Advertisement

Assessing the Non-financial Outcomes of Social Enterprises in Luxembourg

  • Francesco SarracinoEmail author
  • Luca Fumarco
Original Paper

Abstract

By addressing social issues, rather than maximizing profits, social enterprises are said to contribute to the well-being of societies. In this paper, we test whether social enterprises fulfil this expectation. The paper applies regression analysis to a unique dataset obtained by merging survey data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor with official statistics on social enterprises in Luxembourg. Results suggest that social enterprises contribute to subjective well-being, which is an encompassing measure of people’s satisfaction with their own life. We find that when the share of social enterprises in a city increases, the ill-being of poor and unemployed people declines. Therefore, policy makers who seek to increase the well-being of economically disadvantaged people could adopt policies to promote the creation of social enterprises.

Keywords

Social enterprises Subjective well-being Non-economic outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Andréa Gosset for her precious contribution on an earlier version of this work, and acknowledge the financial support of the Observatoire de la Compétitivité, Ministère de l’Economie, DG Compétitivité. F. Sarracino: Russia (LCSR Russian Government Grant #11.G34.31.0024 from November 28, 2010).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allegrezza, S., & Molling, V. (2005). À la recherche de l’économie sociale et solidaire, le cas du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. STATEC Working papers.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2009). Extraordinarily ordinary: Working in the social economy. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(1), 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becchetti, L., & Borzaga, C. (2010). The economics of social responsibility: The world of social enterprises. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Blakemore, K. (2003). Social policy: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borzaga, C., Depedri, S., & Tortia, E. (2010). The growth of organizational variety in market economies: The case of social enterprises. Euricse Working Papers, N.003| 10.Google Scholar
  8. Bouchard, M. J., Ferraton, C., Michaud, V., & Leclerc, P. (2006). Database on social economy organizations: The qualification criteria. Chaire de recherche du Canada en économie sociale: Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
  9. Bruni, L., & Porta, P. (2007). Handbook on the Economics of Happiness. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calkins, P., & Ngo, A.-T. (2010). The impacts of farmer cooperatives on the well-being of cocoa producing villages in Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 30(3–4), 535–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calò, F., Teasdale, S., Donaldson, C., Roy, M. J., & Baglioni, S. (2017). Collaborator or competitor: assessing the evidence supporting the role of social enterprise in health and social care. Public Management Review, 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, J. (2010). Business as usual or economic innovation? Work, markets and growth in community and social enterprises. Third Sector Review, 16(2), 93–108.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, A. E., D’Ambrosio, C., & Ghislandi, S. (2013). Poverty and well-being: Panel evidence from Germany. PSE Working Papers hal-00814659, HAL.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2012). The great happiness moderation. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 468, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).Google Scholar
  15. Conference, European Standing, & of Co-operatives, Mutual Societies, Associations and Foundations (2002). Social Economy Charter. Bruxelles: CEP-CMAF.Google Scholar
  16. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Defourny, J. (2009). Concepts and realities of social enterprise: a European perspective. Collegium, (Spring):73–98.Google Scholar
  18. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Social enterprise in Europe: At the crossroads of market, public policies and third sector. Policy and Society, 29(3), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective. EMES European Research Network.Google Scholar
  20. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2013). Social coops: When social enterprises meet the cooperative tradition. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2(2), 11–33.Google Scholar
  21. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2008). Gross national happiness as an answer to the Easterlin paradox? Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Emmons, R.-A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2012). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. European Commission. (2013). Social economy and social entrepreneurship. Social Europe guide (Vol. 4). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Farmer, J., De Cotta, T., McKinnon, K., Barraket, J., Munoz, S.-A., Douglas, H., et al. (2016). Social enterprise and wellbeing in community life. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(2), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fazzi, L. (2010). The provision of welfare and general-interest services. In L. Becchetti & C. Borzaga (Eds.), The economics of social responsibility. The world of social enterprises (pp. 55–71). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Fitoussi, J.-P., & Stiglitz, J. (2011). On the measurement of social progress and well being: some further thoughts. Documents de Travail de l’OFCE, No.2011-19.Google Scholar
  30. Fowler, E., Coffey, B., & Dixon-Fowler, H. (2017). Transforming good intentions into social impact: A case on the creation and evolution of a social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3754-5.
  31. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institution. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fulton, M. E., & Ketilson, L. H. (1992). The role of cooperatives in communities: Examples from Saskatchewan. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 7, 15–42.Google Scholar
  33. Hayo, B. (2007). Happiness in transition: An empirical study on Eastern Europe. Economic Systems, 31(2), 204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hervieux, C., & Voltan, A. (2016). Framing social problems in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jackson, K. T. (2016). Economy of mutuality: Merging financial and social sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laville, J. (2010). L’ économie solidaire: Une perspective internationale. Paris: Libraire Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
  38. Laville, J.-L., & Nyssens, M. (2001). The social enterprise: Towards a theoretical socio-economic approach. The emergence of social enterprise (pp. 312–333). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Layard, R. (2009). Why subjective well-being should be the measure of progress. Knowledge and policy charting progress, building visions, improving life: OECD Forum on Statistics.Google Scholar
  41. Lewbel, A. (2012). Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. London: A Sage University Paper Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Macaulay, B., Mazzei, M., Roy, M. J., Teasdale, S., & Donaldson, C. (2018). Differentiating the effect of social enterprise activities on health. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Macaulay, B., Roy, M. J., Donaldson, C., & Teasdale, S. (2018). Conceptualizing the health and well-being impacts of social enterprise: A UK-based study. Health Promotion International, 33(5), 748–759.Google Scholar
  45. Muñoz, S.-A., Farmer, J., Winterton, R., & Barraket, J. (2015). The social enterprise as a space of wellbeing: An exploratory case study. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peiffer, J., & Hiltgen, M. (2010). Vers de nouvelles perspectives pour l’Economie Solidaire au Luxembourg ?, A la recherche de l’économie solidaire et sociale au Luxembourg. Quelques chiffres préliminaires. Conference CRP Henri Tudor.Google Scholar
  48. Pèrotin, V. (2013). Worker cooperatives: Good, sustainable jobs in the community. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2(2), 34–47.Google Scholar
  49. Powdthavee, N. (2007). Economics of happiness: A review of literature and applications. Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 19(1), 51–73.Google Scholar
  50. Powdthavee, N. (2010). The happiness equation: The surprising economics of our most valuable asset. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  51. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenblatt, C. (2013). Quelle place pour l’économie sociale en Europe? Think Tank européen pour la solidarité.Google Scholar
  53. Roy, M. J., Lysaght, R., & Krupa, T. M. (2017). Action on the social determinants of health through social enterprise. Canadian Medical Association Journal (Journal de l’Association Medicale Canadienne), 189, E440–E441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roy, M. J., & Hackett, M. T. (2017). Polanyi’s ‘substantive approach’ to the economy in action? Conceptualising social enterprise as a public health ‘intervention’. Review of Social Economy, 75(2), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roy, M. J., Donaldson, C., Baker, R., & Kerr, S. (2014). The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: A model and systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 123, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roy, M. J., Donaldson, C., Baker, R., & Kay, A. (2013). Social enterprise: New pathways to health and well-being? Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rückert, E., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Assessing the social and solidarity economy in Luxembourg. STATEC Working papers.Google Scholar
  58. Sabatini, F., Modena, F., & Tortia, E. (2014). Do cooperative enterprises create social trust? Small Business Economics, 42(3), 621–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Savio, M., & Righetti, A. (1993). Cooperatives as a social enterprise in Italy: A place for social integration and rehabilitation. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 88(4), 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schimmack, U., Krause, P., Wagner, G., & Schupp, J. (2010). Stability and change of well-being: An experimentally enhanced latent state-trait-error analysis. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schneider, L., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Self-informant agreement in well-being ratings: A meta-analysis. Social Indicators Research, 94(3), 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonist psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Snijders, T. A. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In B. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1570–1573). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2012). Recent developments in the economics of happiness: A selective overview. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  65. Tencati, A., & Zsolnai, L. (2009). The collaborative enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toia rReport. (2013). Committee on Industry. European Parliament: Research and Energy.Google Scholar
  67. Tortia, E. (2010). The impact of social enterprises on output, employment, and welfare. In L. Becchetti & C. Borzaga (Eds.), The economics of social responsibility. The world of social enterprises. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Utting, P., van Dijk, N., & Matheï, A.-M. (2014). Social and Solidarity Economy Is There a New Economy in the Making?. UNRISD Occasional Paper: Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy.Google Scholar
  69. van Praag, B., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 51(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Reekum, C., Urry, H., Johnstone, T., Thurow, M., Frye, C., Jackson, C., et al. (2007). Individual differences in amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity are associated with evaluation speed and psychological well-being. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wanous, J., & Hudy, M. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg (STATEC)STATEC ResearchLuxembourgLuxembourg
  2. 2.Laboratory for Comparative Social Research (LCSR)National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations