Unveiling (In)Vulnerability in an Adolescent’s Consumption Subculture: A Framework to Understand Adolescents’ Experienced (In)Vulnerability and Ethical Implications
Consumer (in)vulnerability is studied via a quasi-ethnographic longitudinal study of adolescents aged 11–15. The study focuses on how adolescents define their vulnerabilities within their adolescent consumption subcultures, the factors enhancing this vulnerability, and the social actors involved in their experience of vulnerability. The findings contribute to consumer vulnerability literature in three ways. First, by adopting an adolescent-centric approach based on an emic perspective, we go beyond the monolithic approach of studying one source of vulnerability at a time seen in present marketing literature. Instead, we introduce a polyadic or multiple simultaneous approaches that can consider risk sources. Second, the findings show that adolescents’ perceptions of consumer vulnerability are anchored within their consumption subcultures. This study introduces the concept that young consumers experience vulnerability in multiple ways, including imposed by adults or by adolescents deliberately engaging in risky behaviors. Third, this research provides ethics policy-makers and scholars with the conceptual framework of adolescent-centric vulnerability, which can help them to develop actions based on both imposed and deliberate sources of vulnerability from the perception of the adolescent.
KeywordsAdolescent vulnerability Invulnerability Imposed and deliberate sources of vulnerability Adolescent consumption subculture ACV framework
Travel between the faculty’s institutions was funded by a Grant from Baylor University.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Humans were involved, and all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were completed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Regarding our field and the characteristics of the minor participants involved in this research, we followed the ERIC (Ethical Research Involving Children) guidance developed by UNICEF in 2013 and adapted it to our field activities.
Research Involved in Human or Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies involving animals, performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all of the individual participants included in the study.
- Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Batat, W. (2014). How do adolescents define their own competencies in the consumption field? A portrait approach. Research and Applications in Marketing, 29, 25–54.Google Scholar
- Batat, W. (2015). An adolescent-centric approach to consumer vulnerability: New implications for public policy. In Vulnerable consumers. Routledge, London, pp 103–117.Google Scholar
- Berry, L. L. (1993). Playing fair in retailing. Arthur Anderson Retailing Issues Newsletter, 5(2), 5–6.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Chabot, A., Bergen, H., Kawamura, M., et al. (2016). Harnessing adolescent values to motivate healthier eating. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604586113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clarke, J., Hall, S., Jefferson, T., & Roberts, B. (1976). Subcultures, cultures, and class: A theoretical overview. In S. Hall & T. Jefferson (Eds.), Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain (pp. 9–74). London: Hutchison.Google Scholar
- Gentina, E., Rose, G. M., & Vittel, S. (2015). Ethics during adolescence: A social networks perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(1), 87–93.Google Scholar
- Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2019). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth (In press).Google Scholar
- Kutsche, P. (1998). Field ethnography: A manual for doing cultural anthropology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Luczak, C., & Younkin, N. (2012). Net generation: A conceptual framework of the consumer socialization process. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 16, 47–51.Google Scholar
- Martin, M. C., Gentry, J. W., & Hill, R. P. (1999). The beauty myth and the persuasiveness of advertising: A look at adolescent girls and boys. In C. M. Macklin & L. Carlson (Eds.), Advertising to children: Concepts and controversies (pp. 165–187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Moore, J., Raymond, N. A., Mittelstaedt, J. D., & Tanner, J. F. (2002). Age and consumer socialization agent influences on adolescents’ sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: Implications for social marketing initiatives and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers, R. W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection Motivation Theory. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behavior research 1: Personal and social determinants (pp. 113–122). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Solberg, E. G., Diener, E., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why are materialists less satisfied? In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture (pp. 29–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Soster, R. L., & Drenten, J. M. (2011). Flirting with technology: Understanding the motivations for and consequences of adolescent sexting. In Marketing and public policy conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Thompson, C. (1997). Interpreting consumer: A hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 438–455.Google Scholar
- Thornton, S. (1997). The social logic of subcultural capital. In K. Gelder & S. Thornton (Eds.), The Subcultures reader (pp. 200–209). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Unicef. (2013). Ethical research involving children. Retrieved from https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/eric-compendium-approved-digital-web.pdf.
- Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar