Advertisement

Mandatory Non-financial Disclosure and Its Influence on CSR: An International Comparison

  • Gregory JacksonEmail author
  • Julia Bartosch
  • Emma Avetisyan
  • Daniel Kinderman
  • Jette Steen Knudsen
Original Paper

Abstract

The article examines the effects of non-financial disclosure (NFD) on corporate social responsibility (CSR). We conceptualise trade-offs between two ideal types (government regulation and business self-regulation) in relation to CSR. Whereas self-regulation is associated with greater flexibility for businesses to develop best practices, it can also lead to complacency if firms feel no external pressure to engage with CSR. In contrast, government regulation is associated with greater stringency around minimum standards, but can also result in rigidity owing to a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach. Given these potential trade-offs, we ask how mandatory non-financial disclosure has been shaping CSR practices and examine its potential effectiveness as a regulatory instrument. Our analysis of 24 OECD countries using the Asset4 database shows that firms in countries that require non-financial disclosure adopt significantly more CSR activities. However, we also find that NFD regulation does not lead to lower levels of corporate irresponsibility. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrates that, over time, the variation in CSR activities declines as firms adopt increasingly similar practices. Our study thereby contributes to understanding the impact of government regulation on CSR at firm level. We also discuss the limits of mandatory NFD in addressing regulatory trade-offs between stringency and flexibility in the field of corporate social responsibility.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Corporate social irresponsibility Mandatory non-financial disclosure Private governance 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported through a grant awarded by the Bertelsmann Foundation in 2016 and has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 645763.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The research was conducted in compliance with research ethics policies at the university of the first author. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757.Google Scholar
  3. Albareda, L., Lozano, J., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391–407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9514-1.Google Scholar
  4. Albertini, E. (2014). A descriptive analysis of environmental disclosure: A longitudinal study of French companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 233–254.Google Scholar
  5. Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2017). CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8.Google Scholar
  6. Antal, A. B., & Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France: A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business & Society, 46(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
  7. Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027–1047.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8.Google Scholar
  8. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A., & Hurtado-Torres, N. (2016). The natural environmental strategies of international firms: Old controversies and new evidence on performance and disclosure. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 24–39.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0043.Google Scholar
  9. Armstrong, J. S., & Green, K. C. (2013). Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1922–1927.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.014.Google Scholar
  10. Avetisyan, E., & Ferrary, M. (2013). Dynamics of stakeholders’ implications in the institutionalization of the CSR field in france and in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 115–133.Google Scholar
  11. Bartley, T., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2016). Beyond decoupling: Unions and the leveraging of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Socio-Economic Review, 14(2), 231–255.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv023.Google Scholar
  12. Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 613–626.Google Scholar
  13. Beunza, D., & Ferraro, F. J. O. S. (2018). Performative work: Bridging performativity and institutional theory in the responsible investment field (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance—An International Review, 16(4), 294–311.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00694.x.Google Scholar
  15. Bowen, F. (2017). Marking their own homework: The pragmatic and moral legitimacy of industry self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3635-y.Google Scholar
  16. Bowen, F., & Aragon-Correa, A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 107–112.Google Scholar
  17. Brekke, K. A., & Nyborg, K. (2008). Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(4), 509–526.Google Scholar
  18. Brunner, M., & Ostermaier, A. (2017). Peer influence on managerial honesty: The Role of transparency and expectations. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3459-9.Google Scholar
  19. Carve Consulting. (2016). Danske virksomheders CSR-rapportering. http://csrrapport.dk.
  20. Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407.Google Scholar
  21. Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917–945.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.840.Google Scholar
  22. Chelli, M., Durocher, S., & Richard, J. (2014). France’s new economic regulations: Insights from institutional legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(2), 283–316.Google Scholar
  23. Chen, Y. C., Hung, M. Y., & Wang, Y. X. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 65(1), 169–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009.Google Scholar
  24. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  25. Clark, T. S., & Grantham, K. N. (2012). What CSR is not: Corporate social irresponsibility. In R. Tench, W. Sun, & B. Jones (Eds.), Corporate social irresponsibility: A challenging concept (pp. 23–41). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  26. Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00330.x.Google Scholar
  27. Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429–1448.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0697.Google Scholar
  28. CSR Europe & Global Reporting Initiative. (2017). Member State Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU. Brussels: CSR Europe.Google Scholar
  29. Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 549–572.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8.Google Scholar
  30. Dentchev, N. A., Haezendonck, E., & van Balen, M. (2015). The role of governments in the business and society debate. Business & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315586179.Google Scholar
  31. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005.Google Scholar
  32. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355.Google Scholar
  33. Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.Google Scholar
  34. Dhooge, L. J. (2004). Beyond voluntarism: Social disclosure and France’s Nouvelles Regulations Economiques. The Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 21, 441.Google Scholar
  35. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). ‘The iron cage revisited’: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.Google Scholar
  36. Ebers, M., & Oerlemans, L. (2016). The variety of governance structures beyond market and hierarchy. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1491–1529.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313506938.Google Scholar
  37. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984.Google Scholar
  38. Economist 15–21 December 2018. Schumpeter—Holding Business to Account.Google Scholar
  39. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 313–343.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313.Google Scholar
  40. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5.Google Scholar
  41. Fortanier, F., Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2011). Harmonization in CSR reporting MNEs and global CSR standards. Management International Review, 51(5), 665–696.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0089-9.Google Scholar
  42. Fox, T., Ward, H., & Howard, B. (2002). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  43. Fransen, L. (2013). The embeddedness of responsible business practice: Exploring the interaction between national-institutional environments and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 213–227.Google Scholar
  44. Frynas, J. G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and societal governance: Lessons from transparency in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 163–179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0559-1.Google Scholar
  45. Giamporcaro, S., & Gond, J.-P. (2016). Calculability as politics in the construction of markets: The case of socially responsible investment in France. Organization Studies, 37(4), 465–495.Google Scholar
  46. Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., Sariannidis, N., & Chaitidis, G. (2017). The relation between voluntary carbon disclosure and environmental performance: The case of S&P 500. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 784–803.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-05-2016-0049.Google Scholar
  47. Gond, J.-P., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640–671.Google Scholar
  48. Gond, J.-P., & Nyberg, D. (2016). Materializing power to recover corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 2, 89.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616677630.Google Scholar
  49. González, C. L., & Vílchez, M. L. (2015) Failing to regulate social and environmental reporting in Spain. In XXIII Congreso EBEN España (p. 15). Universidad Pablo de Olavide, de Sevilla.Google Scholar
  50. Gregory, J. H. (2002). Comparison of corporate governance guidelines and codes of best practice: UNITED STATES. Weil, Gotschal, and Manges LLP.Google Scholar
  51. Grewal, J., Riedl, E. J., & Serafeim, G. (forthcoming). Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure. Management Science.Google Scholar
  52. Hawn, O., & Ioannou, I. (2016). Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2569–2588.Google Scholar
  53. Henriques, A. (2010). The reporting of non-financial information in annual reports by the FTSE100. London: CORE Coalition.Google Scholar
  54. Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 453–476.Google Scholar
  55. Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 447–482.Google Scholar
  56. Hess, D. (2014). The future of sustainability reporting as a regulatory mechanism. In J. E. Colburn (Ed.), Law and the transition to business sustainability (pp. 125–139). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among US firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9721-4.Google Scholar
  58. Igalens, J., & Gond, J.-P. (2005). Measuring corporate social performance in France: A critical and empirical analysis of ARESE data. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(2), 131–148.Google Scholar
  59. Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from four countries. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100.Google Scholar
  60. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.Google Scholar
  61. Jackson, G., Brammer, S., Karpoff, J. M., Lange, D., Zavyalova, A., Harrington, B., et al. (2014). Grey areas: Irresponsible corporations and reputational dynamics. Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), 153–218.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt021.Google Scholar
  62. Kinderman, D. (2012). Free us up so we can be responsible! The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 29–57.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr028.Google Scholar
  63. Kinderman, D. (2019). The challenges of upward regulatory harmonization: The case of sustainability reporting in the EU. Regulation & Governance.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12240.
  64. Knudsen, J. S., & Moon, J. (2017). Visible hands: Government regulation and international business responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Knudsen, J. S., Moon, J., & Slager, R. (2015). Government policies for corporate social responsibility in Europe: Institutionalisation and structured convergence? Policy and Politics, 43(1), 81–99.Google Scholar
  66. Koos, S. (2012). The institutional embeddedness of social responsibility: A multilevel analysis of smaller firms’ civic engagement in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 135–162.Google Scholar
  67. Lepoutre, J., Dentchev, N. A., & Heene, A. (2007). Dealing with uncertainties when governing CSR policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 391–408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9214-2.Google Scholar
  68. Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., & de Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance. Business & Society, 49(1), 88–115.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309345420.Google Scholar
  69. Lin-Hi, N., & Muller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1928–1936.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.015.Google Scholar
  70. Locke, R. M., Rissing, B. A., & Pal, T. (2013). Complements or substitutes? Private codes, state regulation and the enforcement of labour standards in global supply chains. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(3), 519–552.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12003.Google Scholar
  71. Lohmeyer, N. (2017). Instrumentalisierte Verantwortung? Entstehung und Motive des “Business Case for CSR” im deutschen Diskurs unternehmerischer Verantwortung. transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  72. Lopatta, K., Buchholz, F., & Kaspereit, T. (2016). Asymmetric information and corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 55(3), 458–488.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575488.Google Scholar
  73. MacNeil, I., & Li, X. (2006). ‘Comply or explain’: Market discipline and non-compliance with the Combined Code. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 486–496.Google Scholar
  74. Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 649–678.Google Scholar
  75. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.Google Scholar
  76. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  77. Mena, S., Rintamäki, J., Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2016). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 720–738.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0208.Google Scholar
  78. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003.Google Scholar
  79. Neumann, B. R., Roberts, M. L., & Cauvin, E. (2011). Stakeholder value disclosures: Anchoring on primacy and importance of financial and nonfinancial performance measures. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2–3), 195–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0054-1.Google Scholar
  80. Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407–418.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0230-x.Google Scholar
  81. Parker, C. (2007). Meta-regulation: Legal accountability for corporate social responsibility. In M. Doreen, V. Aurora, & C. Tom (Eds.), New corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law (pp. 207–237). Cambridge University Press: London.Google Scholar
  82. Pedersen, E. R. G., Neergaard, P., Pedersen, J. T., & Gwozdz, W. (2013). Conformance and deviance: Company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(6), 357–373.Google Scholar
  83. Perez-Batres, L. A., Doh, J. P., Miller, V. V., & Pisani, M. J. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: Why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 157–172.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1419-y.Google Scholar
  84. Perritt, H. H., Jr. (2001). Towards a hybrid regulatory scheme for the Internet. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2001(1), 215–322.Google Scholar
  85. Rasche, A., De Bakker, F. G., & Moon, J. (2013). Complete and partial organizing for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 651–663.Google Scholar
  86. Rathert, N. (2016). Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(7), 858–879.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.19.Google Scholar
  87. Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.796.Google Scholar
  88. Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2016). Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 299–329.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12137.Google Scholar
  89. Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005.Google Scholar
  90. Russo-Spena, T., Tregua, M., & de Chiara, A. (2016). Trends and drivers in CSR disclosure: A focus on reporting practices in the automotive industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  91. Scheltema, M. W. (2014). Assessing effectiveness of international private regulation in the CSR arena. Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business, 13, 263–375.Google Scholar
  92. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x.Google Scholar
  93. Schneiberg, M., & Bartley, T. (2008). Organizations, regulation, and economic behavior: Regulatory dynamics and forms from the nineteenth to twenty-first century. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4(1), 31–61.Google Scholar
  94. Sethi, S. P., Martell, T. F., & Demir, M. (2017). Enhancing the role and effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: The missing element of content verification and integrity assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 59–82.Google Scholar
  95. Shabana, K. M., Buchholtz, A. K., & Carroll, A. B. (2017). The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting. Business & Society, 56(8), 1107–1135.Google Scholar
  96. Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760833.Google Scholar
  97. Slager, R., Gond, J.-P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 763–790.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443628.Google Scholar
  98. Sobczak, A., & Coelho Martins, L. (2010). The impact and interplay of national and global CSR discourses: Insights from France and Brazil. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 445–455.Google Scholar
  99. Steurer, R. (2013). Disentangling governance: A synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. Policy Sciences, 46(4), 387–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9177-y.Google Scholar
  100. Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400226.Google Scholar
  101. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (2013). Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 549–572.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0962.Google Scholar
  102. Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2015). Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 873–891.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2623-3.Google Scholar
  103. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.Google Scholar
  104. Uddin, S., Siddiqui, J., & Islam, M. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility disclosures, traditionalism and politics: A story from a traditional setting. Journal of Business Ethics., 151, 409–428.Google Scholar
  105. Wickert, C. (2016). “Political” corporate social responsibility in small-and medium-sized enterprises: A conceptual framework. Business & Society, 55(6), 792–824.Google Scholar
  106. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  107. Xiaoping, Z., Murrell, A., & Feibo, S. (2016). Temporal dynamics of CSR and CSIR. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2016(1), 1–1.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.13404abstract.Google Scholar
  108. Young, S., & Marais, M. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 432–450.Google Scholar
  109. Zorio, A., García-Benau, M. A., & Sierra, L. J. (2013). Sustainability development and the quality of assurance reports: Empirical evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 484–500.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Jackson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julia Bartosch
    • 1
  • Emma Avetisyan
    • 2
  • Daniel Kinderman
    • 3
  • Jette Steen Knudsen
    • 4
  1. 1.Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Audencia Business SchoolNantesFrance
  3. 3.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  4. 4.Tufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations