. (1991). The Ministry of the Laity: Sharing the leadership, sharing the task. Toronto: Anglican Book Center.Google Scholar
- Percy, M. (1998). Power and the Church. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
- Peyton, N., & Gattrell, C. (2013). Managing clergy lives—Obedience, sacrifice, intimacy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Roberts, R. H. (2002). Religion, theology, and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Shondrick, S. J., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Implicit leadership and followership theories: Dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, and leader–follower processes. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology,25(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stinchcombe, A. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- The Archbishop’s Council. (2015). Senior church leadership—A resource for reflection. The Faith and Order Commission of the Church of England. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
- Tidball, D. (2008). Ministry by the book: New Testament patterns for pastoral leadership. Nottingham: Apollos.Google Scholar
- Torry, M. (2014). Managing religion: The management of Christian religious and faith-based organizations. Internal relationships (Vol. 1). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Verlage, H., Rowold, J., & Schilling, J. (2012). Through different perspectives on leadership: Comparing the full range leadership theory to implicit leadership theories. Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership,10(2), 68–95.Google Scholar