To Help My Supervisor: Identification, Moral Identity, and Unethical Pro-supervisor Behavior

Original Paper

Abstract

Under some circumstances, individuals are willing to engage in unethical behaviors that benefit another entity. In this research we advance the unethical pro-organizational behavior construct by showing that individuals also have the potential to behave unethically to benefit their supervisors. Previous research has not examined if employees engage in unethical acts to benefit an entity that is separate from oneself and if they will conduct these acts to benefit a supervisor. Our research helps to address these gaps. We also demonstrate that unethical behavior to benefit a supervisor, what we term unethical pro-supervisor behavior, is more likely to occur if individuals are more (versus less) identified with their organization or supervisor. That is, feeling a sense of oneness with one’s organization or supervisor can result in employees engaging in unethical behavior to help their supervisor. Further, this positive relationship is weakened if the employee possesses higher levels of moral identity. We test our hypotheses with a two-part laboratory study, a field study, and a time-lagged field study. Theoretical and practical implications of this work are discussed.

Keywords

Identification Moral identity Unethical pro-organizational behavior Unethical pro-supervisor behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Marie Mitchell for helpful feedback on this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Hana Huang Johnson declares that she has no conflict of interest. Elizabeth E. Umphress declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aquino, K., McFerran, B., & Laven, M. (2011). Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Schinoff, B. S., & Rogers, K. M. (2016). “I identify with her”, “I identify with him”: Unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 28–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In A. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 128–139). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2014). Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, F. (2006). Career self-interest and concern for others - The effects of co-worker attitudes on fraudulent behavior. Accounting and the Public Interest, 6(1), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618–634.Google Scholar
  14. Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification identity and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., & Gurt, J. (2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ethics and Compliance Initiative. (2013). National business survey. Retrieved from http://www.ethics.org/newsite/research/eci-research/nbes/nbes-reports/nbes-2013
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankel, A. (2015, August 28). How Dole’s ex-general counsel cost his boss (and himself) $148 million. Reuters. Retrieved from http://blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/2015/08/28/how-doles-ex-general-counsel-cost-his-boss-and-himself-148-million/
  19. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.Google Scholar
  20. Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, K. A., Ziegert, J. C., & Capitano, J. (2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobman, E. V., Jackson, C. J., Jimmieson, N. L., & Martin, R. (2011). The effects of transformational leadership behaviours on follower outcomes: An identity-based analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(4), 553–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leavitt, K., Reynolds, S., Barnes, C., Schilpzand, P., & Hannah, S. (2012). Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1316–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma-mater - a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muthen, B. O., & Muthen, L. K. (2004). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  29. O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 526–543.Google Scholar
  30. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reed, A., II, & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: an empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19(6), 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). Social identity theory and intergroup behavior (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2014). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
  43. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Umphress, E. E., Ren, L. R., Bingham, J. B., & Gogus, C. I. (2009). The influence of distributive justice on lying for and stealing from a supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research, and management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  48. Walumbwa, F. O., & Hartnell, C. A. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership–employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wanek, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Ones, D. S. (2003). Towards an understanding of integrity test similarities and differences: An item-level analysis of seven tests. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 873–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, X.-H., & Howell, J. M. (2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, P., Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, H., & Aryee, S. (2013). Unraveling the relationship between family-supportive supervisor and employee performance. Group and Organization Management, 38(2), 258–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E., Jr. (2011). The myth of global fit indices and alternatives for assessing latent variable relations. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 350–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young, S. F., & Steelman, L. A. (2014). The role of feedback in supervisor and workgroup identification. Personnel Review, 43(2), 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, Y., & Chen, C. C. (2013). Developmental leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating effects of self-determination, supervisor identification, and organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(4), 534–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business and EconomicsUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.Foster School of BusinessUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations