Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 156, Issue 1, pp 273–287 | Cite as

The Potential Use of Sociological Perspectives for Business Ethics Teaching

  • Johannes BrinkmannEmail author
Original Paper
  • 162 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential contribution of sociological perspectives for business ethics teaching. After a brief and selective literature review, the paper suggests starting with sociological thinking and three aspects of it: sociological concepts, sociological imagination, and postponed judgment. After presenting two short case teaching stories (about speaking up or not) and three sociological concepts or frameworks (deviance, roles, and power), the potential inspiration value of a sociological checklist for analysing or diagnosing business ethics cases is tried out. As an open ending, some short final suggestions are made for further use of sociological perspectives in both business ethics teaching and research.

Keywords

Teaching business ethics Sociology Sociological imagination Social deviance Social role Power 

Notes

Acknowledgements

In addition to the anonymous reviewers, a special thanks to Ron Sims, Chandler Johnson, Øyvind Kvalnes, Tore Bakken for any valuable comments. Any remaining imperfection, esp. language-wise, is my own responsibility.

References

  1. Abend, G. (2010). What’s New and What’s Old about the New Sociology of Morality. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds), Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research (pp. 561–584). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Adobor, H. (2006). Exploring the role performance of corporate ethics officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adorno, Th. W., Albert, H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H. & Popper, K. R (1976), (Eds)., The positivist dispute in german sociology, London: Heinemann (mostly also here: http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/positivismusstreit/contents.html; the original text collection in German was published in 1969).
  4. Alexander, Ch S, & Becker, H. J. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Applbaum, A. (1999). Ethics for adversaries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aubert, V. (1967). Elements of sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  7. Aubert, V. (1979). Sosiologi (sociology). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Z., & Tester, K. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beschorner, Th. (2006). Ethical theory and business practices: The case of discourse ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird, F. (1996). The muted conscience. Westport CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  11. Bostad, I. (2011). The life and learning of arne naess: Scepticism as a survival strategy. Inquiry, 54, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brinkmann, J. (1994). Sosiologiske grunnbegreper (Basic sociological concepts). Oslo: AdNotam.Google Scholar
  14. Brinkmann, J. (2002). Business and marketing ethics as professional ethics. Concepts, approaches and typologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brinkmann, J. (2009a). Using Ibsen in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brinkmann, J. (2009b). Putting ethics on the agenda for real estate agents. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brinkmann, J. (2015). Socratic dialogue—designed in the Nelson–Heckmann tradition: A tool for reducing the theory–practice divide in business ethics. In K. J. Ims & L. J. T. Pedersen (Eds.), Business and the greater good: Rethinking business ethics in an age of crisis (pp. 240–261). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Brinkmann, J., & Henriksen, A. (2008). Vocational ethics as a subspecialty of business ethics—structuring a research and teaching field. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brinkmann, J., & Ims, K. J. (2004). A conflict case approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brinkmann, J., & Lentz, P. (2006). Understanding insurance customer dishonesty: Outline of a moral-sociological approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown, M., & Treviño, L. (2014). Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burrell, G. (2016). Editorial to a “virtual special issue” of the Journal of Business Ethics, accessible online here (acc 11th Dec, 2016): http://www.springer.com/philosophy/ethics+and+moral+philosophy/journal/10551.
  23. Castells, M. (2016). A sociology of power: My intellectual journey. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 1–19 (http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074158).
  24. Chonko, L. B., & Hunt, S. D. (1985). Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 13, 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Moral imagination. In encyclopedia of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1980). Actors and systems. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dahrendorf, R. (1968). Homo sociologicus. Essays in the theory of society (pp. 19–87). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dahrendorf, R. (1988). The modern social conflict. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Daub, C.-H., & Scherrer, Y. (2009). Doing the right thing right: The role of sociological research and consulting for corporate engagement in development cooperation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De George, R. (2010). Business ethics (7th ed.). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River NJ.Google Scholar
  33. De George, R. (2015). A response to my critics. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Engelstad, F. (2012). The sociology of power. In M. H. Jacobsen et al. (Eds.), Troduction to sociology: Scandinavian sensibilities (pp. 58–80). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  35. Fogarty, T. J. (1995). Accountant ethics: A brief examination of neglected sociological dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fuller, R. C. (1936). Sociological theory and social problems. Social Forces, 15, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. H. W. (2013). Sociology (7th ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  38. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. H. W. (2014). Essential concepts in sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  39. Ginsberg, M. (1937). Sociology. London: Thornton Butterworth.Google Scholar
  40. Godwyn, M. (2015). Ethics and diversity in business management education. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goodpaster, K. (1992). Business ethics. In L. C. Becker & C. B. Becker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethics (pp. 111–115). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  42. Goul Andersen, J. (1998). Borgerne og lovene. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  43. Grover, S. L., & Chun, H. (1994). The influence of role conflict and self-interest on lying in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests: a general perspective, in Knowledge and human interests (trans: Shapiro, J. J.). Boston: Beacon Press, 301–317.Google Scholar
  45. Hart, H. (1938). Value judgments in sociology. American Sociological Review, 3, 862–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heath, J. (2008). Business ethics and moral motivation: A criminological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hendry, J. (2001). After durkheim: an agenda for the sociology of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hernes, G. (1975). Makt og avmakt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  49. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Höffding, H. (1905). On the relation between sociology and ethics. American Journal of Sociology, 10, 672–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Horkheimer, M. (1959). Soziologie und Philosophie. In Busch, A. & Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie (Ed.), Soziologie und moderne Gesellschaft (pp. 27–38). Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar
  53. Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. in Critical theory: Selected essays, (transl. M. O’Connell), New York: Herder & Herder, 188–243 (German original of 1937: http://lesekreis.blogsport.de/images/MaxHorkheimerTraditionelleundkritischeTheorie.pdf).
  54. Hoyt, C., & Price, T. (2015). Ethical decision making and leadership: Merging social role and self-construal perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hung, H. (2011). Directors’ roles in corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jones, C., Parker, M., & Ten Bos, R. (2005). For business ethics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kahnemann, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  58. Kessels, J., Boers, E., & Mostert, P. (2009). Free space. Field guide to conversations. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  59. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  60. Kvalnes, Ø. (2015), Moral reasoning at work: Rethinking ethics in organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1057%2F9781137532619.
  61. Luhmann, N. (1990). Paradigm Lost: Über die ethische Reflexion der Moral. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt (English version 1991 in Thesis Eleven 29: 82–94).Google Scholar
  62. Mac Gregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014). The silent samaritan syndrome: Why the whistle remains unblown. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Martin, K., & Cullen, J. (2006). Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Martin, K., & Cullen, J. (2009). Appreciating the meta-analytic methodological context: Rejoinder to a reply. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 763–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Merton, R. K. (1957). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  67. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P. M., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in Organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Michalos, A., & Poff, D. (Eds.). (2013). Citation classics from the journal of business ethics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S. (2013a). Ethical judgments: What do we know, where do we go? Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 575–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mudrack, P. E., & Mason, E. S. (2013b). Dilemmas, conspiracies, and sophie’s choice: vignette themes and ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Næss, A. (1968). Scepticism. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  73. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing, Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. O’Byrne, D. (2011). Introducing sociological theory. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Parker, M. (2003). Business, ethics and business ethics: Critical theory and negative dialectics. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying management critically (pp. 197–219). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Phillips, N. (1991). The sociology of knowledge: Toward an existential view of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1993). Values congruence and differences between the interplay of personal and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Prasad, A., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Critical management studies adn business ethics: A synthesis and three research trajectories for the coming decade. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rest, J., Bebeau, M. J., & Volker, J. (1986). An overview of the psychology of morality. In J. Rest (Ed.), Moral development: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–27). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  80. Ritzer, G. (2007). (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Malden: Blackwell (http://philosociology.com/UPLOADS/_PHILOSOCIOLOGY.ir_Blackwell%20Encyclopedia%20of%20Sociology_George%20Ritzer.pdf).
  81. Robertson, D. (1993). Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rommetveit, R. (1953). Social norms and roles. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  83. Seele, P. (2016). What makes a business ethicist? A reflection on the transition from applied philosophy to critical thinking. Journal of Business Ethics (online first, 27 April, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-016-3177-8).
  84. Segal, L., & Lehrer, M. (2013). The conflict of ethos and ethics: A sociological theory of business people’s ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shafer, W. (2015). Ethical climate, social responsibility, and earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stivers, R. (1996). Towards a sociology of morality. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stratton, W. E., Flynn, W. R., & Johnson, G. A. (1981). Moral development and decision making: A study of student decision making. Journal of Enterprise Management, 3, 35–41.Google Scholar
  88. Stromberger, P., & Teichert, W. (1992). Einführung in soziologisches Denken (An introduction to sociological thinking). Belz : Weinheim and Basel.Google Scholar
  89. Turner, R. H. (1956). Role-taking, role standpoint, and reference group behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Valentine, S., Godkin, L., & Varca, P. (2010). Role conflict, mindfulness, and organizational ethics in an education-based healthcare institution. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Luijk, H. (1994). Analyzing moral cases in European business. In B. Harvey, H. van Luijk, & H. Steinmann (Eds.), European casebook on business ethics (pp. 3–12). New York etc: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  92. von Groddeck, V. (2011). Rethinking the role of value communication in business corporations from a sociological perspective—why organisations need value-based semantics to cope with societal and organisational fuzziness. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Ed.), Berkeley: University of California Press, (transl based on the 4th 1956 German edition, German orig. 1922). The text is also available online: https://ia800305.us.archive.org/25/items/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety.pdf.
  94. Weber, J. (1992). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weiss, J. (2004). Werturteilsstreit (value judgment dispute). In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 883–884). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  96. Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Werhane, P. H. (2008). Mental models, moral imagination and system thinking in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Werhane, P. H. (2014). Moral imagination. The wiley encyclopedia of management (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 332–334). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  100. Werhane, P.H. & Moriarty, B. (2009). Moral imagination and management decision making. Bridge Papers, http://www.corporate-ethics.org/pdf/moral_imagination.pdf (acc 3 Dec 2016).
  101. Whitaker, J. (2009). Mexican deaths in the Arizona desert: The culpability of migrants, humanitarian workers, governments, and businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations