Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT)
- 710 Downloads
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of rhetoric and rhetorical strategies that are implicit in the standalone sustainability reporting of the top 24 companies of the Fortune 500 Global. We adopt Bormann’s (Q J Speech 58(4):396–407, 1972) SCT framework to study the rhetorical situation and how corporate sustainability reporting (CSR) messages can be communicated to the audience (public). The SCT concepts in the sustainability reporting’s communication are subject to different types of legitimacy strategies that are used by corporations as a validity and legitimacy claim in the reports. A content analysis has been conducted and structural coding schemes have been developed based on the literature. The schemes are applied to the SCT model which recognizes the symbolic convergent processes of fantasy among communicators in a Society. The study reveals that most of the sample companies communicate fantasy type and rhetorical vision in their corporate sustainability reporting. However, the disclosure or messages are different across locations and other taxonomies of the SCT framework. This study contributes to the current CSR literature about how symbolic or fantasy understandings can be interpreted by the users. It also discusses the persuasion styles that are adopted by the companies for communication purposes. This study is the theoretical extension of the SCT. Researchers may be interested in further investigating other online communication paths, such as human rights reports and director’s reports.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Sustainability reporting Symbolic convergence theory Rhetoric
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Abizadeh, A. (2002). The passions of the wise: “Phronêsis”, rhetoric, and Aristotle’s passionate practical deliberation. The Review of Metaphysics,56, 267–296.Google Scholar
- Aristotle. (1991). The art of rhetoric. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Arvidsson, S. (2009). Non-financial information and the annual report. Working paper, Department of Business Administration, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, C. (1989). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, C. (1994a). Constructing experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, C. (1994b). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101).Google Scholar
- Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social science. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Böhling, K., Murguía, D. I., & Godfrid, J. (2017). Sustainability reporting in the mining sector: Exploring its symbolic nature. Business & Society, 25(1), 271–313.Google Scholar
- Bormann, E. G. (1980). Communication theory. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Bormann, E. G. (1983). Symbolic convergence: Organizational communication and culture. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 99–122). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bormann, E. G. (1985b). The force of fantasy: Restoring the America dream. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Bostdorff, D. M. (1992). “The decision is yours” campaign: Planned parenthood’s characteristic argument of moral virtue. In E. L. Toth & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations (pp. 301–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Brennan, N., & Gray, S. J. (2000). Rhetoric and argument in financial reporting. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. ACCA Occasional Research Papers; No. 31. http://www2.accaglobal.com/pubs/general/activities/research/research_archive/orp-031-001.pdf.
- Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives (Vol. 111). Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Conrad, C., & Lair, D. J. (2004). Corporate rhetoric as organizational discourse. In The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 79–103).Google Scholar
- Cox, R. (2012). Environmental communication and the public sphere. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1981). Applied communication research: A dramatistic approach. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1995). Symbolic theories in applied communication research: Bormann, Burke, and Fisher. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- CVS Health. (2015). Sustainability report. https://cvshealth.com/social-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility/annual-corporate-social-responsibility-reports.
- den Hoonard, Van, & Will, C. (1997). Working with sensitizing concepts: Analytical field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Drumheller, K. (2005). Millennial dogma: A fantasy theme analysis of the millennial generation’s uses and gratifications of religious content media. Journal of Communication & Religion,28, 47–70.Google Scholar
- Foss, S. K. (1989). Generic criticism. In S. K. Foss (Ed.), Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
- Garver, E. (1994). Aristotle’s rhetoric: An art of character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2016). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards 2016. Accessed 7 December https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/.
- Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative designs in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hopkins, L. (2011). Symbolic convergence theory. Retrieved October 14, 2014 from http://www.leehopkins.net/2011/05/31/symbolic-convergence-theory/.
- Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ihlen, Ø., Van Ruler, B., & Fredriksson, M. (Eds.). (2009). Public relations and social theory: Key figures and concepts. Abington: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, G. A. (1991). Aristotle on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Klotz, A. (1999). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis (Vol. 7, pp. 1–84). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Livesey, S. M., & Graham, J. (2007). Greening of corporations? Eco-talk and the emerging social imaginary. In S. K. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 336–350). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Llewellyn, J. (1990). The rhetoric of corporate legitimation: Public relations and philanthropy as social responsibility. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
- McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics. USA: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Morhardt, J. E. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment,19(7), 436–452.Google Scholar
- Neumann, W. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Padgett, D. K. (2004). Coming of age: Theoretical thinking, social responsibility, and a global perspective on qualitative research. In D. K. Padgett (Ed.), The qualitative research experience (pp. 297–315). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric. Notre Dame: The University of Notre dame Press.Google Scholar
- Prentice, S. J. (2006). A symbolic convergence theory approach to graduate recruiting. Master of Arts thesis, Texas Tech University, USA.Google Scholar
- Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Putnam, L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (1983). Communication and organizations, an interpretive approach (Vol. 65). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Robinson, D. N. (2006). Rhetoric and character in Aristotle. The Review of Metaphysics,60, 3–15.Google Scholar
- Self, L. S. (1979). Rhetoric and phronesis: The Aristotelian ideal. Philosophy & Rhetoric,12, 130–145.Google Scholar
- Shell. (2015). Sustainability report. https://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2015/.
- Shields, D. C., & Preston, C. T. (1985). Fantasy theme analysis in competitive rhetorical criticism. National Forensic Journal,3(2), 102–115.Google Scholar
- Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Verizon. (2015). Corporate responsibility supplement. http://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files/annual/verizon-annual-2015/downloads/2015_Verizon_Corporate_Responsibility_Supplement.pdf.
- Walmart. (2015). Global responsibility report. https://cdn.corporate.walmart.com/c0/24/2383f0674d27823dcf7083e6fbc6/2015-global-responsibility-report.pdf.
- Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior,1(1), 41–74.Google Scholar