Advertisement

Care-ful Work: An Ethics of Care Approach to Contingent Labour in the Creative Industries

  • Ana AlacovskaEmail author
  • Joëlle Bissonnette
Original Paper

Abstract

Studies of creative industries typically contend that creative work is profoundly precarious, taking place on a freelance basis in highly competitive, individualized and contingent labour markets. Such studies depict creative workers as correspondingly self-enterprising, self-reliant, self-interested and calculative agents who valorise care-free independence. In contrast, we adopt the ‘ethics of care’ approach to explore, recognize and appreciate the communitarian, relational and moral considerations as well as interpersonal connectedness and interdependencies that underpin creative work. Drawing on in-depth interviews with creative workers in a range of marginal socio-cultural contexts, we argue that creative workers cultivate and sustain a diverse array of practices of care arising from an affective concern with the well-being of others. Far from being merely individualistic and crudely competitive actors, creative workers enact practical ethical responsibilities and affectivities towards a range of human and non-human others, including families, local communities and neighbourhoods, colleagues, artistic scenes and their adjacent genres, and surrounding national and linguistic cultures. In emphasizing the fundamental and structuring role of care in contingent labour markets our approach accords with recent trends in the social sciences that ‘affirmatively’—as opposed to ‘negatively’ and ‘suspiciously’—recognize that mutuality, solidarity and affectivity are powerful drivers of action on a par with or even exceeding market-driven self-centredness.

Keywords

Creative work Cultural labour Caring Care Ethics of care Compassion Creative industries Moral work Informal work Marginal contexts 

Notes

Funding

These researches were supported by Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit (Grant no: MK_211), Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The research involved human participants and hence entailed dealing with personal data that have been managed, stored and protected in accordance with the Research Data Management requirements and Ethical Approval procedures in operation at the relevant national research institutions.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the participants in the study. All the participants were guaranteed confidentiality, anonymity and privacy.

References

  1. Alacovska, A. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(12), 1563–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alacovska, A. (2019). ‘Keep hoping, keep going’: Towards a hopeful sociology of creative work. The Sociological Review, 67(5), 1118–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alacovska, A., & Gill, R. (2019). De-westernizing creative labour studies: The informality of creative work from an ex-centric perspective. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashcraft, K. L. (2018). Critical complicity: The feel of difference at work in home and field. Management Learning, 49(5), 613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aspers, P. (2006). Markets in fashion: A phenomenological approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Banks, M. (2006). Moral economy and cultural work. Sociology, 40(3), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banks, M. (2017). Creative justice: Cultural industries, work and inequality. London: Pickering & Chatto Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Barratt, E. (2008). The later Foucault in organisation and management studies. Human Relations, 61(4), 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beech, N., Gilmore, C., Hibbert, P., & Ybema, S. (2015). Identity-in-the-work and musicians’ struggles: The production of self-questioning identity work. Work, Employment and Society, 30(3), 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self. Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge,Google Scholar
  12. Berridge, S. (2019). Mum’s the word: Public testimonials and gendered experiences of negotiating caring responsibilities with work in the film and television industries. European Journal of Cultural Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549419839876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bissonnette, J., & Arcand, S. (2018). Music entrepreneurs in a linguistic minority context: effectuation as adaptation to the paradoxes of digital technologies. Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts, 7(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  14. Bissonnette, J., & Robineau, A. (2017). Étude sur le développement des artistes et des entreprises de la musique œuvrant au sein des communautés francophones en situation minoritaire. Moncton: Institut Canadien de Recherche sur les Minorités Linguistiques.Google Scholar
  15. Bolton, S., Houlihan, M., & Laaser, K. (2012). Contingent work and its contradictions: towards a moral economy framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bolton, S., & Laaser, K. (2013). Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy. Work, Employment & Society, 27(3), 508–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boucher, J. L., & Thériault, J. Y. (Eds.). (2005). Petites sociétés et minorités nationales, enjeux et perspectives comparées. Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  18. Butler, N., & Stoyanova, R. S. (2018). No funny business: Precarious work and emotional labour in stand-up comedy. Human Relations.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718758880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conor, B., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (2015). Gender and creative labour. Sociological Review, 63, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbeil, J. P. (2012). Le français et la francophonie. Langue, Recensement de la population de 2011. Ottawa: Statistique Canada.Google Scholar
  21. De Peuter, G. (2014). Beyond the model worker: Surveying a creative precariat. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 6(1), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Endrissat, N., Kärreman, D., & Noppeney, C. (2017). Incorporating the creative subject: Branding outside–in through identity incentives. Human Relations, 70(4), 488–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Federici, S. (2011). Feminism and the politics of the commons. https://tobh.pw/7ir9hhq1hfz.pdf.
  25. Felski, R. (2011). Critique and the hermeneutics of suspicion. M/C Journal, 15(1).Google Scholar
  26. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folbre, N. (1995). “ Holding hands at midnight”: The paradox of caring labor. Feminist Economics, 1(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Folbre, N. (Ed.). (2012). For love or money: Care provision in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. An interview with M. Foucault, 1984 by R. Fornet-Betancour et al. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.Google Scholar
  30. Friedman, S., O’Brien, D., & Laurison, D. (2017). ‘Like skydiving without a parachute’: How class origin shapes occupational trajectories in British acting. Sociology, 51(5), 992–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy. An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gill, R. (2014a). Academics, cultural workers and critical labour studies. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gill, R. (2014b). Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics, 21(4), 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gregg, M. (2015). Hack for good: Speculative labour, app development and the burden of austerity. The Fiberculture Journal, 25(186), 183–201.Google Scholar
  37. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Hanbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, T., & Smith, R. J. (2015). Care and repair and the politics of urban kindness. Sociology, 49(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harvie, J. (2013). Fair play—art, performance and neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hennion, A., & Vidal-Naquet, P. A. (2017). Might constraint be compatible with care? Home care as a situational ethics. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(5), 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2017). Capitalism and the media: Moral economy, well-being and capabilities. Media, Culture and Society, 39(2), 202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hjorth, D. (2017). Critique nouvelle—an essay on affirmative-performative entrepreneurship research. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 16(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hracs, B. J., Grant, J. L., Haggett, J., & Morton, J. (2011). A tale of two scenes: civic capital and retaining musical talent in Toronto and Halifax. The Canadian Geographer, 55(3), 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ivancheva, M., Lynch, K., & Keating, K. (2019). Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy. Gender, Work and Organization, 26(4), 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kennedy, H. (2012). Net work: Ethics and values in Web design. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1988). The micro-social order: towards a reconception. In N. Fielding (Ed.), Action and structure (pp. 21–53). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, D. (2018). Independent television production in the UK: From cottage industry to big business. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luckman, S. (2012). Locating cultural work: The politics and poetics of rural, regional and remote creativity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lynch, K. (2007). Love labour as a distinct and non-commodifiable form of care labour. The Sociological Review, 55(3), 550–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lynch, K., & Kalaitzke, M. (2018). Affective and calculative solidarity: The impact of individualism and neoliberal capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018786379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McKinlay, A., & Smith, C. (2009). Creative labour: Working in the creative industries. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McRobbie, A. (1998). British fashion design: Rag trade or image industry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 516–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industry. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  56. Mears, A. (2015). Working for free in the VIP: Relational work and the production of consent. American Sociological Review, 80(6), 1099–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Menger, P. M. (2006). Artistic labor markets: Contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 765–811). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Molterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2019). A practical ethics of care: Tinkering with different ‘goods’ in residential nursing homes. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04099-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mooney, M. A. (2014). Virtues and human personhood in the social sciences. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity (pp. 21–41). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morén Alegret, H. (2016). La facturació discogràfica cau a un mínim històric. Anuari de la musica 2016 Enderrock, pp. 70–75.Google Scholar
  61. Naudin, A. (2017). Cultural entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neff, G. (2012). Venture labour. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nelson, M. K., & Smith, J. (1999). Working hard and making do: Surviving in small town America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  64. Noddings, N. (2010). Moral education in an age of globalization. Educational Philosophy and Theory Banner, 42(4), 390–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oakley, K., & Ward, J. (2018). The art of the good life: Culture and sustainable prosperity. Cultural Trends, 27(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. O’Doherty, D., & Willmott, H. (2009). The decline of labour process analysis and the future sociology of work. Sociology, 43(5), 931–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V., & Land, C. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge companion to alternative organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Parker, S., & Parker, M. (2017). Antagonism, accommodation and agonism in critical management studies: Alternative organizations as allies. Human Relations, 70(11), 1366–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Primorac, J. (2014). The position and perspectives of cultural and creative industries in Southeastern Europe. Medijska istraživanja, 20(1), 45–65.Google Scholar
  71. Raw, A., & McKie, L. (2019). Exploring women’s mutuality in confronting care-precarity: ‘Care Accounts’—a conceptual tool. Sociology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519856236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ricoeur, P. (1977). The question of proof in Freud’s psychoanalytic writings. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 25(4), 835–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rowlands, L., & Handy, J. (2012). An addictive environment: New Zealand film production workers’ subjective experiences of project-based labour. Human Relations, 65(5), 657–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sandoval, M. (2016). Fighting precarity with co-operation? Worker co-operatives in the cultural sector. New Formations, 88, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sayer, A. (2000). Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61(1), 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scharff, C. (2016). The psychic life of neoliberalism. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(6), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Serafini, P. (2018). Performance action: The politics of art activism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, N. T., & Thwaites, R. (2018). The composition of precarity: ‘Emerging’ composers’ experiences of opportunity culture in contemporary classical music. British Journal of Sociology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Taylor, R. F. (2004). Extending conceptual boundaries: Work, voluntary work and employment. Work, Employment & Society, 18(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Townley, B., & Beech, N. (Eds.). (2010). Managing Creativity: Exploring the Paradox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Tresserras Gaju, J. M. (2013). Catalunya i la mundialització: Nous reptes per a la llengua i la cultura. In J. Albareda (Ed.), Catalunya, nació d’Europa 1714–2014 (pp. 766–789). Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana.Google Scholar
  84. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Umney, C. (2017). Moral economy, intermediaries and intensified competition in the labour market for function musicians. Work, Employment & Society, 31(5), 834–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Umney, C., & Kretsos, L. (2015). ‘That’s the experience’: Passion, work precarity, and life transitions among London jazz musicians. Work and Occupations, 42(3), 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. UNCTAD. (2010). Creative economy report. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  88. UNCTAD. (2018). Creative economy outlook. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  89. Vail, J., & Hollands, R. (2012). Cultural work and transformative arts: The dilemmas of the amber collective. Journal of Cultural Economy, 5(3), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Van Maanen, J., Sorensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vandenberghe, F. (2017). Sociology as Moral Philosophy (and Vice Versa). Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 54(4), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Williams, C. C. (2009). Repaying favours: Unravelling the nature of community exchange in an English locality. Community Development Journal, 44(4), 488–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion: Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wuthnow, R. (1995). Learning to care: Elementary kindness in an age of indifference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. XES. (2019). Xarxa d’economia solidària (XES) de Catalunya. http://xes.cat.
  96. Zelizer, V. A. (2012). How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean? Politics & Society, 40(2), 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Society and CommunicationCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.Department of ManagementHEC MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations